Praise The Sun

TopDudeMan

Trainee
CRank: 5Score: 45040

Yearly instalments: What about the games?

Just as a little introduction, this is an issue which I am in two minds about. There could be much debate about this subject to which no end will ever be reached. What I aim to do is provide a picture of the gaming community's attitude towards yearly instalments as well as give you my analysis of why we have yearly instalments in the first place and how it affects my ability to enjoy a game.

Call of duty, FIFA, Madden, WWE, Football Manager, Tiger Woods, Assassin's Creed and a few others. What do these games all have in common? They come out every single year.

Let us consider games on the opposite end of the scale: Elder scrolls series, Final Fantasy series, Metal gear solid series and Starcraft just to name a few. While these games take a considerable amount of time to make, they are considered to be of great quality (by most people). Perhaps the long development time is part of the reason why these games are held in such high regard. Sure, people may have their individual quirks and problems with the games, but it can't be disputed that they are all excellent games. If a game takes a long time to make, surely that means that it is going to be a better game? After all, no job is worth doing unless you do it right.

Now, can you think of any bad games that have been in development for a considerably long time? Duke nukem forever? That's about it, really. The point I am trying to make is that with long development cycles, good quality games emerge. Now, can that be inverted? I.e. do short development cycles mean bad games? Not exactly. Or at least, not always. Here's my take on it...

If I am at work and my manager gives me 3 hours to do something, then he expects it to be done in around about those 3 hours, right? So if I come back after 20 minutes and say "that's it. Job done" then he'll suspect something is up, won't he? Say he comes along and I have somehow pulled a rabbit out the hat and have done a 3 hour job in 20 minutes. What then? Say it is done exactly to the standard he was expecting and is done just as well as the other workers who are finishing their work on the 3 hour mark. Do I deserve a pat on the back? Hell yeah, I do. Do you see where I am going with this?

If a company is able to put out a game and have confidence that people will buy it, they will do so. The game may or may not be of the same quality as a competitor's games: that is a different argument altogether. The point is that this game may take half the amount of time to make and will probably still sell just as well, if not better than the other game that takes 2 or 3 years to make. The question is not in fact "which game is better?". The question is "which game is perceived to be better?". Of course, you're all thinking that the 2-3 year game is most definitely better. That's only natural. But is that really fair? To say that "you've only taken 1 year to make this game, obviously your game is inferior".

Now, lets consider if the same one-year game was released a year later with a gap between instalments. It's exactly the same game, but as far as you, the gamer, is concerned it took 2 years to make. You got bored of the previous game and have waited 2 years for this one. You find that instead of hating on the game for taking 1 year to complete (because, remember, you don't know it only took 1 year to make), you are actually enjoying it a lot more because it hasn't got tedious because it isn't coming out every single year.

I think we've reached the crux of the problem with yearly instalments, here. Large corporations want to make a quick buck, but what they don't realise is that they are running a good video games series into the ground by releasing them every year. Call of duty is one that has been talked about a lot. I feel that after buying these games year after year, they have to do something fresh, something that will blow the whole lid off the franchise. It is because I love the series so much that I buy it every year, but my enjoyment of it has been dying a little. And no, there aren't any alternatives. If I think FPS, I think call of duty. It is the only online FPS which I enjoy (because of its fast pace and mad fun) and it is getting killed by it's own development cycle.

Now, these games are obviously not aimed at hardcore gamers, which I am (and probably you are too, if you're reading this). They expect the typical player to buy this one game and play it every now and again throughout the year. But if you're like me, you want a game you can get into and these games do offer that... at a price. If you do really get into these games, you'll find new enjoyment in them, but it starts to get boring. You stop feeling challenged. You realise that there are very few people like you who play this game as much as you do. Now, that wouldn't be a problem if the game came out every second year. It'd give you a chance to go play something else for a change of pace and forget what this game is like. Then when you come back, it'll feel all fresh.

So, no. I am not going to hate on yearly instalments because I can see the game developer's side of things, but at the same time, they have to do something to keep us coming back, because at this rate, well, we all saw what happened to guitar hero. It is a war of short term cash vs longevity for them and I think the former is going to win this fight, I'm afraid.

Anyway, I've barely scratched the surface, so let me know what you think in the comments section below and whether you agree/disagree, I hope you at least saw things from a new perspective by reading this blog.

QuodEratDemonstrandm4481d ago

Two studios are involved with building CoD. Infinity Ward is probably working on MW4 right now, and Treyarch is getting their next release ready for November. So there is two years of work put into each game. Guitar Hero was done under a similar system.
Assassin's Creed Revelations wuas only one year in development, but a LOT of people were involved. The credits took about 20 minutes to get through. By way of comparison, 10k+ people worked on The Matrix Reloaded and that movie's credits took about ten minutes.
So I can agree with your thoughts on annual releases. As long as the overall quality of the game doesn't suffer.

TopDudeMan4480d ago

Yeah, but I mean, every call of duty game is followed up by lots of DLC (which is a lot of work), so I highly doubt they start work on the next game as soon as work finishes on the current game.
The problem with guitar hero was that they were bringing out like 3 games per year. They really did milk that cash cow. Their fans didn't have the money to buy yearly plastic instruments and new games which were basically DLC.

QuodEratDemonstrandm4480d ago

oh yeah... I forgot about the map packs and the track packs. Wasn't Guitar Hero getting weekly DLC?
Pity Guitar Hero got shelved. I was looking forward to Guitar Hero: ZebraHead.

What? It would have happened eventually.

s45gr324481d ago

Ay my head hurts okay ummm I am not a fan of yearly games at all. Now I have heard that Assassins Creed is a yearly game. Yes it has not changed that much from previous assassins creed games recently. The point is we as gamers saw the life of Etzion how he became an assassin, how he recruited people to follow his ideals. Lastly we saw how he was an old man an a master assassin and no this game is far from perfect. The point is that episodic gaming could work in yearly games. To make games like tv shows and release episodes of say game every year may help solve this issue.

4480d ago
Melisdh4471d ago

My birthday comes up in 3 months. I want to know what is good about the Xbox 360. Also what is bad.
http://www.zimbio.com/AquaL...

110°

Honkai Star Rail 2.2 banners will be Robin you of your Jades on PS5

The Honkai Star Rail 2.2 banners introduce Robin and Boothill, alongside returning faces Topaz and Fu Xuan to HoYo's space fantasy RPG on PS5.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
100°

KEMCO ditch the RPGS for a horror Visual Novel - Horrific Xanatorium

Available right now on Xbox, PlayStation, Switch and PC is the latest from a prolific KEMCO team - Horrific Xanatorium; a horror Visual Novel

Read Full Story >>
thexboxhub.com
100°

Ar Tonelico Qoga: Knell Of Ar Ciel Retro Review – Love Conquers All

Gary Green said: You’ll be forgiven if you haven’t heard of the Ar Tonelico trilogy. The previous two games arrived so late in the PS2’s life-cycle that they simply went unnoticed. While most were tinkering with their shiny new PS3s, Ar Tonelico: Melody of Elemia and Ar Tonelico II: Melody of Metafalica were being ‘returned to sender’ by your local Game stores. Luckily, you won’t need to have played them to understand and appreciate this third and final chapter, Qoga (pronounced k-yoga) tells the story of a racial war between humans and Reyvateils, a breed of biologically produced female cyborgs capable of reproduction, while still having a digital mind.

Read Full Story >>
pslegends.com
Giga_Gaia4h ago

Oh my god. I kinda wish this would get a remaster on PS5, it would be awesome. One of my favorite games on PS3.

That and 3D Dot Game Heroes. It's a shame that some stuff is stuck on PS3.

Knightofelemia3h ago

Ar Tonelico 3 is good I still prefer the first AT game. The music is solid in all the games and Akiko Shikata is a very talented singer bringing life to the game. Only annoying part is well I find is Saki I always choose Finnel or Tyria. KOEI so needs to HD remaster the franchise along with Ar Nosurge and Ciel Nosurge since it never came to North America. I would day one the Ar Toneliceo games and Ar Nosurge if they were remastered.

TheColbertinator2h ago

I still have the limited edition of Qoga unopened. Unfortunately it never went up in value like I had hoped all these years.