Approvals 10/3 ▼
Kain81 (1) - 4462d ago Cancel
iamnsuperman (2) - 4462d ago Cancel
banjadude (1) - 4462d ago Cancel
Nyxus (1) - 4462d ago Cancel
tarbis (1) - 4462d ago Cancel
TrendyGamers (2) - 4462d ago Cancel
Astargatis (1) - 4462d ago Cancel
Victooth (1) - 4462d ago Cancel
1050°

PlayStation: "We will probably be the last to announce something"

CEO of PlayStation France expects Sony to be last out of the gate with next hardware.

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed: title, url, credit url
Columbo4462d ago
Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4462d ago
Stealth2k4462d ago (Edited 4462d ago )

makes sense

@ some of you

Waiting last was not the right move. The ps3 was dead last in all system sales out of 5.

If they want to be first they need to launch around the others. Ask sony how the vita is doing in japan when it waited

thedude444462d ago

come on sony hurry! i want to see your next beast, i cant take it anymore!!!!

ApplEaglElephant4462d ago

PS3 has been outselling 360 every year world wide for past 3-4 years.

Otherwise, the gap would not have never closed.

Solid_Snake374462d ago

Yeah please just announce it Sony!! Wanna see the beast that Sony comes up with

BattleAxe4462d ago

The PS3's tech is solid enough to last another 3 or 4 years. Personally I'll be happy if Sony waits longer this time around. They're still building on the PS3, and they'll be concentrating on the Vita, so it wouldn't make any sense to release the PS4 until either 2014 or 2015 which is really not even that far away.

tee_bag2424462d ago (Edited 4462d ago )

Launching first isn't necessarily the best move. A late launch can be a devastating advantage over the competitor if the technology is a step above.

khellendros14462d ago

I'm happy with this generation. When companies max out graphics they start concentrating on whats most important, gameplay and story.

Soldierone4462d ago

Like I've been saying. PS3 CAN last the entire 10 years with hardly any issues. Sony CAN wait that entire 10 years to announce something, the only thing that will make it come earlier is an announcement from Microsoft on a new Xbox.

At that time Sony will play their cards and compete at the same time, they can honestly fire whenever they want and will do so whenever they want.

They won't fall behind, and the only way they will be early is if that 10 years hits before MS announces their console. Sony learned, that year headstart Xbox got still stings in their side.

decrypt4462d ago

Its funny how console gamers are fine with dated technology.

I dont see many people wanting to hang around to a cellphone after its 2-3 years old simply because they think its old tech. Yet these consoles have been holding the industry back for years now and are already 6 years old tech. I wonder how some of you are fine with it lasting a further 2-3 years.

Comon MS & Sony bring on the next locked down low end PCs so industry can finally progress a bit.

ravinash4462d ago

The main reason why PS3 was delayed a year after 360 came out was because of licencing issues with BluRay.
There will be no such issues with the next one, so it would be safe to say as soon as Xbox comes out with it's next one, Playstation will be right there next to it.

nveenio4462d ago

I just hope they ignore third party developers like they did this year. I'd like to see another system that is full of raw power, instead of one that caters to being "easy" to develop for. A lot of third party games run better on other systems, but they run well enough on PS3 to make having all of the incredible exclusives worth it. So I'm hoping they aim for raw power and new rendering technologies.

NeoBasch4461d ago

These low-end PCs set standards for the industry, which can cut down costs dramatically. Consoles are also generally low maintenance compared to computers, which means less hassle for the end user. They stress convenience.

Are TV's better than computers for using stuff like FaceBook, Twitter, and YouTube? No, at least, not necessarily. But the smart aps make it convenient for the end user by integrating all these functions into a single TV.

Matter of fact, TV's are generally more reasonable than most personal rigs when it comes to home theater set-ups. So I guess what I'm trying to say is supposedly "dated" technology can offer a greater convenience by offering limited functions (such as Facebook, Twitter, NetFlix, Xbox Live, PSN, Video Unlimited, Cinema Now, Zune, etc...) that are catered to the home theater enthusiast, which turns your living room into a place for the family to enjoy most any source of entertainment.

Besides, next-gen development is expensive. Developers don't want to rush out and make flashy tech demos just to sate the graphic whores. We've already lost a lot of developers in the transition from PS2 and Xbox to PS3 and X360. Do you want to lose more? I certainly don't. I'd rather wait and transition when costs are relatively manageable for most independent companies.

Brosy4461d ago

They really don't need to wait on launching a new console. If they want to be competitive they need to launch close to the other consoles. Unless they just don't care about competition. Which seems the route Ninny's taking. Who knows we may have a 1-3 year gap between all the next-gen consoles.

I hope they release a beast of a machine. Nintendo poisined the water for "hardcore" consoles. I hope MS follows suit as well and don't put the main focus of the console on the casual audience.

Gaming1014461d ago

The problem is, once you announce it, you take all the attention away from the current system that you've poured billions of dollars into marketing. You need to keep the focus where it belongs if you're a smart business person - which the vast majority of people commenting on the internet AREN'T, and should stop pretending to be.

THEMIGHTYDOOVDE4461d ago

Beast... don't you mean FLOP!

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 4461d ago
BrutallyBlunt4462d ago

Dead last? That's funny seeing as how the Playstation 3 closed the gap to that of the XBOX 360 in a year less time.

This magical race you present means very little. The Playstation 3 is getting just as much software support from third parties unlike the original XBOX.

BitbyDeath4462d ago

They did lose a lot of marketshare though.

Jobesy4462d ago

Magical race indeed. How can there be a race if the competitors don't start at the same time?

admiralthrawn874462d ago

its funny how ps3 fanboys changed the story now at the end of the generation. ps3 still hasn't closed the gap.

sarshelyam4462d ago

I'd say they're getting more support LevelHead. Just look at the exclusives hitting Capcom's "Street Fighter X Tekken". None of that seems coached.

At any rate, it doesn't matter. No amount of exclusivity to market did any good for Microsoft in my eyes. I loved the original Xbox, but when it comes to the 360, however, year over year I see the reasons for owning one dwindle as their focus shifts to a demographic I don't fall within.

GribbleGrunger4462d ago

@Admiral: i don't know how this generation has passed you by without it leaving some semblance of reality in your views. 'it still hasn't closed the gap'. you REALLY think that? honestly? i don't know whether you're fresh from the womb and have managed to gum off your mittens to type that, but i'm sorry to have to inform you that it's wrong... very wrong.

the 360 had a lead just under 6 million when the PS3 released. for a while that gap closed but MS dropped the price of the 360. the lead then stretched in favour of the 360 to 8 million. since then the slim has released and the price of the PS3 has dropped too. for the last three and a half years the PS3 has been outselling the 360 which is why that gap has now shrunk to 3 million from 8 million.

now, i ask you, isn't that closing a gap?

SolidStoner4462d ago

IF, I would be SONY i would design several PS4, then wait when my oponents come out and choose a bit better version.. even if I put it out later IT would be better over some period of time its a win win... just like it was with the PS3, we all know it has more good than bad.
Gaming isnt something new nowdays, wait and see tactics works better. In my opinion..

PetitPiPi4461d ago

@ Level Head

Dead LAST with 50% market share out the window.

I agree with you. It is funny!

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4461d ago
4462d ago Replies(3)
sikbeta4462d ago (Edited 4462d ago )

But they already said they are not launching this year and if they launch in these upcoming months, it'll be PSP al over again for Vita, when SCE don't give a s*** about it and only focus on the PS4

I said it already, releasing asap would be the best move, but it'd kill Vita, as in the Manufacturer don't caring about the portable, nothing to do with Vita bombing :P and if they release too late, as in letting the competition walk free in the market alone and they'll be totally Screwed!

@LevelHead

That was when MS didn't launch Kinect, now things are different and Sony is not closing the gap

@erasure242 Below

PS3, yeah, same way as PS2 and PS1, but Sony needs a new console or they'll be beaten hard if they wait so long to release their new console

@DARKrage34

"They were last for this current generation and it only proved to be the right move"

So being in third place with less consoles sold than the competition is a good thing now? no, they're not ok and It wasn't a good move at all, well if they released later but with an AFORDABLE console, things could have been different, but things weren't like that and now Wii-U is about to launch and rumors of Xbox Next are strong, if they wait much, PS4 will fail

Machioto4462d ago (Edited 4462d ago )

@skibeta Why?couldn't they have a commercial that showed all Sony products like it starts with a person playing on a Sony tv,you the ps4 and slick graphics,the person gets a call or something they're like darn!they grab a psvita hook it to the ps4 get the game via remote play leave,if they want show any kind of connectivity between the tv,ps4 or vita they could when the person comes back.

moparful994462d ago

Last time I checked the ps3 is still selling well.. SO why does it matter that the ps3 is 3rd.. Did the ps3 not only have the better and more diverse selection of games this year? Yes it did.. Not only was it the most sound from an exclusives standpoint but it also had all of the major third party releases.. Sony's making money, fans get their games, third parties make money.. Sounds like sony is doing fantastic in third place.. WHat does the first and second place console have??? EXACTLY...

frostypants4462d ago (Edited 4462d ago )

They are doing exactly what I said they would all along: they will announce when and only when Microsoft makes a move. They already have the hardware spec'd out should they announce this year, and will make minor upgrades to said specs over time...whenever MS announces, they will as well. It will be based on an upgraded Cell architecture and any additional incremental spec upgrades will have minimal impact on devs who are already developing.

Whenever MS makes a move, Sony will have an announcement ready within 48 hours. I guarantee it. They aren't stupid and there was a method behind the Cell madness. Remember: "scalability".

xxLuckyStrike4461d ago

Sony is still trying to recover revenue lost this gen. Don't expect any announcement soon or super computer in the PS4.. Sony has taken a real good lickin from Microsham and Nintendo this gen. Losing market share and revenue I expect they'll go back to the drawing board next gen. A affordable Mid Range powered console..(see ps1 or ps2)

tiffac0084462d ago (Edited 4462d ago )

I think announcing last and releasing last are two different things.

Sony is not going to just announce ahead of MS because it will kill the sales of the PS3 and they're trying to get as much return as they can on that system.

They could be as ready as MS for all we know. We'll just have to wait and see.

xflo3604461d ago

Imagine if ps4, Xbox 720 released on the same day!

Which would you buy?

LiViNgLeGaCY4461d ago

That's actually a fantastic question, seeing as I would probably only have enough cash to shell out for one of them day one.

Honestly, I'd have a good look at both consoles and which games are coming to each one. I'd have to weigh my options and see what appeals to me the most at launch, and go from there. It's ALL about the games for me.

BlackTar1874461d ago

Man decrypt is why no one likes PC gamers lol

SonyPS3604461d ago (Edited 4461d ago )

Hell why the Vita, why not ask the Ps3 which is still last in sales since launching?

Ares84HU4461d ago

They won't be the last. This is just an attempt to try to trick us and than give us the surprise at E3 this year or the latest, Tokyo Game Show this year.

salinidus4457d ago

hopefully whenever they do decide to reveal the new console kaz hirai will make it awesome

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 4457d ago
erasure2424462d ago

The PS3 still has a lot of good years left. No reason to jump the gun...

2v14462d ago

yea ..still why get left behind

Pintheshadows4462d ago

If Sony is careful, and plans well they could perhaps (not saying they will) release something with far more horsepower than the Nextbox and WiiU later on. This admittedly would be a disadvantage (last out of the gates again, pricepoint). But it could also be an advantage if they nail the launch line up and market it correctly.

BrutallyBlunt4462d ago

The problem with coming out late is you are now the underdog and 3rd party games are no longer synonymous to your platform. Even though games like Mass Effect are now on the Playstation 3 they are still at a disadvantage because the franchise began on the PC and XBOX 360.

Sony already said they don't want to be late to the party.

SweatyFlorida4462d ago

Actually, they could even "skip" next gen, and release a truly powerful console in say 2016-2017 (as prices for powerful tech would have gone down), and have the jump on the gen after the next, learning all the benefits and faults of this gen coming up, and playing a perfect hand next-next gen. Since it will be 4-5 years after the Wii U, it won't be considered being "late".

Of course this means no Ps4 until 2016-2018 for us eagerly waiting for it, however this enables Sony to create a perfect storm, and put the other console companies in a bad position, relying on price cut Ps3's and the Vita to gain cash in their gaming department. This will be a smarter idea then being late a year or 2, as after 4-6 years surely devs will be tired of the tech once again. Just an idea though if Sony is unable to get the PS4 out the gates in a close enough time to the other consoles.

Half-Mafia4462d ago

@Pintheshadows Thats the worst thing Sony could do. Developers would make a PS4 port but they wouldnt put in the extra work/money to get the extra power out of it. So you would end up with the PS4 version having pretty much the same graphics as the 720. And Sony would of lost 1-2 years on the 720.

Pintheshadows4462d ago (Edited 4462d ago )

@Half-Mafia You're correct. I don't think they will do it. Just a thought. And they would certainly be relying heavily on their first party devs. That's why I added they'd need to nail the launch line up to attract buyers. I agree though, it's a risky game to play.

The one thing I would add is, if it were easy to work with it might actually encourage the 3rd party devs to utilise its power.

Half-Mafia4462d ago

@Pintheshadows If all that played out, I still cant see developers doing that. If we were talking like the PS2 days where they had like 80% of the market then developers would definitely get the most out of the system. But with more evenly share there is no point.

Solid_Snake374462d ago

@florida that would make no sense at all... Skipping a gen might leave fans a bit sour

bennyace4462d ago

@Solid_Snake37 You're right. Sony just came out 1 year after Microsoft and lost half of it's market share... Imagine 2-3-4 years!

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4462d ago
BrutallyBlunt4462d ago (Edited 4462d ago )

A lot of us want to play games in 1080p. It is true that even now the games still look great like the upcoming MLB The Show but when you see games like Battlefield 3 on the PC now you really start to see just how much better games could be on a new console. We also see games like Skyrim that could really improve on new hardware.

Sprudling4462d ago

I feel sad for those whose decision to buy a game depends on whether it's 720p or 1080p.

OcularVision4462d ago

@Sprud Nobody (at least that I know of) bases their game purchases on resolution. It would just be real nice to have native 1080p games on our HDTVs that can display 1080p.

kaveti66164462d ago

"I feel sad for those whose decision to buy a game depends on whether it's 720p or 1080p."

I feel bad for those that don't even have the choice.

GreedyPopcorn4462d ago

Just think about consoles based on the same Gpu's as a 580.With optimization the graphics would be 2x better than BF3.

BrutallyBlunt4461d ago

@Sprud

Your comment is like saying you feel sad people want to move to bluray from DVD. I don't base my decisions on if game A is only at this resolution I won't buy it. I am saying that the game would be better if it did have higher resolution, learn the difference.

So go ahead and play Twisted Metal on your old Playstation, I will be playing it on my Playstation 3. See what I'm saying?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4461d ago
thedude444462d ago

im already giving the ps4 a thumbs up because ive been satisfied since 1994

BitbyDeath4462d ago

Sony have the widest range of developers/games which is why i stay with them, if anyone else could do better than Sony then i'd happily switch.

Games are important.

specialguest4461d ago

Sometimes I forget that the Playstation has been around since 1994. We could thank Nintendo for inadvertently triggering the birth of the Playstation. If it hadn't been for that, Nintendo and Sega would've still been battling each other.

DARKrage344462d ago (Edited 4462d ago )

They were last for this current generation and it only proved to be the right move.

Sony has developed a strong brand name and hardware that is capable of 'longlasting value'. Why the hell would they suddenly need to match the competition with a new system? They're smart enough to out-advance them again within a year.

Let the Vita take off first, too... sheesh.

gamingdroid4462d ago

Because, once the Wii-U drops and support gains for it from both consumers and developers, a second (or third) entrant won't garner the support necessary.

The market is ready for a new console and Nintendo is first out of the gate. MS is essentially forced to release in 2013 to prevent Wii-U from getting a too strong a foothold.

So the pressure will most definitely be there on Sony and MS, when the competitor IS out!

Heartnet4462d ago

imo the Wii-U will never gain the same market as the ps3 and xbox 360 has ever as the Wii has been out so long its already chosen its tarket market and everyone knows that so they wont go for that console for fps and what not...

And many parents (which is what the wii brand was aimed at) wont see the point in getting what looks like the same console with the same motion controls etc as they already own the wii.... Sony and MS know this and can bide their time as the Wii-U wont steal their market anytime soon

gamingdroid4462d ago

@Heartnet

The Xbox was relatively unknown and Playstation reigned supreme previous generation, yet at release the Xbox 360 sold like hotcakes. Nintendo came back from being third.

So the take from all this is, don't base the future on the past. When a new generation starts, everything is reset!

tehpees34462d ago (Edited 4462d ago )

@ Heartnet

I like the way you underestimate Nintendo. You talk like there aren't any hardcore gamers in Nintendo's market. Heres a fact: people will buy Wii U regardless.

While Nintendo might not be strong on the FPS market right now thats not to say its going to change. This is completely new console and a completely new start for Nintendo. And one thing I can guarantee is they are definitely strong in the Japanese side of games. Something like Final Fantasy or Tekken could easily sell more on Wii U than on Xbox. Look at Soul Calibur II as an example. It crushed the Xbox version in sales. Nintendo could have that side of the market nailed harder than MS. Probably since Xbox doesn't sell in Japan.

Capcom have also consistently seen strong sales on Nintendo systems. Despite the troubles originally facing it several Resident Evil games sold on Gamecube and both SSFIV and Mercenaries have sold to their expectations on 3DS (Street fighter IV selling over 1 million). And Monster Hunter is also selling like hotcakes. There is more to the "hardcore" market than just FPS games and both Sony and Nintendo have the advantage in the Japanese side of it.

PC_Enthusiast 4462d ago (Edited 4462d ago )

I hope Sony puts a nVIDIA gtx 560 TI in the PS4 with 3-4 Gb of ram update the 50 Gb bluray disc to 100 Gb and make a better Playstation network for a fall 2013 launch the price should be around 400 to 450 dollars i think...

Rage_S904462d ago

I don't think nvidia is in the console race any longer. So it will probably end up being an amd card.

Machioto4462d ago

Rumors are a high end variant of the powervr rogue is suppose to be in ps4.

Heartnet4462d ago

Theres already 100gb Blu Ray disk lol its just the Blu Ray driver cant run in the ps3 isnt fast enough to play certain blu rays.. thats why on some games you have the mandatory install :)

specialguest4462d ago

If the PS4 is released during the end of 2013 or sometime during 2014 with a 560, those specs are definitely outdated.

BubloZX4462d ago

Better than rumored wiki and next box gpus

DeadlyFire4462d ago (Edited 4462d ago )

I vote Power8(2013) for CPU of PS4. Potentially up to 16 cores. 4 SMT threads per core or more? Which equates to 64 processing threads. Sounds delightful. Sony is going to build a machine that lasts for say 15 years. Its going to have to take a step towards this tech over the other tech on the market.

Other two consoles are rumored to sport Power7 or Power7+ CPUs. Which both only hit 8 cores at most with 4 SMT threads. A 16 core Power8 design would be twice as powerful and floor the competition.

Snakefist304462d ago (Edited 4462d ago )

How abut using GTX 580????

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4462d ago
Moac4462d ago

They did launch their console last and they have the more "powerful" console.

Either they will announce some news on the ps4 if Microsoft reviles the xbox720 at E3 or next year.

I do think Sony will outsell the xbox 360 by years end.

Once xbox 360 had a 10mil lead, now its 3mil.

:)

PC_Enthusiast 4462d ago

it's actually even now not 3 million

Azurite4462d ago

@I_OWN_YOU: Source on that?

DebateMaster4462d ago

Its less than a million now. Plus you kinda suck at calculations.

madpuppy4462d ago

"if Microsoft reviles the xbox720 at E3"

???

why would MS talk badly about it's own product??? :P

Show all comments (166)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community13d ago
ChasterMies13d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken13d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga13d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken13d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6413d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long13d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197213d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic13d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 13d ago
DivineHand12513d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91313d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer13d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91312d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit12d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 12d ago
Christopher13d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6912d ago (Edited 12d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit12d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher13d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken13d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197213d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic13d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2313d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218313d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder13d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts13d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)
80°

Sony May Soon Let You Decide How Much NPCs Talk In Games

Sony has patented to add multiple dialogue modes to let players switch between how many conversations with NPCs they want in the game.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community19d ago
blackblades19d ago

Sony is like the only ones outta the 3 that has atuff like like this pop up changing thing in ways.

just_looken19d ago

Sony in the past has always been first at bat with new ideas/tech but in the end never fully use it or just toss it away.

blackblades19d ago

I think they did use some but yeah most usually never happened but at least they thought about it. Sony seeks things like this and other, Nintendo seek different ways of playing going by there different controler designs and console designs.

just_looken19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

some of the other stuff sony want's/owns never used
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://www.eurogamer.net/s...
https://metro.co.uk/2023/03...
https://decrypt.co/114754/s...

monitor/adjust game difficultly as you play
https://www.techradar.com/g...

Sony nfts
https://www.theblock.co/pos...

Pay ai to play the game for you
https://thebusinessofesport...

Oh all the above last 12 months

I just imagine a evil scientist with test subjects when it comes down to sony recent patent reports.

Kaii19d ago

Will we get dialogue options that won't spoil puzzles in a matter of seconds? :p

280°

Judge rules in PlayStation's favour in $500m patent infringement lawsuit

Genuine Enabling Technology was seeking damages, claiming the tech allowing PlayStation consoles and controllers to communicate infringes its rights.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community21d ago
Changed: content
S2Killinit21d ago

Big victory for Sony. And a long time coming.

DarXyde21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Crazy to think the savings from this lawsuit allows them to develop one AAA game.

Make it Bloodborne 2, please and thank you.

21d ago
Profchaos21d ago

Sounds like patent trolling they tried the same thing against Nintendo with the same pattern.

Motion and control input traversing over higher and lower frequencies seperate from each other allowing the controller to do both

Pyrofire9521d ago

Patents suck. Most of them are complete garbage.

Knightofelemia21d ago

So to recoup the money Genuine is going to take on Nintendo or Microsoft next. I hate patent lawyers they are some of the worst bottom feeders out there.

Show all comments (13)