Top
440°

Sony Promised a 10 Year Life Cycle for the PS3

Remember back in 2006 when Sony announced the Playstation 3? The one thing that they consistenly stressed was that this machine was going to last them ten years.

Read Full Story >>
expertscolumn.com
Oculus Quest Giveaway! Click Here to Enter
The story is too old to be commented.
Dante1122933d ago (Edited 2933d ago )

I think Sony could and would still support the Ps3 if they do ever decide to release the Ps4. I mean, they still supported and sold the Ps2 when the Ps3 came out.

Edit: And if the next Xbox and Wii U machines does get announced and released during the year, why would Sony wait it out again and give them another head start (Xbox360)?

kaveti66162933d ago (Edited 2933d ago )

Selling the PS2 isn't the same as supporting it. What was the last Triple A (refers to budget) title released for the PS2? Wasn't it God of War 2, released in 2007?

Edit: @ below

I'm sorry I don't understand. My point was that selling a console isn't the same as supporting it. Of course, since the PS2 is still in demand and since it's very cheap to make, Sony will continue to sell it throughout the world, but that doesn't really count as supporting it because they stopped developing full-blown titles for after 2007, right? Sony itself doesn't support the console as much as the third party publishers who make Madden or Fifa every year.

I don't believe Sony has supported any of their previous consoles for 10 years. 7 years max for PS2. Once the PS4 is nearing release, I think Sony will shift all of its main developers to the PS4.

Funky Town_TX2933d ago

Plus your yearly madden and crap movies games. Why would Sony not sell hardware for $100 that it may cost them $40 to make?

Soldierone2933d ago

Sony didn't "cut support" until like 2009. They announced it too. Until that time PS2 was getting many third party ports, and a bunch of wii style things were going to it.

I agree PS2 wasn't on developers minds, but Sony has a business to run and selling the PS3 is more important.

firefoxprime2933d ago (Edited 2933d ago )

Many people are a stupid. When Sony claims a "10year" life cycle, that said cycle can exist amongst other systems. The PS2 launched back in 2000. 10 years later was 2010, and the PS2 is still selling(kinda).

Basically what I'm saying, is that although the PS3 launched back in 2006, the PS2 was sold along side its successor.

The same will be implimented with the PS4. Its really that simple....called transition people

-sighs-

MrBeatdown2932d ago (Edited 2932d ago )

"Selling the PS2 isn't the same as supporting it. What was the last Triple A (refers to budget) title released for the PS2? Wasn't it God of War 2, released in 2007?"

So, releasing triple A games is considered support, but selling the systems isn't?

If someone was happy with a PS2 2-3 years into the next generation, I doubt they're the type that demands the latest and greatest games.

Supporting a console is a lot more than releasing AAA games. It means keeping consoles, games, and accessories on the shelves so it's actually an enticing option for developers and customers. How long did Xbox games stay on the shelf after Microsoft stopped selling Xboxes? Not very long. Nobody is going to release games for a console that doesn't even have dedicated shelf space in the stores. There aren't a lot of new games for PS2, but there's still plenty of Greatest Hits. It's still easy to find a decent selection of PS2 games without having to resort to used games or Ebay.

And even without triple A games, the PS2 still had a decent line-up of sports games, WWE games, PSP ports or releases simultaneous with PSP (MotorStorm, Jak & Daxter), and music games. And there was the thousands of games released earlier on. Not the kind of stuff we look for, but we're not the type of gamer who would want to use the PS2 as our primary console when the next-gen consoles are out in full force.

LNDCalling2932d ago

So by your very own reckoning of a console relying on third party support meaning it's not supported your saying Microsoft are not supporting the Xbox 360? I often hear Xbox only gamers state that exclusives don’t matter and that third party multiplats more than make up for it.. so why doesn’t that count for the PS2?

Lets see how it sounds….

"My point was that selling a console isn't the same as supporting it. Of course, since the 360 is still in demand and since it's very cheap to make, Microsoft will continue to sell it throughout the world, but that doesn't really count as supporting it because they've pretty much stopped developing full-blown titles for it, right? Microsoft itself doesn't support the console as much as the third party publishers.."

Hmmmm… maybe your right!!

darthv722932d ago (Edited 2932d ago )

When sony says they would provide at least a 10yr cycle that is referring to support in the way of technical as well as software. It does not require sony themselves to provide either but that support in those fields will be available for that duration.

Consumer support (via hardware/software sales) can be less than that obviously.

SilentNegotiator2932d ago (Edited 2932d ago )

Persona 4 came out in 2008, 2009 saw a lot of 'Playstation multiplats' on the ps2 (Motorstorm, Agent Clank, MLB, etc), 2010 saw Silent Hill: Shattered Memories....

As long as Sony is selling the ps2 (600K between Nov/Dec!), and people are still buying them, developers are still making games for it.

I know you've got an obligation to attack the ps2 life cycle because it's a playstation brand product, but ps2 did more in its 8th/9th/10th year than almost any other console ever.

@LNDCalling
LOL! Good point! By his definition, Sony supported the ps2 more in its 9th year than his favorite little console did in its 6th!

Oner2932d ago

I'm gonna save/use that one LNDCalling. Agree & Well Said!

kaveti66162932d ago

Microsoft supports the 360 with AAA exclusives every year. Not many, but they still have their developers working on high budget titles. Turn 10 made Forza 4 for 2011. And Microsoft published Gears of War 3 and Halo CE Anniversary. And Halo 4 is going to be on 360 in 2012.

That's support. When your developers are developing games for the console, that constitutes support. When your developers are no longer developing any games on the console, and the only games being developed for your console are from third party developers and are downports of games being made on newer consoles, then your console is no longer being supported by you. Sony stopped supporting the PS2 after 2007.

Selling the console isn't supporting the console. Having it on the shelves isn't supporting it. The retailer decides to put it on the shelves. Support has to do with software development. Sony (its studios) stopped developing games on the PS2 after 2007. Everything that came after was from third party developers and/or was a downport of games being made on the 360/PS3/Wii.

You guys are deluded. I'm not attacking the PS2. It's a great console, but you guys fall for marketing ploys and slogans. "It only does everything" and "Make Believe" are etched in your skulls.

inveni02932d ago

They promised a 10-year life cycle. They never promised they wouldn't have two consoles at the same time. Remember when Microsoft released the 360 and they completely stopped supporting the original Xbox? Sony is just promising they won't do THAT.

MrBeatdown2932d ago

"Support has to do with software development. Sony (its studios) stopped developing games on the PS2 after 2007. Everything that came after was from third party developers and/or was a downport of games being made on the 360/PS3/Wii. "

It got support. You call them "downports" just so you can pretend they don't count. I don't know why you think you have to develop AAA big-budget games and not release them on PS3/360 in order for it to be considered support. What difference does it make whether or not there is a superior version on a different platform? The vast majority of what we play is on multiple platforms. Tell Microsoft to get cracking on some more first party stuff. I'm tired of playing downports from the PC like Battlefield 3 and Skyrim.

Oh, and Sony released MotorStorm: Arctic Edge and Jak & Daxter in late 2009. I don't know about J&D, but Arctic Edge was excellent on PSP. And it wasn't a "downport".

JackBNimble2932d ago (Edited 2932d ago )

If I can walk into any wal-mart in North America in 2012, and buy a PS2 and games for it, I would call that supporting a system. You can't say that about MS and their first Xbox, can you?

DragonKnight2932d ago

Please don't respond to kaveti. He just loves to go against the grain, I can't really recall a comment I've seen him make (no, I don't go through comment histories to prove points, that's sad) that is positive. Well actually that's not true, he is positive in a certain way. But anyway, just don't and save yourself agony.

A 10 year cycle simply means 10 years minimum of shelf life and development of the console, not 10 years of constant, undivided support. So yeah, 10 years is easily possible for Sony. PS2 says hello.

kreate2932d ago

Also good to note that ps2 was/is supported in other regions like south america, africa, parts of europe and asia well into 2010, even though it kinda became obsolete in the United States.

The last push i saw from sony was the toy story 3 ps2 bundle in 2010/2011. Before that was some singstar stuff.

The clientale base for the ps2 changed cuz the core gamers are mostly on ps3 and also on the 360.
So of course sony will pump games according to the system's clientale of that certain era.

badz1492932d ago

anybody can see that after what happened with PS1 and still happening with PS2. PS3 will have long legs, no doubt about that.

but I really hope they don't mean it as there will be no PS4 release until 2015. that would be crazy!

I'm being positive here and let us recall the release of PSP back in the end of 2004 in Japan. the PS3 was released at around the same time 2 years later. Now that they released the Vita around the same time frame which was the end of 2011, we can expect the PS4 to be released in 2013!

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 2932d ago
Sarcasm2933d ago

Are people really so thick headed to not see that when Sony refers to 10 year life cycle that means they are still going to sell it and support it for 10 years. That doesn't mean they are going to release a console every 10 years.

showtimefolks2932d ago (Edited 2932d ago )

http://www.gametrailers.com...

there you go all of you expecting a new system from sony at E3 or atleast an announcement will be very disappointed.

for rest of us there will be games,games and more games and in my personal opinion which sony seems to agree with we really don't need a new system within the next 2 years.

fall 2014 would be ideal but we may see one fall 2013

if new consoles only means having little more powerful system than i rather wait extra 2-3 years and get something worth getting

This is a great decision for the gaming community. Rushing the cycle of consoles only means we have to spend more money for no significant change. This way we keep our PS3's, which still have the potential of lasting a few years. When the PS4 comes out it will blow our minds with the leaps it takes in technology, community, and who knows what else. It will be money well spent

I don't really see a reason for MS or Sony to drop a new console for a few more good years. The graphics are pretty good, and I don't see them getting a whole lot better for an affordable price. The hardware that WiiU will be using is what I would imagine the next generation to be like. I don't think graphics are going to rule, but native 1080p would be nice, for example, I saw someone playing Skyrim on their Xbox 360 and it was pixelated all to hell and just overall fuzzy looking while my PC version is crisp and beautiful. Same gripe with Skyward Sword, except I don't have the PC option with that game. Basically add a nice layer of gloss and functionality and I think they'll be good to go

dedicatedtogamers2933d ago

Of the three consoles currently on the market, the PS3 is by FAR in the best position to be supported for a full 10 years. And seeing Sony's track record, they'll actually put good games on it.

koh2933d ago (Edited 2933d ago )

True, but if the next Xbox is announced it will force Sony's hand to a degree. I don't see them releasing the PS4 more than a year after Microsoft's new console.

Of course, as others have said, a new PlayStation doesn't mean they will ignore the PS3 at all.

dedicatedtogamers2933d ago

IMO, Sony is going to focus more heavily on the Vita. The PS3 hardware is advanced enough that any multiplats that show up on the Wii U and Nextbox will also be on PS3 (and these same multiplats will also be on 360). At the earliest, it will be at least 3 or 4 years before major multiplats stop being released for the PS3/360.

Rainstorm812933d ago

Seeing that we are on Year 12 for the PS2 this is fully Plausible

Virtual_Reality2933d ago (Edited 2933d ago )

As PS2, if not more.

Well, PS2 have already 11 years.

GribbleGrunger2933d ago

PS1 10 years
PS2 10 years +

why the hell are we still debating this?

Show all comments (58)
The story is too old to be commented.