After the Rayman fiasco, they've proven themselves to being one of the building blocks to the Wii U's ascension from mediocrity.
Factor in the discount for the people who've already bought the Wii version, and of course the numbers are surprisingly mediocre.
The most important thing about subscription-based MMO's, are the consumers continuation of paying those monthly fees.
Redeemed.
I'm glad Ubisoft's supporting the Wii U. They haven't released everything for the console (Far Cry), though they are showing the most enthusiam out of the rest of the 3rd party publishers launching software on the system.
Right? -_-
The Wii U isn't for everyone (same for Vita).
I'm beginning to become more PC gaming orientated. The games are cheaper, mods galore, and there's a plethora of other benefits along with it.
Consoles are there for exclusive software tied to specific gaming platforms (which is great), but generally speaking (technically writing) - consumers prefer third party offerings over the former (which would be 1st/2nd party exclusives).
I surmise that Nintendo, Microsoft, and Sony won't be bothered by ...
Elitist bullplop at its finest.
Totally on my radar now.
Yet no Wii U support (*smh -_-*).
A) You might be right, though we still don't know how the sales will play out when system selling software launches on the Wii U (Mario Kart, Zelda, Smash Bros., Metroid).
Graphically speaking (technically writing); it isn't super powerful, just a really efficient console. Here's the specs rundown http://m.neogaf.com/showthr...
B.)Casuals can easily be regained by Nintend...
Is it time to breakout the Bisquick (sarcastically writing)?
The Twilight conundrum.
'' As for why people want the WiiU to fail, because many think that their way of gaming is the true and only way to game. No different from religion and politics really when you think about it.''
Very intellectually said.
You honestly don't believe in the Wii U (or Nintendo for that matter)?
Be skeptical about the 3rd party support (which is fair at this point in time), but the 1/2nd party stuff is the reason why consumers buy Nintendo platforms.
http://www.gamesindustry.bi...
3rd party developers have shunned out Nintendo long enough. How do you know there isn't a market if they don't try? 3rd party titles bombed on the P(C)S360 also, so we need to establish the perspective of why certain titles fail, while others don't on specific platforms.
Doesn't hurt to try, right?
Anyways, my point was that the ''hypocrisy factor'' is only geared toward Wii U owners whenever they want something ported (or launched) on the console.
Ports aren't really expensive (according to Ubisoft - link at the bottom), so a couple of publishers don't mind porting titles to the Wii U (with updated features).
http://wiiudaily.com/2012/0...
"That title should come to the Wii U.''
PCS360 owners: ''Lmao... There's no market for those games, what's the point!''
*A Game gets ported with specific features for the Wii U*
PCS360 owners: "... where's our version?''
I thought 3rd party titles sold well on the PS360?
I'm not being serious, though it goes that show even 3rd party titles can underperform on the PS36O. Publishers, developers, and gamers with bias towards Nintendo, need to realize that there are a number of factors as to why certain titles don't sell well.