360°

Sony's "Welcome Back Package" Isn't for Loyal PS3 Gamers

Eric of VividGamer.com Writes:

"Just yesterday Sony announced their “Welcome Back Package” to compensate customers for the PSN outage and any inconvenience the outage caused. If you haven’t already checked out what Sony is offering, you can read about the entire package here. While some PSN gamers will be happy with what is being offered, a long-time PS3 owner such as myself might find the compensation a bit underwhelming."

Read Full Story >>
vividgamer.com
Dramscus4726d ago

This guys a whiner.
Seriously quit your bitchin, you don't like your free stuff. Nobody cares.

dwightmccarthy4726d ago

does your bitching about someone else's bitching make you a whiner? just sayin

Aussiegamer4726d ago

Well it kinda does actually, cause dramscus bitching has reasoning and substance. The article is just bs. Simple.

theherp804726d ago ShowReplies(5)
FACTUAL evidence4726d ago (Edited 4726d ago )

I agree with the article. The reason being is that most "loyal" buyers bought mostly everything the week majority of the stuff came out. Like me for an example, I've got mostly everything on the list including a year and 3 months of ps+.

What am I really getting then? I'd be way more happier with 10$ credit, not even...I'd be happy with just 10 cool sony 1st party avatars that just got made.

I'm not whining, but some of you have to realize that there are people with ALL of this stuff already. So is this package worth your CC info, and personal information if you already bought all this? it's more like a kick in the nuts to loyal gamers being that some of us payed full price for all that just for it to be free. So what do I get?

All I get is an "Oh well"?? That's simply BS in my book. Disagree if you want but if it were you, you'd feel the same way. Before you say sony didn't have to do this, think about it...that would be business suicide if they didn't try to offer an apology as they did with this. I'm happy for the people who does not have these titles, but the loyal ones (as myself) who does have them, and the subscription, what do I get?....I just feel so left out as one of sony's loyal gamers. All I'm saying.

EDIT: lol another thing, for US LOYAL psn users, we were offered all this bs. Wipeout was for EU ps+, so was lbp, we got a half off dead nation price, super stardust is like a verrrrry old ass psn game....sony know's what they are doing.

If they really cared they'd offer something like warhawk, mag, or socom confrontation. Notice how they rehashed all the bs they gave us for free!! You know what I might be done with them for sure after R3 and UC3...I'm serious. It seems like ps fans never realize they get played a lot. It's actually getting worse than MS.

Seraphemz4726d ago (Edited 4726d ago )

No information has been proven to have been stolen. No actual reports of people getting cc charges on their cards. So, all it was was ABOUT a month of no online, that UNLESS you paid for ps+ is free, and they are giving that to us subscribers, and EVEN giving it to people that did have ps+....
So, take a look at 'what did YOU lose vs what is SONY losing?' You lose nothing, you have the games...great. But your loss doesnt compare to what the company is giving.

You just can make everyone happy.

-Alpha4726d ago (Edited 4726d ago )

I really understand the position of the article.

Fact is that:

Clueless COD players who buy just COD= free games

Loyal customer= no free game

But at the same time, loyal customers are loyal because the developers make games customers want. I am hoping people didn't buy anything with the intention of entitlement.

Sony can't please everybody, and quite honestly, the whole "Give 2/5" games for free is something they didn't really have to do in the first place. If anybody offers you a free existing game chances are you may already own it. I can only get 1 game (inFamous), but I'm damn happy and feel Sony has done more than enough

opoikl4726d ago (Edited 4726d ago )

The way I see it is that Sony knows all too well that loyal fans like you and me won't turn our backs towards the company, while the casuals certainly might. We support them unconditionally because we've grown kind of dependent of the console to get our daily gaming fix. So they decided to give the casuals all the love needed to embrace the PS3 once again.

And again, why offer lbp without giving the option to download the full game or just some/ all of the DLC? 1 costume, 1 avatar, 1 something other than games I already paid for would make me feel valued by Sony.

It's quite obvious what's going on here..

dwightmccarthy4726d ago

as someone who has played these titles i think everyone should get a chance to play them if they havent already. however these games are years old now so not sure what sony was thinking with this one. It's almost like they didn't offer me anything at all.

rrquinta4726d ago

I don't have all of the games Sony is offering but I agree with this guy in the sense that I wish they had given either other choices, or a coupon or something for a discount for the game of your choice. I think I would have rather had a 25% or 50% coupon to spend in the PS Store when it comes back up then these games, but it's still nice that Sony offered us anything, when they really didn't have to.

LiquidSnack4726d ago

That's different, the reason Sony picked those games was because (and this is the very important part)...THEY'RE PUBLISHED BY SONY

If you gave people money to spend on games from other publishers e.g. a CoD Map Pack...imagine over 10 million accounts using a coupon to buy that pack, Sony would owe Activision a shit ton of money

I'm not saying they don't deserve to lose money after this whole fiasco but at least they're giving us choices of 5 great games even if someone already owns them

Do you know the ONE game 360 users were given as an apology for the 2 week outage back in 2007?

Compare inFAMOUS and Wipeout HD to this:

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

NBT914726d ago

No comparison, Undertow > Infamous and WipEout HD by a long shout. (by the way I am being sarcastic)it does look quite fun though from a gameplay perspective ^^

rrquinta4726d ago

Oh, I know, that doesn't mean I wouldn't wish that it had happened the way I said.

blackburn104726d ago

Thank you. I have been say this all day. Sony gave you theses thing because they belong to them. They can't just hand over someone elses stuff for free. God this site gives me a migrane. BTW Sony doesn't deserve anything. Sony is not a single entity it is many people. They don't DESERVE anything.

Mmmkay4726d ago

"I'm not saying they don't deserve to lose money after this whole fiasco"

So if I hack you... you deserve to lose money ?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4726d ago
admiralvic4726d ago (Edited 4726d ago )

You cant make everyone happy... but Sony wouldn't die from a basic perk IE Avatar, Theme, Special DLC item, etc. For the "hardcore" demographic.

metsgaming4726d ago

you will get that stuff with ps+ and other games for free.

admiralvic4726d ago

While true... its counter to the main point. Everyone in the US will have the item I mention... Perhaps UK/JP/HK too. My post is about the 5 games and none being something I dont already have.

TheKindRoost4726d ago

this gen is the worst yet, full of whiners, spoiled brats and etc... I can't imagine worse it'll get once next gen comes.

Show all comments (56)
120°

Sony Could Increase Your Game's Difficulty If It Sees You Complain About It

Sony has recently published a new patent that wants to dynamically handle the games' difficulty and gameplay based on the player's emotions.

jznrpg11h ago

This is something I might use. Sometimes I play some good games but they don’t have difficulty option and are a little too easy.

Profchaos10h ago

Souls games will be like that players struggling make it harder

PassNextquestion9h ago(Edited 9h ago)

I think if used correctly it could work well

jambola5h ago

cool idea
cool idea for horror games especially
the way it's explained here sounds like it could never be forced hopefully, so that's ok with me

Show all comments (7)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies20d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken20d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga20d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken20d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6420d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long20d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197220d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic20d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 20d ago
DivineHand12520d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91320d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer20d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91319d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit19d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 19d ago
Christopher20d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6919d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit19d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher20d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken20d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197220d ago (Edited 20d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic20d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2320d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218320d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder20d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts20d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)
80°

Sony May Soon Let You Decide How Much NPCs Talk In Games

Sony has patented to add multiple dialogue modes to let players switch between how many conversations with NPCs they want in the game.

blackblades26d ago

Sony is like the only ones outta the 3 that has atuff like like this pop up changing thing in ways.

just_looken26d ago

Sony in the past has always been first at bat with new ideas/tech but in the end never fully use it or just toss it away.

blackblades26d ago

I think they did use some but yeah most usually never happened but at least they thought about it. Sony seeks things like this and other, Nintendo seek different ways of playing going by there different controler designs and console designs.

just_looken26d ago (Edited 26d ago )

some of the other stuff sony want's/owns never used
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://www.eurogamer.net/s...
https://metro.co.uk/2023/03...
https://decrypt.co/114754/s...

monitor/adjust game difficultly as you play
https://www.techradar.com/g...

Sony nfts
https://www.theblock.co/pos...

Pay ai to play the game for you
https://thebusinessofesport...

Oh all the above last 12 months

I just imagine a evil scientist with test subjects when it comes down to sony recent patent reports.

Kaii26d ago

Will we get dialogue options that won't spoil puzzles in a matter of seconds? :p