Xboxliveaddicts writes; 15 years in development, 3 developers later and a whole lot of waiting and we finally have it now that 3D Realms and Gearbox studios have it completed and published, the infamous Duke Nukem Forever was finally released for us all to enjoy. So how did it stack up now we finally get to play it.
Duke Nukem Forever originally began its life as a sidescroller instead of a shooter back in 1996, and that canceled version has just been leaked.
Very cool, but i don't know how real this is... I'll check it out later to find out.
Duke Nukem Forever, the troubled FPS from Gearbox and 3D Realms, has been restored to more traditional 90s shooter thanks to a sweeping “remaster” mod
kinda of a misleading title.
Mod features:
Sprinting removed and faster player movement
Jump height increased
Swim speed is much faster
Player can now hold breath underwater for 45 seconds instead of 15
Weapon rebalance and screen shake when shooting removed
2/4 weapon limit completelly removed
Quicksaves (F5 by default)
Depth of Field removed and new post processing effects
Driving sections are now in first person perspective
yw.
It is pretty amazing, I remember being so hyped that they covered the Duke theme back when it happened haha. I still quite enjoyed Forever though personally.
It is great, you should check out Eric Calderone - Duke Nukem meets metal .. thats proper as well
Duke Nukem Forever, the infamous and controversial FPS from 3D Realms, apparently looked much better before launch, as modders discover various cut features
Wow, that advanced lighting makes a huge difference to the visuals. I get that Gearbox tried to slap everything together and release a finished product. But it seems like they cut out a lot of content that would have made the experience more enjoyable. That's a shame.
Same, the AI could be pretty dumb but the bosses were fun. I thought the levels (mostly) got better later in the game too.
lol this game getting hammered in reviews..... latest one is IGN at 5.5/10.
IGN have poor reviews lately.... this game it´s pretty good and it´s what i was expecting after 14 or more years of wait.
Idiots would know a good game if it cut off there incredibly small, hopefully non-verile testicles off & shoved those hairy marbles down there throats. How dare all these retarded reviewers underscore this gem of a game by such a huge ammount.....
Anyone would think Sony made this game if you look at some of the mongoloydel scores they have given it...I mean sure it's not a ten worthy game, or even a 9 & some may debate it getting an 8 even......but after purchasing the game & enjoying it enough to play through several levels on my 1st quick play, as well as checking out the onlines worthyness, I must say, these idiots giving the game 2's & 3's just want to see there name up in lights & sites getting hits for reasons other than there journalistic skills (in fact, you will see the contrary & realize these geese deserve no place reviewing games).
I mean, for me the game is easily 7.5-8 worthy & personally I enjoyed the weapons & several other of the aspects most complained about in some of these crappy reviews..... For great contradictions I read some trashy sites 2 out of 10 review & they mentioned the crappy controls/gameplay as well as the horrible levels....then I read the wrap up of the IGN 5 out of 10 review & the main 2 positives they mentioned were good controls/gameplay & great levels......huh, did I miss something here....How can supposed subjective media give out such crappy reviews that put a game down with the worst of the worst, when Duke is a far, far, cry from the worst & is a nice little tribute & heartbeat to let fans know that the series is still alive & kicking.