Playing and reviewing as much new games as financially possible.
CRank: 5Score: 5890

Is digital distribution the future of gaming?

Ok as a gamer I've been around the gaming block. I've seen games evolve graphically and seen them change storage devices. As a gamer for 4/5 of my life I've played on almost every gaming console and played a large variety of games. Digital distribution is a new method for selling games that has been getting a spotlight shone on it by gamers for various reasons and some gamers ask if this will be the only way to get games? I'm here to give you some reassurance but remember I may be wrong as well, only time will tell.

The short version is yes digital distribution is the future of gaming BUT for the PC space. Why? Well let's face it, those who game on PC are a small market and it saves a boat load of money. Also think about this, we use PCs to download various media and it's convenient. Services like Steam are a fantastic distribution channel for games on PC and is a near perfect system that anyone who's used it haven't really got much to complain about. Cloud gaming is also one of the great feature Steam has and this is great for people with multiple PCs and allows the PC gamer to play almost anywhere. Could a home console use this method... HELL NO!

Digital distribution for consoles is a relatively new thing that has been embraced by all gamers but here's the truth about it. If Microsoft for example released a digital distribution console, would you buy it? I bet the majority of you said no and you want to know why? We buy consoles to avoid the PC space and have a solitary gaming unit separate to our PC. Look at the fact that we buy different consoles to play each companies games, how many of you have seen the games for these consoles on PC? A lot of them are aren't they? Also don't forget this thing called an emulator, with a PC any good programmer can reproduce the emulation program used by the console and people will just stick with the PC then. Microsoft can afford to go full digital because of PCs but what about Sony and Nintendo? They can't! The main reason we like having a console(or at least the main reason I like having a console) is because we like diversity and variety. If everything is digital both PlayStation and Nintendo will die in the gaming industry due to piracy and more importantly people will prefer the all in one unit.

What does the future of digital distribution and consoles hold? To be honest I think what we already have but better. I can see to be honest retail games selling extremely well like they are now and digital distributed games being games of yester year and from every region of the world with indie games having they're own separate section in the online stores. The way I'd improve the service would have the online stores having 3 sections. A classic games section with classic games from the companies previous console with games never seen in the regions before eg. Grandia 3 for PS2 available to PAL region or Final Fantasy III (NES) available to USA, an add on section that has all the expansion packs and extra content for games, and a Indie section for all the games like Blade Kitten and Limbo to populate and be separated from the rest to get their own spotlight. Will the console companies adopt what I think would work? Probably not but maybe if we all ask for it, it will happen.

I like digital distribution on consoles but I don't like the idea of downloading Fallout 3 or Mass Effect 2 on my Xbox 360 when I can buy it instore and save HDD space for indie games like Blade Kitten and DLC like Halo Reach's Noble Map Pack. Most of us prefer the physical medium for games and always will but for PC, the physical medium is pretty much dead and it's not a problem since services like Steam are well designed and actually helps the PC gaming space. I haven't used Steam myself but from all my PC gamer friends opinion it's a god sent and they agree, if console lose a physical medium the south(PC gaming) shall rise again and the consoles will die. Their words, not mine!

What do you think? Is digital distribution the future of gaming? Or is it the end of console gaming? Would you give up console gaming and go to PC gaming if the home consoles go digital only? And would you like a cleaner online store with 3 proper sections to search to separate the classic games, indie games and add on's?

Dramscus5305d ago

I think the generation of consoles after the next one will be full digital.
Next ones will probably be half and halfish you know.
Plus theres the onlive wildcard. Ultimatly though we'll end up digital only at some point.

Matthew945304d ago (Edited 5304d ago )

Of course it is, Steam has shown us that.

Buy a game, depending how big the file is it will arrive in minutes/hours while I would have to wait days for a box.

Steam you always have your games in one place, no more searching for games. DD sales are always great too.

This blog post is great and all of its points are correct.

richsmith5302d ago (Edited 5302d ago )

I must agree! Especially that we are in the technological advancement, I believe that the digital world has a big participation in online gaming!Like in my case now, I am searching for a good Online game this Christmas. So as the electronic toy is rampantly dominating the scene! The Eyeclops Mini Projector sounds like a plaything, and it’s really sold in the plaything department. Here is the proof: Eyeclops Mini Projector - Starter-quality bigscreen projection For its sub-$50 cost tag, the Eyeclops Mini Projector has passable level of quality. Just like several children’s playthings, the cheaper plastic outer shell of the Eyeclops Mini Projector hides decent-quality electronics.

40°

Rematch director says there’s “room for more than one take of football”

In an industry with countless FIFAs, sorry EA Sports FCs, Sloclap’s Rematch is a brilliant arcade football game that feels incredibly unique. Putting players in the shoes of an individual player, the new multiplayer game is essentially Rocket League without the rockets and cars… it’s football.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
90°

It Shouldn't Take Expedition 33's Success to Remind Square Enix That Turn-Based Still Sells

TNS: Expedition 33 was the wake-up call Square Enix needed, telling it turn-based RPGs are still popular, but that shouldn't have been the case.

Read Full Story >>
thenerdstash.com
Relientk772h ago

True, but if it does get it through their thick skulls, then that works.

Although, the Dragon Quest 1 + 2 HD remakes will be turn-based and (the worst kept secret) Final Fantasy IX remake should be turn-based I would imagine. Let's see if any newer games go turn-based too.

DivineHand1251h ago

While it is true that Sqaure Enix has moved away from turn based games compared to how they were in the past, there is a good reason for it.

Older gamers will know this but during the ps2 era, we were flooded with turned based games from Japanese studios and this created a form of fatigue back then going into the next generation.

When Square released FF13, they received heavy criticism for making the game turned based like every other FF game and not doing enough to innovate. This is why they made FF15, FF7 Remake and FF16 have real time combat. It gave the series a fresh spin and has brought in new fans to the series.

I personally would be happy with either turned based FF or the real-time combat version we see today.

Shane Kim38m ago

Remake and Rebirth have "turn based" if you set it in the settings.

andy851h ago

Only need to look at their own game DQ 11 approaching 10 million to show there's a market. And that's not as big of a name as FF

Tacoboto49m ago

Another article about Expedition 33 and Square Enix and turn-based games? This is starting to sound like propaganda.

The game didn't sell because it's a turn-based game; it sold and is enjoyed because it's a really freaking good game that released completed at a good price without gamer drama attached to it. No Mtx, no wait-until-it's-patched, minimal bloat, a self-contained story, no multiplatform BS. Just a solid original game that absolutely nails what it intended to do.

CrimsonWing6918m ago

Maybe try actually listening to the fans who have supported the series for decades. This habit of ignoring your core audience just to chase people who were never interested in Final Fantasy in the first place makes no sense. And when that approach fails, doubling down on it is beyond baffling.

The battle system has never been the main reason non-FF or non-JRPG players stayed away. Gutting the series’ identity to chase a broader market doesn’t attract new players. It just alienates the loyal ones.

Keep going down this road and we’ll end up with Final Fantasy Fortnite abomination or a F2P Battle Royale game.. Oh wait…

50°

Ruffy and the Riverside Review (Tim Bowman Media)

Ruffy and the Riverside is an excellent and incredibly creative platformer with a unique gameplay hook, colorful world and memorable characters.

Read Full Story >>
timbowmanmedia.com