280°

Did Microsoft steal the Kinect?

In 2009, while Microsoft was busy designing and marketing what would become the Kinect, [Carlos Anzola], an inventor, tinkerer, and self-ascribed geek from Bogotá, Colombia, had been working for years on a nearly identical gesture interface for the PC. His creation, the Human interface Electronic Device, or HiE-D – pronounced ‘Heidi’ - was capable of gesture recognition years before Microsoft would release the Kinect.

Read Full Story >>
hackaday.com
Godmars2904666d ago

Weren't there any number of motion sensor technologies around before Kinect was made? MS even bought a company doing research out of concern they'd be accused of "borrowing" like they borrowed research from IBM for Sony's Cell chip.

newleaf4666d ago

Yes we get it, SONY started all things. The Sun was invented by SONY

Bonobo123454666d ago

No surprise really.
Respect goes to Carlos, Viva Colombia!

@newleaf, stop hating, It's not cool to be such a bot.

XRider4666d ago

^^^this^^^ is why this site is called News 4 Sony. Can't say "bot" or "xbot" yet here it is in full glory, and 10 hours old. Let me go repeat that in a Move article and it would be gone in minutes. A non trolling comment that just says something nice about MS and nothing about Sony even gets removed.

Fox014666d ago

"short answer, yes they did...as they did with the cell technology. and it all goes back to the eyetoy, and sony in general.

so next time a bot comes in and says microsoft made something revolutionary, shut up"

And this comment doesn't get flagged for "trolling"?

gamingdroid4666d ago

"short answer, yes they did...as they did with the cell technology. and it all goes back to the eyetoy, and sony in general."

LOL. Sounds like IBM handed MS cell technology on a silver platter at the expense of Sony. I'm sure a webcam existed before the EyeToy.

sjaakiejj4666d ago

@Xrider

Stop complaining. If you don't like the site, don't use it. If you don't like the comments, don't read them. Whichever way you put it, the site is in no way biased towards one or another manufacturer. There's Sony fanboys, Microsoft Fanboys and Nintendo fanboys in roughly equal amounts, and complaining about one of them being in a minority is just plain and simply silly.

Machioto4666d ago

@nopunctuation But it was prototype before wiimote and that should be sufficient for people,so they can stop saying Sony stole nintendo idea.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4666d ago
nopunctuation4666d ago (Edited 4666d ago )

Yes they did.
Sony stole the Wiimote
Microsoft stole HD gaming.
Sony stole achivements
Microsoft stole Miis.

You could go on. This whole generation has been one big contest to rip off the competition's features.

tiffac4666d ago

Wasn't the Move developed first before the Wiimote?

At least according to this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

nopunctuation4666d ago (Edited 4666d ago )

Yeah but its all about timing. Wiimote came out first and even though it was obviously rushed and buggy (still is even with motion plus), its is generally considered the first of its kind. Move improves on the wiimote in almost every way but the calibration is just annoying. Could have been so much better if they had found a way to avoid that as a mandatory action to start every game.

MintBerryCrunch4666d ago

MS first bought out the Israeli firm Primasense, the guys basically behind the tech of the Kinect, then they bought Canesta, a company which provided the gesture control technology behind the Sony Eyetoy

coincidence?

idk, but i can see why MS went after them since one was working with experimental tech and the other was already established since they were behind the tech of the Eyetoy

cstyle4666d ago

MS never bought primesense. They actually bough 3DV the company behind the z-cam. Plus ms has been working on this tech long before the kinect came along.

THILLREBORN4666d ago

@Server-1
Wow got any proof that they were working on the Kinect tech for any period of time prior to a few month prior to the reveal.

When a company starts these types of things they open up patents and have internal documents showing history of development so that way if a copy infringement lawsuite gets put forth they are protected.

That piece never took place so unless you pulled some document right on out of your arse then please close the hole that is your face.

Intelligent gamers in the know got on real quick that MS bought the Kinect tech and then put more money behind it to finish the polish...that's all. If they had been working on it for years where are the games using it to even 50% of it's abilities...mods can use it better than MS. Where are the internal studios projects to support the hardware again non-existent.

There are so many holes in the story of MS working on it for years that it's not even funny...s**t swiss cheese will float longer than this story.

kneon4666d ago (Edited 4666d ago )

It was 3DV that created the basic Kinect hardware, they had already shopped it around to Sony and Nintendo who both turned it down. I don't think Microsoft was doing anything like Kinect until they started working with 3DV.

I'm assuming 3DV also had some patents related to their camera so I don't know who will win. But their technique for determining the depth are very similar, this guy projects infrared dots while Kinect projects an infrared grid.

tudors4666d ago

@server-1 it's the primsense chip.

Les-Grossman4666d ago

Everyone steals something. Like Sony stealing XBOX Achievements & naming them Trophies

Vega754666d ago ShowReplies(3)
zinkabassy4666d ago ShowReplies(1)
tiffac4666d ago

Most products are either made from another persons idea and was reinvented to become better or the idea was just made by a couple of people at the same time but from different locations.

Why is people making a flame war out of this I will never know.

kneon4666d ago

If you want to claim achievements were stolen then I claim Microsoft stole them from Ratchet and Clank

http://www.gamefaqs.com/ps2...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4666d ago
bozebo4666d ago (Edited 4666d ago )

Kinect is just 2 webcams and some nice software (that runs on its internal CPU because the 360's cpu can't be loaded up with extra processing).

The key thing is NOT gesture recognition. Its ability to actually pick up the front and sides of what the cameras see as actual 3D polygonal information is where the magic happens, and is what sets it apart from things like eyetoy - which uses 2D scanning and recognition techniques.

But kinect in general is a failed piece of kit. They just released it because they knew millions of people would buy it after their huge marketing campaign. The input lag, for a start, makes it totally useless for gaming.

danielle0074666d ago

I've been playing Child of Eden with Kinect. It's really amazingly fluid and I don't even notice any lag. It's one of the most fun games I've played in a long time. I don't think it's completely useless for gaming.

greatjimbo784666d ago

@bozebo. Kinect doesn't have a CPU. They took that out at the final prototype stage, to keep down production costs.

tudors4666d ago

@greatjimbo78 they put it back mate.

ElementX4666d ago (Edited 4666d ago )

Kinect has those infrared beam things also...

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Webcams don't use infrared projectors.

EasilyTheBest4665d ago (Edited 4665d ago )

Bosebo
The input lag, for a start, makes it totally useless for gaming
So you obviously havent played Child of Eden, which is actually better without a controller.
You probably havent played Kinect Sports or Dance Central either...

bozebo4665d ago

Kinect Sports had loads of input lag. Why would I want to play Dance Central?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4665d ago
MischievousIQ4666d ago

MS must be doing it wrong cause HiE-D looks like it responds better than Kinect.

Show all comments (43)
20°

Joy Ride Turbo - The Beginning of the End for Xbox Kinect

Joy Ride Turbo launched 10 years ago today. The first title was Xbox Kinect exclusive, yet this sequel failed to support the device at all.

300°

10 of the Biggest Video Game Hardware Failures Ever

Cultured Vultures: "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal, and no matter how much developers might try, some gaming hardware just fails to hit the mark. We’ve compiled a list of 10 gaming hardware fails, and boy did some fail hard."

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Knightofelemia822d ago

I would label the Power Glove, Kinect, and that Tony Hawk skateboard more as hardware addons hardware failure would be like the Virtual Boy and one day Stadia.

Magog822d ago

Kinect was bundled with every Xbox One and inflated the price on an already underpowered and low RAM machine so for the One it wasn't an accessory as much as a white elephant.

CaptainHenry916822d ago (Edited 822d ago )

Definitely the RROD but that power glove had a lot of issues as well. The Kinect just didn't work

822d ago
CrimsonWing69822d ago

Hardware add-ons are more like RAM or a video card, basically components that enhance capabilities or performance of the computer.

If you really want to get technical the Kinect is more of a peripheral device, kind of like a keyboard or mouse to a computer.

ThatsGaming821d ago

The person in this article obviously is not up on their gaming history....

Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, Coleco Gemini, Commodore 128, Commodore Amiga, Atari 5200, Atari 7800 were all massive failures and in most cases cost their companies participating in future gaming generations.

Gamer79821d ago

Sega saturn (successful in Japan) and dreamcast were not failures.
Seems like you're not up on you're gaming history

septemberindecember821d ago

@Gamer79

How in the world are the Sega Saturn and Dreamcast not seen as failures? They both sold around 8M each, which is much lower than the ~30M that the Genesis had sold before it, and even the Master System before that. They were both the worst selling consoles in their respective generation (PS1, N64 outsold Saturn, PS2, GC, and Xbox outsold Dreamcast). Both of the consoles were incredibly short lived. The Saturn was discontinued in every territory but Japan after just three years. In Japan the console was discontinued after six years. Meanwhile the Dreamcast was discontinued worldwide in 2001 after launching in most territories in 1999 and in Japan in 1998. The failure of the Saturn and Dreamcast lead to Sega pulling out of the hardware market. Which, by the way, all of this occurred when Sega was massively dropping the price of their consoles quickly to compete. Sega was hemorrhaging money at this point.

None of this indicates a successful console. Saying the Saturn was a success because it did better in Japan is like saying the Vita is a success (they both sold around the same amount of units in Japan). Even the Wii U outsold these consoles worldwide.

Magog822d ago

The picture should be the 360 RROD. When I think of gaming hardware failures that's what springs to mind. Kinect and it's bundled price tag definitely hobbled the already underpowered Xbox One though for sure so I would give it a close second place.

porkChop822d ago (Edited 822d ago )

That's not what the author means by failures. It's about hardware that failed in terms of sales (Wii U) or just failed to deliver on its promise (Kinect).

Magog822d ago (Edited 822d ago )

Given that the 360 had a year head start, much easier hardware to develop for, was cheaper, and still ended up in third place I think it qualifies especially when you factor in the frustration and huge losses incurred by RROD.

porkChop821d ago

Selling over 80 million consoles isn't a sales flop. We get it, you don't like Xbox, but that doesn't mean the 360 is suddenly a failure.

Rhythmattic821d ago

Porky....
You know how many people I know bought a 2nd or third 360 due to RROD? Even when MS had to confront the issue with replacement systems, my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in, and waiting for a replacement.,,..,..
If that's how you consider it a win... OK.. but so is having 5 , of which 3 don't function.... Its a win win....mwhahahahaha

porkChop821d ago

"my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in"

You're acting like it would take months. When I sent my 360 in I got a new one literally 5 days later. As soon as MS had tracking confirmation that you sent yours, they'd send a new one to you the same day. No one is going to spend hundreds to buy a new console instead of waiting a week. I swear you guys pull some of the dumbest shit out of nowhere and think people will actually believe it.

Regardless, none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about.

Rhythmattic820d ago (Edited 820d ago )

Porky
"You're acting like it would take months"
Sometimes it could.. FFS.. 'Strya here...
Best turnaround I reckon was 2-3 weeks.....
Either way, My mates experiences still exist.. So Sorry, no point trying to earn Xbox Achievements when it doesn't feature in what was a situation you never dealt with,,,,
3 of my friends would disagree (overall, 10 extra Xboxes purchased)
Regardless.. MS sold a lot of 360's that was due to this reason.. That is sales. Fact

"none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about."
Headline says HELLO !
Oh and "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal," that's enough to pass this on without taking your article bias into consideration.....
As for the rest.... Ok.. But you've actually gone out of your way to give MS a Pass... Fap on.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 820d ago
Aloymetal821d ago (Edited 821d ago )

Yup, and because of that big fiasco MS had to fork out 1 billion but knowing them I think they're very proud of the 360, it's the only time a MS console reached 80mil+ sales, RROD played a big part of that and a record they will never break again.

Rhythmattic821d ago (Edited 821d ago )

So true.. Even when MS accepted they where caught out in the biggest lie of any generation, The wait for a replacement was outweighed by just buying another, and having one be returned as a backup, which, btw, generally failed on first swap.
I own honestly can't believe MS tards are just supporting , or arguing why and what MS did by just dismissing it....

lonewolf10822d ago

Lol I had the Atari Jaguar, surprised its "competition" the 3DO isn't on the list too, both as "popular" as each other.

SullysCigar822d ago

Lol same. Played the crap out of Aliens Vs Predator and Tempest 2000 .... aaand that's about it really!!

lonewolf10822d ago

Sad but true that was pretty much it.

Kurt Russell822d ago

Agreed, I never actually saw a 3DO make it to retailers in the UK. At least the Atari Jaguar was sold for around 6 months.

lonewolf10821d ago

It made it to some my brother got one, fared just as well as the Jaguar so most probably hard to find in general.

darthv72821d ago

3do had way better games. Jaguar not so much. Neo Geo sold less than both and yet isnt considered a failure. Go figure.

LWOGaming822d ago

Stadia is a weird one. It hasn’t sold at all well but in terms of how it works it’s still miles ahead of Xcloud in terms of stability and performance. Xcloud is still a way behind and that needs sorting but it will be in time. Stadia for me is one of those things that will go down as a what could have been moments. With better marketing it could have been a roaring success. I still play it and it remains the best place in my opinion to play CyberPunk 2077. Only platform I have played it on without having any issues at all. The tech is great. The concept is fine. Marketing terrible. Shame really.

Magog821d ago

The sales model was awful. They should have teamed with an existing player to allow for local and cloud access to games or a gaming subscription service.

LWOGaming821d ago

It was a strange mess from such a huge company, as I said, as a system it works really well but without gamers it’s nothing. Such a waste,

LWOGaming822d ago

The Xbox One was Microsoft’s Nintendo Wii U. Undercooked, undersold and just an unholy mess. The thing is with any of these failures is to learn from them and thankfully both Nintendo and Xbox did just that to the benefit of gamers everywhere.

Show all comments (39)
120°

Pivotal Decisions in Gaming History - Xbox Goes All-In on Kinect

Xbox 360's Kinect had flopped yet Microsoft insisted on mandatory Kinect for Xbox One, driving the price up and alienating their potential customers.

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
darthv72998d ago

the tech was pretty damn good but their focus on making it the centerpiece was not. Had they opted to keep it as a secondary or even tertiary device, it may have found new use for AR/VR.

PrimeVinister998d ago

Maybe. But they were two early for VR and too late for motion control

998d ago Replies(2)
Godmars290998d ago

Their focus was marketing metrics. Information gathering for targeted advertising. Also "event curating" or head counting for special TV events. If MS had had their way with always online and mandatory Kinect pre COVID, as and during it they'd likely be turning into dominant presence in many Western homes. Be getting subsidized by Disney and other streamers as well as the NFL.

Thing was, Kinect as an actual game system, its games, just weren't ready. MS moved on it too soon. Thankfully.

Atticus_finch998d ago

Sorry but it was incredibly bad for gaming. The thing barely worked as intended and the games were broken shovelware. And let's not forget all the lies from Xbox to try and sell it. What happened to Milo?
It's like Xbox it's a perpetual lying machine.

PrimeVinister998d ago

I had almost forgotten about Milo. It looks so unbelievable in retrospect. How did anyone believe it?!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 998d ago
TheEnigma313998d ago

Kinect requirement, TV focused, DRM, and $100 buried Xbone before it even stared.

PrimeVinister998d ago (Edited 998d ago )

I think Kinect was the worst of the bunch. They reversed DRM overnight and try to play down the TV stuff when they realised it made them look disinterested in gaming.

Kinect stuck around for six months, preventing sales and making more and more people upset when they dropped the Kinect and the price.

Atticus_finch998d ago

Don't forget the inferior hardware which affects their game development to this day.
And the constant boasting and lying that hasn't change very much to this day.

kayoss998d ago

I was kind of excited for the kinect. It had potential. That was until i tried it at one of their Microsoft store. The thing was so laggy and worker who was there, had no clue what he was doing. It kind of made rethink about buying an Xbox One with Kinect.

PrimeVinister998d ago

I had already been turned off of the idea by Kinect for 360. Even when it worked, the games were bad and showed no potential.

Wii made you understand what they were going to do with it within about 10 seconds of Wii Sports. It went on to become a bit of a joke but at least it worked and had a purpose.

Thundercat77998d ago

The damage to the Xbox brand was so hard that til this day they are just the last place brand in the market.

PrimeVinister998d ago

Totally. They haven't been really all that relevant since.

Godmars290998d ago

That has to do with repeatedly failing, having to reaffirm only to again fail at creating a competent flow of decent games.

@PrimeVinister:
Until Game Pass and BC are mentioned. Only for the point to be missed.

kayoss998d ago

thats because they dont know what they want to be. A gaming console, Television, or a gaming service?

Godmars290998d ago

@kayoss:
They wanted, expected, to be Steam. To have everyone coming to them and paying for the privilege. That's the exact mentality on display when they tried to push always online.

brewin998d ago

Its sad because the Xbox one version of Kinect was actually pretty solid. Not for motion games, I couldnt care less about those, but for the other features that are now commonplace in the gaming ecosystem. Things like voice control and optional motion features in games. Stuff that Sony did with the PS camera was pretty sweet and they could have done some of that stuff with Kinect.

The tech was pretty sweet when implemented right though. Who remembers the implementation in Dead Rising 3?! You could lure zombies away by saying stuff into the kinect, it was a bit hokey at first, but it actually enhanced the game significantly once you learned all the different voice commands. There was and still is nothing else like that!

The focus on TV seemed to be an issue for people, but the TV pass through had some real potential. They could have had cable companies giving the XBone out instead of cable boxes! I understood what they were trying to do, but they needed to show the games too, and thats where they lost the core gamers. Being able to jump right to a sports event or TV show with out leaving the console was actually a pretty cool thing. I spent many nights switching between NHL games or TV shows and jumping right back into my games seamlessly, just by telling Kinect to do so. It was better than people care to admit, but I loved it!

People say XBone had no games, but on launch I got Dead Rising 3, AC Black Flag, Watch Dogs, Killer Instinct, Battlefield 4, Forza 5, and Ryse. That was actually a pretty solid lineup in hindsight! Then later on it got gems like Quantum Break, Dead Rising 4, Sunset Overdrive, Gears 4 and 5, the Ori games, Rare Replay, Forza Horizon 3/4, State of Decay 2, ReCore (SUPER UNDERRATED GEM), Halo 5, Halo Wars 2, and all the great 3rd party stuff as well! I dare anyone who sat on the Xbox One to go back and give it a shot now.

It was actually a pretty great console all things considered. Yes the PS4 had better 1st party stuff, stuff that MS just couldnt top or even compete with, but there are some really great games that a lot of people missed out on that they would probably really enjoy if they actually played them. Thats why I recommend a Series S and Gamepass to a lot of people, as its a great way to get an awesome lineup pf games for super cheap!

Show all comments (22)