TGH Writes: "The original F.E.A.R was released back in 2005. Since that time, the series has built quite the cult following due to its unique approach to traditional FPS gameplay along with its honorific nature Now the third instalment in the series has been unleashed upon the world. But, is F.E.A.R 3 worth another week of sleeping with the light on? Or is best to lay this game to rest? Let’s find out."
DualShockers Writes "F.E.A.R. 3 (or F.3.A.R. if you’re a marketing executive) isn’t a great singleplayer game. It’s fine, competent even, but Day One Studios had an unenviable task in trying to wrap up Monolith’s F.E.A.R. series. With two timelines and two highly different styles of horror attempted in its wake, F.E.A.R. 3, well, it tries its best."
F.E.A.R. 3 wasn't even really a horror game when it came to the campaign. It was a good action game, but lost just about all of its horror roots along the way.
There have plenty of great horror games, but others haven't been so lucky as to stick around. They deserve to get a new lease on life.
That was probably the first time ever that I saw Castlevania in a list of horror games.
ps: Be warned, you have to click a lot to see every game in the list. I stopped after the 4th time.
What is divergent co-op and how could more games benefit from it?
Great detailed video review guys. Love the game.
Game looks pretty fun
when was fear scary? Fear has never been a horror game more of an action thriller
then again i don't get scared easy
and i don't think reviewers should knock a game for its story length.....all shooters have always been 5-6 hours depending on difficulty you should already expect that from a FPS
My copy is still on its way :( Want to play this soooooo bad I can taste it.