850°

Carmack: Thinking “Consoles are basically as good as PCs” was a “big mistake”

Treating consoles and PC as equals was “one of the biggest mistakes I made in this generation,” John Carmack has admitted, and says that he would develop RAGE “very differently” for consoles now.

Read Full Story >>
beefjack.com
MrSpace4626d ago

Right we get it Carmack you love the PC.

I'm sorry I think the guy is a genius and his games are amazing but all this talk about the PC and how console don't live up to them is getting ridiculous consoles will never be as powerful as the PC, we all know this. Consoles are consoles because it's something we don't need to waste a crap load of money on for the actually thing and keep updating it like the PC.

reynod4626d ago

Console gaming is actually alot more expensive then PC.

A PC that will outperform console will cost you about 500-600usd, thats about a 200-300usd Difference, this can easily be overcome in 1 Steam or D2D discount. Not to mention later on every console game costs more, also PC does alot more things then just play games.

Lastly the PC needing constant upgrades is a myth. That was true back in 2000 when games actually progressed in terms of graphics. Now a days games are made with 6 yr old console hardware in mind. Hence a PC doesnt need to be upgrade to play those games. Unless its some PC exclusive game and you want to play it maxed out.

Alex Kidd4626d ago (Edited 4626d ago )

Here we go again the ongoing console vs PC argument. Before this goes any further, yes PC's are capable of running higher res etc. etc. And like anything you get what you pay for.

Now as for Carmack is this guy retarded? How could he be so naive to think consoles could ever keep up with pc's, they are outdated weeks after they release but that doesn't mean there won't be good games for consoles but the perfomance is never going to keep up with a pc.

xX_Altair_Xx4626d ago

"Console gaming is actually alot more expensive then PC."

That depends on the individual. For example downloading games on Steam isnt an option for me since my broadband is SO slow - took 4hrs to download MW2 map pack :(

And also a PC does need upgrading at some point. Upgrading console vs PC, i think console wins since it comes as a system. For PC it's Gpu, CPU, OS, Ram, etc. But I think if you're a gamer you should play over all platforms and not worry about graphics or resolution all the time.

news4geeks4626d ago

Not to mention the fact you can just plug your PC into your tv via hdmi and play it as if it was a console if sitting at your desk with keyboard/mouse isn't your thing.

PC gaming is just better in every way, but consoles are still awesome and have some pretty cool exclusives.

Substance1014626d ago (Edited 4626d ago )

@Altair

PC may need an upgrade in about 4years time by which time the console may be dead too. At which point you may need to buy a replacement console. However on PC you have other options.

Imagine someone bought a core 2 PC 4 years back. They could simply overclock the CPU, upgrade to a new GPU (about 150usd which is cheaper then getting a replacement console).

Now the replacement console will perform just like the one you orginally bought 4 years back. However PC with a new GPU at 150usd will surely outperform whatever you bought for EVEN 250usd 4 years back.

Also do not forget if in 4 years time the console fails you will need to rebuy the entire unit, there is hardly anything like repairs. On PC if you dont want to upgrade and it does fail you could simply replace the part that went bad which again is cheaper then getting a new console.

Which is why i think PC gaming is cheaper in the long run. Lets not forget a console like xbox also requires you to pay online charges which adds up in 4 years time, making xbox the most expensive platform to game on, PS3 second, PC being the cheapestl.

StayStatic4626d ago (Edited 4626d ago )

TLDR : works out roughly the same

Its true but depends how many games X person buys for Y platform:

Some rough calculations:

Average console price mid cycleish $300

10 games at 60$ a go $600

and then any accessories on top of that your looking at 1000$ their.

With PCs its different because it depends what parts you have available to you and if your starting from scratch or not. e.g. you can recycle your Hard Drives , DVD Drives etc etc

For me personally my new PC tower 1.5 years ago cost just under £700:

I7 920 @ 4GHZ
6GB DDR3
1GB ATI HD 5870

So in the end it starts to look about the same in the long run if you take steam games into account which are like what £30 for the latest games and then awesome sales on top with games in the region of £5 - £20 + massive game packs.

Meaning you need to spend less on games compared to the console.

evrfighter4626d ago

Carmack didn't believe in Digital Distribution. He truly believed the reason pc retail sales were going down was because of piracy.

When Rage was announced ID even went as far as to reaffirm everyone that it was not going to be released digitally.

This is the result. I basically already said a few weeks ago that the biggest mistake Carmack made in his gaming career was letting the DD parade go on right past his window and he had no idea it happened.

awi59514626d ago (Edited 4626d ago )

Well when the consoles launched they had the current video cards in them that havent released yet. But as you know new GPU's come out every year so now console is 6 years behind pc. Consoles are so far behind at this point a 69 dollar graphics card greatly outperforms the ones in Xbox and ps3 by 4 times.

Theonetheonly4626d ago

Am I the only one thinking that this was very obvious even *gasp* before Carmack said it.

Come to think about it consoles haven't been the same as PC since the day they launched.

SilentNegotiator4626d ago (Edited 4626d ago )

It's no-one's fault other than Carmack's if he thought that. Consoles will never be as powerful as many PCs because consoles are about marketable affordable cost-effectiveness.

But they've always had decent graphics. No one cares if "ATI-FTW-3278438" thinks that 720p30fps is what calculators run on. It works great with most people and the hardware required stays within somewhat-above average household budgets, if not exceeding such.

@reed
"Am I the only one thinking that this was very obvious even *gasp* before Carmack said it"
-
LOL, of course not! It's not official until Mr. Universe Programmer 1993 says so!
/s

andyboy134626d ago

The only reason I built a new pc in under 4 years was because my GPU started dying and I didn't have the receipt to warranty it anymore... Good job me ha! I had a lifetime warranty on it... I figured well, might as well go to quad core and then it was new mobo... I went totally overkill at maybe $1200. NOT $2000.

lil Titan4626d ago

this is the part where every pc owner who has praised Carmack in past comments call him an idiot now. *gets popcorn* *reads comments*

zag4626d ago

Yeah I agree reynod.

All the GFX cards even the budget ones will handle the top PC games easy, these days.

Too many games are geared for the console so on a PC the game just seems like a poorly made one compared to the old PC only games.

You end up paying less for the PC version anyway probably because they know it's not quite good on the PC so figure it;s not worth the money as the consoles.

Ranshak4626d ago

@zag

Thats the funny part PC version is usually superior, yet its cheaper. Unless they severly butcher a console port PC version always turns out better.

GTA 4 is an example of a bad port, but look at it now. It got fixed in about a month of release with patches. However now the modding community has really made the game what it should have been.

DragonKnight4626d ago

"Console gaming is actually alot more expensive then PC."

You know I always find it funny when people say that. And the reason I find it funny is because pricing is always dictated by the market's demand and what people are willing to accept.

If you went point for point, PC and console gaming are pretty even in pricing, with each having their bargains in different areas.

But don't think for one minute if PC gaming were the mainstream choice of gaming entertainment that the price of games would stay cheap.

It's a fact that console gaming is more lucrative than PC gaming, and publishers know they can get away with ridiculous pricing schemes because consoles are infinitely more convenient than PC's and have a more content demanding market as well. But the moment that shifts, expect the price of PC gaming to be just as bad, if not worse, than what any pro-PC individual thinks of console gaming.

Ranshak4626d ago (Edited 4626d ago )

@dragonknight

Lets take a look at one of the largest publishers financial report EA raked in:

PC: 154m USD
xbox 360: 151m USD
ps3: 110m USD

Activision still claim 60% of their earnings are from the PC(most of that is due to Wow).

Valve, sell over a billion usd on Steam.

Point being PC is selling as good or better then any single console. Hence there is demand for PC games just as good as any console which is why PC has gotten so many exclusives this year.

Game prices are simply lower on PC because, MS and Sony dont get a cut. Hence its a win win situation for the publishers and the gamers.

Personally in my group of friends hardly anyone games on consoles, its about 5 of us. 2 of us own consoles though most of our time is on the PC.

DragonKnight4626d ago (Edited 4626d ago )

@Ranshak: If what you're saying is true, then explain why the vast majority of major game exclusives are NOT on PC but on consoles? Explain why the gaming industries focus is on consoles by and large and NOT on PC's? There are so many points that invalidate what you say and still work to my point.

You focused on the two largest multiplatform publishers and one almost exclusive PC developer who created their own PC distribution network. Why don't you dig deeper and include some more and see that PC is not performing on the level of consoles in a market sense.

**EDIT** And let's not forget that companies like EA and Activision buy small companies that make Facebook games, etc.. Take a look at the more major games and then compare.

badz1494625d ago

and people are saying that this guy is a genius?! he just realized that PCs are way more capable than consoles? that's retarded!

Ducky4625d ago (Edited 4625d ago )

@DK
"If what you're saying is true, then explain why the vast majority of major game exclusives are NOT on PC but on consoles?"

... because exclusives are an issue to console manufacturers. They have to push their console over their competitor, and one way of doing that is by funding projects exclusive to their platform.

A platform exclusive on console usually means there's an agreement/contract that is keeping the game exclusive.
A PC exclusives means that the game can't run on consoles, either due to the console hardware not being up to par, or the developpers not having the necessary resources.

When a multiplatform game comes to PC, the developers often try to add in extra things to make PC players happy (such as the recent DeusEx game which supports DX11).
Why would they go through all the effort if there was no significant monetary reward?

Anyways, it isn't really all that relevant. At the end of the day, I'm pre-ordering games for $32 which would be $60 on consoles, and that's what matters to me.

DragonKnight4625d ago (Edited 4625d ago )

@Fat Old Man

"... because exclusives are an issue to console manufacturers. They have to push their console over their competitor, and one way of doing that is by funding projects exclusive to their platform."

They are an issue to gaming as a business period. If an excellent game is exclusive to a console, that's one less reason a person has to game on a PC. There are more major exclusive console games you'll never see on a PC than vice versa. PC has a sh*t ton of games, no doubt, but looking at recent development will show you that major studios make more console games than PC games. Less reason to game on a PC due to less exclusive content is a real issue.

"A platform exclusive on console usually means there's an agreement/contract that is keeping the game exclusive.
A PC exclusives means that the game can't run on consoles, either due to the console hardware not being up to par, or the developpers not having the necessary resources."

No. A PC exclusive literally means it's exclusive to PC only because that's what the developer wants. There is no game on the PC right now that CAN'T be run on a current console. It's all up to what the devs are willing to do. Your argument is PC quality vs. Console quality. And while PC has the edge, a console version would not be unplayable even if you were to port a max setting PC game to a console. Some cuts have to be made, but to suggest a PC game CAN'T be played on a console is just naive.

"When a multiplatform game comes to PC, the developers often try to add in extra things to make PC players happy (such as the recent DeusEx game which supports DX11).
Why would they go through all the effort if there was no significant monetary reward?"

Because PC gamers whine, and they have to be enticed. Devs want money, but a major problem for PC gaming is piracy and other issues that hinder profit margins compared to consoles. It's far easier to pirate PC games than console games, so SOMETHING has to be done to entice people to actually BUY the game, instead of pirating it. And when you see an outrage over "Press Start Button to begin" you know that the PC audience will whine, and b*tch, and moan at devs constantly. Some devs just give in.

"Anyways, it isn't really all that relevant. At the end of the day, I'm pre-ordering games for $32 which would be $60 on consoles, and that's what matters to me."

And the list of those games you can pre-order that are console games appearing on the PC is minute compared to the list of games I can play on my console that you'll never see on PC. So, it's moot.

blackmagic4625d ago

dumbest argument in the history of gaming is that the pc is "too expensive". Seriously, anybody who uses the term 'gamer' to describe themselves probably puts 10 hours a week into gaming if not more. To put that into perspective, imagine doing a 10 hour gaming session every single day for TWO HUNDRED AND SIXTY DAYS STRAIGHT! That's how much gaming we are talking about in a five year period.

cost: ps3 $600, 360 $400, two pc builds $1500
So, for $500 a year on average, you have access to the 3 most advanced gaming platforms at all times.

Bolts4625d ago

When you start buying your games for $20-30 less from Steam or other digital services thats when console gaming starts to suck.

Ranshak4625d ago (Edited 4625d ago )

@dragonknight

PC actually has more AAA exclusives then Xbox 360 this year, maybe just as many as the PS3. I dont get your thing about PC not having exclusives.

Following games were released as exclusives to PC this year:

Witcher 2, Shogun 2, Dawn of war 2 retribution, Red orchestra 2, dota 2.

BF3 will be like an exclusives because console version is vastly dumbed down port. I dont see how the industry isnt focusing on pc, even though PC has no company funding exclusives.

Combine the indie scene and PC actually has more exclusives then any console games like Amnesia, Magika etc

Plus every multiplat out there is superior on PC.

AAA games like Witcher 2 could be purcahsed at launch for 36usd, D2D had a discount few weeks after launch where they priced the game down to 33usd. (let meknow ifyou can currently preorder UC3 for 36usd).

An awesome game like Red orchestra 2 is up for sale at 35usd pre order price.

ChrisW4625d ago (Edited 4625d ago )

@reynod,

THAN, god damn it! It's THAN, not THEN!!!

ian724625d ago (Edited 4625d ago )

"Console games are more expensive than PC ones"

This may be true to those who don't shop around, and pay full price. I use supermarkets etc and can get great deals on console games, even on launch day. MoH cost £28, Blops £25, MW2 £32,(all launch day), was £26 in one shop but sold out by time I got there.

Also after a few months of game been out, can get console games less than half price, around £20. Just need to shop around.

reynod4625d ago (Edited 4625d ago )

@Ian72

Waiting will only bring things further in the PCs favor. Because 3-4weeks after launch most games are already in extreme discounts at Steam or D2D (no way any retailer can compete with those sort of discounts on console). While the console version may drop a bit in 2-3 months time, Waiting game just plays more in favor of the PC.

Reason console gaming is expensive because Sony and MS have to get their cut. You should check out Steam and the rest of the DD network sometime around the holidays you will get what i mean. Console prices will look like a rip off then.

In some places around the work console games can cost as much as 70usd at launch. Here in the middle east console games tend to cost as much as 80usd and their prices dont fall at all. Hence Steam along with PC gaming is a much cheaper alternative.

gamingdroid4625d ago (Edited 4625d ago )

***They are an issue to gaming as a business period.***

Really?

***If an excellent game is exclusive to a console, that's one less reason a person has to game on a PC.***

Really? An exclusive is one less reason to own a competing platform?

I'm pretty sure the vast majority of people buy into platform due to the overall package, not because of a few exclusive games. Otherwise, everybody would have bought a Nintendo Wii especially or PS3 by now and left PC and Xbox 360 all alone....

***No. A PC exclusive literally means it's exclusive to PC only because that's what the developer wants. There is no game on the PC right now that CAN'T be run on a current console. It's all up to what the devs are willing to do. Your argument is PC quality vs. Console quality. And while PC has the edge, a console version would not be unplayable even if you were to port a max setting PC game to a console. Some cuts have to be made, but to suggest a PC game CAN'T be played on a console is just naive.***

Can and can't isn't really important. After all consoles are a stripped down computer, so it isn't suprising then that a stripped down game will work on it. In fact, any game can run on the NES as long as you strip it down enough!

The importance really is do people want that experience?

If you look at games like StarCraft 2, those games are doable on consoles albeit stripped down in graphics and controls, but I doubt people would really take to it. A good example of that is Halo Wars, a decent RTS that didn't sell all that great. The controlls were good on consoles, but it is so much better on PC.

***Devs want money, but a major problem for PC gaming is piracy and other issues that hinder profit margins compared to consoles.***

Piracy is a problem, but let's face it, it also affects consoles and handhelds. The Nintedo DS had major piracy problems and games still sold well. If you are talking about profit margin per unit, then there is more room to grow for PC without console tax. If you are talking about as a whole, it scales with market size so that is a moot point.

Also, you answered this yourself:

***You know I always find it funny when people say that. And the reason I find it funny is because pricing is always dictated by the market's demand and what people are willing to accept.***

+ Show (24) more repliesLast reply 4625d ago
DaTruth4626d ago

It's true, we don't need to hear this anymore! I don't need to hear that my PSP/DS isn't as powerful as my PS3/360 and I don't need to hear this!

If it bothers you so much, just make a completely different game on PC, like they do with the portables. No body makes ports to the DS or mobile phones for that matter from consoles, they just make another game.

Obviously there's no market for separate versions of games for every platform, so please stop crying about it!

kramun4626d ago

Put your hands over your ears and go "La la la, I can't hear you!"

ChrisW4625d ago

Wha-? Sorry, I was putting my hands over my ears and going "La la la, I can't hear you!"

...Now, what were you saying kramun?

JsonHenry4626d ago

He wasn't referring to raw power of the PC being better than the consoles. He meant other restraints such as conforming to each company's own standards and rules (there are none on the PC), individual networking abilities, system restraints outside of raw rendering power. Things like that.

However, nothing he said is new. All devs pretty much have said the same thing. But in the end those devs that try still give us fantastic games on all platforms if they have the know how and put the effort in.

InNomeDiDio4626d ago

When you have seen Crysis 2 DX11 Ultra with HighRes-Textures in native 1080p and you really think you're holding a weapon in your hand you see that PC is the way to go

AKS4626d ago

Wat?

It looks quite good, but you seem prone to hyperbole.

InNomeDiDio4626d ago

"quite good ... " lol

dude it's like day and night compared to standard PC Version on the highest Setting.

AKS4626d ago

"...you really think you're holding a weapon in your hand"

As a former Marine, you can't imagine how amusing such a statement is to me. You're going way overboard about the graphics. I have it on PC as well, and it looks very good, but I didn't have a life-altering religious experience from turning it to Ultra.

InNomeDiDio4626d ago

Ok, you're a Marine. If I were a Soldier I would never play such games to be honest. But I'm not and I do.

First you said it looks "quite good", then you said "very good".

For me it's a huge difference between standard and ultra.

But why the stress?

AKS4626d ago (Edited 4626d ago )

@InNomeDiDio

First, "quite" and "very" can be taken to mean roughly the same thing, especially with intonation in spoken language.

Plenty of Marines and soldiers play video game during their recreational time, often even while deployed overseas.

http://www.dvidshub.net/ima...

I play Battlefield: Bad Company 2 with a former Army Ranger and sniper regularly. It's nice to play with someone who actually understands military tactics and communication rather than blindly running forward like sheep as I often see with the typical online multiplayer FPS crowd.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4626d ago
Slayer OP4626d ago

Carmack is not a genius; He is a fanboy that gets paid to bash other consoles. I dont know why people defend him and put him on a pedestal. Just because someone boggles your mind with techspeak doesnt mean they are geniuses. He has his companies paying him to say what *they* want him to say.

fr00ty-wizenhymer4626d ago

@Slayer OP Are you a fucking idiot!? He founded id software, he's been his own boss for most of his career. He has created the entire FPS genre and created deathmatch and if not created, than streamlined and improved online gaming. You fucking ignorant fool. I want to see your programming skills.

Krimmson4626d ago

Yep, that's all Carmack gets paid for. Just spew out stuff because he has no idea what he's talking about, right?

Nevermind the fact that he practically invented the FPS genre, was one of the founders of his company and is a fucking rocket scientist (no, really. The man programs rockets for hobby), Carmack is just some guy that just gets paid to speak.

Do yourself a favor. Go out, buy the book "Masters of Doom". It's about how John Carmack, John Romero and others started id software and revolutionized video games. It's a fantastic read and it'll educate yourself as to why people listen to what John Carmack says.

DaTruth4626d ago (Edited 4626d ago )

Sometimes, someone on here says something so ridiculous you laugh your face off.

Then, while you're laughing, you scroll to the next comment and that person answers them so suitably, and you laugh whatever is under your face off!

Bolts4625d ago

Without Carmack there would be no Xbox 360 or the FPS genre period. He even invented almost everything there is about online FPS gaming. Without him Valve wouldn't even exist.

Only ignorant console fanboys would bash this guy.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4625d ago
fr00ty-wizenhymer4626d ago

PC will always be superior to console. End. Of. Story.

caperjim4626d ago

As others have already stated , PC gaming isnt expensive as people seem to think. Games are dirt cheap too with superior graphics and multiplayer.

I game on a 55 inch LED with my 360 controller and it feels like im on console but only better.

awi59514626d ago (Edited 4626d ago )

I can build a high end Pc for 650 bucks if you only want a single card option. Get you a kick as gpu for about $230(a 6950 will run anything on high) a amd quad costs like $99 and the rest of the hardware doesnt cost that much. A single slot motherboard can be anywhere from $60 to $100 the same for a Computer case. Power supply is $80 bucks and 8 gigs of ram $50 dollars.

vickers5004626d ago (Edited 4626d ago )

"superior graphics and multiplayer"

The multiplayer is superior in terms of options yeah, but not in terms of the community. I only know 3 people who play pc games, and all they play is WoW. I'd rather be playing with my friends, all of which reside on consoles.

And the 360 controller doesn't work for every (or even most) pc game. There's motionjoy/pinnaclegameprofiler , but that only goes as far as to provide very basic controls, and doesn't feel anything like using a 360 pad on an actual 360.

If every pc game (barring games like MMOs and RTSs) did support both the 360 controller and the DS3 (properly and optimized for controllers, not just crappy mapped functions like pinnacle and motionjoy do) I'd probably switch over PC gaming for my primary platform. I hate mouse and keyboard, it just completely takes me out of the immersion and ruins it for me. Has nothing to do with my skill, just the fact that mouse and keyboard (for me) kills immersion in games.

caperjim4626d ago

@vickers500
If the 360 controller support is the only thing holding you back from switching over then its time to make the switch now. Most multi platform games come with 360 controller support.

Honestly i wont even buy a game unless it has gamepad support built in. Dont believe the garbage that most other PC gamers try to feed people about the "superior" mouse + keyboard. I see no difference playng against K/M users compared to console controller users. It just depends on what you grew up using.

vickers5004625d ago

"Most multi platform games come with 360 controller support."

Not really, at least not the majority of the games I've downloaded from the steam sales. Most first person shooters don't support it and don't support it properly. I brought up that point in a past article and people were somehow angrily shocked that I wanted to use a gamepad on an fps, bashing me for wanting to use what I grew up with. These very same people saying "well PC is better than consoles because you can use a controller". Well you can't for most games, especially most of the first person shooters I've played on pc. Anyways, they don't seem to respect some peoples preferences and opinions and act like you're some kind of idiot for not wanting to use THEIR preferred control method.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4625d ago
4626d ago
Lets-Game4626d ago

its all preference, some enjoy console gaming some pc gaming and all the bs about costs and performance is absolutely pointless cause as long as game is good and you enjoy it you will play it on whatever platform its available. I still play homm3 and cs1.6 with friends from time to time. But as much as I loved gaming on ps1 and ps2 when i got my ps3 i missed kb and mouse too much so after a year i gave my ps3 to my cousin who LOVES it, good for him :)
Oh and on topic, really Carmack sorry but this is either some kind of pr or ad but i cant believe a famous game designer not knowing the most basic thing about platforms which you design your games on.

TBONEJF4626d ago

I agree with you on that one MrSpace.

starchild4626d ago (Edited 4626d ago )

MrSpace, your comment is completely unwarranted and absurd. You and everybody that agreed with you should hang their heads in shame. That is not at all what he is talking about.

John Carmack is an engineer, he is a practical man. He isn't talking about things in the fanboy way that most of you are stuck in. He is simply saying that if he had it to do over again he would have utilized the PC platform a little differently.

In hindsight he thinks it would have been better to lead on the PC and then iterate on the consoles. This is what Dice is doing on Battlefield 3 and it tends to result in a better product for everyone.

Some of you need to stop wearing your fanboy pride on your sleeves and stop getting so offended by comments that are completely innocuous and are not motivated by fanboyism in any way.

showtimefolks4625d ago

i know this for a fact that RAGE will sell much much better on consoles than it will on pc.

so yeh consoles are not as good as pc but you try to build me a pc for 300 bucks try it that can play these so great game.

its easier to compare pc's to consoles when both ps3 and xbox360 are 5 years old so you can always spend more money and upgrade your pc's but the only consoles upgrade comes when they launch new ones

in my opinion

games like gears 3 and uncharted 3 are showing that beautiful graphics and great gameplay is possible on consoles

zeddy4625d ago

i hope sony and microsoft have a rather long conversation with carmack before they start to build their next consoles, this man knows what he's talking about.

Leio4625d ago

And if you think games are all about graphics then youre even more misstaken

FanboyPunisher4625d ago

I would talk about console and pcs the same too;

The guy programs; hes very logical in how his brain works to do that job. Hes logical because console kiddies bitch about how their consoles like they are state of the art.

Carmack just brings harsh reality back into view; but its 100% valid.

End of the day

Carmack > Console Kiddies still in denial.

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 4625d ago
dktxx24626d ago

Gamers had fun with the NES, the Snes, the PS1 and the xbox. If that doesn't show you that its about the games, nothing will.

Quit yapping about hardware, and make good games. Your graphics engine will be outdated in a year, but a great game stays great forever.

kramun4626d ago

'but a great game stays great forever. '

Like Doom.

Northtouch4626d ago (Edited 4626d ago )

'great games stay great forever'

Metal Gear Solid MGS series.

branchedout4626d ago

Nostalgia is a pretty powerful drug, you know.

tiffac4626d ago

Of course the PC will be the better hardware in the end, you can upgrade a PC anytime. It doesn't have a life cycle to go through like a console does.

vortis4626d ago

You mean like having to buy new hard drives to play online games for the Xbox 360 and PS3?

tiffac4626d ago (Edited 4626d ago )

You know what I mean :p

PC will always have an advantage over the consoles when it comes to hardware there is no denying that fact, no spin that can make it untrue, no troll that can turn it into a lie. Its just the way it is.

Not that it matters when you just want to play a game anyway.

nickjkl4626d ago

i never had to upgrade my hardrive though

majiebeast4626d ago

I love both the same pc has its games and consoles have theirs. Plus for my ps3 i dont need to buy new components every 2-3 years to play the newest games.

Eiffel4626d ago (Edited 4626d ago )

For anything other than exclusives I don't see why you would. o.O As far as multiplats go, you'd be set that entire generation on the PC, or by choice go beyond that at max quality for little to nothing.

Only reason I own consoles is for the exclusives and simplicity, at the sacrifice of quality and customization, as far as the sacrifices go for consoles, it's a gamble in my mind how long it would last until I'd have to buy another or wait on warranty. :/

And consoles this gen die from freaking use, too much money to sink into something I'd have little control over hardware wise.

awi59514626d ago (Edited 4626d ago )

Thats wrong too good graphics cards from 3 years ago still run games on high they just dont have the new direct x effects thats the only draw back. The cards i had 3 years ago are like 40 dollars to buy now. You can crossfire or sli them and run the latest games on high just without direct x 11. Its cheaper than buying a new game on console.

RedDead20674626d ago

The current generation of consoles is outdated. But console players don't know any better.

5119ent4626d ago

I know and I dont care...The leap in graphics is not enough to warrant new consoles

caperjim4626d ago (Edited 4626d ago )

Watching console/PC video comparisons on NAG dont do PC justice. Even i find it hard to spot the difference.

Trust me there is a huge difference. When i go from playing PC on my big screen TV in 1080P to console on the same TV it hurts my eyes with all the jaggies and muddy textures.

I have a library of over 100 games for PS3/360 and i find it hard to play them now.

vortis4626d ago

The leap in gameplay does warrant new consoles.

The only next gen game we've had ALL this generation is GTA IV....everything else was basically a visual upgrade over the previous gen's outings (i.e., RE5, Halo Reach, KillZone 2-3, etc.,)

L.A. Noire tried something new with the tech but gameplay wise it was the same stuff we've been doing since Police Quest back in 1995.

Imalwaysright4625d ago

And yet SA shits from a great height on GTAIV, Gameplay wise you wont see any revolutionary improvements because games are as realistic as they can get and BF3 is the proof of it. BF3 is just BF with a fancy paint of coat. Gameplay wise its not a vast improvement over BC2, certainly not what you would expect from the 1st true next gen game. Sure there will be improvements on gameplay but nothing as revolutionary like GTA3 was 10 years ago.

Jack_DangerousIy4625d ago

What a complete idiot you are.

PC GAMERS: So pathetic and self righteous..

You play video games buddy. I have a buddy who brags that he knows more about family guy than anybody else... How sad is that? That's exactly how I feel about you. It's a toy. Get over it.

Show all comments (150)
80°

Quake II Development: From Concept to Launch Day - A Retrospective

"Quake II is a masterpiece; an enduring first-person shooter that shows iD Software at their technical and artistic best."

- Christian 'Reggie' Wait, TechStomper

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
50°

Legendary Game Developers: id Software

The story of John Romero, John Carmack, Adrian Carmack, Tom Hall, Jay Wilbur and their legendary company id Software. From Commander Keen to Wolfenstein 3D, from Doom to Quake, they invented the 3D first-person shooter genre, and they transformed PC gaming into a multi-million dollars business.

Read Full Story >>
gamesnostalgia.com
MadLad407d ago

They definitely pushed the FPS genre into the mainstream.

250°

John Carmack, the consulting CTO for Meta's virtual-reality efforts, is leaving.

businessinsider writes: "His exit came on Friday, the people said. Carmack, who has been openly critical of Meta's advancements in AR and VR, core to its metaverse ambitions, posted to the company's internal Workplace forum about his decision to leave."

Read Full Story >>
businessinsider.com
BlackIceJoe489d ago

I hope he starts up another new company and can get another new game engine on the market too.

Number1TailzFan488d ago

He's apparently focusing on AGI, Artificial General Intelligence, AKA trying to get AI to be sentient. Which according to Ray Kurzweil could happen by 2029.

Rainbowcookie488d ago

SKYNET approves

SKYNET becomes a follower

SKYNET left the forum

Yui_Suzumiya488d ago

Then I need to look more into this because it sounds like the backbone tech I need to make Projekt Monika a reality.

camel_toad488d ago (Edited 488d ago )

AI advances are really starting to open my eyes to us not even having scratched the surface. But with the field itself growing exponentially and stuff I'd never considered before like putting AI to work finding cures for major diseases - it's exciting but also kinda scary tbh.

More on topic - sentient AI. Creating a digital soul so to speak. Spooky in a what have we done and is it good or bad kind of way.

masterfox488d ago

He is like: "Im done with F#@#$%NG nonsense, pff Metaverse da funk I was thinking!!, Im out!! :D"

Yeah he put a smile in his face too in the end.

Orchard488d ago

I hope he goes back to traditional games.

VR gaming is a flop and the Metaverse has (fortunately) completely failed to take off.

Babadook7488d ago

VR has much more potential than flat screen games. Just need to tap the right market and fund AAA development. Meta is a rotten company though so good to see him leave.

Orchard488d ago (Edited 488d ago )

That's where it becomes a catch-22 problem though. Very few companies (if any) are going to spend AAA amounts of dollars on VR if the market isn't there - and the market isn't there.

If it was the future of gaming we'd see the big publishers getting involved - and basically none of them are.

Agree on Meta 100% - horrible company and I really do hope FB (and social media) dies some day soon.

JackBNimble488d ago

There will never be AAA games until VR sells at the rate of mainstream consoles. Understand that even if Sony do sell 3.5 million VR in the next 2 or 3 years like they hope, that isn't ever going to get any commitments for AAA budget. No investor would ever sign off on that.

Orchard488d ago (Edited 488d ago )

The adoption has been terrible and the market basically non-existent as a result of that.

We're now 10 years into PC VR gaming, 6 years into console VR gaming and it just hasn't taken off - the reality is, most consumers don't care for it.

Even with a huge install base like the PS4, only a few million adopted it, about 3-4%.

ApocalypseShadow488d ago

He only thinks it in his mind. Because Microsoft isn't offering "high fidelity VR." Only Sony is offering "high fidelity VR" because they actually deliver.

I just read today that Honda is moving forward in using VR and has vehicles that were built in VR without an actual real vehicle.

Orchard just doesn't know any better. He claims he's a PlayStation fan but doesn't want Sony to succeed in growing the VR market. But he's okay with Microsoft buying up the industry and game pass. Tell you where his mind is actually at. Or he has investment in it.

But Carmack leaving is only that he was frustrated with higher ups. But he's very interested in AI. And that's a good field of investment too.

JackBNimble488d ago

If any of the big 3 had sales were like VR for their console, they would fold like the Saturn. Right now VR is nothing more then a high priced peripheral and no one should expect AAA for it.

By the way , I am one who would like to see VR succeed, but it has a long way to go before that ever happens.

Orchard488d ago (Edited 488d ago )

@Apocalypse

"Only Sony is offering "high fidelity VR" because they actually deliver."

And the reality is, from what we've seen thus far, the vast majority, about 97% of Sony customers don't care about it in the slightest. They can't even sell out of PSVR2 devices, which are supposedly in short supply. Better to just invest in traditional experiences instead.

"I just read today that Honda is moving forward in using VR and has vehicles that were built in VR without an actual real vehicle."

Yes. And that helps gaming how? I've said time and time again that AR/VR is great for enterprise. Just not great for gaming.

The lack of customers, lack of customer interest, and lack of AAA game companies investing & AAA game experiences being crafted says everything we need to know about the state and future of gaming VR.

tagzskie488d ago

When uncle philly announced true vr experience and demoed fallout 4 in one x, some xboys sings different tune..

Orchard488d ago

@tagzskie Well, those people were wrong.

Knushwood Butt488d ago

'Just not great for gaming.'.

That's your heavily biased opinion. You are in every VR thread trying to project your doom and gloom. Why?

There are many genres where VR is at least equal to or better than flat. VR in a driving game destroys the flat experience.

FPS, horror games, even Tetris is better in VR.

You speak about AAA as if it's the only consideration, moving goalposts.

Capcom.

Are they not a AAA publisher?

Is RE4 not a AAA game? RE7? RE8?

Hofstaderman488d ago (Edited 488d ago )

The Metaverse is one big flop but VR gaming on its own still has steam and growth potential. Remember Mark and his Meta wants you to associate gaming with the meta verse the gaming industry and its large number of users has the capacity to sway the opinion of the mass market.
Incidentally, Meta is haemorrhaging money and expertise that’s what this article is highlighting.

ApocalypseShadow488d ago

See, the problem orchard is that you see what you want to see. Sony sold PSVR at profit. They made money on software. They made money on a 10 year old peripheral. Yeah. It didn't sell 100 million. How many games sell bucket loads when they cost almost 10 times less than PSVR was at launch? That's why the new headset is coming. Before, there was no console VR. There is now. To grow the market, you must keep pushing and not be afraid like Microsoft. Facebook, HTC, ByteDance, Varjo, Valve, Sony, etc are growing the gaming market. Did flat gaming sell millions overnight? No. It took time. Just like any other product. Fads fade. VR is not a fad because it has potential in many areas. Sony doesn't want PS VR 2 to be a Kinect. A fad. Millions on advertising but no substance. It's why PS Move still exists and works on PS5. And Kinect is dead. Move had substance. PSVR had substance. Which is why PS VR 2 exists.

Honda is an example of VR entering other sectors. It's fairly obvious that it "ain't no 3D TV." Bugatti also uses VR as well as other car manufacturers. VR is here to stay. I know it hurts you that it's growing bedsides flat gaming being successful too. Just like mobile.

You just like to lie to yourself and others. VR is in education, in construction, in the automotive industry, medicine, real estate, music.... AND GAMING. The market wasn't there. Now it's here and it's growing in every sector besides gaming. But you want it to jump out there immediately like some viral video or fad. That's not how it works.

Chances are, you developed something, because you call yourself a developer. And no one wanted your product. So you're projecting.But there are other companies and developers who are successful in making VR work. You just sucked at it.

You claim Sony isn't selling out on pre-orders. But you don't even know what numbers they have allocated. Or how many they are producing to meet demand. You just pull it out from you know where and lie to everyone that Sony is failing. Sony has said they will have headsets for launch and not have to worry about production. What do you have that goes against Sony's statements on the matter? Absolutely nothing. Put up your facts against Sony's production lines?

But tell us. What software you made for VR that failed so that we all can know where your mindset is?

Orchard487d ago

@Knush You just highlighted the problem perfectly - the only AAA taking part in console VR is Capcom. Where is COD VR? Battlefield VR, GTA VR? All the big pubs are skipping on it because they don’t believe in its future - if they did they’d be investing in it now.

@Apocalyspe At the time I thought MS were insane for not getting into VR, but looking back on it, given where we are now, that seems like a very smart decision.

Honda making VR for car showrooms or whatever means nothing for gaming. The vast majority of gamers - PS gamers included - don’t care in the slightest about VR. The numbers show that.

I’ve never worked on a VR game nor do I want to. The market being non-existent means salaries are substantially lower when compared to AAA salaries. I wouldn’t take the pay cut - I’ve been in AAA since graduating college, and I intend to keep it that way.

But that’s also the good point of being a developer, ultimately it doesn’t really matter to me if the game sells well or poorly - I still get paid the same at the end of the day.

It’s funny that you mention Kinect because I consider the Kinect a failure too - but it still had 4x the sales of PSVR and a way higher attach rate.

We are supposedly still in the tail end of a chip shortage, so clearly we would expect a new device like PSVR to sell out - Sony themselves were too or they wouldn’t have done invites to get one initially - they thought it was going to be difficult for people to get one (so did many on here) but when it turned out it wasn’t they opened it up to everyone.

Clearly it isn’t moving as many units as they’d anticipated.

Come talk to me when we’re all sitting in our living rooms with VR headsets on and the attach rate is so high they ship it in the box as the default controller method - so I guess I won’t ever be hearing from you again :p

Knushwood Butt487d ago

@Orchard

'the only AAA taking part in console VR is Capcom'.

No, EA and Ubisoft have VR games on console.

https://www.ea.com/games/f1...

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 487d ago
Stanjara488d ago

Problem with VR is that it hasn't have legs. Everything from mevement, enemies, pacing, puzzles has to take that into equation.

488d ago Replies(2)
Hofstaderman488d ago

I agree with you. I remember when Second Life was as the dogs bollocks and big business had store fronts or ambassador land parcels but soon discovered that it was pie in the sky. Second Life is still operational but only frequented by a stagnant population of people who were with it since it’s launch. New people sign up to try it out but tend to not stay. People want to browse the internet or use it to play games not live in it.

generic-user-name488d ago

"And yet, you can provide me no evidence to the contrary."

Compare sales of gen 1 VR headsets with sales of gen 1 home consoles.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 487d ago
XxINFERNUSxX488d ago

One of if not, the best game engine developer in the world. I hope he gets back into developing game engines.

Orchard488d ago

I could see him in some kind of director role at Epic games working on Unreal Engine. That would be pretty cool.

MadLad488d ago

I would hope he stays away from modern day Epic.

Orchard488d ago

@Mad Depends. Their engine & online services are highly impressive and very advanced.

The games on the other hand... Fortnite... no thanks.

Wrex369488d ago

They need to stick VR back in RnD departments everywhere that or let the porn industry lead the way like everything else that's been introduced then brought to mass market after porn made it a thing lmfao

Number1TailzFan488d ago

Yea VR has that virt-a-mate thing which seems to be quite popular with adult Quest 2 owners, but i mean there is Half Life Alyx, few other things.. nothing huge after those so far.

Show all comments (39)