It just really sucks when certain websites clearly show biased views against anything of their opposite preference of console especially the PS3. There's so many stupid and ridiculous statements that have been made by numerous websites whether its a blog or so-called professional reviewers. So I wont go back into the history of this nonsense, but I will talk about the present.
I happened to take part in the Killzone 2 multiplayer beta and I must say that this game is truly amazing on all fronts. It's pretty hard for games to impress me nowadays but this game truly did. The graphics are stunning, but its not about the graphics to me, its about game play which also happens to be on par with the graphics in a sense of the "wow" factor. From the guns to movement, the game has added true realism which sets this game apart from any fps. This is not a preview so I will keep this information in general. Let me just say, Killzone 2 is game that Sony can finally say is on the lvl or if not higher than a Gears of War in a sense of greatness as a whole. Its that GOOD, matter of fact its that GREAT. Killzone 2 is one of those games when you pick up and play, there's just nothing really bad you can say about it, basically you would say its a definite AAA title rather it's your cup of tea or not.
Well in the latest Gamespot hands-on or the "fat guy" in the 1up show, if you would have never played the beta you would think this game is just average with pretty graphics. Gamespot said "environments are static with no movable objects" in the mp beta hands-on, well anybody who's in the beta can tell you that was just a flat out LIE. Just about everything is movable, so I don't get why Gamespot made that statement. The "fat guy" in 1up's latest show criticized Killzone 2 for having realistic controls with realistic guns, lol. In opposition, read IGN's latest hands-on. They are praising Killzone 2 on every single angle but if you compare Gamespot and IGN's previews, you would think they are commenting on two different games.. Is this a sign come Feb. 2009? Anybody who's in the beta can tell you definitely that Killzone 2 is the next big thing but some of these websites are going to try to shoot down Sony's upcoming AAA title. Killzone 2 isn't a game that can go both ways with views, this game is no doubt a great game. Some may ask, why our views cant go both ways? What I mean by this is the general concessus for KZ2 should be very positive in a unbiased world. Reviewers have the right to critique KZ however they want, but don't lie about it. I welcome cold hard facts that are positive and negative about the game but so far the negative has been nothing but lies. Some of these reviewers do not want Sony to have their own "Halo" title. Come February 2009, we will clearly see who's bias against Sony and who's not. Rest assure, somebody will try to shoot down Killzone 2, its bound to happen and that's just sad.