520°

Square Enix looking for Xbox 360 job experience....for Versus 13

A Final Fantasy Versus XIII job wanted ad lists PS3 package title experience as necessary, "or otherwise an Xbox 360 package title". But Versus is a PS3 exclusive! Just like FFXII was. Well, at one point.

Optical_Matrix4593d ago (Edited 4593d ago )

Lol Kotaku shit stirring once again. It's a well known fact that people who have worked on 360 games are perfectly viable to work on PS3 exclusives as well, especially when the developer in question is developing on a multiplatform engine. I'm almost 100% certain people who have developed solely on 360 have moved on to work on PS3 exclusively and vice versa.

Either way, multiplatform or not the game just needs to hurry up and release.

@Mohdunknown...like The Last Remnant and Infinite Undiscovery?

RedDead4593d ago

Hopefully no multi, it's take longer and there is a chance it will be affected quality wise, we just don't know if FFXIII was or wasn't due to the 360, but i'd prefer them not to take the chance. Too bad for me though, I highly doubt it will stay exclusive, this is S-E.

Dante1124592d ago (Edited 4592d ago )

Lol, didn't they reveal this "developer wanted job" in 2010 when Wada said something that got FF fans mad where he had to come out with a statement saying FFv13 is still currently being work on as an exclusive? Hope they don't make it multi though, it'll get gimped like FF13 did. Ouch, was that game a train wreck.

Edit: Yeah, it would be a tight squeeze to fit the game on dvd since it'll have some CGI cutscenes and so called "hugh towns and side quests" to visit. Something would most certainly have to be cut.

ApplEaglElephant4592d ago (Edited 4592d ago )

Sony is second largest stockholder of SE. They have a considerable influence in SE, but they can be over ridden.

After FFXIII, sony will do everything in their power and influence inside SE to keep FFXIII VS exclusive. On top of that, Sony has secured exclusivity contract. So there is very very small chance of Versus ever becoming multiplat.

I mean when they say if you havent worked on PS3 title before, its ok if you have 360 title experience. It simply means nothing since Versus is running on multiplat engine.

zeeshan4592d ago

Vs is defenitely 360 bound. Why else is it still not out?

Minato-Namikaze4592d ago

@apple. I believe that vs is running on the original white engine. It's why the game already looks miles better than XIII. But if it does go multi then you can expect to hear about cut content soon after. Plz don't ruin this game SE :(

ApplEaglElephant4592d ago (Edited 4592d ago )

that there is a contract in place for Versus unlike FF 13.
Also, Sony is second largest stockholder currently.

And Versus is not out yet because FF 13-2 is coming out this year. Why would they release two FF on PS3 same year..

You are just saying "Versus is 360 bound" without reason. you are just desperately grasping at straws at best...

DragonKnight4592d ago

@Apple: Source for this contract subject you brought up. I have not heard anywhere that there is an exclusivity contract for Versus XIII, and surely if there is then there was for XIII itself.

On topic, this is akin to asking if a person simply has current gen console development experience. However I wouldn't put it passed Wada to lie to everyone again and make Versus XIII multiplatform.

gaffyh4592d ago

This is normal, even Sony developers ask that people have experience with PS3 or 360 development.

TheRealWar4592d ago

"Denial is a defense mechanism postulated by Sigmund Freud, in which a person is faced with a fact that is too uncomfortable to accept and rejects it instead, insisting that it is not true despite what may be overwhelming evidence."

DragonKnight4592d ago

@TheRealWar: A) Sigmund Freud has been proven to be a wack job. B) What "overwhelming evidence" can you provide that supports a 360 version. C) Did you even read SE's ad? It's essentially asking for console experience, not the 360 specifically.

Fail.

Ravens204592d ago

PFFT with so many great games coming out, I have NO time to waste on a FF game anyways.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4592d ago
zeal0us4593d ago

I think SE should make FF a time-exclusive for the PS3. Let another company(they can trust) handle(not develop) the 360 version. It would prevent delays for the ps3 version and 360 won't end up port hell.

Sure it won't address all of the problems but it would fix some of the big ones.

labaronx4592d ago

my thoughts exactly..... this is taking way too long.

wouldn't be suprised if it was announced for, 360, PC and wii u as well

firelogic4592d ago

Seriously. You don't go looking for 360 programmers by saying, "We want PS3 experience, or at the very least, 360 experience."

I really don't know how anyone with any modicum of intelligence could derive, "360 version in the works!" from that statement.

Prophet-Gamer4592d ago

I really, really hate Kotaku. They just seem so unprofessional, no they don't seem like it, they ARE incredibly unprofessional.

SilentNegotiator4592d ago (Edited 4592d ago )

"A Final Fantasy Versus XIII job wanted ad lists PS3 package title experience as necessary, "or otherwise an Xbox 360 package title""

A games company looking for people with experience with HD consoles (with clear diction that they're more interested in ps3-experience more than 360)? FF13-vs on Xbox 360 confirmed!

/sarcasm

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4592d ago
Mohdunknown4593d ago

it will be released for 360 tho. it has to. It defies logic for square to make it exclusive to one system

4024592d ago

exactly square enix needs the money and besides porting to 360 is very cheap and easy so they won't have to invest much time or effort into the 360 version

sashimi4592d ago

Guess that means Dragon Quest is also going multiplat then since it "defies logic" for square to make it exclusive to Nintendo /s

Mohdunknown4592d ago

Not all dragon quest games are only on nintendo platforms.

Games like DQ8 was on ps2.

Nintendo also published some of the game in the series in NA and Pal areas.

d3nworth14592d ago

If it were any other genre then i would agree but JRPGs don't usually sell well on 360. Question is it worth the trouble of porting a game to a console whose audience generally doesn't buy that type of game? Personally I say no. Might as well just leave it on the console you know it's most likely to sell on.

_Aarix_4592d ago (Edited 4592d ago )

But itll sells enought to make a profit as oppose to never porting it.

Foliage4591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

Not when it costs you almost a whole extra year of development.

Granted, the 360 library has been terrible for years now and it looks like the trend will continue. There is a lot of good reason for them to think that a console with no competition may be worth porting to...

firelogic4592d ago

Riiight. Just like Gears of War is on the PS3. Oh wait. I guess Epic is just as stupid as SE is.

Mohdunknown4592d ago

except MS has made a deal with EPIC where Epic owns the ip but MS has the publisher

I don't think sony and square are in the same deal

SnotyTheRocket4591d ago

Maybe Sqeenix will get it in there heads that, oh I dunno, XIII sucked? Vs is Exclusive.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4591d ago
Peaceful_Jelly4593d ago (Edited 4592d ago )

Nooooooo I don't want another gimped FF game! Goodbye to gorgeous CGI's and who knows what other stuff for the sake of fitting the game on what? 4 discs? If the game's more open then what's gonna happen, you'll need to change discs back and forth too? =/

And considering that both versions have to be equal then how is this gonna work on PS3? Are they going to divide the game in multiple chunks? Man I'm scared! What if they totally gimp the game to make it fit on 1-2 DvD9's!

Pozzle4592d ago

Didn't Square confirm Versus is 100% complete a few weeks ago though? So I'm guessing they've already finished the PS3 version. If a 360 version does end up being made in future, I doubt it will affect the already-completed PS3 version.

Ddouble4592d ago

Nah they said it's going into 100% production meaning it's now their main priority so all hands on deck whereas before some people would be helping out with the other games they had coming out.

4024592d ago (Edited 4592d ago )

don't waste your breath even the ps3 version of ff-13 was completed before square enix even STARTED work on the 360 version yet ps3 fanboys still proclaimed that the game was held back by 360 when in actual fact ff-13 is only 6.8gb game data(which can easily fit on a 360 disk not to speak of the new XGD3 360 disks that can hold 8gb) and over 32 gb of 1080p CGI(on ps3 the 360 version has much lower quality CGI to save space) which means that the VAST majority of ff13 data was CGI and NOT game data.

ff 13 was held back by square enix. lost odyessy on 360 had cities and towns so why couldn't FF13 and most of lost odysseys disk space was taken up by CGI as well and NOT game data(only 6gb was game date the rest of the 18gb was CGI)

ffv-13 on 360 will be the same they'll develop first on ps3(spend most of their time on the ps3 version) then when thats completed they'll quickly port it to 360 so the 360 version will have a very short development cycle. by the way ff-13 on 360 isn't nearly as good looking as 360 games like crysis 2 and gears 3 so improvements can be made the ps3 version isn't nearly as good looking as uncharted 3 either.

I wish they'd brink more FF to pc but I don't think that would ever happen.

If you want a MASSIVE rpg tell square enix to use most of the space for GAME data and NOT CGI as I personally don't play CGI I play the game itself and I'd prefer more content.

Pozzle4592d ago

@Ddouble: Ah, ok. I must have read the news article wrong. :(

SnotyTheRocket4591d ago

They said I was in beta I think, so yeah, pretty much done.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4591d ago
Foliage4591d ago

@ 402 the 360 fanboy

You're quite wrong. When the 360 version was announced, the PS3 version was immediately delayed on this side of the planet to match the release date of the 360 version. That is what you call BEING HELD BACK.

Next, content was removed from the game after the decision to go multi-plat was made. Quite obviously to keep the experience on both consoles similar. There is irrefutable proof of this from countless credible sources (including square themselves), if you take even a minute to stop talking out of your arse and check the facts.

Next... if you think that when the 360 version was announced, that they signed the deal the day prior. Your level of delusion is on par with a chronic drug addict of some heavy stuff. Just like how Mass Effect 2 was being worked on for a year for the PS3, even to the extent of having it on the ME3 engine (in other words, not just a port)... there is next to no chance that the 360 version was not already being worked on prior to the announcement. Who knows how long it may have been? It takes a lot of work to cram a game into such an outdated disc format.

stonecold34592d ago

wont happen its ps3 exclusive?

DigitalRaptor4592d ago (Edited 4592d ago )

This is just Kotaku stirring it up for the fanboys with their unpublished "wink".

Just delve into my comments history and you will find logical points of past about Versus XIII and why it's simply NOT going multiplatform.

Every single person on here talking about how Square Enix will port it to the 360 and it's cheaper and it "defies logic", you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about and you're grasping at straw at best!

Versus XIII has been planned as a PS3 game (complete technological optimization) for its entire development process, XIII & XIII-2 didn't and the 360's limitations were in mind during both developments. If they were to bring it to the 360 at this stage, the entire development process would have to be deconstructed and reconstructed to fit 360 development (processing & storage) - it would damage the goals of this project, AND the pace at which it's development progresses.

I'm not going to repeat myself even more, just look at my comment history regarding Versus. Do some research and it will lead you to the most logical conclusion.

And not only this, but anyone who would rather see this game downgraded to fit on their system, you're completely selfish and people like you will never see the bigger picture. We've seen this happen with FF XIII (there was not much proof there, just major suspicion), but with XIII-2, what more needs to be said? The CGI cutscenes were downgraded because of the 360.

If it was coming to 360, it would have been announced months ago, since it's gonna be released next annum.

NB: For tl;dr version just read comment #17

*waits for the non-supported disagrees*

Show all comments (99)
70°

I’m Glad Atlus & SE Changed Dates To Avoid Competing With Shadow Of The Erdtree

Saad from eXputer: "I'm glad I don't have to choose between Square Enix, Atlus, and FromSoftware due to bad release windows and Shadow of the Erdtree."

H921h ago

More intelligent than guerilla games

raWfodog3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

Atlus is releasing their game one week before Erdtree, SE is releasing theirs one week after.

HZD released four days before Zelda, HFW released one week before Elden Ring.

It seems to me like they are still releasing their games too close to Erdtree.

140°

Here Are The Games Leaving PS Plus Extra & Premium In May 2024

Here are the games that will be leaving the Extra and Premium tiers of the PS Plus subscription service in the month of May, 2024.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
gold_drake8d ago

crazy, glad i own the ones i wanted to revisit and play

ChasterMies8d ago

Absolver Downfall
Abzu
Adrift
Ashen
Elex
Final Fantasy VII
Final Fantasy VIII Remastered
Final Fantasy IX
Final Fantasy X | X-2
Final Fantasy XII The Zodiac Age
Final Fantasy XV Royal Edition
How To Survive 2
I Am Dead
Jotun
Last Stop
Minit
Moster Jam Steel Titans 2
My Friend Pedro
Observation
Sundered Eldritch Edition
The Artful Escape
The Messenger
This Is The Police
This Is The Police 2
World of Final Fantasy

Asterphoenix8d ago

Glad that I absolutely can't stand subscription services.

Petebloodyonion8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

I don't recall Sony forcing you to subscribe like nobody forced you to go to Blockbuster to rent games instead of buying them.

SonyStyled8d ago

Pay-per-view was almost cheaper than the cost of gas and rental fee from Blockbuster. Blockbuster doesn’t exist today. Are you being sarcastic?

130°

Yuji Naka guilty of insider trading breaks silence to accuse Square Enix producer of lies

Yuji Naka was fined $1.2 million and given a suspended jail sentence for the crime.

Profchaos14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

I find his comments around how Balan turned out to be very insightful as to why the game is trash. He basically apologises for its existence

solideagle13d ago

can you please give some of us who don't know anything about this, a summary of what happened?

Chocoburger13d ago

Balan was knowingly rushed out by S-E, it had an extremely short dev cycle and was fairly low budget.
Naka was the game's director until near the end when he was fired or perhaps he quit, I forgot.

carrotcakeag13d ago

@Chocoburger Yeah they did fire and replace him which caused him to unload a bunch of rants about the company. The project only existed because of Naka in the first place, he convinced Square to give him one shot at making a platformer. They gave him an opportunity but pulled the rug out before he was done for reasons not explained.