180°

Kotaku - Assassin’s Creed Needs to Be More Difficult

Kirk Hamilton writes: I've been revisiting Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood in anticipation of the soon-to-be-released fourth game in the series, Assassin's Creed: Revelations. I started a new game, and within an hour or so protagonist Ezio Auditore was effortlessly laying waste to dozens upon dozens of enemies—guys on horseback, heavily armored pikemen, and scores of sword-wielding Roman guards.

TomInc4638d ago

I always viewed Brotherhood as a bit of a stepping stone.. That said, I loved the Desmond story continuation throughout! The development with Desmond is something I want to see get more gameplay and more challenge in Revelations.

MostJadedGamer4637d ago

I hate Desmond. I hate anytime the historical part of the game is interrupted by Modern, or Sci-Fi crap.

Noticeably_FAT4638d ago

No it doesn't, I like how accessible it is currently.

M-Easy4638d ago

Exactly, kotaku needs to STFU.

4638d ago Replies(2)
BrianC62344638d ago

I guess some people want all games to be harder. Assassin's Creed games aren't really about tough fights though. They're more about exploring and doing everything in the game.

MostJadedGamer4637d ago

That is true, but when there is ZERO challenege, and its totally impossible to die in combat it makes very boring, and pointless.

PhantomT14124637d ago (Edited 4637d ago )

We could at least ask them for a "hardcore mode", like having only one or two square. It would still be accessible for those who won't accept the challenge.

I understand how games have to be accessible these days but this is too much, I never lost a fight in Assassin's Creed unless I wanted to, and I'm not bragging about it.

MostJadedGamer4637d ago

Yea that is the problem it is actually almost impossible to die during combat the game is so rediculously easy.

MostJadedGamer4637d ago

Um Noticeably Fat the total lack of difficulty is what RUINED both AC2, and Brotherhood the combat was such a cake walk that you might as well have been just watching a movie combat was just totally pointless.

If they are going to make it that rediculous easy that might as well just make it a interactive movie

Heck in Brotherhood you didn't even need to play at all sometimes you could just stand there, and watch your master assassins defeat all the enemies.

The complete, and total lack of challenge is what ruined both AC2, and Brotherhood.

Noticeably_FAT4637d ago

I play the AC games on normal difficulty and I have a difficult time on some parts. Especially when I tried to eliminate the Borgia tower guards on those missions. There were plenty of times when I had to run around or go through a ton of health potions.

As I said, I think the game is fine the way it is, it's accessible and fun. If it were some super difficult game I'd not be interested in it, it gives me a challenge that I can do.

PhantomT14124637d ago

@Noticeably_FAT

There are no difficulty levels, that is the problem discussed here.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4637d ago
HeavenlySnipes4638d ago

That's why I find them boring. They don't encourage you to play as an assassin. You don't have to be stealthy to play the game and you aren't rewarded if you are. The combat is piss easy, as soon as you get counter kill unlocked. Just stand still, wait for an attack then counterkill. Some enemies can't go down like that, but they are usually the slow kind that you can easily doge and take out. I find it disturbing that I can easily take down the 15 people trying to kill me.

Iroquois_Pliskin4638d ago

yes the game does reward you for being an assassin... you can't get 100% sync if you play like an idiot

ItsMeAgain4638d ago

Two different things, he talks about being stealth and you about being assassin.

bunfighterii4638d ago

I think it needs a more developed stealth mechanic, but I do like these games.

princejb1344638d ago

as much as i love assasins creed it is way to easy
i feel like superman very unstoppable against the enemies and is all thanks to the counter button

badjournalism4638d ago

Except that in order to use the counter button as an unstoppable force all the time, you can't go on the offensive and lose all the fun of the combat. That's like people who said Arkham Asylum was too easy 'cause they used detective vision almost full time.

princejb1344638d ago

the counter is the offensive since they die in one hit with it
and i never liked detective mode it was weird during combat

Show all comments (24)
60°

PureArts & Ubisoft Announce Assassin’s Creed Hunt for the Nine 1/6 Scale Diorama

This should make fans and collectors very happy. PureArts & Ubisoft Announce Assassin’s Creed Hunt for the Nine 1/6 Scale Diorama Assassin's Creed Hunt for the Nine 1/6 Scale Diorama available for pre-order on January 25.

260°

Can We Finally Admit Assassin's Creed 3 Deserves an Apology?

AC3 was released during a turbulent transition period for Ubisoft and the Assassin's Creed series. It ventured into uncharted territory, narratively and mechanically, which caused it to receive mixed reviews. At its core, though, it's a damn good stealth game.

Read Full Story >>
thenerdstash.com
isarai248d ago

Nope, I hated 3, connar was bland, literally the most flat character in the entire game. Not to mention to myriad of bugs, camera issues, and that annoying thing where he automatically ditches his weapon you payed for for the sake of a cool finishing move forcing you to trek back to your base after almost every encounter just to re-equip your own weapon. It just didn't work as fluidly as the others like 2 and 4

Samonuske248d ago

The series peaked at AC3 for me. It’s been my favourite in the series. Connor will always be one of my favourite video game protagonists.

Becuzisaid248d ago

No. Game was BORING. Connor was really dull. Environments, while impressive, because of the geographic location and time period were not really exciting to be in. I would love some kind of game set in there colonial American time period, but a game like AC that back then centered around parkour and vertical traversal really didn't fit those environments.

-Foxtrot248d ago

Nope

There was a lot of issues but mine is how they handled the war

They told us Connor was not going to get involved, that the war was more of a background setting for the real story and it wasn’t going to be one sided

They lied, even the cinematic E3 trailer showed Connor emerge from the Colonist side and slaughter the red coats to get to his target, inspiring the Colonists to fight back

I just thought it would have made more sense lore wise that the red coats were mostly compiled of Assassins fighting the Colonist templars who wanted to take the new world for themselves.

Since the Red coats lost the war, it would then explain how the Templars started to gain the upper hand and how on the future the assassins were mostly killed off and the Templar’s had pretty much taken over everything.

Instead it just felt like they didn’t want to p*** off the American audience

Even Haytham was cool, he should have been an Assassin through and through and should have been the main lead.

toxic-inferno248d ago

The game even seems to lack the humour of the other games. It almost seems as though the idea of even slightly making fun of American history wouldn't be acceptable.

-Foxtrot248d ago

Exactly

It just felt super safe

“Better not make the colonists look super bad incase people boycott our game”

jeromeface247d ago

someone missed the whole point

-Foxtrot247d ago

There was literally no point

What I've just said above would at least make sense lore wise and why the Assassins start to loose their war, die off and how the Templars are in control in the future of almost everything....what they did was just, pointless

CrimsonWing69248d ago

I’m one one of those weird people that liked Ass Creed 3, but to be fair I never got around to finishing it.

Show all comments (28)
240°

5 Of the Most Unlikeable Video Game Protagonists

There are good video game protagonists, and there are bad video game protagonists.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
259d ago
GhostScholar259d ago (Edited 259d ago )

I disagree that max is unlikable. Chloe is infinitely more unlikable in my opinion.

gold_drake259d ago

omg chloe was awful. i really hated her at the end haha

Cacabunga259d ago

Abby was absolute trash protagonist in every way..
Tidus was so meh to me..
On villain side, the one i didn’t like wa Micah, because they wanted him to be that way and it was brilliant👍🏽

Rancegamerx259d ago

I agree, I liked Max, Chloe was a horrible friend and a bad influence.

Cacabunga259d ago

Everyone agrees on chloe, I’m sure even ND do.

H9259d ago

Both are horrible, granted Chloe is infinitely worse, it feels like Chloe is just fanservice for people who too over the edge and wasn't written to be a character that makes sense

GooGobbler259d ago

What about that Forspoken Tw*t

MrChow666259d ago

exactly I was expecting it to be a the top of the list

ravens52259d ago

Ye I was expecting her too. Guess they actually played the game. Unlike you and whoever agrees.

gpimlott258d ago

I played through the whole game and think she is one of the worst character Ive ever played as

ravens52258d ago (Edited 258d ago )

gpimlott. How?

Stanjara248d ago

Why would I payed and played the game if the whole internet is making fun of a character?

-Im here to kill Chaos...are you Chaos?

Yeah, I didn't play that game either.

Christopher259d ago (Edited 259d ago )

She's actually not bad. It's the writing itself that is bad overall, but she's fine overall. She's no worse than Miles Morales IMHO. Both thrust into a spotlight and receiving both praise and blame and dealing with it.

Forspoken is a bland game because it's 75% bland, boring, repetitive going through the motions and diversions that add nothing of the value with purposefully gated memory moments that don't feel organic or like you're discovering things but waiting for others to reveal things.

ravens52259d ago

Exactly Chris. Even though I liked the game. I kno u played it. People who actually played it and went thru her dream saw she was a good likeable person who really just acted out due to being alone and unloved. I think your problem is it was open world, I think if it was more linear you may have liked it better.

savedsynner258d ago

Oh no she's bad. Very unlikable even before you add on the bad dialogue. The game could have been quite good with a good protagonist

ravens52258d ago

For all the people like synner. Shes actually half white lol. Inferior complexity is a hell of a thing. You'll be ok.

Nerdmaster259d ago

Most of these aren't even that bad. Especially comparing to others like Squall "Whatever" Leonhart, Forspoken's Frey, and the guy from Atomic Heart.

-Foxtrot259d ago

Squall is one of the best developed main FF characters so...

People talk about his "whatever" thing thats at the start of the game, not the character he eventually becomes in the end.

Nerdmaster258d ago

No amount of "character development", (especially the ones that for me feels sudden and undeserved like Squall's), will justify him being a d**k to my girl Quistis. Even if he found the cure for cancer, from that moment on, I would never like him.
The article is about being unlikeable, and he was indeed unlikeable for at least half of the game.

BrainSyphoned259d ago

Squall is the best protagonists in FF so you can go whatever yourself.

H9259d ago

My good sir, I need to steal that "you can go whatever yourself" because it's gold

BlaqMagiq1259d ago

Except Squall has actual character development.

gold_drake259d ago (Edited 259d ago )

the "watever" is only present in the english localisation.
so your argument doesnt rly ... stand imo.

Nerdmaster258d ago

Good for you that you could enjoy the japanese version. That's not the case for me and the majority of people here, though.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 258d ago
gold_drake259d ago (Edited 259d ago )

i had to stop reading after the "blatant misogyny" in the Dantes inferno section.

i actually liked Max haha.

the forspoken chick is missing tho

Show all comments (49)