850°

Failure-in-Motion: The PlayStation Move is a Bust

PSLS: Think back to E3 2010, when all the talk was about Microsoft and Sony jumping onto the arm-waggling motion-controller bandwagon made so popular by the little Wii that could. The 360 went the way of controller-less cameras, and the PlayStation 3 decided to stick close to the Wii with the PlayStation Move. While the PlayStation Move is much more precise than the Wii, and has seemingly infinite potential, up to this point in time the Move has been a complete bust. And it’s looking like it will continue to be, at least in the near future.

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
doctorstrange5070d ago

I agree. It needs some move-only AAA games.

Trexman895070d ago

it just needs games period. Sure, games like No More Heroes will have Move Support, but there need to be game designed specifically for the device.

Heartnet5070d ago

Like Sorcery :) that game look sweet imo :P

Boletarian5070d ago

If there was a game designed specifically for Move, that one could only play with Move, would it be said that Sony was shoving Move down people's throats?

Ju5070d ago

Move only games is not what I want. I want all games to support it (at least all shooters). I love the Move in shooters. Each its own I suppose. I hardly play games because they are Move exclusive, I like the games I am used to; but with a new experience.

They can tack on what ever they want, I think Sony should force all 3rd party studios to support a move option in FPS and 3rd person shooters (and action games). Glad Resistance3 will support it, but a shame if BF3 won't (well, there is some time left).

sikbeta5070d ago (Edited 5070d ago )

If they wanted to push the thing for real, they should have Sourcery done by the time Move was released, (no news about this game for months now) the same way with LBP2 which was pushed back until January, get ready all the patches for the games that support Move like HR and RE5 ( pay to Capcom to get it done in time if needed), release some Move-only games and after all that, release games with optional support like KZ3 and R3...

t0mmyb0y5070d ago

I was hooked on Tumble when it came out, then Echochrome 2 wasn't quite as engaging. Now I don't use it :(

-Alpha5070d ago (Edited 5070d ago )

It needs exclusives, sure, but the problem is that it's an optional motion device, meaning less focus and attention by devs because they don't want to limit their product.

PS3 is doing well, consumers and devs just want to focus on the plethora of games for the product, not jump into unnecessary device add-ons.

The product itself is too much of a risk for devs to go out and utilize to its potential. As long as the product is optional, devs will assume first that most of their audience does not have both.

This also goes for the people saying the Vita will make the Wii U obsolete: Wii U tablet is in the hands of 100% of Wii U buyers. Devs have more confidence in using the Wii U tablet to its advantages. The PSVita is not in the hands of 100% PS3 users and devs wont utilize the compatibility as a main focus.

fr0sty5070d ago

I guess kinect is a bust also? it only has a couple million more sales, and an even worse looking game library.

Aggesan5070d ago

In a way I'm glad it's not a huge success. Too many people buying it would mean too much focus on casual stuff from the developers, which is in conflict with my intrests.

killcycle5070d ago

Move for me has been the best experience for Arcade shooters.

Deadstorm pirates and Time Crisis.
Killzone 3 is also very very good with move god knows how they made it so accurate on that game.

What do they need?

POINT BLANK!!!!!

seinfan5070d ago

That's the problem, though. Call the developers lazy, but they have to do twice as much work with vector calculations just to support both the DS3 and Move. They are going to favor DS3 in terms of QA simply because it's the standard. But if they only supported Move, then people would be like "wtf, I don't want to buy a game that makes me use this only." Pick your poison.

DarkTower8055070d ago

I enjoy The Fight: Lights Out, then House of the Dead is coming out soon. Still waiting on Sorcery like others.

Dee_915070d ago

after i got use to sharpshooter i was hooked for awhile
I was just imagining what could be possible
but it does need more support
Honestly I was hoping for more move titles at e3

lil Titan5070d ago (Edited 5070d ago )

i wouldnt say move is a failure anymore than kinect is a success http://imageshack.us/photo/...

Disccordia5070d ago

I think Sorcery was either cancelled or will return as only a move-optional title? The game looked pretty much done at e3 2010 and then we've seen nothing for 15 months.

fatstarr5070d ago (Edited 5070d ago )

they are lucky no more heroes is designed for the wii. like i said a year later and its just a wii mote imitation with lackluster games.

they should just release ps4 with move and move+ support out the gate

100% of the games library should support it thats like gettin a ds game with no touch input.

a universal move to controller mapping should be able to be downloaded and patched into any game so you could at least walk and play basically with move in anygame.

Getowned5070d ago

yep the move is a failure and not because of the tech the device it's self is great but it's not used to it's full potential it suffers i got mine with the socom4 bundle and it was fun but then socom got boring and i stoped playing and a month later i got dead space extraction and played it with the move (as a huge fan of dead space i loved it 8.5/10 not bad for a rail shooter) i am how ever intrested on how it will be used with the new bioshock game..my biggest problem with move is lack of support i should of known they wouldn't support it that much just like the eye toy and the move turned into nothing more then a gimmick right now the only move game i still play is the fight lights out.we need more move games maybe a few made for move only or at the very least move in mind.

nickjkl5070d ago

i find it strange how people call i a failure because there's only a small number of move only games

that's like calling a car manufacture a failure because only a small amount of there vehicles are used in racing

Marceles5070d ago (Edited 5070d ago )

Well that's the thing nickjkl...a car manufacturer makes race cars, but if people aren't making any roads for the race cars to drive other than on a regular street, then what's the use of owning one? You can only drive at the limit and only know about its potential.

darthv725070d ago

The wii uses the wiimote 100% of the time. This includes using it as a pass though for the classic controller.

Yet because of the focused attention in the controller it basically gives the devs different ways of making it work for their game. Move has potential but it needs to get past that "add-on" appeal and fall into more of a standard like the wiimote.

Problem is....sony would not commit to that kind of investment. Changing everything they have done with traditional controls and forcing the use of move to take the sixaxis/ds3 place. It wont happen or if it does then next system release.

But to call it a bust is hardly appropriate. The games are there with more to come. To call move a bust would be like calling sony's 3d in games a bust. The only ones that should be able to say that are sony themselves. For now there is support for both move and 3d as new games come out.

zag5068d ago

All this stuff doesn't work simply because you need to devote a whole room just to make use of it.

Which many people just wouldn't want to do that.

The other reason is not many people will want to stand up and jump around just to do stuff in a game.

Many people are just jumping on the band wagon because it's new then find out that a 6 hour game would actually require you to stand up and jump around for the whole 6 hours and probably give up after 20 mins.

+ Show (17) more repliesLast reply 5068d ago
50Terabytespersec5070d ago (Edited 5070d ago )

I hope Sony learns from this garbage..
Thank you also MS for brainwashing(millions in marketing) Americans into thinking your crap is just as good, motion control BS!
Motion Control is the day i can run walk in place and jump and shoot evert MF in the room and break a major sweat and calories,and not look like and idiot doing it!!!!
This crap is child gimmicks and nerd life-sucking toys!
Im out in the outdoors doing this crap and with Paintball Bikes and guess what Im not obese!!!!
Give me games like uncharted and Killzone not Gimmicks Sega 32x anyone?

Neko_Mega5070d ago

Really? This idea seems to be working for Sony more then Wii making games Wii Remote only.

Elwenil5070d ago

What are "Paintball Bikes"?

ASTAROTH5070d ago (Edited 5070d ago )

Unfortunately its all NINTENDO's fault.

Nintendo take a gamble just adding motion controls to a GameCube powerfull old tech hardware. The press and everybody saw the Wii as an "innovative" gameplay over graphics console when the reality was it was just a new motion controller with lots of shovelware and crap games to play. We all end buying a Wii just for the hype... as amazing as Mario Galaxy 2, I cant stand playing it for more than one hour with the Wii mote.

Then everybody copied NINTY and guess what?? Ninty just droped the Wii controller for a more traditional controller with a LED screen and a console with HD graphics. What happened to the gameplay over graphics NINTY?? The truth was that gameplay experiences were and are even worse with motion controls.

NINTY is known among fanboys for being innovative. I believe NYNTY is the responsable for the decadence in gaming. They just want more money from the Mario franchise. Ninty is also responsable for the overhashed and re-releases of old games in new packeges... HELL Ninty even re-releases its old Mario All Star as a Wii "exclusive". Thanks to that now we see a everybody re-releasing games as HD revisions instead of completely new experiences. From Sony to MS to Nintendo and Capcom everyone seems to have an HD collection of something. Dont be surprised if the mayority of Wii U games ended up being "remastered" Gamecube and N64 "classics"

Just my opinion... ohh and I have the MOVE too. So far KZ3 is one of the few games I really enjoyed with it... but I still prefeer playing it with the DS3!!

5070d ago
orange-skittle5070d ago

Sony copy-cats everything Nintendo does. When Nintendo showed the world the Wiimote, Sony responded w/ the dumb six axxis controller. Barely any games make use of it and is almost unused now. Microsoft stuck w/ their guns and kept their controllers the same way without following Nintendo. Their response to Nintendo was remote-less control. What was sony's response, Another controller that does the same is the wiimote. What's next Sony, a tablet?

Hayabusa 1175070d ago

Though you put up a good arguement against motion controls, you failed miserbaly by suggesting it was Microsoft that "brainwashed" Americans into believing Motion controls was the future when we all know (except for you, apparentely) that Nintendo kicked it off. Fanboyism at it's best...

Achemki5069d ago (Edited 5069d ago )

@orange skittle
How can a "me-too" company be the only one with blu-ray and true stereoscopic 3D in 2011, lol?

Look, I like Nintendo, but the Wii isn't even HD and the online Wii friend codes are a dinosaur. You can just as easily say Nintendo is copying Sony and MS with their new Wiis and the 3DS since the Wii supports neither 3D, HD or anything resembling a relevant online service.

orange-skittle5069d ago

@Hayabusa, MS didnt brainwash anyone into thinking that bc you would've seen it mass marketed and everywhere. You would see it implemented in a lot of their games as well. They just want a piece of the pie w/o making and ME-TOO controller. MS wants the 360 to be a multimedia machine. That was the target goal since 2001. They invest more into XBL than they do anything else. If you did your hmwk you would have seen that was Bill Gates' mission statement.

@Achemki

You have to be joking if you think Nintendo is copy-catting. They haven't followed the leader yet and sometimes it has failed while others have been successful. When everyone went CD-ROM, nintendo stayed cartridge based and failed. Then when they went disc, they went mini-disc and and failed. Nintendo not only dominates consoles, they dominate hand helds. How can you even say what you said? MS has yet to release a motion controller or update their DVD9 drive to blue-ray to appeal to the masses. They do what they do...period. Sony should focus on what really matters most...ONLINE GAMING. Fix PSN and give it a major update/overhaul. Digital Downloads and Streaming is the future.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5069d ago
VINNIEPAZ5070d ago

As I said in my other post if you bought Move or Kinect you shouldn't have expected a massive amount of games to go with them. When you buy these "ad ons", you are most likely going to waiting months between something worth using them for. I have both and am somewhat happy with what has been released for both, yea I wouldn't mind more games but this is about what I expected. Saying either failed is all perspective I guess.

TheDivine5070d ago (Edited 5070d ago )

Idk kinect has tons of games and lot coming. The difference is move is kind of an afterthought where kinect has the focus. Its great move can work with games but it needs a reason to buy it like move exclusives, not just sorcery down the road but at least 5 good ones. Kinect has that. I dont own either but il get kinect down the road once all these games get released. I want ur shape and ufc trainer not to mention child of eden is awesome on it. Hope steel batallion, project draco, and kingdoms whatever come out well.

Kinect is a platform where move is a redisigned controller. I dont want to spend 100 for move plus 80 for another just to replay through my games. Il pay 150 for kinect if theres games i want for it.

mcstorm5070d ago

I agree with you. There is aot of hate for kinect and move but they are both good at different things. Kinect offers more than move and i think so far ms have done a good job with it as they have some must have games like kinect sports dance central. But move dose not really have any stand out game. Yes kz3 and lbp2 look amazing but if yoi dont tell everyone what move adds to the game noone will buy it and this is why kinect has out sold move. This is why apple out sell everyone else and tthe same for the wil and ds out selling the other consoles.
The biggest plus for kinect though is it can be used for more than games and this will help ms think of new ways to interact with the console plus with games like forza 4 me3 adding extra content into the games for kinecg it will help other developers come up with other ideas for there games. Where sonys first party are not really showing off move in there games so its not pushing the device.

SonnyD9785070d ago

Kinect does not offer more than Move, mcstorm.

taylork375070d ago

@Sonny

They are both busts so who the fuck cares.

Kurt Russell5070d ago

I bought a move... it's a clever bit of tech - but I bought one game when I got it, and have never bought anything for it since. If house of the dad lands for it I will get it, but in general it's just another dust gatherer in my living room.

IcarusOne5070d ago

Sonny says "Kinect does not offer more than Move, mcstorm."
I disagree. (Full disclosure: I own neither.)

Kinect allows you to navigate the dashboard without a controller. Move doesn't. Kinect recognizes your face and signs you in automatically. Move doesn't. Kinect allows you to interface via voice commands. Move doesn't.

At this point let me clarify: I'm not saying the PS3 can't do some of these things, just that at the moment, it doesn't.

I'm not too interested in either piece of tech at the moment, but what really impresses me about Kinect is its use beyond the console. Hospitals buy it and write their own software for it, allowing doctors to interact with 3D MRI scans. Cancer researchers use it to examine theoretical proteins. I just read that there's even a Kinect at the Hadron Collider, allowing the scientists there to better control the scans of the collisions.

In my opinion, Kinect is moving us closer to a Minority Report future. Move isn't really doing anything, aside from helping some of us play a couple of video games.

paintsville5070d ago

Kinect is a huge success with lots and games and record setting sales. Move, like this article said, is a bust. Too much like Wii.

Achemki5069d ago (Edited 5069d ago )

@icarusone & mcstorm
And the Move has ITS OWN DEVELOPMENT KIT on the PS Store with free discounts for schools and people who want to use it for educational/teaching applications etc. Do some homework. http://blog.us.playstation....

Move needs a camera to work so a camera is part of Move and the camera has been recognizing facial scans and voice (it has a built in mic for any game) for years. Kung Fu Live scans and tracks your whole body into the game as is. Games/apps like Tori-Emaki and Operation Creature Feauture are 100% hands free Minority Report (including menus) since 2006/2007. The concept of Kinect is only new to people that don't have PS3s or know what they do, *cough cough*.

@paintsville
Move sales are just a smidge below Kinect. Kinect however doesn't support AAA games. Move works with lotsa stuff from existing games like Heavy Rain and Killzone 3 to LBP2 and Resistance 3 later this year. Resistance > Sesame Street.

StanSmith5069d ago

@achemki

If you had used kinect you wouldn't be comparing it to those PS Store titles that use the PS Eye.

Look, i was like you. I doubted kinect. I just couldn't see how it could work and i wrote it off as an eyetoy copy. Oh boy did that opinion change when i played it at a friends house. Simply put, it works. It's better than Move. It now has better support than Move. Move will just be an add-on as this article says. Kinect has become a new way to play games just like the Wii was when it released.

I'm no longer using my Move controllers. They just sit there collecting dust. This year, however, i'm planning on buying kinect for games like Star Wars & Rise of Nightmares. As for move.... It could find itself being traded in.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5069d ago
showtimefolks5070d ago

for example PSP is a failure yet it sold over 60 million systems and sold a lot of software for sony too so why is it a failure? compare to DS is that why?

and ps move has sold over 9 million units and that's without any major title just for move. I don't think sony considers that a failure and with more titles using move and some move exclusive titles coming up soon its only gonna get better.

sorcery should be a great game with move

but what a fan may consider a failure might be a huge success for that company.

SlipperyMooseCakes5070d ago

If you read the article, he isn't coming from a sales perspective. He goes over that early on.

nycredude5070d ago

So just because he thinks it is a failure then it is? Forget about the numbers right just toss that out the window.

damnyouretall5070d ago (Edited 5070d ago )

i really like my move sharpshooter. kz3, socom 4 and r3 round the corner. headshots are easier,kinda as easy as using a mouse to aim. all the people that tried my setup really enjoyed it, so i wouldnt say its a bust. some people think theyre too cool and just wont give it a chance. anyways im hoping a great game like skyrim will use the move. we'll see. ive been playin games for 27 years and i dont mind changing it up a bit. move is better than just a gimmick imo

arjman5070d ago

They need Lord of the Rings with move controls.

Imagine slaying uruk-hai at Helm's Deep with the move as your sword and the nav. as your shield...

JayD-1K5070d ago

you would need 2 move controllers but, yeah...nice idea!

firemassacre5070d ago

i do not agree, i think the move has actually proven to have hardcore games like resistance 3, killzone 3, bioshock infinite will use it ect...all we need it sorcery.

GrandTheftZamboni5070d ago

Killzone 3 + Move + 3D = one of a kind experience.

I wouldn't believe it if I hadn't tried it for myself.

subtenko5070d ago

Well the ps move does have more games than kinect, I guess kinect is dead O_O say it aint so :( I like both, I prefer one over the other, but I sitll like both.

As a ps2 eyetoy owner, I appreciate what both do for the gaming industry no matter how big or small of a deal they are. Sometimes things make you go "wtf..." but thats not all the time..

Agree or Disagree if you Agree

Tired5070d ago

You DO realise just how lame 'Agree or Disagree if you Agree' is, right?

tplarkin75070d ago

Sony did not invest in motion control tech. The Sixaxis controls and Move were knee-jerk reactions to the competition. It was done to please the investors, not gamers.

jneul5070d ago

dont be stupid and completely ignore the existance of eyetoy even before wiimote existed and they even had an early version of move back in 2001(just a prototype without buttons or gyros), yes back then it was all just testing to see if their theory worked but seriously i think we are all fed up of of these suggestions when there is proof out there that sony did indeed invest in motion control way before ninty did....

Seferoth755070d ago

Come on now... Posting a video in 2008 two years after the Wii releasd and slapping a 2001 date on it is hardly proof.

BTW you might want to look up this thing called the Power Glove. Nintendo released it before Sony was ever even in the gaming market.

so if I take a Wii video and slap a 1980 date on it you'd take it as proof?Wow

You got fooled by PR BS.

Cmpunk5070d ago

atleast sony didn't abonded their fanbase unlike m$

Hedberg5070d ago (Edited 5070d ago )

I think it works really well in Socom 4, Killzone 3, Tiger Woods: The Masters 2012, and The Fight: Lights Out....I am looking forward to Sorcery and Resistance. It works really well for shooters (not with the sharpshooter attachment, I haven't tried that, just by itself) It is akin to using a mouse a keyboard and I have really taken a liking to it.

My kids love The Shoot, Time Crisis: Razing Storm (especially the Dead Sea Pirates part),and even Eye Pet and Start the Party...... Definitely and underrated peripheral in my eyes.

cobblestone195069d ago (Edited 5069d ago )

Move still has more overall quality than the embarrassing Kinect. Kinect makes me feel sorta ashamed to be a gamer...

EDIT: @Cmpunk: The fact that you have any disagrees proves that 360 fanboys care WAY to much about what happens with the Ps3.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 5068d ago
Lifewish5070d ago

Needs some much needed love in the form of killer games.

Drekken5070d ago

The shooters that support move have been pretty amazing. Slap a move and a navi in the sharpshooter and that warrants the price of entry. I have been having too much fun with it lately and can't wait for resistance 3.

guitarded775070d ago

No doubt... Sony has done an excellent job of making games for all players with the Move.

LadyGaga5070d ago

Those games only support Move functionality and are best played with a controller. Those games don't count. Move doesn't have any decent exclusives.

Drekken5070d ago

So what you are saying, Lady Gaga is that a game that I only play with the move/sharpshooter doesn't count as a move game? Your N4G persona is as stupid as your music.

Sony already said that move won't replace the controller, but be another option. I spent money on move and get to use it with these games and that counts.

BrianG5070d ago

I personally have about 6 games for Move, 3 being Move only and the others Move compatible.

While I'm not overwhelmed with great games at my finger tips, I'm also not completely disappointed.

The Move compatible games are always fun, and I am picking up quite a few this Fall, old and new. But I would obviously like to see more Move exclusives, like Sorcery type games. Maybe even a full on Gladiator type experience, Fallout style game maybe, those would be great.

Creative uses for the Move controller. I don't want to see games like Deadmunds Quest from E3 or Move Hero's. While those games do target an audience, they aren't for me.

metsgaming5070d ago

sports champions was great and thats about it, then there is killzone 3 which i played a little bit with it. They need to make a sports champions 2 i was disappointed they went and made a mid-evil game instead. When you look at it alot of shooters are using the move now but i just dont like it for shooters or at least FPS. Then there was that bs with RE5 that you had to have the gold version. Complete bull that would have worked great with the move.

Fishy Fingers5070d ago

Tacked on peripherals rarely win over the masses, Move just followed the trend. Better luck next time. Stop wasting development resources on it please.

Parapraxis5070d ago (Edited 5070d ago )

I'd like some more move games. Spending development money is not a waste to me. If anything they should put more money into it, especially from a business standpoint.
Resistance 3, Bioshock Infinite, GoldenEye 007: Reloaded and The House of the Dead Overkill will all be played first with Move.
And if they play as well as KZ3 I'll be more than happy.

Vaud-Villian5070d ago

Move released at about the same time Nintendo started to fall into decline. Waggle gaming is a popped bubble.

Show all comments (216)
170°

Sony Aims To Sell 15 Million PS5 Units This Year, but Is Shifting Focus to Monthly Active Users

Sony CEO Hiroki Totoki and CFO Lin Tao talked about the state of the PlayStation business and the strategy and targets going forward, including how they're responding to the tariffs.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
1Victor38d ago

I wonder how the USA tariffs war will affect that projection. 🤔

S2Killinit37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

I think they take that into consideration when they announce their projections. Currently, after the xbox price increase, the PRO is cheaper than the series x! That is ridiculous, and it can’t last.

darthv7237d ago

you keep saying that but the price of a PS5 Pro is S699.99 (US) and the price of a Series X is $599.99 (US)

S2Killinit37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

The series x with 2 TB storage space is more expensive than PS5 PRO which also has 2 TB storage space.

darthv7237d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Oh so you are pitting a regular Pro with a special edition X... got it. If you are going so far as trying to compare apples to apples... please add in the optical drive and stand to the Pro. Seeing as the X has both of those by default.

I will help you if you are unable to do so.
PS5 Pro 2tb: $699.99, Optical Drive: $79.99, Stand: $29.99 = $809.97
Xbox Series X Galaxy Black Special Edition 2TB: $729.99

37d ago
S2Killinit36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. The series X with 2TB storage and much weaker, is… more expensive! So yeah, Im pointing out that fact.

Also, the PRO does not require a stand.

Ps: regular series 2TB is $749 (where did u get 729?)

darthv7236d ago

Its right here on the official XB site: https://www.xbox.com/en-US/...

Okay, so no stand for the Pro, but you might still want the optical drive. So $779.98 vs $729.99. A properly outfitted Pro is still more $$ than a 2tb X.

S2Killinit36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Do I need to mention that the series x is not nearly as powerful as the PS5 PRO?

And no, the PS5 PRO runs just fine without a drive, and people don’t have to buy the drive right away, assuming they want it.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 36d ago
drivxr37d ago

I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU.

RaiderNation37d ago

Because that's where the real money is made, in microtransactions.

Profchaos37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

People are spending less time playing is a typical trigger for this.

The less time spent playing the less likely you are to spend more money on games and services including subs or even the next console.

Increased engagement equals more money.

37d ago
DarXyde37d ago

Same reason Microsoft does it: it looks better to investors and it's a solution when unit sales slow down.

Personally, I'm not a fan of this metric; and by using it, you're kind of signaling that you're moving into the "This is a PlayStation" era.

Z50137d ago

Because the PS4 also has users and not necessarily sales

Obscure_Observer35d ago

"I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU."

Because they´d finally realized that MS wasn´t wrong after all.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 35d ago
37d ago
37d ago
310°

Sony Announces Large Profits Growth for PlayStation; Expects Further Wins in Current Fiscal Year

Sony announced its financial results for the fiscal year 2024, and things are certainly looking up, despite a decline in PS5 sales.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
CrimsonWing6938d ago

Expect sh*t to slow down if prices aren’t kept in check.

Redgrave38d ago

Who downvotes the truth?

Even PSN itself is too damn high.jpg

S2Killinit37d ago

Gamepass is already at 20$ per month if im not mistaken.

toxic-inferno37d ago

@neutralgamer1992

Not all of us. I'm a big PlayStation fan, and have been since the PSOne. But I can't begin to defend what's happening currently.

At least Nintendo release a large number of games from their major franchises. Sony is just not banking on their established franchises, and yet are raising prices. Not great.

S2Killinit37d ago

Im pretty sure we are going to see a price increase for PRO. I mean think about it, its currently cheaper than xbox series x! That cannot last.

Eonjay37d ago

I'm absolutely sure we will not see a price increase. I don't think we should 'expect' to see price increase because it just adds validity to what Nintendo and Microsoft have done.

darthv7237d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Sorry to pop that bubble but the Pro is not cheaper than a series x... generally speaking (like you are). It is cheaper than one specific version, and doing so by not including the optical drive and stand like the X has by default.

So keep on trying to convince people you are right when everyone knows it's quite the opposite. A stock Pro is $699.99 and a stock X is $599.99. A special edition galactic black 2tb X is $729.99. And if you really want to compare apples to apples... adding the aforementioned optical drive and stand brings that Pro to $809.97 and then they would be on equal footing.

Twisting truths to fit a narrative... I expect better from you S2.

S2Killinit37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. And the series X with 2TB is more expensive. Which in my opinion is insane conseidering how much more powerful the PRO is. The PS5PRO does not need a stand, it can be used without a stand.

TheKingKratos38d ago

So the Pro is not offering any push in sales at all ?

CrashMania38d ago

It's still an expensive, niche product ultimately. And they exceeded their sales projections for units sold by half a million.

lawox37d ago

"18.5 million units have been shipped during the full fiscal year. This is actually ahead of the 18 million units target set by the company."

They beat their yearly estimate. It's not broken down by device, but it's clearly performing well enough. Since it's been released it's consistently been the second best selling SKU on Amazon only after the the Slim with disc.

37d ago
Bathyj37d ago

18 million a year is in the toilet?
I remember when 10 was considered good
Hell Microsoft would take that right now.
Probably pay $100b for it.

37d ago
BeHunted38d ago

If their profits fall next quarter, we'll probably see more price hikes. I can't imagine having to pay £20 a month for PlayStation Plus.

S2Killinit37d ago

I think gamepass is already paying that much.

37d ago
drivxr38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Decline in hardware sales.
Behind on lifetime sales and decline in first party sales.
Third party content and PSN came through to save the day.
Things will improve starting with the next Ghost game.

Hopefully a steady flow of first party content by end of '25

rlow137d ago (Edited 37d ago )

I guess you get downvoted for stating facts from Sony’s own lips. What I’m curious about is what their top games of the year were and how much Xbox games contributed to the increase?

CrashMania37d ago

Well, generally 3rd party publisher games contribute the most anyway, so no different to capcom, EA and so on contributing to this figure.

lawox37d ago

That's because the report is actually really good.

They beat the console sales estimate that they set last year March, they have increased users both due to the record numbers of PS4 users and strong PS5 sales which is leading to great profits in sales and user spend.

This report is about the financial health of the PlayStation brand and as a platform PlayStation is stronger than ever. Heck they even have Microsoft putting their biggest franchises on the platform.

37d ago
S2Killinit36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Well, the facts in the article are positive. Nothing wrong with his comment, but in my opinion it doesn't correctly indicate all the facts and nuances that give context to the reality of things. I downvoted for that only.

Make sense?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 36d ago
Lightning7737d ago

This is exactly what happened to Xbox year's ago. They had no first party and started seeing decline in 1st party sales, which effected their third party games which eventually effected their console sales. A slow decline across the board.

Calm down PS fans I'm not saying PS is becoming like old Xbox. I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. Look how Xbox finally has compelling first party and things are on a up swing(despite years going on a downswing). I know thanks to PS releases which helps a ton, (which is why Xbox hardware only dropped 6% instead of 30+% like it usually does) The point still stands despite what Genz Trends may go, first party and compelling games sell hardware and software still. Sony's financial quarter is an example of this, of what lower First party output looks like.

No matter they'll be right back on track in due time any time especially with DS2 (not my type of game but I know many like it) and Yotei. They're not Xbox and let things get bad for so many years on end.

crazyCoconuts37d ago

"I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. "
First party is mostly relevant for the sole purpose of creating EXCLUSIVES that are needed to stay competitive. With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important. PlayStation as a platform now has free reign to profit without the high expense of needing exclusive first party titles.

red2tango37d ago

Sony has been very lazy with 1st party games compared to the PS4 era. And even the PS4 era was nothing compared to the PS3 era in terms of games.

S2Killinit36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

We have Ghost and Intergalactic coming. And then Marathon which is not exclusive to PlayStation. I think Covid and that chip shortage put a speedbump in game development because game manufacturers dont want even more risk that their game will arrive to too little hardware, but the games are starting to show up.

Lightning7737d ago

"With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important."

Absolutely not. If that was the case then Nintendo would put Mario on Sega Genesis and Sonic on Super Nintendo. I know things are way different 30+ years later but not much has really changed in terms of exclusives and their impact on hardware. Especially early in the console life cycle.

Sony made all the money this quarter handover fist. Profits isn't a issue for them right now. I was just saying lower hardware sales and lower first party sales will hurt them or any console manufacturer of they don't have the compelling games in the long run. Just like it hurt Xbox. IF Sony keeps up not having lower first part output. Which we know they're not.

crazyCoconuts37d ago

Well no big exclusives in the last two years yet PS is doing great. What are people gonna do? Buy an Xbox?

S2Killinit36d ago

I agree with you. But they have had plenty of exclusives so far. Has it been ideal? Nope. I have a feeling we are seeing a resurgence with the effects of covid and that chip shortage now behind us.

Lightning7737d ago

No it's just like 360 where they had no games yet ppl still bought it because they sold ppl on the games early on that gen the fans were locked in and invested. They were riding the good will and was dubbed the shooter, racer box. The games dried up and they never recovered from it which hurt them in the long run. Same here with PS they still make the big bucks because they had games early on and the fans locked in and will continue to lock in for a little while longer despite lacking in first party.

S2Killinit36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

I agree. But the problem with xbox was that for some crazy reason MS thought game development wasnt all that important to a platform holder. They literally did not fund games with their own studios. When they lost marketshare they couldnt justify paying for exclusives with large install bases making it too expensive. That is not the scenario with PlayStation.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 36d ago
Show all comments (46)
150°

PS5 shipments top 77.8 million

PlayStation 5 has shipped 77.8 million units worldwide, Sony announced in its financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

italiangamer38d ago

Perfectly in line to reach 100 million by March 2026.

Profchaos38d ago

Theys have to clear 22.2 million to do this.
When you average out the current number over 5 years it's unlikely.

If the console was going down in price it would be possible but they have not been able to reduce the cost in fact it's gone up so this is working against them.

gta Vi has also been pushed out of the financial year and there's likely millions of GTA v players still on ps5 that have not made the jump those players would for GTA vi

The overall poor market conditions and uncertainty doesn't fill me with confidence trade war, weak yen and the ongoing cost of living crisis. We're not talking core gamers picking up a new system were talking gamers who wait for the back 9 to enter a new generation.

I think 2027 they will but 100 not this year.

italiangamer38d ago

They will reach 100 million during 2026.

S2Killinit37d ago

It might actually get a boost considering that even the PS5 PRO is currently cheaper than the series x. This will of course be over soon as Im expecting a price hike for the PRO.

Travesty37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

I know Sony said they are considering raising prices.. Well as of yesterday China and the US lifted their tariffs standoff. At least for 90 days until they can agree on a trade deal that would benefit both parties. So with manufacturing in China and shipping them to the US I’m hoping it will not affect the prices.

Although I kind of doubt Sony will top 100 million since GTA 6 will be releasing next year by March. Could be wrong and I’ll be glad to be.

Xbox shooting itself in the foot or more like nailing their own coffin with rising prices. Hopefully Sony will stay put.. Ghost of Yotei is releasing for $70 still so that’s a god sign hopefully.

senorfartcushion37d ago

Is this a good thing for someone with no shares in Sony stock?

italiangamer37d ago

More PS5 on the market = higher chance of getting even more games.
It's not rocket science.

gold_drake37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

very nice.
in almost 5 years too.
some big hitters are yet to come

badz14937d ago (Edited 37d ago )

come on...don't say that! that slogan "Greatness Awaits" is haunting me everytime someone says this and yeah...1st party output has not been a highlight this gen which is a huge bummer! personally, I would rate their 1st party output this gen 4/10!

gold_drake37d ago

to be honest, when i typed it out, it did sound like a slogan for that ha