180°
2.0

Postal III Review (Gamespy)

It's frankly incredible to think that Running with Scissors made fans wait eight years for this. Is the trademark Postal "humor" still there? Postal Dude's frequent remarks about hoping to "kill women and minorities first" say hello. But a lack of freedom, unforgivable glitchiness, and generally terrible design make this a hard sell even for fans of the series.

Read Full Story >>
pc.gamespy.com
Kakihara4494d ago

Least shocking score ever?

FinaLXiii4494d ago (Edited 4494d ago )

The game is suposed to be bad in nature that´s why we love Postal games in the first place because its a dirty mess that only some hardcore gamers will get their hands on.

Postal games were always bad but alot of fun to mess around in ways that other games dont allow.

come_at_me_bro4494d ago

Note the date everyone: January 3rd. Earliest GOTY confirmation ever?

Crazay4494d ago

When did they think it was a good idea to make the 3rd game to begin with?

I shudder to think that Postal 2 sold enough copies to warrant not only a shit movie by a shit director but a 3rd kick at the can.

Psychotica4494d ago

Was going to get it since I liked the first one. But when I found out there was no free roam I lost all interest. Supposedly there is going to be a patch to allow free roam, I will wait and see..

Show all comments (7)
50°

Postal 3: When Does Delisting Games Matter?

Justin from NoobFeed writes - Games like Postal 3 sometimes get delisted and disappear forever, but is this something that actually matters when the game is bad?

Read Full Story >>
noobfeed.com
Inverno517d ago (Edited 517d ago )

It's about preservation. Doesn't matter how bad the game, the movie, the book, the history was. It has to be archived, so that 10 years from now we can be like "oh yeah, this shite exists" and then again in 50 then 100 and then we can be like "this was what they were doing 100 years ago, how interesting"

110°
2.0

Review: Postal 3 (New Gamer Nation)

The Postal games have always been somewhat of a mixed bag in terms of how they are received. The first two were not masterpieces by a long shot, but they have somewhat of a cult following. In case you haven't heard of the series before let’s bring you up to date, that's if you haven't already clicked off after realizing this wasn't a review for Portal 3. The first Postal game was released back in 1997 by American developer Running With Scissors (previously Riedel Software Productions of Spy vs Spy fame). A 3D isometric violent shooter that put you in the shoes of The Postal Dude, a guy pretty down on his luck that wants to slaughter everyone in town with a wide-array of weapons, it was pretty extreme at the time. The sequel released 6 years later, now a first-person affair in an open-world. Again as The Postal Dude, it's more of same except there were objectives added in the form of chores, such as buying milk from the grocery store or picking up your paycheck from work, and you could choose to go about it as a decent, upstanding citizen or you could just cause mass chaos. Anyway, while both games weren’t reviewed by critics too well, they were particularly fun for what they were.

Read Full Story >>
newgamernation.com
90°
3.5

Postal III Review - Gaming Nexus

From the review: "The Postal series of games have been primarily known for the controversy caused by their extreme levels of violence, disregard for graphic content, and exploitation of stereotypes. With the change from the Unreal to the Source engine, Running with Scissors had a chance to take the franchise beyond the simple foundations of bad humor and shocking imagery of past games. Unfortunately, Postal III continues in the tradition of its predecessors by containing generic gameplay, off-color humor, and an assortment of bugs that hinder the overall experience."

Read Full Story >>
gamingnexus.com