xYLeinen

Contributor
CRank: 7Score: 102030

Taliban removed from MoH: A view of a former Army Ranger

This was posted in GameTrailers forum by a former Army Ranger and this is his view on the Taliban issue in the upcoming Medal of Honor. I post this because I agree with this, and I think he hits a few valid points. I hope you enjoy this read as well as I did.

"As a former army ranger from back in the day of desert storm I say this is bullshit. Its bullshit what EA did and its bullshit what citizens did.

EA has no conviction, no backbone and cracked for fear of hurting sales.

The american people who complained so much about this are even worse because they decided they love americas freedom so much they would bitch until they took something away from someone else. Kind of counter active to the whole freedom thing. But then again most americans love their freedom when it comes to them getting what they want, but soon as they dont like something then they dont think you should have it.

Yes I know, this really isnt a big deal. Its just a title in a video game. But it is a big deal because its the fact something was changed because people didnt like it, and that folks is wrong. If EA wanted the taliban in there then they should have been allowed to without reprisal. If people didnt like it then in a perfect world they would have said "Well I dont agree. But its just a video game. I dont like it so I wont buy the game but anyone else should be free to decide if they want to play it or not" But sadly that isnt the real world, the real world is full of fucking morons who want to hate, bitch, complain and try to take apart anything they dont agree with and dont give a shit what the other person thinks instead of just accepting it and moving.

Lets face facts. Americans like the people who complained are fucking idiots. They are the definition of bad americans because they are pro america, pro military, pro everything red, white and blue to the point where they cant think for themselves and kneejerk defend anything considered offensive to this country.

They dont give a shit that they think its ok in the game for people to play americans killing taliban, but they think its wrong to play as taliban killing americans. That logic makes no sense to me. How come they dont bitch about you being able to play as a nazi or a japanese guy from a WW2 game online? Being a nazi is fine, but being taliban is just evil and wrong and disrespectful to the men and women of this country great and glorious god fearing righteous and most wonderful nation in this entire universe!......bullshit. And most of all, its just a video game. If you dont like it then dont buy it.

So you should be able to play as the taliban. You can play as a nazi in other games. Either its all ok or none of its ok.

So fuck you, you closed minded dipshits that wanted it removed from the game. You need to grow up and learn to accept you wont things in this life and if your bitching about a video game so much then you need to learn to do something constructive with your time. Freedom is not telling others that they shouldnt be playing as someone in a video game, thats the opposite of freedom.

And fuck you EA for not having the balls to stand by your conviction. I would have had more respect if they stood up in the middle of all this controversy and said "Look folks. We know your upset but this is just a video game, and its our video game. Were going to make the game we want to make. We dont expect you to agree with us but atleast realize we have as much right to make this game as you do to not like it. We will sell it and if you dont want to play it for the content then thats fine. We wont tell you your wrong for not buying it if you wont tell us were wrong for making it because thats what america is. The ability to make choices. We chose to make this game and you can chose not to play it".

And fuck the families of the fallen who bitched and complained. Your honoring the memory of your dead soldier by trying to take away a right to free speech and censoring something while that solider was supposedly "fighting for freedom"? Your a disgrace to that soldier. Besides, what about the families of people in the taliban? How come they dont have a say? Arent they in the same boat by losing a family memember to some conflict they werent even personally involved in? Oh thats right, no one cares what they think because no one gives a shit about them because they are brown people from another country that doesnt agree with us.

So basically we all lose because we let the complainers win. We lose because a company compromised themselves in the face of those complainers and thus set back the ability for game developers to try riskier content and do what they want in the future. No one wins here.

Either its all ok or none of its ok"

What do you think?

TooTall195370d ago

Personally I think the name change is dumb. Maybe they should just make the American soldiers invincible, or better yet don't base your game in the middle east if you don't want the Taliban in your game.

WildArmed5370d ago

I totally agree with :
"Either its all ok or none of its ok"

It's a slippery slope when you start making exceptions.
Where does it end?

I find it stupid that EA bent over backwards.
But it was a pure business move over anything else..
They dont really care as long as their sales are secre
*tsk tsk*

5370d ago
ZombieNinjaPanda5370d ago

agree with everything that this man said.

Catdeerduck5369d ago Show
Show all comments (6)
50°

How Persona 5: The Phantom X's Wonder Compares to Joker

Wonder's role as Persona 5: The Phantom X's protagonist has thrust him into the spotlight, and there are clear parallels to the original's hero Joker.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
250°

Final Fantasy XVI Xbox Launch Sees Weak Sales Performance, Fails To Enter Top 20

The Xbox version of Final Fantasy XVI has failed to enter the platform's top 20 paid games list, indicating weak launch sales performance.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
MaximusPrime_5h ago

On the other hand, FF XVI sold more than usual on PS5

Obscure_Observer2h ago

Day One Release vs One year later release with zero marketing to build excitement/hype.

Both Xbox and SE should know better.

MajorLazer2h ago

Also fewer than half the consoles sold compared to the PS5 so much smaller customer base.

lodossrage1h ago

I get that the game was older.

But so were Sea of Thieves and Forza Horizon when they came to playstation and those made it into the top download lists for awhile. So the coming a year later excuse doesn't really fly anymore.

Scissorman1h ago

look at stellar blade on PC. over a year later and it's already sold over a million copies. this has nothing to do with marketing or hype. the xbox audience, broadly speaking, just doesn't purchase games.

ravens5235m ago

Excuses lol. Everyone already knew this would be the case. 90% of Xbox players don't buy games.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 35m ago
CrashMania5h ago

If it ain't on gamepass, they ain't interested.

Great job MS for training most of your player base to not want to actually buy games, maybe SE will realise releasing FF on xbox isn't somehow going to help them match their exaggerated sales targets. Hopefully remake fairs better, probably will on Switch 2 at least.

Vits3h ago

No game, especially a AAA one, deserves strong sales after taking years to arrive on a platform and still asking the same price as everywhere else. You can’t just ignore a platform for that long and then expect people to be excited by the release. That cycle came and went already, there is no hype for it anymore.

Either you're all in from the start or you're not. This lazy, bare-minimum approach of tossing out a late port and calling it a day shouldn't be rewarded. If you're not willing to respect the platform, don't bother showing up at all.

crazyCoconuts2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

But the formerly exclusive Xbox games like Forza Horizon enjoyed great sales on PS even after years past their initial release.
Your references to deserving and "shouldn't be rewarded" implies that gamers are buying games based on some moral platitude that simply doesn't exist in practice.
Gamers buy games because they want to play them.

Vits2h ago

Nah, it implies how it should be. If gamers weren't the dumbass consumer class around, being played like freaking dumbass because they can't get over the hype for a freaking second and think if that purchase even make sense.

Chevalier2h ago

This is EXACTLY why they wouldn't and shouldn't bother im the first place. I can't remember which FF game launched on Xbox with the Switch and Playstation version and ONLY did 4% sales on Xbox. So lets not pretend these sales would have been better because if you believe that you are absolutely delusional

Vits2h ago

"Either you're all in from the start or you're not. This lazy, bare-minimum approach of tossing out a late port and calling it a day shouldn't be rewarded. If you're not willing to respect the platform, don't bother showing up at all."

Chevalier2h ago

Weird. How come you don't say the same about Xbox studio games that show up some YEARS/DECADES later as well?

Sea of Thieves
Grounded
Forza Horizon 5
Pentiment
Hi Fi Rush
Gears of War

Mostly at full price and selling well. Oh right doesn't fit your BS narrative

andy851h ago(Edited 1h ago)

In fairness they didnt. This was 16, 15 released on Xbox day one.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1h ago
Relientk773h ago

Continual proof Xbox gamers don't buy JRPGs. Shocker

Chevalier3h ago

Wait but I was told by Xbox fans that they support FF and these franchises? Weird. Shocked

PapaBop2h ago

Honestly, if you're a JRPG fan, you're going to own a PS5, Switch or PC. Only benefit of owning an Xbox for JRPGs is all the money you save by not having any games to spend it on.

Show all comments (40)
50°

Review: Survival Kids Is Too Little For Too Much On The Switch 2 – Entertainium

Survival Kids tries and fails to rekindle an old Konami franchise by bringing it to the Switch 2, but ends up leaving it stranded and to fend for its own.

Read Full Story >>
entertainium.co