Head2Head: Shadow of the Damned Analysis (Lens of Truth)

Lens of Truth writes "Welcome back for another exciting Head2Head! This week we slip our way into the shadows to reveal which version of Shadows of the Damned is the one to buy. This one may surprise some of you as for the first time in a long time, it is the load times that pins one version slightly above the other. Lets put a little light into the matter and see what lies beneath the shadows as we put this dark title under the lens to remove all doubt."

Read Full Story >>
The story is too old to be commented.
RudeSole Devil3440d ago

Nice one, PS3 looked slightly better to me.

MGRogue20173440d ago (Edited 3440d ago )

PS3 version wins.

It's very interesting that PS3 won this one considering that most multi-platform titles run & look the best on the Xbox 360..

It's almost as if developers are more... what's the word... knowledgeable of how the PS3 works & their improved skill in developing for the system is showing in recently released PS3/X360 titles, Nice. That's what I like to see.

belal3440d ago

Developers have started to work better with ps3 here, nice to see that!

Btw is the game any good?

CernaML3440d ago

Akira Yamaoka was involved. Game of the year confirmed. :P

HeavenlySnipes3440d ago

what are the point of these? You only see differences in screenshots, no developer allows their game to look noticeably different in video. The only reason I'd buy a multiplat on PS3 rather than 360 is because I feel the XBL is a ripoff. Unless a game is coming with more content on one platform (i.e BF3 on PS3) I don't care which system I get it on. :/

DrFUD3440d ago

I can't agree with LOT on this.
I hate screen tearing and if one version has none even while the other only has minor cases I have to go with the version without it (just like with Crysis 2)

Show all comments (11)