420°

Miyamoto - Wii U is Technically on Par with Xbox 360 and PS3

SegmentNext - "Nintendo is confident Wii U hardware capabilities finally put them on the equal footing with their competitors".

Read Full Story >>
segmentnext.com
THC CELL4717d ago

i really dont think it will be par with ps3 as the 360 is not the same as ps3

Active Reload4717d ago

I think it's going to have higher frame rates and resolutions than those two consoles. That's my prediction...

EYEamNUMBER14717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

tittles are all so misleading around E3
i thought we were finally gonna get some insight on details of the console or something

yeah hes saying they believe it can do everything the others can
details on the actual system or still not there and i don't think well see em until september

Muletroid4717d ago

"When asked about whether Wii U with its hardware capabilities has put Nintendo on equal footing with its competitors, he replied"

then he just simply says
"Yes, we do feel that we’ve reached that"

that doesn't really tell me its on par technically
id love to get some actual info ive been seeing nothing but speculation for weeks now and im getting sick of it

Anarki4717d ago

Nintendo struck again.... come on guys, 360/ps3 is 5-6 years old and even then the tech wasn't the best. I'd expect infinitely better by now, especially considering the advancement in technology

SuperLupe4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

Dude the gap between the PS3 and 360 simply isnt that big at all, like really REALLY far from what you people try to make it out to be or wish it is.

waterboy4717d ago Show
sikbeta4717d ago

On par? come on Nintendo... :P

Pixel_Enemy4717d ago

So Nintendo admit they are finally joining THIS generation of hardware. A bit late because Sony and MS will be revealing their next gen hardware by the time WiiU is released

zootang4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

Still no HD format, Blu Ray.

SilentNegotiator4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

That's why when they sputter out the phrase "1080p" to any question about graphics, they refuse to use words like "native", "aliasing", and "framerate".......or even "better than"
Guess what? PS3 and 360 "support 1080p", too.

Reggie is stumbling over a question about how it runs in comparison, and it's "It has 1080p....check that box"
Can we check the box next to "Better graphics than PS3/360"? Or "native 1080p"?

If it's on par, obviously not. And their refusal to release REAL specs doesn't exactly instill confidence that it will have better framerates, resolutions, etc.

afterMoth4717d ago

I'd be bummed if it was only graphically matching the 360.. Quite a bit better if it matches the PS3 but still I'd hope for an advancement considering it comes out lat 2012.

360 man4717d ago

@ waterboy. the gap is big with exclusives ay?

well forza 4 is graphically superior that gt5 so how do u like those apples.

http://n4g.com/news/781139/...

watch video if u dont believe me :P

NiKK_4194717d ago

@360man
We'll see

Nice name btw

Dramscus4717d ago

@360 man

Haven't all their previous release vids been pre rendered on a pc with graphics and effects maxed out?

krauley4717d ago

for the wiiu to match ps3/x360 frame rates and resolution its gonna need a processor with power. cpu power = heat. the heat will need fan(s) and heatsink(s) to cool down cpu. So if nintendo does try to match the other 2 systems its not gonna be coming from that little white box seen in the e3 demo.

MaxXAttaxX4717d ago

SHOW me actual gameplay first.

Then we'll talk.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 4717d ago
metsgaming4717d ago

Impossible, the xbox360 and PS3 arent on par so how can the Wiiu be on par with both of them? So which is it closer to in terms of graphics a 360 or PS3?

Dread4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

sorry dude but the difference between the 360 and playstaiton 3 is marginal at best. Both systems have their advantages and disadvantages.. But it is a real stretch to claim that one is far superior than the other.

Crysis 2, the new Tomb Raider, Rage, Battlefield 3, all look amazing and equal or better than any console exculsive out there.

I know that most sony fans have tried to argue that one is much better than the other, but its all in their heads dude. I have not seen any evidence of graphic superiority. Uncharted 2 set the bar, but it has been surpassed.

again the difference is marginal at best.

Ju4717d ago

Yeah, after a while you start believing that...until you actually put UC2 back into the console.

360 man4717d ago

@ ju.

why dont u take a look at the 360s power

forza 4 baby :)

http://n4g.com/news/781139/...

dragon824717d ago

I own all the major exclusives for both consoles and I must say that the PS3 exclusives do look better than the 360 exclusives by a fair margin. I am sure that the 360 can produce games that look as good but it just hasn't done it yet.

Crysis 2 does look good on both consoles but after playing through the whole campaign it's clear that there are graphical issues that keep it from reaching it's full potential.

As far as Forza 4 goes, yes it looks good so far. I am going to reserve judgement until I see the final project. Same with Battlefield, Rage and Tomb Raider.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4717d ago
thugbob4717d ago

And then when the PS4 and XBox720 releases Nintendo will be behind yet again assuming that those two consoles are released in 2013.

But if Sony and Microsoft stick to their 10 year console goal then we won't see those until 2015/2016 which would be enough time in my opinion for Nintendo to release another console to coincide with the PS4 and 720 releases.

nnotdead4717d ago

720 by 2014 and PS4 same year or 2015

4717d ago
TKCMuzzer4717d ago

That might be true but Nintendo can't keep releasing twice as many consoles and expect customers to keep buying. Look at the DS and its newer models , now the 3DS. The 3DS is not selling as well because Nintendo have saturized their own market.
Their reluctance to add real horse power to their machines means that people are unlikely to upgrade when the differences are minimal.
Sony have a 10 year cycle but that's for the full life of the machine. All they are saying is they will continue to support the PS3 for those 10 years.

RumbleFish4717d ago

If it is on par with X360 and PS3 it's 5 years late.

iforgotmylogin4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

man i think people need to get battles right

i need there not to be confusion with what is competing with what

Atari and all that pre 85 stuff.

NES - Sega master system

SNES- Genesis

Game boy- game gear

N64- PS1 - Segasaturn

Gamecube - PS2 - Xbox- Dreamcast

NDS - PSP

WII - Xbox 360 - Ps3

3DS- PSV

WIIU- XBox *next* - PS4

Wiiu is next gen thus battling with ps4 because your gonna definitely hear ps4 vs wiiu next gen this that.

currently wiiu should have no competition in gen 8 and shouldn't be in direct comparison with ps3 and 360.

thugbob4717d ago

Exactly. WiiU is the start of next gen and it being on par instead of being ahead of last gen is ridiculous, although Nintendo is not known for it's outstanding graphics anyway so it probably doesn't even matter.

news4geeks4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

Nintendo used to be known as having some of the best graphics each gen until they released the wii and now they are continuing this tacky gimmick trend with the horrendous wiiu. Nintendo is dead to me.

iforgotmylogin4717d ago

what are you talking o.o

nes got destroyed graphically and in specs but dominated

snes had good graphics but poor specs dominated as well sega couldnt keep up.

n64 had the highest specs that gen good graphics but it got destroyed in sales but had some of the best rated games of all time. this is when 3rd party started having an effect on things.

gc was in second in terms of graphics its mystery x gen to me. 3rd party wasnt there but everything else was. good specs graphics and controller. didnt do to well

wii filled with tremendous 3rd party crapware support. decent 1st party. lowest specs of the gen yet great visuals in some games. Nintendos best generation yet since its snes days.

gimmicks as i now see it change the game and actually differentiate between you and your competitors. gimmicks are the new 3rd party imo. and i cant wait to have a cool wiiu sitting in my room because we have always dreamed of a controller with a screen and now its finally here.

solidboss4717d ago

the wii u is with the ps3 and xbox 360. it is NOT next generation hardware nor software. the controller might seem next gen but everything else is possible on the 360 and ps3. plus its using a 25gb disc ps3 has dual layered blue ray.so it can do more than the wii u. once again it is NOT next generation console. everything the wii u can do (gaming wise, not controller wise) can be done on the 360 and ps3. of everything i have seen from the wii u nintendo officially announced pikmin and a new zelda. everything else is on other consoles. sure the new zelda looks nice graphically but its nothing the 360 and ps3 cant do.

iforgotmylogin4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

the wii u isnt with that gen.
its nintendos answer to the next generation it could end up being a repeat with ps4 and 720 over killing it but thats nintendos choice.

25gb proprietary disk for wii games. no game in the industry except maybe 5- 6 games managed to fill up a complete dual layer blueray. How do you know that these new nintendo games wont fill up a 25gb disk? so its useless to make that a fact and any damn way wtf does a damn disk have to do with shit?

you havent seen the full potential of the wii u just some tech demos with awesome effects, all that video was 360/ps3 stuff.

if you are so hung up about graphics ill say somthing stupid to make you happy.

untill the ps3/ps4 can do dx11 graphics and do things my pc cant its still in this gen.
because if you havent seen dx11 work its magic it puts mostly every game to shame
adding textures to 2dflat images thats next gen and lighting effects.

if the ps4 isnt better than a 6 core i7 with 16 gigs of ram and dual graphics cards its last gen and forever will be. no matter what hardware in systems cant keep up with computers because every year the next gen of cpus come out thus they will always be old.

theonlylolking4717d ago

@thugbob
Nintendo has a fantastic art team but better graphics would make there games look even better.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4717d ago
meetajhu4717d ago

Remember Xbox being 4 times faster than PS2, still PS2 demolished Xbox in high quality games. The same will happen. Though i have all console i support ps3 the most, coz of its value for money and exclusive games. I always facepalm when i see other console owners justifying with their purchase.

iforgotmylogin4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

i think in gen 6 nothing showed that better than resident evil 4.

the best graphically of that generation and it still holds up today.

capcom pulled out some hidden power in my cube

etowntwo4717d ago

Lmao.....

Last gen all of Sony's best games came from 3rd party.

And Xbox is the one that showed its superiority in EVERY multiplat and exclusives like Chronicles of Riddick, Splinter Cell; Chaos Theory, Doom 3, Half Life 2 and Halo 1 & 2.

And PS1 was inferior to N64.

Get your facts straight kid

Graphics4717d ago

@etowntwo why you talking if its clear you never played or owned a ps2 or a ps1.

Sony with ps1 and ps2 dominated the competition. With exclusives and 3rd party. All best games came from 3rd party for ps2? So I guess GoW1&2, R&C series, Dark Cloud 1&2, Sly series, Twisted metal, GT3&4, Socom series, jak and daxter series,ico, shadow of the colossus and many more that came from sony studios which were ps2 exclusive must of been 3rd party, right?

You say the best ps2 games came from 3rd party, but then go on and list all 3rd party games as best for 360 except one which is halo... You the one who needs to get their facts strait... ps2 dominated xbox in terms of exclusives, 3rd party exclusives, and over all in better games. Also all those games you listed except one are 1st person shooters.. nice variety you had their on xbox..

death2smoochie4717d ago

If the actual rumor specs are true. The specs that were leaked about the new Wii, then it will be more powerful than the PS3 and Xbox360 easily.
We all have to wait for the specs though.

iamgoatman4717d ago

Despite what a lot of people would like to believe around here, the difference between the 360 and the PS3 are pretty damn small. If one was dramatically more powerful then the difference between multiplat games would be greater than what we see today, in fact up until lately the so called weaker console has outperformed the more powerful console in that area which you just wouldn't see if the difference was a big as some make out, or at least in that frequency.

You may claim that it's taken some developers time to learn the architecture which is true, and can be linked to inferior multiplats a few years ago, but devs now know how the hardware works and some even use it as the lead platform yet the differences remain small.

The only time we see a difference in visuals is when a developer has the opportunity to use the hardware to it's full potential, which requires large developments budgets to produce proprietary game engines which are optimized specifically for the hardware. Developers producing games for various platforms don't have these kinds of resources or the time to tailor specifically to one platform. I'm sure if we had more studios building engines solely for the 360 with say the budget of a game like GT5 or KZ2 then we'd see the same high quality results.

At the end of the day, both consoles output the vast majority of their games in 720p at 30FPS with little to no AA, with one using "cheaper" methods instead.

AKS4717d ago

I'd say the PS3 has a bit more graphical power than the 360, but much of the difference with the graphics in the PS3 exclusives is that Sony has a tremendously talented stable of developers who are required to communicate and share advancements in programming and design. ND and others are among the most talented development teams around, especially with Amy Hennig being a key contributor in creative direction. She's one of the best directors in the business. Just have a look at the list of games she's worked on if you doubt this. She has the Midas touch.

The massive hardware advantage the PS3 has over the 360 is with AUDIO. It's a substantial advantage over the 360 and is still a bit ahead on audio over Wii U (7.1 LPCM vs. 5.1 LPCM from what I've read).

Graphically, the PS3 and 360 are relatively close (hardware, anyway) compared to the massive jump down with the Wii or enormous jump up with PC.

BrianC62344717d ago

Even if it's as powerful as the PS3 and 360 it's too late. Nintendo is bringing out a new console to compete with the PS3 and 360? And not until 2012? It will look bad when the PS4 and whatever Xbox come out.

chriski3334717d ago

thats cool and all but ps3 is 4 years old and the 360 is 6 years old not a good comparison

xCaptainAmazing4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

As said by the Darksiders devs. Who knows by how much, though. It isn't a huge concern to me because Nintendo usually isn't on the forefront with this kind of thing. The only thing that really bothered me about the Wii was that they practically used GC hardware and totally ignored the HD trend, and their core fanbase. They're a bit late if you compare it to this gen, but somebody has to come out first and have the lowest spec machine, so why not Nintendo since they don't care anyways?

The next gen likely isn't going to be the same kind of leap. 1080p will be the new standard, possibly as well as 60fps with some kind of extras thrown in, like mandatory anti-aliasing. It is not worth investing in higher res television screens when they are nowhere to be seen.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 4716d ago
Shok4717d ago

I don't think he means it's equally as strong, I think he's saying that it can do everything the 360 and PS3 can do.

InfiniteJustice4717d ago

So what happens when PS4/ next Xbox are released? Will Nintendo release another console so multiplatform games can still come to a Nintendo console?

KentBlake4717d ago

If it's released 5 years later and has the same power, it's not on par in my book. It's just late.

BlmThug4717d ago

More Than 6 Years Late When It Releases

amilio4717d ago

microsoft said that they have 5 more years with the xbox 360 you know what that means? 5 years with kinect >.< and sony said that the PS3 aint done yet and they started the development process for the PS4 so thats gonna take ah few more years again. buh there will be ppl who wud disagree although the ppl themselves said it.

Orionsangel4717d ago

Yeah that's cute and all, but MS and Sony are going beyond that soon. When they introduce their Next gen systems. As usual always late to the party Nintendo.

Show all comments (101)
80°

How Many More Victims, Like Garry's Mod, Will Nintendo's Hurtful Crusade Create?

Hanzala from eXputer: "As Nintendo takes out 20 years' worth of stuff from Garry's Mod, I watch in shock, thinking why it continues to hurt and discourage its fans."

RiseNShine3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

The irony that some of the most disgusting business practices come from companies like Disney or Nintendo, i can't even begin to understand what terrible damage was Garrys Mod making to Nintendo bottom line, imho they're getting pretty nervous about where they're heading in the future, handhelds are no longer something exclusive to Nintendo, from Steam Deck to many others, now you can play the latest games and pay a fraction of the price on Steam sales, so it's up to their exclusives, which just on their own would make hard to justify purchasing a closed overpriced hardware with outrageous price policies (Super Mario Odyssey is still 60 euro 6 years later!), and as a home console they're always underperforming compared to Sony or Xbox.

gold_drake3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

i cam guarantee you, that their exclusives alone is what drives switch sales. they sell in the 10s of millions of copies.

nintendo created their franchises to be sort of nostalgia driven, exclusive only on nintendo.

people will always buy the pkmn games as they always bring in new younger fans amd is family friendly

mario kart, the same thing, mario games in general.

zelda games are system sellers. animal crossing for the casual gamers.

nintendo doesnt need third vame devs essentially. they made sure with the switch and the limitations that they looked more to pc ps and xbox.

its sad, but nintendo is more than fine with what they're doing. they positioned themselves to appeal to the more casual gamers.

but to your point, im not sure why they're doing this rly.

Inverno3d ago

Look at how they handled Nintendo games being streamed or uploaded on YouTube in the past. They killed Yuzu and Citra even when they had nothing to do with ToTK being leaked, not to mention it was basically unplayable on emulation the week it was leaked. Smash Bros tournament, that was fairly recent. They shut down their online services without any care for purchases made. I bought a switch after skipping their last 2 consoles and handhelds but I don't plan on buying anything Nintendo in the future. They take things to the extremes, they legitimately hate their fans. They're honestly right up there with the likes of Acti, EA, and Ubi, only difference is that they disguise themselves as being family friendly all the while being shady.

80°

Nintendo's Massacre Of The 3DS And Wii U Is Finally Complete, Regrettably

Hanzala from eXputer: "The cruel hammer of Nintendo has fallen. Farewell, 3DS and Wii U, you surely brightened my life and many others; you won't be forgotten."

280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10124d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref23d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde23d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander197223d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville23d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff218323d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos23d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 23d ago
isarai24d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref23d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan23d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis00722d ago (Edited 22d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander197224d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

24d ago Replies(3)
Einhander197223d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

23d ago
23d ago
Zeref23d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde23d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander197223d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander197223d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier23d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto23d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff218323d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto23d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 23d ago
Hofstaderman23d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts23d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts22d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic22d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)