Activision released this two batches of images of Call of Duty 3, one from the Xbox 360 version, the other from the PS3 one.
They both look about the same! I am glad my 399.99 xbox 360 can output the same graphics as a 599.99 POS3!
That defines the 360 up until this point in time now doesn't it. I am sorry that you are in the same boat as me and are not being entertained by your 360 "which is why you are on this site talking bad about a console that doesn't even exsist yet". Whether you belive it or not in many people eyes the 360 has not lived up to what many of us thought it would be and now its the Wii and the PS3's turn to try and do better.
bishop I disagree. And how do you know that he owns a 360 anyway. hmm. Whether you believe it or not many people think the 360 is excellent and you can hate on it all you want but it wont change the fact that its a fine piece of hardware with great games and many more to come.
They both look the same to me, I agree with #1 comments, and why bother spending more on the ps3 with games from what I have seen so far do not excite me as much as forthcoming 360 titles, I've not seen anything on PS3 yet that looks far superior yet and before anyone says it - I'm only interested in posting on this article not because i'm dissatified with my xbox and need Sony fulfillment but because I'm just interested in developements across all gaming platforms. Anyhow I got my media center to work with the xbox last night and now I can watch freeview on my Xbox, how cool is that! will the ps3 do it!
it's multiplatform. if they made the PS3 version look better people like you would get their feelings hurt.
And the multi player will be better than CD3.
Unless you are showing me screenshots of the exact same scenes on each console then I can't really tell if one is better then the other. Besides this is not the game that will define the 360's true power or the PS3's true power and if they port the game using the same graphics on both consoles then this game isn't really a good example between the PS3 and the 360 is it. However Sony still has a lot left to show me before their price is justified. On a postive note PS3 first year games are already looking as good or better then many of the 360's second year games.
We haven't seen so much from PS3 games. Heck we haven't seen so much of anything of the PS3 actually. Many of the 360 games I have not seen anything on PS3 ingame footage that can live up to it. ANd especially games that will come up like Gears of War, Too Human, Lost World, etc. seen nothing like it. Even one of the best that are there, Resistance looks less the COD3, it's just about the same setting with some aliens added
"On a postive note PS3 first year games are already looking as good or better then many of the 360's second year games" Really? Thats your opinion and thats cool. But I think that 360s 2nd gen titles all look better than ps3s launch titles or at worst the same but there surely is not ONE ps3 title that looks better than a 360 2nd gen title.
I'm certainly not shocked that the PS3 is getting the sequel to the #1 selling xbox360 game. TheMART - come out of your cave. Don't take it personally. Obviously you've missed E3 and where plenty of games were playable and since then many more gameplay videos have been shown.
I dont give a sh!t what system i get this game for, all im finally proud of is that you can finally play as a canadian soldier. Its about time. We finally see how WWII was fought with Canadians and Americans, beating the sh!t out of nazis, because that how it was in real life. It wasnt just the americans.
true to that, true to that
WHY? The XBOX 360 is a next gen.system that came out last year and so developers have had some time to learn from developing next gen. titles so when it was time to do a cross or multiplatform game they already know how to make it look good due to this almost 1 year spent with XBOX 360. In other words if and of course this is funny but if the ps3 was the first out then the same would go for the XBOX 360, it would also look like or close to 2nd year next gen. titles already out. Get it? It's not that the ps3 is that good or easy to develope for, it's that it owe's it's graphic designs in new games to the almost 1 year XBOX 360 experience. Just experience and learned know how through experience.
well, this: http://media.ps3.ign.com/me... definately looks better than this: http://media.xbox360.ign.co... besides, when it's all said and done RFOM will own COD 3 on both the PS3 and the 360
The developers of fight night have had a lot more time to improve on the ps3 version; thus making the ps3 version look better.
well, in the interview EA said that it was a bit of both: that they had more time to improve the visuals on the PS3, and that the PS3 was capable of things unique unto itself. if you ask me i just think this was a copout to saying that one system's better than the other (which would favor Sony), or that they're both the same (which would favor Microsoft). other than this no one really has any idea why the PS3 version looks better: but there you have it. i don't think it should be a matter of trying to deduce WHY one version looks better than the other; but instead we should just go with whichever version is the best and leave the deducing to the developers.
Fight Night 3 was a rushed first release for the XBOX 360 and yet it's a fantastic graphical and boxing experience. 1 year later through the design experience of the XBOX 360 it's been polished up a bit, your lucky your getting this through the XBOX experience. This is what i'm saying.
Resistance looks like a wart on GOW's arse. Honestly Sony could put a lump of dog crap in box and make it exclusive and you morons would buy it.
lol that fight night really changed a little grahpically
well the 360 version was already gorgeous in its own right (definately better looking that the previously gorgeous PS3 E3 05 demo). that EA was able to improve on it in a noticable way on the PS3 now should say SOMETHING.
Insomniace makes excellent games and the gameplay videos look fantastic. Plus friends who've played it at E3 said it was very smooth and that was a long time ago. I still haven't picked up COD2 for my 360 as the demo just didn't excite me much. Hopefully COD3 changes that.
i don't even like WWII shooters, and like you didn't get COD 2 for my 360 (GRAW's been quenching my military-shooting thurst since i got my 360). but RFOM has two BIG things going for it: a) it is a game set in WWII time, but is NOT a WWII shooter, and b) it has Insomniac
I think the PS3 Verison has 10 more pixels then the XBOX one OMFG!!! jeez kids, there is still a reason WHY they are called gaming consoles.. Grow up now nerds :) Now or never, end the flaming
honestly without GRAW (which I play too much ;) ) I wouldn't mind being without a 360 until more good games hit.
well, i had Oblivion, but i sold it. i tried my best to stick with it, but deep down inside i'm just a turn-based FF/DQ/Suikoden man. GRAW has been GREAT, but other than it i've only played old XBox games on my 360 (Fable, Ninja Gaiden, Chaos Theory). i won't necessarily say that i'm regretting getting a 360, as i'm DEFINATELY looking forward to GOW, then there's Fable 2 and Halo 3 to look forward to in spring of 07 (thats if Microsoft doesn't push either back...ain't holding my breath). but i'm definately looking forward to the PS3, even despite this most recent blow Sony has dealt themselves.
Im just another dissapointed 360 owner. It doesnt have enough good games and besides GOW theres nothing more this Cristmas to be happy and make the competition envy. The only game Ive played lately is Dead Rising and im let in just to play SOUL CALIBUR 3. So if games is the most important thing; as said by many in this forum. The PS2 has the BEST games of this fall. PERIOD. FF XII, Okami, Yakusa, Xenosaga 3, Valkyre Profile 2, Guitar Hero 2, and many more. So if there are anyone in the forum that claims to be a GAMER. They are going to agree that the PS2 still delivers the fun. LOL. This Christmas is Gears of War and a bunch of PS2 games, If you could find a PS3 youll be an extremely lucky SOB!!! WELCOM3 CHANG3!!!
Looking at the grass on both versions, the 360 version seems to have a lot more blades of grass that also seem to look alot better than the ps3 version. If anyone can answer, why is that? Is it something the 360 has that makes these sort of things look better?
You need identical locals to really know for sure. I highly doubt they coded from ground up for either console so one should expect about the same level.
I think the 360 version of COD3 looks slightly better than the PS3 version. It looks crisper and with less jaggies, but they are basically identical. The PS3 version of FN3 looks better than the 360 version, but the PS3 version had 6+ months more development time. In fact, a FN3 developer actually said that the extra time given to the development of the PS3 version allow them to add the extra graphical effects. You can't compare the two. You can compare COD3, Assassins Creed, UT2007, RE 5 or any other game that is released simultaneously on both systems. In this case, COD3 screenshots look slightly better on the 360 or even in some cases, but neither game is finished so no one can make a final judgement.
ut2007 hasnt been confirmed for the 360 yet
yes ut2007 has
from what i have seen they both look identical model wise and shading/lighting wise. i am sick of all this ps3 v xbox 360 garbage. it ruins it for people who want to have sensible chats. the ps3 cannot be more powerful than the 360 because the technology is not there and wont be there till the time ps4/xbox 970 comes out. the only thing more powerful in sonys system is the blu-ray technology, which is there to use the playstation brand name to promote blu-ray movies and in the future, more capable blu-ray players, that is all it has over the 360 really and from reports, blu-ray isnt getting worldwide praise from reporters and websites is it? but give it time, it may turn out to be excellent and sonys gamble pay off.
...So if FNR3 is only better cause of extra time then, WHY THE FOCK AREN'T THEY RELEASING AN UPDATED VERSION ON THE 360? The Devs just didn't say anything for political reasons, and besides if they had said the it looks better soley because of the PS3, you would have called them "paid Sony-bots", so just quit with the flaming and learn to "Play Beyond". And Riddle me this Batman, if the 360 is such an awsome system than, WHY THE FOCK ARE YOU GUYS ALWAYS HERE, Posting in the PS3 section. And this is not retorical, I would really like to here explaination. (Its like the girl who pretends not to like you, but is secretively in love with you.)
1. Ask EA why they arent makin an updated version for 360 but it only looks better because of additional dev time. I'm guessing they arent becsuse the ps3 version doesnt look that much better. I'd say a little more than marginal. 2. I dont own a 360. Play beyond? lol what a joke
well.....for me its obvious that the 360 version look better!i dont know if some people here are blinded buy their love for sony but honestly...the 360 version really looks better to me!and i have to say that i will buy a ps3...only when they'll drop the price ,but still,i dont say that because i dont like sony!
While most of us in here going on and on about what the games look like. I'm getting sick of EA coming out with games just to make money. These WWII shooters aren't going anywhere. There is less Storyline and just the same characterizations over and over. Like that fella stated look at "Metal Of Honor, Metal Of Honor 2, Metal Of Honor Addons, Call of Duty, Call of Duty 2, Call of Duty Addon, Brother in Arms, Brothers in Arms 2 etc." Same Sh!t. This game is becoming just another Shooter with some type of relevance to the great WWII. Only so much you can do with games set on history. (look at that Giant Crab game). Anyhow EA has alot of games and is a big company but I think Money drive them more than making a great game with great story and next-gen gameplay, without so many FN Clones and Addons and sequals. Alot of recycled stuff. Take a look at thier game history. NFS and all the others. Oh yeah since thier in it for money you'll see 90% of EA games multi-platform.
Hey dumbsh1t, look just under the title of the article. See.....it says playstation 3 and xbox 360. Therefore, (I'll help you out here because it may take you awhile) it's in both sections. Why would they release a new version of FN3 on the 360? The game already was released on the 360. No one would buy it. The developers had 6+ plus months to work on the PS3 version, hence the updates. Here's a quote for you: Blank: The game will be called Round 3. Ideally we would have been able to release the PS3 version simultaneously with the 360 but the platforms were off cycle. The extra time between the releases has allowed us to add some of the awesome new features that I've described. This is from: http://ps3.ign.com/articles... Now, if you don't want to look like an idiot when comparing consoles, compare games with the same development cycles and release dates. It only makes sense. If a game was released on the PS3 and then given 6 more months of development time for the 360 version, the 360 version would look better. Also, for the guy that said UT2007 wasn't coming out on the 360. Here's a link for you: http://www.next-gen.biz/ind... This comes straight from the publisher. About a third of the way down the article the 360 version is confirmed.
who are you talking to?
The guy who's name is in the title of my post.
Cod3 will be better on the Xbox 360 because as you know, FPS's are way easier and better to play because of the Xbox controller, Its made for FPS games, Graphically though they look the same, Looking forward to it.
Stinks for FPS games. The way my fingers are positioned on the analoge, then your trying to tap the L+R buttons; after a while it sucks. 360 more comfortable. I rather the PS controller for fighting games. Better D-Pad.
don't forget us brits, we also fought in world war 2, but hollywood would have you believe the yanks won it single handed
I think the PS3 COD3 looks alittle bit like paper cut outs of the 360 version. I know I cant say this with out sounding like a hater but it is what it is. I cant tip toe areound it. But I will say both look great.
It probably has to do with the antialiasing and lighting but The 360 version has a softer look to it with deeper shadows however once again the PS3 version probably isnt running on final hardware so who knows what it will really look like. I am constantly amazed with 360's lighting and shadows. Next Gen rules no matter which console your on. I played games on and off for well over 20 years starting with atari but last year when 360 was released I became a gamer, a very, very old gamer.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.