TVGB: L.A. Noire is an egregiously hollow experience. I’d like to say that it helps bridge the gap between gameplay and story, but it clearly does not do anything of the sort. I’d like to say the impressive facial animations instantly make you forget you’re playing a game, but they certainly do not. What the game tries to accomplish is in vain due to the poor choices made on the design side.
Hanzala from eXputer: "I do appreciate GTA 6, Rockstar, but if I could trade it for a new L.A. Noire or a Bully game, I'd do so in a heartbeat."
How are they lost? You can get L.A. Noire on Steam, PS5, Xbox Series and Nintendo Switch and Bully is on the PS5 and Xbox Series too.
Whenever gta 6 launch we won't be getting another rockstar title for another 10 years lol but on the positive side they bou to come back n show how open world supposed to be done 🔥
There was a lot to love about Rockstar and Team Bondi's 2011 open world title.
One I never finished. I've been looking at the ps4 version off Amazon the last few months just never bit
I picked it up on sale recently, going to play it next summer. I'll get more out of it this time, first time around I treated the open world like it was GTA and goofed about, whereas now I'll play it with more respect. RDR2 has trained me well.
I also hadn't read Raymond Chandler at the time so presumably that'll add another layer of enjoyment too.
Absolutely stunning game. So underrated. Played through it again last year and it still stands up so well. Like many of rockstars games it’s actually a far better experience on PC. I didn’t enjoy it as much on console. Completed it at least 3 times on pc.
The rumours of a sequel are awesome news despite the fact I think Rockstar are now the shell of the company they once were.
GF365: "Out of the many historically accurate games out there, these are our picks for the six best games that are historically accurate. While these games aren't completely accurate, they depict the times and situations of history well. Plus, they're all a lot of fun to play, too."
Historically accurate from the past is tough to truly know and judge especially the farther you go back because history is written from the people in power and doesn’t mean it’s the truth just the narrative they wanted to tell.
I don’t care about historically accurate in most games because they are games not biographies or history books . Just make the game fun , good gameplay and such .
Ghost of Tsushima wasn’t historically accurate in many things but I loved the game . Many examples like it .
LA Noire puzzles me, they went to extraordinary lengths to create LA in painstaking detail but you could do nothing in it only drive around and take note of a few landmarks. Confusing design choice and kind of a wasted opportunity
I don't think L.A Noir was ever designed with a future in mind. I still think it was made as a tech demo to show investors it's worth parting with their money for. Im certain we will be seeing this facial technology used in GrandTheftAutoV.
I felt Heavy Rain had a lot more going than LA Noire. It's an ok game, but it's not something I would recommend right off the top type of game. There are times I feel this game is getting way too much praise.
If anything, GTA could learn a thing or two from L.A. Noire. L.A. Noire is immersive and fun while GTA is a boring, glorified driving sim.
several times i almost clicked on "confirm buy", on psn+.
because it's quite cheap.
but i read a lot of reviews, and i'm not sure if i will enjoy the game. while i really liked heavy rain, l.a. noire make me feel like i'm gonna spend countless hours searching this, and that, always at the opposite place in the map, just to make the game last xx hours.
right now, there are so many great games i'm discovering and playing, like arkham city, it's not the best time to buy la noire. maybe one day, if there's nothing to play.
have anyone played it ? was it fun and interesting, to play ?