MediaKick: "There aren’t many studios that make you wait for sequels quite as long as Valve do – with the possible exception of 2K with Duke Nukem, but we wont go in to that – yet in a sense that’s what makes this particular studio so special. Instead of hauling out the same old thing every year, Valve ensure their sequels are unique in their own right, not only improving on the original games concept but redefining the franchise as a whole."
A new Half-Life making-of has revealed details about cancelled Valve projects, including Half-Life 3, Left 4 Dead 3, a Dark Souls-inspired RPG, and more.
wait so I have to pay Steam money for this "Video" and Epic Games are the ones who are greedy? FOH
Open world L4D game?
I'm curious
I'd love to see Zoe, Francis and Louis come back, or maybe Bill if they pretend the cross over with L4D2 never happened and they went North to Canada.
Damn I want more Half-Life and L4D..
Half-Life would be less jarring if it didn't end on such a cliff hanger.
Hard to believe that was all the way back in 2007.
Wow, great plans all flushed down the toilet. These probably would have all sold well too. A fan in me no more of valve.
B. Michael Logan writes: "Sometimes pressure from gamers has paid off when it comes to pushing game developers to grace our lives with sequels of games that we desperately need. However, we may never see sequels to game we’ve been demanding for years."
I’d love a portal 3 but I don’t know where you’d go with it. The second one pretty much wrapped up every thing nicely.
Don't bother with Valve IPs anymore they don't make games anymore just focus on Steam.
Gabe Newell's omni-studio might not have the appetite for Half-Life 3 anymore - but these developers could do it.
It's interesting but after all this time i don't think it's possible to launch a HL3 game without disappointing fans in some way.
Do they keep the old mechanics and risk the game feeling dated?
Do they overhaul the game play systems to be more competitive and risk alienating hardcore fans?
Who writes the story as the writers from the original have long since parted ways with valve?
Is it even worth it? HL2 ep 2 was released in 2007 games have evolved dramatically in the past 12 years and the same techniques and story devices have been surpassed these days and valve hasn't released a fully story driven game since portal 2 in 2011 (even that's a little debatable as to how much story it had IMO it was light on story intentionally but lots of fun).
Most fans have developed their own theories and there are so many possibilities out there with the direction the story could have went maybe Valve don't want a 3 because it will never live up to fans and their own story they create after ep 2.
If we see anything HL related from vavle i would prefer it to be set around an entirely new cast
Stupid article.
Half Life 3 is the only thing Valve needs to focus on.
Why wasn't Half Life 2 called Full Life?
Yep, I am 36 yrs old now and actually want to finish the game before I get too old lol, developers should bare that in mind when making a game imo
I agree with the article, because we only have two options:
1. Half Life 3 gets released now on the current Source engine, which is a bit updated from HL2's day, but nothing spectacular.
2. Wait until the next generation, where the Source engine would be updated significantly, where HL3 could be as revolutionary as HL2 was back when it was released.
(3. Bonus option would be Valve licenses CryEngine 3 or something else, which will never happen, ever.)
Half-Life was the benchmark for FPS, Half-life 2 set the new benchmark for current FPS. Half-Life 3 will no doubt do the same but I think we will have to wait for next-gen. we need to be patient as Valve has never failed to bring us the spectacular when it comes to this series, it will take as long as it takes.