Well... Bethesda fully came out and said they launched the game on PS3 knowing it was broken.
But, if they actually told people that they were having trouble making it and would take longer... Im sure people would understand rather than launching a broken game... making their PS3 fans look like idiots for buying it on their preferred console.
Regret buying Skyrim since I popped it in my PS3, should have gotten PC.
I would one day like to see W2 on PS3, but if a studio says they are having trouble... I have more respect for them rather than being deceptive and lying to people
I play on PC occasionaly... I only prefer my PS3 because I feel it is more convenient.
Also don't have a decent enough rig to run W2.. and I am not buying a new laptop.
So maybe one day... but If they are not ready I respect them
Meh, the PC version is the only one worth playing anyway. The same with Alan Wake, that game is terrific on the PC and its how I feel it should be played.
I get tired of these chants on n4g. We've had cases on both sides of non-MS published games staying 360/PC and we've had more that go the 360/PS3/PC route. We know a PS3 version was up in the air a few months ago. Could fanboys for once hold back speculative words like Jam's and WAIT for a confirmation?
No matter how genuine the statement may be, any phrase regarding "congrats"(or another nice term) and "to 360 owners" is going to get a ton of disagrees.
Its this that makes me cry. Thank goodness I bought a 360 for mass effect, now i can play this as i did skyrim with no worries. I own both consoles and play mainly on ps3, but there is no doubt that Sony really screwed up with their memory, ie. Fallout, skyrim, and now the witcher 2's absence. I guarantee it never comes to ps3, especially considering all the problems it has had with skyrim and cdprojekts issue w memory on Xbox. It is sad too because imagine what the ps3 could do if it had the xboxs memory. The next Gen better allow for, atleast a memory upgrade. If u wanna play a working rendition of a particular title, u may have to upgrade. I'm fine w this. I'm not fine w playing skyrim for 195 hours and losing all of it (which of course, i didn't because i got for Xbox).
Yeah memory limitations is what holds ps3 back. Look at the Last Remnant? Look at FF14 and probably versus13. I know the speed of the xdr is good but you still need to have actual ram, 360 almost made the same mistake if it hadn't been for Epic and Gears.
Both consoles have 512mb RAM. The 360 has one pool of 512mb DDR3. The PS3 has 256mb XDR/256mb DDR3. But the 360 has a smaller OS footprint, than the PS3. Giving Devs a tad more Ram for game development.
I'm just saying that with a small team that referenced memory issues on the 360, i can't imagine after seeing skyrim on the ps3 that this "small team" will want to tackle the foreign architecture that is the ps3, especially considering how developers have mentioned that they don't love the divided memory so much. I'm doin a little reading between the lines. I'm pretty sure this wasn't an exhaustive interview on all the reasons in the world that it wasn't made for ps3. But i guess posting isn't for exploring the article as much as for picking apart every detail of someone else's post.
Just think, the Xbox 360 people are going to make CD Pro a bit of money off this release, so their company might expand if the $$$ rolls in. I think future games of Cd Pro will me multi-platform.
The PC version is getting all the content thats is being added to the 360 version for free. I don't think that the 360 or PC versions will be left out if a PS3 port come out at some point.
If a PS3 version come out, good for PS3 only gamers.
Either way, I'm buying a version of The Witcher 2- whether 360, PC, or PS3. Got to support game development in my mother country :-)
/waits six months
/picks up Witcher 2 PS3 Enhanced Enhanced Edition
I'll be picking this game up for my 360 for the achievements. I already have it for pc.