Pro-G writes:
"PS3 owners are starved of high-quality FPS games at the moment. Apart from launch game Resistance: Fall of Man, which we thoroughly enjoyed, and the recently released Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, which we enjoyed even more, there's not much to write home about. But developer Epic is aiming to change all that with its PS3 port of classic sci-fi FPS Unreal Tournament 3, which will, for a time at least, be a console exclusive."
"Will UT3 be the PS3's Halo killer? To be fair, UT3 has never been billed as such a thing. Will it be as good as Call of Duty 4 online? We'll reserve judgement for the review. But my first impression is that what makes UT different - the speed and intensity of the action - has been shackled, resulting in an experience that feels like it's deliberately holding something back. The game looks like being a wonderfully realised port, one that further reinforces the view that the PS3 will have a much better time of it in 2008."
Opinion is divided on this one for sure! Is motion blur good for gaming? Why do developers include it?
I hate any game that has motion blur and the first thing I do is switch off the motion blur in games. It just makes me nauseous.
I agree with Alex here, many implementations are terrible but when it is done right it improves the experience.
Alex from GamersFTW writes:
“In all seriousness though, I feel like DOOM’s success will be measured by how much the game has to offer. Graphically it’s looking spectacular, and I’m sure the latest multiplayer trailer caught all of our attention. Personally, the game is beginning to remind me of those late nights playing Unreal Tournament 3, which is totally a good thing. This, in addition to the promise of user-generated content, is making DOOM look like the best first-person shooter I’ve seen in ages.”
The campaign looks brilliant, like a true nostalgia trip to the original DOOM titles of old! The multiplayer equally looks like a trip down memory lane to fast-paced and frantic arena games a-la Quake, and honestly the MP REALLY makes me want to the get game at launch to capitalise on the hype. Problem is I'm not overly fussed with multiplayer typically in games, they can get weary after a while, and buying a game solely for its MP is risky - especially on console - as it's heavily dependant on the community!
Rock to my left, hard place to my right..
EDIT: On the MP note, does anyone know if it'll have bots available, similar to Unreal Tournament 3? I still give that a quick play time to time with bots (and all the mad mutators).
Its basically a "console" ahead, in terms of graphics, of another shooter called Homefront thats getting ready to release. LOL
Great selections as always and they are...
Final Fantasy
Metal Gear Solid
Super Smash Bros.
Crypt of the Necrodancer
Unreal Tournament
Advance Wars
Payday 2
... at the moment... In no rush to try this at all yet...
EDIT
How can someone disagree with the fact that i'm enjoying COD4? Go crawl back in your hole!!!
i have no money. damn u games.... *looks in his empty wallet*
but the sixaxis pad is killing me!!
how teh 4uck does SONY expect REAL gamers to play games with these s#itty pads???
When I press either L2 or R2, it feels like my hands have been sweating for days!!!
I think I'll either get UT3 for my top-grade PC (the platform it's meant to be played on) or I might even trade in my PS3 for an ELITE.
4UCK THIS!!!
why paid for lag
Dude, why bother commenting when you just end up answering your own question. If you're not going to bother with the PS3 version, don't comment here in this article and waste the site bandwidth. PS, COD3 is a horrible example to post here; it was a terrible port on the PS3. UT:III on the PS3 has been receiving nothing but praise, with some sites labeling it a worthy competitor to the PC version for what it offers technologically.