Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning Xbox 360 vs PS3 HD Screenshot Comparison (Head2Head)

Check out a screenshot comparison between the PS3 and Xbox 360 version of Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning. Hint: Click on "see full-size" to view the images in the original size.

[NeoTribe]

Fight!

[TheXgamerLive]

ps3 is a bit to bright and the 360 has that blur effect added w/nicer draw distances, regardless both look decent, still I'd rather see video of gameplay.
Comparison pics say very little.

PC versions are usually better but when in actual gameplay basically nobody ever and I mean "EVER: see's any difference. You'd have to be comparing side by side and nobody does that when playing so the differences in all 3 are mute.

[BiggsnWedge]

and then add mods to PC.. PC is always x100 better there is no ifs ands or buts

[Ser]

@BiggsnWedge

True. But the PC doesn't have Demon's Souls or Dark Souls, so I'll stick with my inferior console. :)

Also, they both look pretty similar, nothing to dictate which version you should purchase.

[caperjim]

Its actually the opposite of what you are saying. PC versions always look better. Full 1080P with no jaggies and silky smooth framerate.

The actual gameplay is when you truly see the difference in games. Screenshot comparisons are a joke. Im mostly a PC gamer and even i find it hard to see the difference between console vs PC screenshots. Trust me, sitting in front of a 55 inch LED playing with the game settings maxed is night and day when graphically compared to a console.

[SephirothX21]

Not only graphically do PC version outperform the console versions but also in frame rates and loading times. Do you want to play Battlefield 3 in 1920 X 1080 with 60fps? Well you're not going to be doing that on any console but I do it on pc with ease with a GTX580, 8 gigs of 1600mhz ram and a 4.2ghz overclocked i7 2600k.

[TheXgamerLive]

Yet it still looks basically the same and plays w/o bugs/errors/virus/blue screen etc.........on consoles.
pc is a dying breed, it will live on but gaming is moving quickly away from just sheer ease of play.

[Half-Mafia]

Both versions dont have high AA. And the 360 version seems to have some kind of smooth/blur filter over it.

Either way ill be getting this on PC. 16x AA at 1080p

The game looks so much sharper, more detailed and textures are much higher.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

look @1:08. The Stone tablet thing. Wow

[dooge]

Hey, check out just after 1:08 on the video you linked. When the character begins to run away from the stone tablet, you can see the texture filter finally pop-in. If you blink you'll miss it.

Still, PC wins.

[KMCROC54]

blah, blah , blah . who gives a shit grow TFU.

[BiggsnWedge]

Swearing and using abbreviations I don't understand is very immature, sir.

[KMCROC54]

Let me clean this up a bit more just for you .

Blah,blah,blah, who really cares get over it.

The reason for my original comment was that it carried more venom & anger over such stupidty.
As for the cleaned up or more dociel comment it has no sting or bite if you will.

[Lior]

ps3 looks to have slightly better shaders

[Angrymorgan]

Ps3=better lighting

[lilbrat23]

PS3 the colors are more brilliant then the 360. I hate when they compare graphics as you really do not know how it is really being set up.

[ironmonkey]

ps3 looks way sharper/xbox is blurry. probably not noticeable when playing.

[Oldman100]

Wow easy win for ps3. Take a look at the ground textures. The thing that bothered me though when I played the demo on ps3 was the variable framerate. It would be nice if they gave you the option to lock the framerate at 30fps.

http://www.videogameszone.d...

http://www.videogameszone.d...

[SlowBurn]

since this is a consoles comparison,might I add the graphical fidelity of the pc version is miles ahead...of some weird fucking need to defend pc at any possible opportunity...
PS3 looks better however