BeefJack: "Flaunting the talents of horror filmmaker supremo John Carpenter and equally creepy comic book and film writer Steve Niles, does F.E.A.R. 3 manage to shock? Or has it become a mewling kitten in a stagnating FPS market since being taken on by Day 1 Studios?"
DualShockers Writes "F.E.A.R. 3 (or F.3.A.R. if you’re a marketing executive) isn’t a great singleplayer game. It’s fine, competent even, but Day One Studios had an unenviable task in trying to wrap up Monolith’s F.E.A.R. series. With two timelines and two highly different styles of horror attempted in its wake, F.E.A.R. 3, well, it tries its best."
F.E.A.R. 3 wasn't even really a horror game when it came to the campaign. It was a good action game, but lost just about all of its horror roots along the way.
There have plenty of great horror games, but others haven't been so lucky as to stick around. They deserve to get a new lease on life.
That was probably the first time ever that I saw Castlevania in a list of horror games.
ps: Be warned, you have to click a lot to see every game in the list. I stopped after the 4th time.
What is divergent co-op and how could more games benefit from it?
bought it for my 360, it was ok
What eles did you want Fettel to lift? if you coudl tear apart the map the person playing as Point Man would feel left out of the action, not really sure what the issue with melee is about either if your running into a party of five looking to knife one you should expect to be shot at. The game a decent title imo with a top notch co-op mode, i'd would of thrown a 8 at it overall with the only real negatives being lack of a 'OMFG' weapon (Fear 3 weapons seem a bit tame) and a lack of real feeling of the story moving foward. The way the ending is pushe out via co-op scores is quite cool