270°

SCEE: 40GB SKU Is The Future For All

The launch of Sony's PlayStation 3 latest SKU, the 40GB, was seen by many as a backward step followed by their announcement of a price drop; reason being ironically that backward step had completely no backward compatibility for PS2 games. In what will now puzzle the industry more, Sony confirm that this model will be the only one left worldwide with the 60GB and 80GB being discontinued.

Read Full Story >>
games.iafrica.com
Meus Renaissance5993d ago

1. Why is it everytime Sony Europe speak it's always bad news?

2. I hope the Backward Compatibility statement is just PR talk, because if it isn't we have a saboteur working for their Research department. No one I personally know who has purchased a PS3 recently even considered the 40GB model because of this small fact. If they are serious, they should bundle it with two games or something because most would want the BC as they may not be able to afford many PS3 games during purchase.

3. I thought Sony intended to release a media service much like Live's movie Marketplace, why on Earth would they commit to only 40GB then? I'm confused by this but then again it's SCEE; what should we expect.

Jandre025993d ago

I dont understand it at all. Maybe next year they are more confident in software or something? But why take away the options? I dont get it but I dont care ive got a 40gb already. And whatever they are doing is working already, since the PS3 is finally outselling the 360, though very slimly. Its weird though, very weird.

ReBurn5993d ago

This isn't actually all that surprising. Sony said during E3 that they didn't see multiple SKU's in their future. I think that it makes good sense to consolidate and only have one offering. The 40gb hard drive isn't that much of a hindrance considering how inexpensive it is to upgrade it. The 80gb model was always considered to be limited edition.

The only thing I don't like is the backward compatability. Sony practically made that a hallmark of the PlayStation platform and to take it away just saddens me. I have a 60gb model, so it really isn't a problem for me. But I don't like what it means for the future of the PlayStation brand.

BlackIceJoe5993d ago (Edited 5993d ago )

I agree with you Meus Renaissance what is sony thinking. I do not see how the 40 gig can be the future. Also least time I heard the reason HD IPTV service MegaTV has not come out in the US or any where else other then Korea was because the 80 gig was not the only SKU. So does this mean that HD IPTV service MegaTV will not come out any more.

Plus I have a 60 gig and am already having to delete stuff so why would people want the 40 gig.

I may not use the PS2 part of my PS3 any more but that does not mean I do not like it. I like being able to know that if I want to play PS2 games I can. I just wish Sony would see this is a bad move. Also what forums have Sony read saying people do not care about PS2 playback in the PS3. Because every one I know and what I read online people want it. So I just want to what place they get there info from.

Gamespot-equals-EGM5993d ago (Edited 5993d ago )

I think Sony will still offer 2 SKU's (one with BC) for the bigger markets, namely for the US and Japan. And only the 40gb for the smaller markets (smaller European countries, etc).

This interview was with a South African newspaper right? That's definately a small market.

@Meus (below):

40gb = offered in all markets = worldwide
80gb = offered in select markets = not worldwide

Meus Renaissance5993d ago

He was asked if it was Worldwide, he said yes.

actionjackson5993d ago

I agree, I'm shocked. Alhtough it is almost unbelievable, if true, this would be a huge blow to the Playstation brand. I understand that Sony came to the game with multiple sku's to set up with MS, but to go backwards is really strange. If anything, why not leave the best system on the market and then, through production means, reduce the cost? Or keep the best sytem on the market, include software emulation and reduce ports? Something doesn't sound right. Sony has never downgraded their technology after the launch of any line of products. Sony's motto has been, better tech, higher price. That's true in almost every product they sell. Why now? Why the downgrade after a year?

hazeblaze5993d ago (Edited 5993d ago )

You guys did not read the article in its entirety. He clearly states that what the interviewer asked about the 80 gig is not true. He states that the 40 gig is the only one that will be universal WORLDWIDE. He says that the 60 GB is the only one being phased out... which we've known for months now. But the 80 GB is not being phased out.

You should change the body of this news as not to mislead ppl and start new internet rumors.

BISHOP-BRASIL5992d ago

I agree and disagree with all of this...

I would not get a 40GB PS3 if I can get a 60GB or 80GB or anything with BC... More than that, I don't know many people that would...

I even predic that 40GB would flop and they would end with a 60/80GB version with software BC worldwide...

But still, since this move, Sony puts things just a bit more right than it was back in two or three months. The price was way better accepted, peoplo look to don't care that much on BC after all, the games (where they said that they would put the money) are indeed coming...

So we can say that I don't know that much people or I don't know nothing about gaming business... Maybe they just time it right and put 40GB on market in a moment with a better game library coming and near xmas... Maybe all of this.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5992d ago
Spike475993d ago

they said before that they would discontinue the 60gb and the 80gb would be left.

then everybody went crazy about it,but now there is a 40gb.

actionjackson5993d ago

I agree. That's exactly what I understood. We went from 20gb/60gb to 40gb/80gb. But this article suggests differently. The interview states that 40gb is going to be the only model left in the industry "worldwide". Doesn't make any sense to me.

hazeblaze5993d ago

What the article states is that the 40 GB model will be the only one that is universal worldwide. The US may have a 80 GB while Japan has a 120 GB etc.... The article makes it clear that the 80 GB is not being discontinued and that the journalist may have misinterpreted something if he thought it was going to be. How are you guys missing that???

Tsalagi5993d ago

I have a 60GB so it really doesn't matter to me but if removing the backwards compatibility will keep the prices of the next-gen systems reasonable then i'm all for it. Just don't trade in your last gen console at Gamestop and you'll be fine.

Arkham5993d ago

I wouldn't worry. I believe he's referring exclusively to Africa. E.g. going forward only the 40GB model will be available in Africa.

The "Worldwide" comment was qualified by Foster. He seems to be saying that on a worldwide basis, only the 40GB model will be available everywhere. Models other than the 40GB will be offered in other countries, but this article is focuses exclusively on Africa.

ActionBastard5993d ago (Edited 5993d ago )

Why is this surprising? Did you really think AFTER they remove BC, they'll drop a new model with it. Have some realistic expectations ppl.

EDIT: @ AJ
I don't dispute any of what you said. I do feel that there is just no way they can segment their userbase more than it already is. If the long term goal is to have the PS3 play PS3 games (novel idea), they should discontinue the 60&80GB models. You just can't have current 40GB users paying $400 for a console without BC, only to have a 60 or 80GB reduce in price to $400 as well (obviously, the 40 would drop too).

actionjackson5993d ago

They don't need to make a new model. They had 2 that were selling (60bg/80gb). The 60gb had the EE, and the 80gb has software emulation. Why not leave one of those in the marketplace. Those who were willing to part with their PS2 would likely purchase the complete option 80gb. Those with a PS2 could have purchased the 40gb version. This combination, of all the one's Sony came out with, seemed the most reasonable. This article sounds odd enough, but this is truly against how Sony has been running there business since the beginning of time.

Show all comments (60)
80°

10 Weirdest Video Games of All Time

Plenty of unforgettable games have completely messed up their players throughout the years, all the way back from the PS1 days to the dark recesses of the modern internet.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
120°

70 percent of devs unsure of live-service games sustainability

With so many games fighting for players' attention and interest losing out over time, time sink games are at risk of eventually losing steam.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
thorstein18h ago

It was worrisome to begin with.

It's a niche genre with only a handful of hits that can stand the test of time.

CrimsonWing6917h ago

What’s to be unsure of!? Look at the ratio of success to failure!

DarXyde37m ago

It's pretty ridiculous.

Imagine having a breadth of data at your disposal to see the statistically low success rate of these games, only to be laser focused on the exceptional case studies.

shinoff218316h ago

Yes. Stop all the live service bs.

jznrpg15h ago

Only a few will catch on. You need a perfect storm to be successful in GaaS and a bit of luck on top of that. But a potential cash cow will keep them trying and some will go out of business because of it.

MIDGETonSTILTS1715h ago

Helldivers 2 manages just fine…

Keep production costs low… don’t just make custscenes until the mechanics and enemies are perfected first.

Make so much content that you can drip extra content for years, and the game already feels complete without them.

Most importantly: make weapons, enemies, levels, and mechanics that will stand the test of 1000 hours. This might require more devs embracing procedurally generated leveled, which I think separates Helldivers 2 from Destiny’s repetitiveness.

Show all comments (11)
60°

The Battle Pass Is The Worst Thing To Happen To Modern Gaming

Nameer from eXputer: "Some exceptions aside, I don't think the battle pass is a net positive for gaming with how they're implemented in most live service titles."

got_dam20h ago

Battle passes AND meta gaming both.

DivineHand12518h ago(Edited 18h ago)

I like the way Helldivers 2 does battle passes. It allows you to make purchases on each level of the battle pass and gives you the option of choosing which item to unlock first. The more purchases you make using medals the further you progress. There is no timer and you can earn medals towards purchasing stuff via personal orders and Major orders.

I haven't played much live service games that have battle passes but I remember some games that have battle passes where you progress through it linearly using an exp system. What makes it really bad is that the battle pass will have like 50 or more levels with the cooler stuff being closer to the end. They also have an in-game shop that sells exp boosters so you can reach the end of the pass before it refreshes. Everyone ilse will have to grind their way through.

lucian22917h ago

battle pass in fortnite is perfect; buy one and it buys the rest for every other season as it gives you more money than the first cost. so 8.50 and season ends with you getting 13.00, it pays for the next and you have some pocket change to save up for cash shop. All of which is optional