570°
6.7

PlanetXbox360 Review: Assassin's Creed - 6.7/10

The third-person stealth genre has never been one hurting for quality titles and it seemed as though Assassin's Creed would follow in the footsteps of great games like Splinter Cell and Metal Gear Solid. One set in the time of the Knights Templar really peaked my interest and we were hoping for a stellar title to match the stellar screenshots we have been seeing for months now. Assassin's Creed is not all problems but with only nine missions, no replayability (other than a few hidden items and boring side quests), and zero multiplayer it is hard to recommend it for a purchase. The game has some really amazing moments but at the end of the day it is just too repetitive and too many things go wrong for it to deserve a good score, save your time for Mass Effect or Call of Duty 4.

Read Full Story >>
planetxbox360.com
CRIMS0N_W0LF6008d ago

Their head is still stuck up Master Chief's arse

BLaZiN PRopHeT6008d ago

lol altho they said save your money for ME and COD4?

JsonHenry6008d ago

I think they made valid points about the game.

What we have here is a problem - what most of us would enjoy, these guys are SOOOO burnt out on playing just another FPS, just another RPG, just another strategy game that unless something just pops out and re-invents the genre they give lackluster reviews.

You and I are not burnt out. We play only when we want to. We are the lucky ones who can play a game that probably does deserve a 6.7 and still enjoy the game anyway.

And BTW - they did have VERY valid points about why they gave the game a 6.7. Go watch the first 10 minutes video that was posted on here earlier. The game looks like fun, but NOTHING great.

Kaneda6008d ago (Edited 6008d ago )

Well UBISoft markets this game as innovation... but it was far from innovation according to the article... I was going to buy this game tomorrow. After reading this I will skip this game...

NEXT Uncharted Drake...

lynx1halo6008d ago

I think this might be one of those games that either you really love...or you really hate........oh and PlanetXbox360 is garbage

CRIMS0N_W0LF6008d ago

Halo 3 Graphics: 9
Assassin's Creed Graphics: 8

Gameplay I cannot say but all vids look its very fun.

Controls are stated to be easy and as you can see from the tutorial its very simple controls and given 6

Replay: They scream no MP it does not mean it does not have replay! This game is open it has replay *points at GTA* They give Bioshock 8.5 replay value which unless you are an achivement whore you won't touch Bioshock for some time after you pass the game.

Sound 7.5: Ok... I doubt the sound is that crap I guess they used some crap speakers

jASSon 3606008d ago

yet again the PS3 proves to be just another blu-ray player. We all know that this game would have been awesome had it not been on the PS3 also.

@above.

Halo 3's graphx are a 9 because its one of the best looking games of this generation. only game to compete with it is Gears. AC has nothing on halo 3, and this reviewer lets us know that.

imo the only thing that held AC from greatness is it being on that "other" console as well.

lawman11086008d ago

If the game stinks then it stinks and they will save people money and at $60 bucks a pop! I will buy it when it's around $30 bucks just because it still looks good. Did it come out on the PS3 or was that DELAYED? if so what was the score?

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 6008d ago
Blood_Spiller6008d ago

For someone who is looking for a good singleplayer experience (which is probably something you're in the market for if you're buying Assassin's Creed) I find it laughable that he would recommend COD4's 5 hour campaign over this title. My preorder remains intact.

monkey6026008d ago (Edited 6008d ago )

Although I can see what you are talking about, I have to ask have you played COD4? The single player might be short but it is nothing short of fantastic.

Anyway the GAMETRAILERS review seemed fair to me and I am still getting this game.

EDIT: Just clearing up dude that I meant no offense by this message.
What did you think of it?

EDIT: Fair enough point not much I can really say to that

EDIT: No you didnt dude. Just wanted to make sure I didnt either. I added a bubble for your responses. Slater

Blood_Spiller6008d ago (Edited 6008d ago )

Yes I have played it. It has all the same ingredients of previous Call of Duties - being hectic, large scripted battles and annoying commanders giving you orders but it lacks the story of the previous titles. The main draw in the series for me was that you experienced war through the eyes of 3 people and you got attached to the story of those soldiers, in this call of duty it jumps around too much for that attachment to evolve and you feel like you're more or less being rushed along to the credits.

*EDIT*
I know you meant no offense, sorry if it came off like I was pissed at you or something!

Rooted_Dust6008d ago

COD4 was fantastic, but every time you play it, it's going to be exactly the same. Thats the problem with overly scripted and linear games.

razer6008d ago

You have the "Mile High Club" achievement for COD4 on veteran? If you don't have a 360 have you completed "Mile High Club" on veteran??

COD4 is far from short if you play it on a level that actually requires skill. It took me over 4 hours alone just to pass this one level on veteran.. The hardest FPS level I've ever played.

Not directed at you but I find it laughable that people rush thru these games on n00b level and then complain that a game was short..

lawman11086008d ago

Yes, COD4 is sadly as short as HS but not evey game is 80 hours.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 6008d ago
ShiftyLookingCow6008d ago

I guess someone felt like they had to top 1UP

BlackIceJoe6008d ago (Edited 6008d ago )

This is the worst review yet. I have been seeing lots of high nines and even a ten. I still think this game is great and this review does nothing to stop me from playing it when it comes out.

lonestarmt6008d ago

agree. Still buying it. too many high scores already, and this guy got on my nerves. lol.

TheSadTruth6008d ago

Some people are more critical of gameplay than others. You are essentially doing the same thing the entire game it sounds like it does get a tad repetitive. Compare a game like this to Zelda, where you constantly get new items and abilities, or ratchet and clank where there are many mini games and such, or Halo where there are lots of unique encounters, a variety of weapons blah blah blah. I haven't played assassin's creed and neither have you guys, so don't be quick to judge. Many other reviewers like GameInformer and GameTrailers have called the gameplay "repetitive" as well.

Douchebaggery6008d ago

but having watched the GT review it look like it's easy to break the game and make the A.I. act retarded

Show all comments (81)
60°

PureArts & Ubisoft Announce Assassin’s Creed Hunt for the Nine 1/6 Scale Diorama

This should make fans and collectors very happy. PureArts & Ubisoft Announce Assassin’s Creed Hunt for the Nine 1/6 Scale Diorama Assassin's Creed Hunt for the Nine 1/6 Scale Diorama available for pre-order on January 25.

260°

Can We Finally Admit Assassin's Creed 3 Deserves an Apology?

AC3 was released during a turbulent transition period for Ubisoft and the Assassin's Creed series. It ventured into uncharted territory, narratively and mechanically, which caused it to receive mixed reviews. At its core, though, it's a damn good stealth game.

Read Full Story >>
thenerdstash.com
isarai197d ago

Nope, I hated 3, connar was bland, literally the most flat character in the entire game. Not to mention to myriad of bugs, camera issues, and that annoying thing where he automatically ditches his weapon you payed for for the sake of a cool finishing move forcing you to trek back to your base after almost every encounter just to re-equip your own weapon. It just didn't work as fluidly as the others like 2 and 4

Samonuske197d ago

The series peaked at AC3 for me. It’s been my favourite in the series. Connor will always be one of my favourite video game protagonists.

Becuzisaid197d ago

No. Game was BORING. Connor was really dull. Environments, while impressive, because of the geographic location and time period were not really exciting to be in. I would love some kind of game set in there colonial American time period, but a game like AC that back then centered around parkour and vertical traversal really didn't fit those environments.

-Foxtrot197d ago

Nope

There was a lot of issues but mine is how they handled the war

They told us Connor was not going to get involved, that the war was more of a background setting for the real story and it wasn’t going to be one sided

They lied, even the cinematic E3 trailer showed Connor emerge from the Colonist side and slaughter the red coats to get to his target, inspiring the Colonists to fight back

I just thought it would have made more sense lore wise that the red coats were mostly compiled of Assassins fighting the Colonist templars who wanted to take the new world for themselves.

Since the Red coats lost the war, it would then explain how the Templars started to gain the upper hand and how on the future the assassins were mostly killed off and the Templar’s had pretty much taken over everything.

Instead it just felt like they didn’t want to p*** off the American audience

Even Haytham was cool, he should have been an Assassin through and through and should have been the main lead.

toxic-inferno197d ago

The game even seems to lack the humour of the other games. It almost seems as though the idea of even slightly making fun of American history wouldn't be acceptable.

-Foxtrot196d ago

Exactly

It just felt super safe

“Better not make the colonists look super bad incase people boycott our game”

jeromeface196d ago

someone missed the whole point

-Foxtrot196d ago

There was literally no point

What I've just said above would at least make sense lore wise and why the Assassins start to loose their war, die off and how the Templars are in control in the future of almost everything....what they did was just, pointless

CrimsonWing69197d ago

I’m one one of those weird people that liked Ass Creed 3, but to be fair I never got around to finishing it.

Show all comments (28)
240°

5 Of the Most Unlikeable Video Game Protagonists

There are good video game protagonists, and there are bad video game protagonists.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
208d ago
GhostScholar208d ago (Edited 208d ago )

I disagree that max is unlikable. Chloe is infinitely more unlikable in my opinion.

gold_drake207d ago

omg chloe was awful. i really hated her at the end haha

Cacabunga207d ago

Abby was absolute trash protagonist in every way..
Tidus was so meh to me..
On villain side, the one i didn’t like wa Micah, because they wanted him to be that way and it was brilliant👍🏽

Rancegamerx207d ago

I agree, I liked Max, Chloe was a horrible friend and a bad influence.

Cacabunga207d ago

Everyone agrees on chloe, I’m sure even ND do.

H9207d ago

Both are horrible, granted Chloe is infinitely worse, it feels like Chloe is just fanservice for people who too over the edge and wasn't written to be a character that makes sense

GooGobbler208d ago

What about that Forspoken Tw*t

MrChow666207d ago

exactly I was expecting it to be a the top of the list

ravens52207d ago

Ye I was expecting her too. Guess they actually played the game. Unlike you and whoever agrees.

gpimlott206d ago

I played through the whole game and think she is one of the worst character Ive ever played as

ravens52206d ago (Edited 206d ago )

gpimlott. How?

Stanjara196d ago

Why would I payed and played the game if the whole internet is making fun of a character?

-Im here to kill Chaos...are you Chaos?

Yeah, I didn't play that game either.

Christopher207d ago (Edited 207d ago )

She's actually not bad. It's the writing itself that is bad overall, but she's fine overall. She's no worse than Miles Morales IMHO. Both thrust into a spotlight and receiving both praise and blame and dealing with it.

Forspoken is a bland game because it's 75% bland, boring, repetitive going through the motions and diversions that add nothing of the value with purposefully gated memory moments that don't feel organic or like you're discovering things but waiting for others to reveal things.

ravens52207d ago

Exactly Chris. Even though I liked the game. I kno u played it. People who actually played it and went thru her dream saw she was a good likeable person who really just acted out due to being alone and unloved. I think your problem is it was open world, I think if it was more linear you may have liked it better.

savedsynner207d ago

Oh no she's bad. Very unlikable even before you add on the bad dialogue. The game could have been quite good with a good protagonist

ravens52206d ago

For all the people like synner. Shes actually half white lol. Inferior complexity is a hell of a thing. You'll be ok.

Nerdmaster208d ago

Most of these aren't even that bad. Especially comparing to others like Squall "Whatever" Leonhart, Forspoken's Frey, and the guy from Atomic Heart.

-Foxtrot207d ago

Squall is one of the best developed main FF characters so...

People talk about his "whatever" thing thats at the start of the game, not the character he eventually becomes in the end.

Nerdmaster207d ago

No amount of "character development", (especially the ones that for me feels sudden and undeserved like Squall's), will justify him being a d**k to my girl Quistis. Even if he found the cure for cancer, from that moment on, I would never like him.
The article is about being unlikeable, and he was indeed unlikeable for at least half of the game.

BrainSyphoned207d ago

Squall is the best protagonists in FF so you can go whatever yourself.

H9207d ago

My good sir, I need to steal that "you can go whatever yourself" because it's gold

BlaqMagiq1207d ago

Except Squall has actual character development.

gold_drake207d ago (Edited 207d ago )

the "watever" is only present in the english localisation.
so your argument doesnt rly ... stand imo.

Nerdmaster207d ago

Good for you that you could enjoy the japanese version. That's not the case for me and the majority of people here, though.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 207d ago
gold_drake207d ago (Edited 207d ago )

i had to stop reading after the "blatant misogyny" in the Dantes inferno section.

i actually liked Max haha.

the forspoken chick is missing tho

Show all comments (49)