Gamesradar - Is Battlefield’s take on CoD as good as CoD’s? Does it negatively affect what makes Battlefield Battlefield? And should the attempt have even been made?
The two are completely different beasts. Why can't someone enjoy both. Shouldn't that be a third option.
This is so stupid. BF3 and COD have nothing common besides the perspective their played from. I'm beginning to question if these "journalists" have even played BF2 at all.
@MariaHelFutura Nothing in common at all?
Silly statement to make.
No they have nothing in common asides from being a FPS. Let's compare Crysis2 online and BF2. You shoot bullets. Or R3 and Operation Flash Point. You again shoot bullets. BF is about large scale team combat and COD is about throwing a grenade across the map and killing 6 people.
Ummmm, did you forget the whole 'Modern Warfare' thing?
EA are the ones making the direct comparison. Above and beyond the call? gimme a break Props to the activision for not following ensuite
And this title is why gamesradar just lost all credibility And @ rayray The modern warfare setting belongs to cs, 1942 desert combat, and bf2. Cod is the clone here
It's all hype and only a win for the PC crowd at the same time saving face by way of the PS3.
Choose which ever game u want, this is getting really old and boring fast. Jesus.
BF3 > MW3 in terms of technology, visuals, gameplay, community, features and multiplayer. COD is the same since part 4. At least DICE tries to push the technology further and bring us some amazingly realistic warfare.
"I did it all, I did it frequently and I had the best time I’ve had since… well, since the last time I played full-scale Battlefield multiplayer." Sounds like he had the time of his life. I can't wait!
Battlefield fans want Battlefield to be like Battlefield. Not for it to be like Call of Duty. They want it to deliver a different experience from the Call of Duty experience
Truer words were never typed. Now if people could just get that through their heads.
How many more times can they be compared. Just buy both, one, or neither. It's simple!
NO. That's what killed the Resistance 2 and 3 multi player.
Just buy whatever makes you happy.
It's not COD and it should never ever try to be COD.
Why are all these "BF3 is like CoD" articles poking up? They are completely different.
Read the article
I played the battlefield 3 beta. It's nothing like Call of Duty.
will mw3 at least have dedicated servers?
IF PEOPLE ACTUAL READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE, YOU'LL SEE THAT THE REVIEWER ACTUALLY REALLY LOVES BF3... he even mentions of DICE have the COD genre covered with the quick-fast past TEAM DEATHMATCH inclusion..
I personally didn't really like battlefield and may cancel my pre-order.
Half the games that try to beat COD end up being more like COD then the developers realise and then they wonder why its poorly recieved, why play a cookie cuter game when you can just play well....COD...
but naw def not better at least on the bf 3 beta absolute garbage and glitchy as fuck. played mw3 back in sept and perfect in every way . thats embarrassing for dice considering it was a couple weeks away from launch when the beta came out.
Perfect in every way... What am I reading... I assume you haven't seen the latest code of BF3
I played the beta, doesn't even come close.
game is still trash lmao way overhyped all it is bf bc2.5 lol
All game site previews noticed BF3 trying to be like COD. From SP campaign, BF3 coop, MP team deathmatch, attachments and camouflage, - BF3 wants to be like COD. So instead of MW3 a copy of old COD games, it's BF3 copying COD.
The only thing Battlefield wants to have in common with CoD is $$$
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.