Techtorial: Merely 24 hours after NVIDIA announced the world's fastes video-card to the world, a new comparison video has surfaced in the web of what appears to be a comparison between GeForce GTX 680 vs AMD Radeon HD 7970 running Battlefield 3.
Check out the obvious winner on this report.
NVIDIA’s RTX 50 “Blackwell” architecture has been a bit of a bore for us gamers. Apart from Multi Frame Generation, which has limited use-case scenarios, there isn’t much to be excited about. It is achieved using GPU-side Flip Metering. The optical field data is generated using AI models in the Tensor cores.
Between the price, performance and power draw, with the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti, NVIDIA nailed the mainstream formula.
Nvidia writes:
The Nintendo Switch 2 takes performance to the next level, powered by a custom NVIDIA processor featuring an NVIDIA GPU with dedicated RT Cores and Tensor Cores for stunning visuals and AI-driven enhancements.
The raytracing probably doesn't even equal a low end PC GPU, even if it did it would probably be mostly useless. They'll probably force it in some game now that will run like shit maybe 30fps at best, just because "it can do it"
Please. I'd like to play my switch games on my 4k tv without it looking all doodoo.
Nvidia could have said this months ago and cut the bullshit. Anyway the rumors were true.
I'm not expecting of anything from ray tracing but dlss will be the thing that sees the unit get some impossible ports.
Video is down. But the picture strikes me as odd, seeing as how I get about 75 frames running Battlefield 3 on my GTX 580.
A new video card came out and it's x percent better than the last AND the competing one?!
Freaking insanity.
Theres no point in investing in PC gaming if your not gonna go all the way and hit that MAX Setting.
I have 2 HD 6970's and play BF3 at 2560x1440 with everything maxed out and I get between 40-60fps.