HonestDragon

SuperContributor
CRank: 7Score: 43650

Well Played, Games Media, But This Isn't Over

GamerGate has been at the forefront of gaming news and has even been covered in other media outlets (like the BBC and The Colbert Report). Where it was once a unified movement, it has now led to a divided community and we have the games media to thank for that. Even though there was a small amount of progression on holding games media accountable for their actions, there has been an increasing recession in the understanding of why GamerGate started that a lot of people are purposely ignoring or confused by and accepting the false truth that the games media spun. The gaming media won by diverting attention away from questioning their work ethic and turned it into a second war between gamers and social justice warriors by proclaiming GamerGate as an online bullying campaign against women. Those who are anti-GamerGate because of the fabricated definition of the movement bought that spiel hook, line, and sinker, but we are not done fighting.

Gamers began by standing tall against the gaming media giant and declared that they reshape the way they do business. The whole kerfuffle with Zoe Quinn and her questionable relationships with gaming media (whether true or not is still unclear) brought forth the built up wrath gamers have had for the media for years. It was finally time to call them out on the consistent nonsense they would publish every year. Gamers shifted attention away from the "Quinnspiracy" and focused on those she had "friendly" relationships with; however, there was a vocal minority amongst them who began targeting Quinn instead with constant and unnecessary threats.

This led to two things. One, sites like EscapistMagazine and even Kotaku and Polygon (surprisingly) revised their policies. Two, the media lashed back. The tide started to turn. Many writers proclaimed that it is the "end of gamers". Others were denouncing the same gamers who were demanding the gaming media to clean up their work ethic were nothing more than women hating bullies. The latter of these two results is what has been pervasive as of late and many people (gamers included) began to condemn GamerGate and anyone who associated themselves with it.

This sudden backlash to a movement that set out to actually improve a section of the video game industry has been a huge blow. Those in the gaming media who collaborated on setting the stage against gamers worked. This not only allows gaming news sites to sit back and let gamers tear each other apart in this civil war they sparked, but allow opportunists like Anita Sarkeesian to take advantage to push their agenda. In turn, this has given people like her even more exposure than they deserve. She was on The Colbert Report for crying out loud.

Now we are back to square one by trying to put out the fires the media started and people like Anita Sarkeesian keep adding fuel to. Those of us still adamant on taking the fight to gaming media have been left with being called nerds, misogynists, and basement dwellers. That's right. We are back to the old stigmas that gamers fought against before and are dealing with now. While we're at it, how about we add the old stigmas to Dungeons & Dragons and comic books since those were perpetuated by the media as the bane of our society? After all, Dungeons & Dragons was responsible for the increased practices of witchcraft and devil worship. How about comic books where they are influencing your children into doing stunts that could injure or even get them killed? Yes, those claims really happened. Do you see how stupid and out of hand these things can get when the media portrays pop culture as the next atomic bomb of our age?

The damned thing is that every form of pop culture has had its battles with the disillusioned media, but video games are the favored punching bag in the present. You don't have to have a comment history or Twitter feed to prove that you never said anything demeaning to women. Many people will still label you the derogatory words above regardless of that fact because you support what GamerGate was originally meant for. Here's the reality of it: no matter what side of an argument you are on, throwing insults at the other camp will never lead to any progression or understanding. That goes for gamers who claim to be for GamerGate, the anti-GamerGate crowd who use insulting terms, and the trolls who incite fights.

Do I necessarily blame people for being critical of GamerGate because of the trolls? No, of course not. Seeing the tweets and messages left by them are possibly the only thing they have seen regarding GamerGate. Trolls and generally unpleasant people are responsible for much of the hate. I do blame some of the anti-GamerGate crowd for being equally vitriolic with their remarks toward gamers. I just said this: insults don't lead anywhere. You are not being the bigger person by insulting gamers. You are lessening yourself as an individual by blindingly conforming to a story instead of questioning it. You were suckered in by the gaming media who instigated the misogynist notion of GamerGate. Once again, the media succeeded in making us fight against each other.

There was an attempt to quell the ongoing slander against gamers. It is known as #NotYourShield. This was an attempt by primarily female gamers to show their support of GamerGate. Unfortunately, they have faced the same scrutiny that male gamers have. They have been declared "lost" and "despicable" by opponents of GamerGate. So, not only are female gamers who refuse to have pretentious individuals use them as a scapegoat a problem, they are just as bad or worse than the straight/white/male gamers who have perverted the industry. Likewise, ladies that means you are also apparently misogynists. Seems rather counterproductive of people who are defending women by being anti-GamerGate to insult female gamers isn't it?

http://www.cinemablend.com/...

Through it all, I believe that there is an underlying ulterior motive by gaming media to cause such a ruckus. Not only to redirect the discussion away from them mind you, but something more. That motive is to draw more people in to their sites by proclaiming themselves as supporters of women and get more traffic. No one wants to support a site that plays into favoritism and takes perks over giving legitimate opinions and providing worthwhile content. Let's face it, they have been losing out to Youtube personalities who have no loyalties to publishers or Public Relations for good reason. I follow more Youtube personalities than go on sites like Kotaku and Polygon. TotalBiscuit, Angry Joe, AlphaOmegaSin, HappyConsoleGamer, Maximilian Dood, ProJared, Commander Holly, Dodger, and FarFromSubtle are among the many Youtube personalities I support and recommend to view and follow. These are people who you can trust and aren't afraid to be honest.

I have never hidden my feelings on the GamerGate situation. I think that what it originally was for was an admirable idea. Games media has always been a slippery slope with Public Relations and publishers giving gifts to journalists who in turn do them favors. The Game Media Awards are a joke. The Video Games Awards (or possibly still VGX) is a pathetic display by our games media. This industry deserves better. Hell, every entertainment industry deserves better from their media coverage. Movies, comics, and anime still get slack from their own media which more often than not is equivalent to what games media does with sensationalism and agendas.

I am HonestDragon. I am a straight, Spanish male who has been a gamer since I was five years old. No one speaks for me and I don't condone the threats and attacks women get on social media by trolls who use a movement to spread their hate and immaturity; however, I also fight against those who falsely identify gamers like myself as a basement dwelling nerd who doesn't allow girls into his boys only club. GamerGate isn't going anywhere, but it hasn't made any recent positive waves either. We have to stand together if we want corruption, backdoor favors, and the politicization of video game journalism to end. It doesn't matter what your race, gender, religion, or sexual preference is. If you support the idea of games media cleaning up their act and condemn the actions of spiteful trolls who instigate fights, declare it. Show the games media that you will not have them or anyone else speak for yourself. Games media have won this battle, but the war isn't over.

Christopher3454d ago

I think a lot of people see video gamers as somehow the punching bag, when what I see is Conan O'Brien doing video game reviews often and even Kevin Spacey being on The Tonight Show to advertise the latest Call of Duty.

So much fear for how people perceive us when the media already perceives us the same as those who watch movies and tv shows.

As long as we continue to put money into the pockets of video game publishers, who then put money into advertising, we will continue to have the support of the mainstream media.

As far as the 'gaming media', they're just like many of the people who read their articles. They will do what attracts the most users, which tends to be whatever develops the most drama. Even if it's bad drama. It's really all about the hits and not about a strategic attack against those who have it out for them. So, I wouldn't say well played on their part, only that it was a situation where they could easily get more hits by keeping the thing going by focusing on the outliers who harassed others. If siding with GamerGate got them more hits, they would have gone that route. But, it wouldn't have.

At least that's my two cents on that element of the situation.

NewMonday3454d ago

don't matter what narrative the media try to push, more publicity is better for GG because more people will start asking questions.

Blacklash933454d ago

Depends. If the media is spreading prejudiced ideas about GG, it isn't going to be entirely in the favor of it. I think there is indeed such a thing as bad publicity.

NewMonday3454d ago

@Blacklash93

only if the actual facts are bad, if bad publicity is based on lies the story wont stick when people ask questions

many new people join GG because they notice big hols in the media narrative so they do some digging and learn the truth

DefenderOfDoom23452d ago (Edited 3452d ago )

GAMERGATE gets the most attention when they talk about FEMALES in GAMING .

When people talk about TRIPLE AAA games publishers doing things like paying reviewers for good reviews . Seems like most people do not care about that.

I think we need we separate ANITA S and female side of GAMERGATE . And start a separate movement and call it E.G.M ( ETHICS in GAME MEDIA) TOTALBISCUIT is at the forefront of this topic .

DragonKnight3454d ago

I have to completely disagree with your assessment that the mainstream media is on our side when Brianna Wu by herself has proven that that's not the case. And going back further, FOX News is another example of how the MSM is against gamers.

Why, this past month MSNBC, CNN, The BBC, and CBS have all posted pieces against gamers at the behest of feminists claiming harassment. Anita Sarkeesian wrote a piece for The New York Times with her usual bile.

Conan O'Brien doesn't represent Mainstream Media nor does Kevin Spacey. Conan latched on to game reviews at a good time to capitalize on a trend, Spacey is trying to promote himself. When you can show me Mainstream News outlets actually, and consistently, speaking about gamers positively rather than jumping into the feminist echo chamber of absent fact checking and emotion based non-evidence, then I'll believe you about the MSM backing us.

Christopher3454d ago (Edited 3454d ago )

They speak positively about us all the time, we just only pay attention when it's the drama being discussed.

I've seen reports on our games alongside movies and other tech devices.

You say Conan and Spacey aren't an indication of mainstream media when neither would be doing this if that wasn't the case. Conan gets paid by advertising to do it and Spacey is doing this because it's part of his contract which is determined again by advertisers on whether he will promote it or not.

The fact of the matter is that video game advertising is just as mainstream as most other common forms of advertising. That means it gets the same level of good publicity as it does bad because it's an interest of the mainstream audience.

This emotion-based, non-fact based reporting happens in every other form of major news element as well. Politics, celebrities, movies, TV shows and more. Why are we confused when it happens with video games as well?

DragonKnight3454d ago

I see where the problem is. You consider advertisements to be a part of the MSM and I don't. I only consider news outlets and how they report on gaming and gamers to be the aspect of MSM that should be focused on. Why just today I saw, and was completely unsurprised by, an article that claims CBC is uninterested in reporting on any other narrative about subjects like GamerGate other than the narrative created by Zoe Quinn, Brianna Wu, and Anita Sarkeesian.

But Canada's media is notoriously pro-feminist so that's why I'm not surprised.

We are on different spectrums in this one. You're free to consider ads as a part of the MSM, but ads have yet to garner the kind of support that the hit pieces posted by the branch of the MSM that I'm talking about have.

Christopher3454d ago

***You're free to consider ads as a part of the MSM***

You're free to ignore that an increase in ads relates to the increase in mainstream publicity and is reflective of the status of the medium as a whole.

If you ignore that celebrities are getting paid to promote video games and that video game news is being reported alongside other forms of entertainment, from sales to releases, then that's your choice.

The fact of the matter is, you're ignoring the standard news that is reported by the mainstream media and only focus on the negative. It's a positive that Kevin Spacey is advertising a game. He's a celebrity, he's respected, he's in a video game, he's on a show that is seen by millions, and he's telling them to play a game.

Sounds like mainstream media hating on gamers to me.

DragonKnight3454d ago

@cgoodno: You're free to ignore the fact that advertising a game does nothing to speak positively about gaming culture or gamers at all. All it does is showcase a game, possibly get people interested in said game, and that's where it ends.

Can you name one Fox News, MSNBC, BBC, CBS, CNN, or any other news outlet that has spoken positively about gamers, or is your entire position "well Conan plays games on his show, therefore mainstream media is speaking positively about games" because that's a gross oversimplification.

What's good for gaming as a business doesn't necessarily equate to being good for gaming's image. Gaming is on track to being a 100 billion dollar industry, and at the same time it's looked down upon as a hotbed for misogyny, racism, bigotry, and homophobia. What has Conan or Spacey done for that? Exactly, nothing.

Christopher3454d ago

***Can you name one Fox News, MSNBC, BBC, CBS, CNN, or any other news outlet***

So, we're distilling mainstream media to just news stations who thrive on drama much like gaming journalists now?

Interesting.

So, some quick searches and I find that what they report is pretty much the same as every other gaming site out there but without the crazy fanboy opinion pieces.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news...

http://www.cbsnews.com/vide... (focuses on how issues are with a few children with disorders and not gamers as a whole)

http://www.cbsnews.com/news...

http://www.cbsnews.com/pict... (top ten lists on a site that hates video games?)

http://www.cbsnews.com/news...

http://www.cbsnews.com/news...

---

http://www.foxnews.com/cate...

---

http://www.nbcnews.com/tech...

---

http://www.bbc.com/news/tec...

---

Conclusion, I'm not sure what you're trying to get at here. Somehow you think that the fact that us gamers only focus on when they have the same people telling us games can be bad but the reality is these outlets promote video games with their own reviews, news that proves how video games is good, and the like.

The reason why video games is becoming good news? Because it's worth the advertising dollars to make them interesting. As the people who game continue to grow, so does the desire to market towards them and thereby the interest mainstream media, in general, have in promoting said activities to increase advertising.

The same reason we're seeing so many comic book movies and the like. The age of the people who grew up on that stuff are controlling the mainstream media by requiring that companies focus on what we have interest in.

I'm just not on this bandwagon of many who think that because news on a few people saying gaming is bad that it wipes out all the news that they otherwise put out that isn't bad for video games and actually celebrate it through its accomplishments and talking about the games themselves.

DragonKnight3454d ago

Let's go through your links, though I'm sure you'll retort about how I'm being needlessly picky or something but you provided the links so obviously you want comment on them.

Link 1: is about the same feminist crap that shouldn't be involved in gaming in the first place. You already know how I feel about things like that, so no need to go further than that on link 1. Its assumptions are themselves the problem.

Link 2: Oh yeah, saying that children could have problems by playing certain games is DEFINITELY showing gaming in a positive light. I'm going to chalk this one up to a lack of effort on your part.

Link 3: Contradicting link 2. Nice. Yeah, the fact that gaming has positive aspects is something we've all known, it's also a news story that's brushed under the rug. You only find this information when you look for it. This could possibly be the first link that you've posted that could support your stance, but it also contradicts link 2 like I said.

Link 4: A top ___ list is innocuous. It has no positive nor negative bearing on anything. Gamers hate them, casuals ignore them.

Link 5: Another link that only applies to core gamers. How many casual gamers and people that continuously attack gaming do you think actually care about LoL being a spectator sport? Have you seen the backlash that said sport received for daring to have separate competitions between men and women? You'd better believe that that got more attention than this link did.

Link 6: Legit link. Nothing to say about this one.

Link 7: Ha, Anita Sarkeesian's threatcapade is front and center. Try again.

Link 8: Hmmm, well I see this... "CoD: 'Toxic' gamers not welcome." And this... "Big firms 'must condemn GamerGate'" as the top stories. Such positivity.

This is what I'm getting at. Your position is weak. It relies on either catering to core gamers who already know all of this stuff, or else it contains the very negative crap I've been talking about.

All of the positive news you think you can come up with to claim that the MSM is pro-gamer is DWARFED by the negative narrative the MSM focuses on.

It's your prerogative to choose to ignore that gamers are being attacked, as a group and as an identity, by the MSM. It's also your prerogative to believe the magical fairytale that advertisements somehow make gamers look good, which they don't. But just because you believe these things doesn't eliminate the real world instances that are far more prevalent in the public eye marking gamers as any negative adjective you can find in the dictionary.

I particularly like the "toxic" part in Link 8, as now it's moved from being something that applied only to men, to now applying to gamers too.

Christopher3453d ago (Edited 3453d ago )

***but you provided the links so obviously you want comment on them. ***

Not really. I just saw how they all reported on news the same as everyone else and stopped posting specific ones.

***is about the same feminist crap that shouldn't be involved in gaming in the first place***

Women shouldn't be involved in gaming the way they want. Gotcha. It wasn't feminist at all, but about supporting women in the development of games.

***Oh yeah, saying that children could have problems by playing certain games is DEFINITELY showing gaming in a positive light. ***

Putting the blame on kids who have mental disorders rather than blaming video games.

Seems like it's freaking positive to me. Kind of like saying that people who go on killing sprees have mental issues, not that it was the video games that did it.

***Contradicting link 2.***

Not comprehending link 2...

***Yeah, the fact that gaming has positive aspects is something we've all known,***

Wait... the fact it's positive news gets swept under the rug by you because "we all know it." Gotcha.

***It has no positive nor negative bearing on anything. Gamers hate them, casuals ignore them.***

Disagree. Who does a top 10 list for something they hate?

***Another link that only applies to core gamers. How many casual gamers and people that continuously attack gaming do you think actually care about LoL being a spectator sport? ***

It's being reported by a major news network and is in the eye of the mainstream media. Are you just looking for reasons to shoot down your own claims that they don't report on this stuff positively or what?

It's like you want your opinion and nothing else. Screw proof that shows them reporting on news how we want them to, which is like every gaming site out there who loves games the way we do.

***Ha, Anita Sarkeesian's threatcapade is front and center. Try again. ***

Ha. Ignores all the other news on the page. Cherry picking.

***"CoD: 'Toxic' gamers not welcome." And this... "Big firms 'must condemn GamerGate'" as the top stories. Such positivity. ***

Thinks that a news site that says there are toxic gamers and that they aren't all toxic is bad when we all know there are toxic gamers out there ourselves (we just call them 12 year olds on XBL usually). Also, again ignores every other piece of news on the page that is positive, cherry picks two out of many.

***It's your prerogative to choose to ignore that gamers are being attacked,***

It's your prerogative to think that they are the only thing in the news being attacked. Politics. Religion. Corporations. Technology companies. Everything gets attacked. But, somehow, some bad news related to gaming and GamerGate means there is no positive news?

Fact of the matter is, you cherry pick to support your view point and ignore the fact that mainstream media is reporting on news the same as the core gamers are. That means there is both positive and negative news. And most of it is positive by treating gamers as equals and not just outright spending hundreds of articles talking about how gamers themselves are awesome people who are the nicest people on the Internet.

I think your issue might be that you are on N4G too much where bad news thrives as discussion points for too long. N4G is not reflective of the mainstream media. It is reflective of the core gaming community. You are unable to see positive news even when it is there, apparently.

DragonKnight3453d ago

"Women shouldn't be involved in gaming the way they want..."

Finally found what you look like. Took awhile, but this is you right?

http://upload.wikimedia.org...

"Putting the blame on kids who have mental disorders rather than blaming video games."

Guess you missed the part at the very beginning where he's talking about what games said kids can't be allowed to play then right? Yeah, figured as much.

"Not comprehending link 2"

That's your hangup, not mine. The video was pretty clear.

"Wait... the fact it's positive news gets swept under the rug by you because "we all know it." Gotcha."

Actually, I think that first pic was wrong, this one is clearly you.

http://upload.wikimedia.org...

"Disagree. Who does a top 10 list for something they hate?"

Are you serious? You've seen them on this site. You're an admin here and you're telling me you've never seen one single top 10 list that says anything remotely similar to "Top 10 reasons I hate ___" Wow. You must be really lax at this job.

"It's being reported by a major news network..."

It's like you want your opinion and nothing else. Screw proof that shows them reporting on news how we want them to, which is like every gaming site out there who loves games the way we do."

I like how you skipped the part about the male female separate competitions because it completely refutes your point. Nice dodge, anyone else probably wouldn't have noticed it.

"Ha. Ignores all the other news on the page. Cherry picking."

Top stories are what's in the public consciousness, that's why they are prioritized as top stories. Try again.

"Thinks that a news site that says there are toxic gamers..."

I take it back, you're obviously Stretch Armstrong. I repeat the statement about top stories, and this time the first 2 top stories prove my point.

As for the rest of your comment, you have crossed the line into irrelevancy. Religion, Politics, whatever else you want to bring up are wholly unimportant and are just a diversion because you don't want to concede the very real and obvious fact that no one is talking about the meager few positive pieces of news you seem to think are more prevalent than they actually are, and no one considers advertisements as positive press but you.

You're being willfully ignorant and trying hard to deflect. I mean, I actually haven't been on N4G for quite awhile, as you'd notice if you'd check the frequency of my comments. I've been busy looking at how the MSM has been reporting on gamers for a project I'm working on. Your irrelevant analysis of where I've been doesn't diminish or dismiss the truth. But I'm not going to bother trying to convince you of anything. You're free to live in your self-imposed ignorance all you want to. Just don't expect anyone else to join you there.

Christopher3452d ago (Edited 3452d ago )

***Guess you missed the part at the very beginning where he's talking about what games said kids can't be allowed to play then right? Yeah, figured as much. ***

Wait... you think kids with mental disorders should be playing violent games intended for mature people? Essentially, should we also be giving them licenses to carry guns? We're talking about people with mental disorders that make them more prone to acts of violence here.

Interesting...

***You're an admin here and you're telling me you've never seen one single top 10 list that says anything remotely similar to "Top 10 reasons I hate ___" Wow. You must be really lax at this job. ***

Well then, find me that top 10 list on that site that says that. What I showed you wasn't one about hate, but liking.

Stop spinning and looking for ways to hate positive news.

***I like how you skipped the part about the male female separate competitions because it completely refutes your point. ***

It was a story about Twitch TV...

***Top stories are what's in the public consciousness, that's why they are prioritized as top stories. Try again. ***

And you only chose one on one day. Again, cherry picking. Try again.

*** I repeat the statement about top stories, and this time the first 2 top stories prove my point.***

Yup. Must be good to ignore all the other top stories. I mean, if 2 out of 10 is about something you hate, it must mean they are negative towards video gamers.

Only solution possible there.

***You're being willfully ignorant and trying hard to deflect.***

Nope. You're usually up to taking things personally and thinking someone's opinion is somehow an attack against you and when everyone isn't specifically standing up and supporting your view, you somehow think it must mean they agree with the other.

Fact of the matter is, you will always see your viewpoint as a point to be defended by all and won't accept the fact that most people just don't care about it.

***You're free to live in your self-imposed ignorance all you want to. Just don't expect anyone else to join you there.***

Self-imposed ignorance versus self-imposed denial of the truth.

Whatever floats your boat. You've yet to prove any statistics or information to support your side, by the way. I provided a ton of sources where you can see positive gaming news.

I think I've done more than my fair share of supporting my opinion.

You can keep ranting on. It really doesn't matter what I say. You have your mind made up. As I've said before.

DragonKnight3452d ago

@cgoodno: You know, I had made up my mind to not bother responding to whatever your comment was going to be, because the argument had already entered an unending circle. Then you had to move the argument out of the talking points, and into this...

"Nope. You're usually up to taking things personally and thinking someone's opinion is somehow an attack against you and when everyone isn't specifically standing up and supporting your view, you somehow think it must mean they agree with the other.

Fact of the matter is, you will always see your viewpoint as a point to be defended by all and won't accept the fact that most people just don't care about it."

So I'm going to respond to this. One, when your critique of any individual on this site on a personal level is solicited, I'm quite certain they are capable of seeking you out for that. Until then, I'd refrain from it. Makes you look petty.

Second, a common trend among a few people here, thankfully the minority, who care so much about their own opinion on something they'd move into a personal critique is that they are unable to separate the ideas of responding to comments and "defending" oneself from alleged attacks.

I don't care what your opinion of my opinion is. Responding to you whenever you make a comment to me is not taking something personally, it's engaging in discussion. Perhaps you're not used to people actually responding to you, but given that you're on the internet you should be.

I don't make comments to seek out allies. If I did, I'd never have a controversial comment or blog anywhere at any time. So the idea that I care about having people agree with me is wholly antithetical to what I talk about. Needing people to agree with me would mean I'd take your position, not the one I have taken.

And finally, for someone who doesn't care about my viewpoint, you've spent an awful lot of time arguing with me. That means you either care about your position more than you're willing to admit, or you care enough about my position that you can't let it go.

Anything else?

Dunban673451d ago

Cgoodno: your arguments come of as being insincere and intentionally misleading at best

Did I understand you correct that you believe kids with mental disorders are prone to violence? That is a sweeping statement and highly inaccurate, or were you just saying that kids with mental disorders that play games are prone to violence ... Also highly inaccurate and condemning.

You are trying to feed someone chicken sh-- and tell them it's chicken salad - not a good look and intellectually dishonest - it does not seem you are sincere in what you communicate

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3451d ago
s45gr323454d ago

The problem is gamers are easily controlled by the media and are way to loyal to corporations.

Christopher3454d ago

"The problem is people are easily controlled by the media and are way too loyal to corporations."

ftfy

Highatus3454d ago

Great blog!

I believe you nailed the heart of gamer gate.
It is far too controversial to not have opportunists on either side veer from the cause of the discussion.
You are right in saying it is not about the misogyny, it's about the underlying corruption of games journalism that ultimately use to push their own agendas.

Anita and feminists alike I have no issue with; they too are a victim of their own opportunism and unfortunately have shown their faces in light of a situation that really has no issue with feminism as a whole, and in hindsight could actually hinder their progress rather then help the feminist cause.

Like cgoodno said above, it's opened an opportunity to derail the situation and create drama to feed their sites hits. They do not care about the heart of the issue because it is in direct relation to them, so in turn take the opportunity to make it benefit them regardless if right or wrong; which if thought about is what gamergate is at its core, they have corrupted the situation to benefit their needs.

Dunban673454d ago

I enjoy your blogs - they are always well written/thought out and much higher quality than 95%+ of what is typically done in the gaming media

IMO, one of several reasons the gamer media has jumped on the "everything to do w a woman in gaming is mysoganistic" and " we are good SJW s gamergate is bad" to try and attract some mainstream credibility - one way to try is pick a main stream topic, create good guy and bad guy, then "boost the signal". Once it starts generating traffic and bumping In to the main stream they can pretend they are legit for a while and try to ride the wave for their own benefit - however, it will be a short term ride for them - gamer media is typically the "bottom of the barrel" and will prob not become legitimized in its current form-

The problem is, in their attempt to high jack the face of gaming they may very well do long term damage to the medium- Developers and publishers will essentially censor their own creativity in order to avoid bad pr and games will become more and more bland. They will also add another more damaging label to "gamers" as not only being the nerdy basement dwelling virgins, but now they will also be sexist, violent, racist bullying basement dwelling virgins.

Sooner or later it will not be acceptable for Mario to save Peach and Link to save Zelda ( with the direction things are going now)

e-p-ayeaH3454d ago (Edited 3454d ago )

Its all about advertising and sales to put it simply when it comes about the big videogame media corporations.

Show all comments (28)
40°
9.0

Balatro Review — A Fun Deck-Building Delight | eXputer

Moiz from eXputer: "The constantly challenging nature of Balatro makes it an unforgettable experience and a delight for Poker enthusiasts."

40°

Another Crab's Treasure is a Soulslike Game Built on Vibes

Another Crab's Treasure is a Soulslike game, but aside from a few important mechanics, it marches to the beat of its own drum.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
40°

Mob Entertainment CEO Talks Poppy Playtime Chapter 4 Villain And Future Plans

In a recent Game Rant interview, Mob Entertainment's CEO and Co-Founder Zach Belanger talks Poppy Playtime Chapter 4 and the company's future plans.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com