Following in the tradition of Harry Potter, the first Deathly Hallows was not a game worth writing home about. The Harry Potter series prior to the Deathly Hallows was enjoyable and interesting, however the Deathly Hallows Part One took many steps in the wrong direction whilst trying to be different and innovative and ultimately resulted in a very average title. You can read the Deathly Hallows Part One review here. Today however it’s all about the Deathly Hallows Part 2 and lets begin by saying WOW, what an improvement.
No major Harry Potter game has been released since 2011. Are they gone forever or can we expect new ones to return to loyal Harry Potter fans?
Sadly not much. Hopefully they can make some good Harry Potter games. I loved Lego Harry Potter games
Most of them were loosely based on the films.Now that there's no more movies being made for the time being, I don't see a new Harry Potter game releasing anytime soon.
Sorcerer's Stone and Order of the Phoenix were a blast to play because of their explorative nature. Goblet of Fire was another good one too, many good times with the co-op on that one.
They became trash after Chamber of Secrets and Quidditch World Cup. The Lego games were fun though.
PS3 Attitude: "Introducing a new weekly feature, in which PS3 Attitude takes an irreverent* look at the world of gaming. Today we’re discussing five sequels that, if we had our way, would never have seen the light of day; although, in a way we’re glad they did, because otherwise we wouldn’t have been able to write this article.
*At least 37% of the following is probably incorrect."
I would give you 10 speech bubbles for that comment if I had the power lol. DA2 is just horrible lol.
If it's a role playing game that needs to be on the list my vote is for Final Fantasy X-2. It was like a Japanese Charlie's Angels.
Why the hell should DA2 be on the list. The first one was a blast, the second one wasn't as good as the first but could still hold it's own. I didn't think DA2 was great by any stretch of the imagination, but I had fun with it, and the majority of reviewers agreed. If DA2 was released on it's own without the first to compare it too, no one would have said boo about it because as a stand alone rpg, it wasn't bad. It's only crime was it wasn't as good as the original. I've seen plenty of rpg's come out worse than DA2 but none seem to merit the hate that DA2 receives.
Yes... erasing standards is good for the gaming industry /sarcasm
DA 2 was a bit of a misstep compared to Origins, but there were some good things about it. The plot was more grounded and had applicability; not to mention it was a great cave simulator.
SAME HERE!! All 4 One was a great addition to the series, I don't see why these guys are hating on it. I'm a good ways through it now with a buddy of mine online, and it's loads of fun. The co-op "things" (dunno the correct word here), make it a lot of fun.
I think they are looking at this game like the other games, which is an incorrect way of looking at it. It's different, and if you play with a good friend whom also loves the series, it will be great. I haven't played by myself outside of the very first level, so I don't know of the AI problems.
duke nukem was the worst!!!! And what with 10 years in development.. Pathetic game.
The lights have gone out at EA’s Bright Light studio, Develop understands, with the group’s closure resulting in job losses and staff relocations.
LOL, sorry but this game is a 4 at best.
This is a 9 game.
9/100
2.5 off of perfection...
I think you may want to review your score.
You guys are a tough bunch.
It was reviewed back to back with Part 1 so...in contrast it may come out as a 7 or so next to the horrid part one. It is obviously an improvement