180°

Addicted-Gamers: Uncharted 3: Drake’s Deception – Best Campaign Ever?

Read what Mike.M @ Addicted-Gamers thinks about Uncharted 3's single player campaign.

Read Full Story >>
addicted-gamers.com
gaffyh4533d ago

Personally, I prefer the campaign in Uncharted 2, but I wouldn't say it's the best campaign ever. Honestly, I don't know what I'd say is the best campaign ever.

Aery4533d ago (Edited 4533d ago )

Maybe not ever ... but for sure it's one of the best SP campaign.

StraightPath4533d ago (Edited 4533d ago )

not really way better campaigns out there. was abit formulaic and what to expect and ND did not help as they literally spoilt all set pieces so i knew every single set piece before it happened. Second run through on Charted was plain boring and showed its weakness. This is a first play game only. No replay value whatso ever in single player.

I think in my opinion Uncharted 2 campaign was far superior.

There was alot of let downs from story to character use and plot holes story was forgettable at best.

blumatt4533d ago

Why is it that people always say that about Sony's first party games?? They always say the same thing. "No replay value." That's a load of crap, if you ask me. There's plenty of replay value. Different difficulties, co-op, and finding all the treasure in each level. People are so biased against Sony these days. I just don't get it.

jammy_704533d ago

U2 is slightly better... But best ever? I duno... Mgs3, gta:sa, tombraider 1, spyro the dragon campaigns are all awesome :)

Thatguy-3104533d ago (Edited 4533d ago )

Nope Among thieves is better IMO but there are a lot of campaings that are equally as enjoyable like heavy rain, bioshock, God of War, kingdom hearts etc.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4533d ago
MrBubble4533d ago

The single player was great but there were so many plot holes and stuff unexplained

rezzah4533d ago

This story was meant for you to read between the lines, in which everything is easily explained except for the

Spoiler

what exactly happened to the wedding ring, IMO Drake lost it and Elena was upset but understood why as she didn't kill him for doing so (or maybe she is just happy that she didn't lose him compared to a ring). Sully found the ring by chance or he searched for it continuously until he found it, which he then gave to Drake at the end of UC3.

End Spoiler

Well I guess i just figured out the last of the so call "plot holes" in UC3. =)

Lord_Sloth4533d ago

I seriously doubt as though he was talking about the ring, genius.

rezzah4533d ago

Many people have a hard time understanding many things in UC3 but if they stop to piece parts together, outside of what is only shown then they can understand everything through possibility and likelihood.

MrBubble4533d ago

Ha you have to be idiot not to get that

How did Talbot survive the gun shot

What was with Marlowes guy in the chatue

Those are the ones I'm talking about

rezzah4532d ago (Edited 4532d ago )

Okay finally lets begin Mr.bubbles.

First of all, unless you expect to be spoon fed with UC3 story on every little thing then there is never going to be an answer for you. however unless you set your mine to accept possibilities of what lies between the story that is shown then you will learn of what is or could mean.

Now to your first point:

Talbot is rather simple, gun shot to the right part of his chest wearing a suit, yet is still able to survive without a scratch. Now if he was wearing a regular police vest it would obviously be too big to put under his clothes and must wear it over to stop bullet penetration. So with this most would dismiss the possibility of a bullet vest and wonder what could it be?

The answer is there was always a bullet vest, but one that is not used by police and is thin enough to be worn under a small shirt. Meaning this vest was and is very likely to be too expensive for the police to buy or it is a creation that only Talbot and a few others in the world are aware of. Imagine something so thin is capable of stopping a bullet...Obviously it will be very expensive, which means this is why only Talbot has it and not the rest of his men. maybe Marlowe has one too.

Next point:

this one always got to me, since Talbot and his men never knew of the chateaux before it means that the dead man died on that same day that Drake and Sully were there. Now what are the possibilities of death that will make a human's body appear as it was rotting for a couple weeks? Obviously not a gunshot wound, ut what is there in the chateaux that can cause a death to appear as such? My only deduction is spiders. The man's dead body is a foreshadow (used in stories to foretell the comings events in the future of the story) of the existence that something NOT HUMAN kill the man. And therefore the only thing that we know of that is not human are the spiders. Somehow the spiders crawled up on the man in that dark area and ate him and drained all or the majority of his fluids.

If you dismiss any of my possibilities without bringing forth any reasonable possibilities of your own, then you are one of those who cannot read between the lines and will never understand UC3 story in its entirety.

Edit: sorry for any typos above.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4532d ago
Urmomlol4533d ago

Uh no. Uncharted 2 was substantially better in almost every way.

Tarantino_Life4533d ago (Edited 4533d ago )

UC2 Campaign is one of the most perfect campaigns of this generation. UC3 is not even close. Pacing issues, Ridiculous plot issues, reused ending etc etc etc. UC3 is the biggest disappointment of the year for me. For the disagree's name one moment in UC3 that has the charm, the snappy writing in any of these moments. I am not even talking about the gameplay scenarios which are also way better in UC2. http://www.youtube.com/watc...

christoph2034533d ago

I completely agree mate, story wise it was weakly written and designs or the 2 didnt mold well

Thatguy-3104533d ago (Edited 4533d ago )

I agree with you 100% dude people claim Drakes deception is the better game but ignore or back up the fact that no character development occured in the whole game and the only one we got was Drakes and sully and even then we still don't know a lot about them since they only showed how they met and that's it -_- ...It's not a bad game but don't think that it triumphs Among Thieves. maybe in the set pieces but that's about it..Remember how the chapter "Urban Warfare" open? it was short but EPIC!!!! ....

Show all comments (37)
160°

Analyzing 'Uncharted: Drake’s Deception' – Wait, What is The Game About?

Uncharted 3: Drake’s Deception has a lot to live up to as Uncharted 2: Among Thieves is an incredible and near-perfect game.

Read Full Story >>
goombastomp.com
Profchaos904d ago

It's about retirement...oh wait

UNCHARTED2FANATIC904d ago (Edited 904d ago )

I cant even say what the point was its easily the worst story in the series. The online was a whole lot of fun though but overall doesn't come even close to 2

porkChop904d ago (Edited 904d ago )

It was a step back for sure. Personally, I thought even the MP was way better in U2. Solid game, glad I played it. I just think they didn't push as hard as they did with U2.

UNCHARTED2FANATIC899d ago

Yes both the online and story was better in 2 no doubt

Flewid638904d ago

The "young Drake" portion was pretty top notch, story-wise. But yeah, everything outside of that I felt was inferior.

DanielEndurance904d ago

Villains were all over the place in this… one second they wanted Drake dead, the next they needed him, then they want him dead again, then they coulda killed him, but poisoned his friend instead, then coulda shot him again, but had brunch with him, then needed him alive, then coulda mowed him down, but decided to kill him by fire and let him escape… Uncharted 2 was way better. 😅😅

slowgamer904d ago

=D Sounds crazy. I don't remember any of that. Played it on ps3 and I remember thinking that why was this game so bashed compared to second one. I liked it.

Chocoburger903d ago (Edited 903d ago )

Another thing that annoyed me about UC3 events was the agent Talbot teleporting around Turkey. It just felt off to me, and made no sense.

Also, for about one third of the game, you go on a wild goose chase to rescue Sully, who wasn't even there to be rescued, and you end up back where you started again. There was simply no pay off for all the events you go through, so it fell flat in that regard as if they couldn't figure out how to make the game longer, so they decided to side-track you to do something with no pay off, hoping you wouldn't notice due to all the incredible action set pieces they made.

Overall though, even with its flaws, I still enjoy the game.

TheEnigma313904d ago

This was actually my least favorite in the series. Didn't have that same impact that part 2 set.

Flewid638904d ago

Uncharted 2 is the pinnacle of the series (to me).

Granted, 4 had the best story in my opinion, but 2 was the overall best game.

Show all comments (12)
210°

Uncharted 3 Anniversary Retrospective: Shackled By Its Precursor's Legacy

A decade after its release, how does Uncharted 3 fare today? Does its story still work? Was its precursor’s legacy a bedrock or quicksand for its own aspirations?

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
905d ago Replies(2)
SullysCigar905d ago

When arguably the weakest game in the series is still awesome and more fun than most games today, you know you're onto a winner!

coolbeans905d ago

I'd extend "arguably" before awesome too. Many technically demanding scenes were jaw-dropping for the time, but it's tough to ignore the sub-par context propelling the action forward.

SullysCigar905d ago

Tough for you, perhaps, and that's fine. I enjoyed it very much. Perhaps a little less than the others in the series, but then the bar is extremely high.

I remember being blown away by the water and sand tech in U3 for the time too. It certainly was a visual treat!

LucasRuinedChildhood904d ago (Edited 904d ago )

It is very good, but when I originally played Uncharted 3 it was the most disappointed I'd ever been in a video-game because Uncharted 2 was just that good. I enjoyed 3 much more when I replayed it in the Nathan Drake Collection though. I could just enjoy it for what it is and accept that it's not Uncharted 2 - it's not a roller coaster, and it doesn't balance and rotate between action, puzzles, platforming and set-pieces in the same way.

Uncharted 3's gameplay is a bit more compartmentalized and focused on one thing at a time. I'm not surprised the scrapped version of Uncharted 4 was going to have no gunplay for the first half. It's also paced much differently - it takes a long time to get to the notable set-pieces. Uncharted 2 is insane from Nepal onwards which is about an hour into the game. haha.

I did like the introduction of chase sequences, and I love first hour (bar fight, young Drake) and from the airplane sequence onwards but I just think the rest of it just sort of meanders along without as much purpose as 2.

When it comes to the script, you can feel the absence of Neil Druckmann and Josh Scherr (writer on every other console Uncharted game). Drake gets hit in the face, and the game goes on a random side plot for an hour to give you some boat set-pieces. He then washes up on a beach close to where Elena is staying to get you back to the real plot. Drake just says "How convenient" to try make you laugh off how sloppy the plot got.

In retrospect, I'm not sure if Naughty Dog were ready to work on 2 different games at once. 3 clearly had production issues that 1 and 2 didn't have, and Hennig's version of 4 didn't work out. They had to crunch so hard to get the rebooted version done on time that Bruce Straley gave up making video-games.

coolbeans904d ago

I'll give you some props for the extra analysis. I remember Druckmann climbing his way to a writer spot in UC2, but wasn't aware of Josh Scherr. I didn't know that was the reason for Straley's departure either. That's pretty damn rough.

GhostofHorizon904d ago

They had to make some weird choices as far as story went because the actor for Cutter had to bail which left a few holes in the story.

Uncharted is one of my favourite series and while the leap from 2 to 3 was not nearly as big as the leap from 1 to 2, I think it was an amazing experience none the less.

coolbeans904d ago

Graham McTavish's departure wasn't easy, but I don't think that would fix many holes tbh. Because the main issue to consider is the precarious mindset Naughty Dog was operating on: an increased emphasis in set pieces that HAD to go in and worrying about the context later.

Petebloodyonion904d ago

I really liked part 3 ( Among Thieves is still the best in my opinion) My only complaint was the interactions with the villains and how they were a missed opportunity, Linda MacMahon (Marlowe) was an interesting antagonist due to the history with Sully and Nate but it fails basically flat especially with her ending. And I couldn't care about Navaro 2.0.

What I did love and made me care was Cutter, in the short time he was in the game you could feel that the guy was a good treasure hunter for example when he pulled his own notebook with the clues he founds so the team can escape a room.
It was a small touch that add a lot to the character.

Good-Smurf904d ago

Marlowe was played by Rosalind Ayres.

MadLad904d ago (Edited 904d ago )

I have mixed feelings on the series. I still own all of them on the PS3, and the collection for PS4, but I didn't truly "love" any of the games until 4.

They're good games, but they always stumble on some element.
The first is good, but the climbing mechanics weren't exactly fine tuned with the first showing. Not to mention the spongey enemies if you played on anything past normal; but you're then faced with a fairly unchallenging game experience.
The second mostly fixed the climbing, but added in a pretty clumsy stealth mechanic.
Three was just two with a new story.

Four got it right though.
I don't remember once getting annoyed by any mechanic had in the game.

I know that everyone has a soft spot for 2, and 3 is sort of the black sheep of the series; but they did, overall, get progressively better. Which doesn't always happen.

Show all comments (28)
190°

Ranking the Uncharted Games From Worst to Best

KeenGamer: "Which Uncharted game is the best? Uncharted is widely recognized as one of the most groundbreaking and consistently great franchises in gaming. For both long-time fans and newcomers to this action-adventure classic, here’s a ranking of the franchise’s four main games."

Read Full Story >>
keengamer.com
Kyizen1003d ago

UC 2, 4, 3 and 1. Great read and article

ABizzel11002d ago

No Golden Abyss -_-, otherwise I agree with the order.

UC2: Best overall
UC4: Best graphics, best gameplay, best locations, best environements
UC3: Best set pieces IMO (the boat and desert fights will always be amazing)
UC1: A rough Draft of what was to come
UCGA: Basically UC1 on Vita

Levii_921003d ago (Edited 1003d ago )

Great list and great article nicely writen and explained. Although for me personaly i would put Drakes Fortune above Drake’s Deception and Uncharted 4 is absolutely my favourite of the franchise and number 1 for me.

Inverno1003d ago

U2 is the only game playable on crushing without causing a great amount of frustration. Not to mention just how much influence it had that they redid some of U2s set pieces like the caravan twice, and armored truck chase in U4.

DFresh1003d ago (Edited 1003d ago )

I'd rate it as the following.

1.) Uncharted 2
(Close to perfection of any game I've played in years. Single Player/Multiplayer/Co Op all amazing.)

2.) Uncharted 3
(On par with UC2 multiplayer/co op wise minus the kickbacks [aka killstreaks]. I really liked the Lawrence of Arabia story.)

3.) Uncharted 4
(Single player is amazing. Multiplayer was meh. Co Op had potential. Absolutely hated the health revive system it slowed down the game way too much. Always preferred the fast pace action of UC2/UC3. Made it way more fun that way. Recoil was too ridiculous that most people in lobbies would only do hip firing, using power weapons and using that OP grappling hook to melee people after dropping them. Nobody wanted to revive anyone.)

4.) Uncharted
(It's the first in the series so it's hard to judge. Though I loved the story.)

NecrumOddBoy1003d ago

I agree here but it’s also a series you can play from front to back and truly enjoy. Story-wise, they are all great and flow so well. I wish they threw both Golden Abyss and Lost Legacy on this list. Lost Legacy is the best mechanically in my opinion. You can see it’s stepping stone framework for TLOUS2.

Michiel19891003d ago

uncharted 2 is one of the few games that actually surpassed its pre-release hype.

medman1002d ago (Edited 1002d ago )

I am a single player gamer...I barely ever touch a multiplayer component. The only exceptions over the years have been the Mass Effect 3 multiplayer, TLOU factions, and the Uncharted 2 multiplayer. The Uncharted 2 multiplayer saw me spend more time playing it than all my other multiplayer experiences over the years combined. That game really was a masterpiece all around.

brando0081002d ago

I agree completely, those are all stellar MP experiences, coming from another SP gamer who only occasionally gives MP some time.

Gardenia1003d ago

Come to think of it, the step between Uncharted 1 and Uncharted 2 is huge. It goes from the weakest in the series to one of the best games ever made.
I think I'm going to play all of them again soon.

Ninver1003d ago

Yeah all of a sudden I've got that Uncharted itch.

Michiel19891002d ago

is multiplayer still up for the remastered trilogy? or did it never have UC2 mp?

Ninver1002d ago

@michiel1989

Not sure

Show all comments (26)