VideoGamer - You could say that it would be boring to constantly chase the same old multiplayer game, with the same types of maps, same types of killstreaks giving out the same rewards at 3, 5, and 7 kills, with the challenges, persistent stats, and levelling you've seen time and time again. You could also say that, if you were some kind of suit-wearing business numbers man, it would be supremely foolish for a developer without an industry-leading budget to even attempt competing for territory in the absolute harshest of online arenas.
DualShockers Writes "F.E.A.R. 3 (or F.3.A.R. if you’re a marketing executive) isn’t a great singleplayer game. It’s fine, competent even, but Day One Studios had an unenviable task in trying to wrap up Monolith’s F.E.A.R. series. With two timelines and two highly different styles of horror attempted in its wake, F.E.A.R. 3, well, it tries its best."
F.E.A.R. 3 wasn't even really a horror game when it came to the campaign. It was a good action game, but lost just about all of its horror roots along the way.
There have plenty of great horror games, but others haven't been so lucky as to stick around. They deserve to get a new lease on life.
That was probably the first time ever that I saw Castlevania in a list of horror games.
ps: Be warned, you have to click a lot to see every game in the list. I stopped after the 4th time.
What is divergent co-op and how could more games benefit from it?
