Approvals 12/10 ▼
INehalemEXI (2) - 4796d ago Cancel
SeanScythe (1) - 4796d ago Cancel
-Mezzo- (4) - 4796d ago Cancel
OliverKO (3) - 4796d ago Cancel
Dante112 (1) - 4796d ago Cancel
extermin8or (1) - 4796d ago Cancel
840°

Uncharted 3 & Uncharted 2 Comparison; Shows PS3′s Sheer Power

The graphical leap Uncharted 3 will take from its predecessor was evident ever since the game’s unveiling. Now, VGHQ compare both Uncharted 2 and 3 and by doing so showcase the PS3′s astonishing power.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

Fake
I know Bloodmask that you are a great news poster but this comparison is fake and unfair. Not only many of those screenshots are very low quality but one is from Uncharted 2 multiplayer and the last 4 ones are from a completely scrapped version of Uncharted 2 which doesn't look half near the shipped game.
PLASTICA-MAN4796d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(1)
+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4796d ago
Dante1124796d ago

Wow, UC3 looks incredible. Can't wait.

- Ghost of Sparta -4796d ago

Uncharted 3 looks better than Battlefield 3 on PC.

Mr_Objective_4796d ago

Pictures look amazing...
but no much differance in quality.

Saint-Revlot4796d ago

Who would disagree. It does look incredible. Especially in motion.

Korix4796d ago (Edited 4796d ago )

Looks amazing indeed. Big Uncharted fan here.
However, some of the comparisons are between ingame UC2 screens, and pre rendered UC3 scenes (enhancement of ingame graphics - better lighting, DOF, AA, etc).
I hate how people can't do proper comparisons. Sometimes people even compare concept art to ingame screens.
This one is good for the most part though.
Would have liked to see actual ingame screenshots from both games, in full size. Turning down the size only makes the game look better than it actually is, and things like AA and DOF is hard (impossible) to get a "real" look at.

GamerSciz4796d ago (Edited 4796d ago )

@Korix Pre-rendered does not mean fully CGI. The Uncharted series uses real-time rendering with pre-canned camera movements for the cut scenes but it is all in-engine footage being done in real-time. That's why people have so much respect for the graphics.

Korix4796d ago (Edited 4796d ago )

@GamerSciz
Look at the UC3 trailer when Drake and Sully is talking. It looks better than the actual gameplay footage we've seen. it's got better lighting, and superb AA that isn't possible to do real time.
That's not something I've read or heard from a friend of a friend, it's what I can actually see my self. So even if Naughty Dog says it's all ingame, I wouldn't believe it. Game devs often speak a little *too* highly about their games.
I don't mean to be an idiot troll or anything, but honestly, don't you think certain trailers/scenes from the series looks better than when we actually play it, and look at things up close?
Clearest indicator is the AA. You will NOT see any aliasing in scenes like the one i mentioned in the UC3 trailer. AA like that simply isn't possible to do real time. Not even the most powerful PC's are able.

jack_burt0n4796d ago

Korix deal with it, that level of AA is a multipass SPE technique it creates an almost identical effect to 16x+. Its not that new its just a new generation of technique of one already used.

Stop all the BS ranting u have no clue.

RBLAZE19884796d ago (Edited 4796d ago )

@ ghost of sparta

whoa...slow your role there buddy. It looks good but let's just take it easy. Battlefield looks way better...like dx11 better. Just stop while you're ahead although i'm probably too late and this has escaladed into a full blown shitstorm

OneSneakyMofo4796d ago

I love how all of these people are in denial because of the graphics. That's just how good they are. :]

MaxXAttaxX4796d ago (Edited 4796d ago )

Cutscenes use the in-game engine.
http://farm4.static.flickr....

If you get the camera up close to the characters during gameplay you'll notice that it looks quite good indeed.
http://farm4.static.flickr....

Plus, Uncharted has very little aliasing in-game to begin with:
http://tinylink.in/CDQ
Seriously, how many times have you noticed any jaggies?

And that was only UC1 ;)

[On topic]
Also, the 2nd pic of Uncharted 2 is from an old build.
Can't wait for a proper comparison.

jetlian4796d ago (Edited 4796d ago )

those images are uncharted 1 and the cutscenes are rendered higher than real game.

MaxXAttaxX4796d ago (Edited 4796d ago )

What do you mean by "rendered higher"?
Cutscenes and gameplay have the same resolution as well as textures.

The main difference is that cutscenes have even better lighting and shadowing compared to gameplay.

So like I said before...
http://n4g.com/news/715617/...

sikbeta4796d ago

I can't wait for this game, UC3 will be HUGE!!!!

paintsville4796d ago

Well there's no dening that UC3 is a good looking game but I don't see this "astonishing power" that's mentioned in the ps3fanboy title of this article. Competent yes, astonishing no.

ChrisW4796d ago

- Ghost of Sparta -

Whoa there cowboy! No touching PC games!

bozebo4796d ago (Edited 4796d ago )

@korix
"Not even the most powerful PC's are able."
lol that's completely incorrect.
unreal's next gen demo was running on pc .(probably at about 10 fps, but a new generation of gpus are coming out which will make a big improvement - probably not affordable to have it at > 30fps this year though, but maby next)
the witcher 2 looks FAR better than this.
the skyrim screens/vids seem to be rendered on 360 (they are in 720p, if they were on pc surely there would be higher res screenies around?)
dirt 3 looks absolutely amazing on pc.
battlefield 3 looks miles better than this.

all that said, uc3 still looks amazing. just remember though, the ps3's graphics are bottlenecked by the rsx which is based on 5 year old graphics technology - the cell cannot magically make the graphics look better. the ps3's power lies in it's cpu capabilities, which are overkill for most games unless they purposely do some crazy AI calculations on the cell.

WetN00dle694796d ago

- Ghost of Sparta -

The F*** you smoking?
I mean yeah UC3 looks amazing and i cant wait to get my hands on it but better than BF3 on PC..........dont think so. I guess you meant BF3 on the PS3.

Man In Black4796d ago

The cutscenes in Uncharted 2 are pre-rendered, which is why alternate skins and such don't show up.

jetlian4795d ago

ingame models arent the same as the cutscenes ones

Mr_Objective_4795d ago

Wow a lot of disagrees for an objective opinion.

To many subjective opinions flying around here.

squidyj4795d ago

@NathanExplosion

It's the same engine used in cutscenes but they use improved effects because they're able to control things like resources present in the scene and they don't have to run physics or ai systems they can do more. For example in Uncharted 2 they ran a different Subsurface Scattering solution in cut-scenes as opposed to in-game.

The paper they published on the subject is here, it's called 'Uncharted 2: Character Lighting and Shading' you can find the comment about their choices on page 59 of the PDF. In cutscenes they did a quick blur of a lightmap to approximate the Nvidia human head demo. In game it wasn't worth the cost because it took a fair bit of rendering time per head on screen.
http://advances.realtimeren...

That's one example of how Uncharted cutscenes have higher quality features enabled than gameplay scenes. Obviously shadow map frustum can be precomputed for set scenes, as well as art resources and LoDs amped up for a scene where you know exactly how many polys are going to be on screen at any one time and where you know exactly what your memory usage is going to look like.

This, however, does not mean that the cutscenes aren't rendered in real time, in the engine, they totally are, they just use better features than Naughty Dog can afford to use in a dynamic gameplay scene.

MaxXAttaxX4795d ago (Edited 4795d ago )

They're the SAME character models!
Do some research.

@squidyj
Truth.

jetlian4795d ago

you said truth to squid who in the frist sentences agreed with me

" but they use improved effects because they're able to control things like resources present in the scene and they don't have to run physics or ai systems they can do more"

MaxXAttaxX4795d ago

That has nothing to do with different models!
Again, character models and in-game models are the same ones!

The main difference is that cutscenes have higher quality lighting and shading.

+ Show (21) more repliesLast reply 4795d ago
RankFTW4796d ago

Not to be a dick but the word is "awe" not "ore", just for future reference.

hiredhelp4796d ago

- Ghost of Sparta -
Uncharted 3 looks better than Battlefield 3 on PC.
----------------------------- ---------------------

You have no idea what your talking about. dont bring pc into this.

RBLAZE19884796d ago

he was doing an accent. Like orlock or whoever in killzone 3. Or frenchie from the departed (both roles are played by the same actor)

clrlite4796d ago (Edited 4796d ago )

@rank
He probably misspelled that in order to simulate a NY or Boston accent, hence the "powaaa" thrown in(maybe australian). I doubt he writes his papers like that.

I can't wait to see how amazing UC3 looks when it is finished. People are already comparing it to recent PC games and it's not even finished.

Silly Mammo4796d ago

WOW! I remember when someone did a comparison of UC and UC2 and I was duly impressed with that. ND certainly knows how to push the PS3!

zeal0us4795d ago

Agree, guess some1 disagree about the "ND certainly knows how to push the PS3!"

offtopic
Sometimes I wish they would show the person who disagree with comments that also include a written statement why they disagree

Back on topic
I think ND will do a better job than Crytek with pushing the ps3 to it limits, Crysis 2(ps3) graphic wise look to close to its 360 counter-park to me

I think its time for me to get a Ps3 :) and play some good games

zeal0us4795d ago

Agree, guess some1 disagree about the "ND certainly knows how to push the PS3!"

offtopic
Sometimes I wish they would show the person who disagree with comments that also include a written statement why they disagree

Back on topic
I think ND will do a better job than Crytek with pushing the ps3 to it limits, Crysis 2(ps3) graphic wise look to close to its 360 counter-park to me

I think its time for me to get a Ps3 :) and play some of its good games

Theonetheonly4796d ago

Those arent Screenshots.

wait the lower ones are. but the one with the scarf is not a screenshot. sorry.

not gonna happen realtime.

tell you you honestly aren't that gullible.

its ok if you wanna disagree ive come to expect denial to the truth. It has to do with poly count, Those are in Engine Renders. nothing about that has anything to do with realtime. Sheer Sheep.

jammydude4796d ago (Edited 4796d ago )

What do you mean by "those aren't screenshots"? Of course they are.

Do you mean 'those aren't in-game'? Because you'd be correct there. However they're in-engine using game assets so it's essentially in-game and could probably be run in real time (no extra effects applied other than what you'd see in-game) however, for loading purposes, these are pree-rendered FMVs just like in UC2.

Again, the polycount of the characters is not changed, those are all in-game models rendered in-engine.

MysticStrummer4796d ago

@jammydude - Shhh Let him pretend he sounds smart and superior.

Theonetheonly4796d ago

No really Im dead serious. In engine. maybe if drake's face was the only thing being rendered. that is all. Im not trying to sound smart its just not in the scope of the system. the cg render is to draw attention from unwitting fans games like GOW do the same thing. its ok tho most people wont know the difference. drake will only occupy about 3%-%15 of the screen for a majority of the game, unless its during a cut scene, during which i am unsure if they will use pre rendered cg movies to fill or if they will do them real-time. I heard them speak of pre-rendered and real-time "coexisting" but im not sure if that means scripted destruction with dynamic rigid bodies at play in the same scene or if that means they will be using some type of image blending which i doubt.

Saint-Revlot4796d ago

Ummm.....Naughty Dog said it themselves that these are all real-time. They also said it was not CG.

Theonetheonly4796d ago

The footage is convincingly realtime. ;)
srry upon closer inspection I was wrong.
I still do not believe that this will be the LOD. For actual gameplay but naughtydog will most definitely blur the line so it wont matter. Ive got a PS3 sittin right next to my monitor and Im pretty familiar with the capabilities of the box, but convincing someone of that is apples to oranges Been dealing/W this stuff all of my life.

let me make a well phrased statement,

That scene does not have much more room for improvement given the budget, meaning the computational horsepower available is being used to its end. To me this would be the mode i would show things in if i was to run a Cutscene however it does not mean that this level of visual fidelity would be possible if there was anything else on the menu, like controls and collision detection this to my eye is a scene not an example of game-play, expect to see muddier textures AA and lower resolution for the game in play.

the best line of comparison is GT5 using more acute shaders reflections particle density and shadowmapping during replays. and to note i also think that gt5 smoke is a post process effect. unsure tho. :)

squidyj4795d ago

No, that's totally legit realtime rendering. Now, whether it's cut-scene or gameplay, I'm not sure and we will simply have to wait and see. I'd like to hear what you think is going on in that scene that can't be done in real time.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4795d ago
hennessey864796d ago

its more like naughty dogs astonishing talent than the ps3s power

RatherHavaBigGirl4796d ago (Edited 4796d ago )

sheer power? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha h ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah a hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha h ahahahahahahahahahahahaahahaha h ahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!! im a ps3 only owner and i can laugh at that one. really, if you wanna talk sheer power talk pc

as far as uc3, i hope the controls are fixed along with better platforming, combat and less predictable moments (got tired of nathan almost falling but somehow finding that life saving grip at the last second. ugh so cliche). the graphices were good though :)

Big_Dom4796d ago

That kind of sense will get you a billion disagrees on here.

BloodyNapkin4796d ago

You are correct if you wanna talk sheer power talk PC. But if you wanna talk great games and awesome exclusives then we will talk PS3 like we are.

bozebo4796d ago

awesome exclusives?
aren't naughty dog games the only good exclusives? oh and mgs 4...

every other platform has better exclusives, even pc

downwardspiral4795d ago

@nathawants2bmarcus
Sounds like you have some kind of sick desperation in your laugh.

BloodyNapkin4795d ago

@bozebo

Care to enlighten me then....

squidyj4795d ago

The Last Guardian
Heavy Rain
God of War 3
Uncharted
Resistance
Killzone
LBP
MGS4
GT5

I would say thoze are all great exclusives but as with anything YMMV. There are a lot of great games for every platform though, so it's pointless to argue about it.

PS3 is a powerful little system, no doubt about it. It's capable of doing a lot of very interesting things but it won't match the power of a high end gaming rig, of course, that's to be expected, it's running on hardware specs from 2006

2Spock4795d ago

@bozebo

Of course everything is a personal opinion when it come to exclusives and what people like. But clearly the PS3 leads the way in great exclusives unrivaled on any other platform.

And regardless if anyone wants to admit it or not the PS3 is trouncing every platform in great games and a great experience that can only be had on the ps3 and for any type of gamer, from GOW to GT5 to HeavyRain to R&C and so on.

RatherHavaBigGirl4795d ago

@downwardspiral

replace 'sounds' with 'looks' or 'seems' and that insult would land better

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4795d ago
Maddens Raiders4796d ago

...dude am I the only one that gets the accent? Kind of Steve Irwinish. RIP.

OT:

Anyone surprised? I mean these are the Naughty Gods.

clrlite4796d ago (Edited 4796d ago )

No, they might be too busy looking for grammatical mistakes to decipher the meaning of his words. RIP Steve, at least that bloody crocodile didn't get you.

A lot of people are talking about PCs in this thread. Also saying some of these screens aren't real time. What are they going to say if the game comes out and looks even better?

Buho4796d ago

Not bad for five year old technology huh PC fanboys?

DigitalPiracy4796d ago

I almost replied with an insult but after thinking more carefully I decided that you are correct. No, it's not bad for old tech but can you imagine what it could look like if developed for the PC under the assumption that, say, everyone owned at least a GTX 470. You would probably cry.

Buho4796d ago

LOL that made me laugh. Bubbles for you! :D

ChrisW4796d ago (Edited 4796d ago )

It's no mistake that UC2 had good graphics, and it'll be no mistake that UC3 will have phenomenal graphics. However, instead of saying it's a "comparison," just state how the graphics and engine have excelled between episodes. It'll attract more interest.

(I know the creator of that blog is reading these comments)

pain777pas4795d ago

The plot from the gamestop interview has GOTY all over it. Hopefully they get a little Kojima on us with some incite on things we should but dont know.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 4795d ago
tommy-cronin4796d ago

at least there using sully more in this, he looks so much better in the u3 comparison

Sharingan_no_Kakashi4796d ago

Wow...UC3 makes UC2 look dated. Never thought I'd actually say that about UC2 O_O.

HeavenlySnipes4796d ago

But you can definatly see the improvement

piroh4796d ago

U2 had the best graphics...till now

Masterchef20074796d ago

Poor drake he is starting to get old

No i dont mean old as in used up. I mean old as in he looks older in the 3rd game.

Anyways its great to see that ND always finds new ways to push the PS3.

trounbyfire4796d ago

well ND said drake looks that way because of the sand and dust on his face and his nose looks broken, he was in a plane crash after all. if you have seen the trailer he looks normal when he its talking to sully.

yume-k4796d ago

yup, he looks older and uglier than a 100 years old octopus

Show all comments (173)
160°

Analyzing 'Uncharted: Drake’s Deception' – Wait, What is The Game About?

Uncharted 3: Drake’s Deception has a lot to live up to as Uncharted 2: Among Thieves is an incredible and near-perfect game.

Read Full Story >>
goombastomp.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community903d ago
Profchaos903d ago

It's about retirement...oh wait

UNCHARTED2FANATIC903d ago (Edited 903d ago )

I cant even say what the point was its easily the worst story in the series. The online was a whole lot of fun though but overall doesn't come even close to 2

porkChop903d ago (Edited 903d ago )

It was a step back for sure. Personally, I thought even the MP was way better in U2. Solid game, glad I played it. I just think they didn't push as hard as they did with U2.

UNCHARTED2FANATIC898d ago

Yes both the online and story was better in 2 no doubt

Flewid638902d ago

The "young Drake" portion was pretty top notch, story-wise. But yeah, everything outside of that I felt was inferior.

DanielEndurance903d ago

Villains were all over the place in this… one second they wanted Drake dead, the next they needed him, then they want him dead again, then they coulda killed him, but poisoned his friend instead, then coulda shot him again, but had brunch with him, then needed him alive, then coulda mowed him down, but decided to kill him by fire and let him escape… Uncharted 2 was way better. 😅😅

slowgamer903d ago

=D Sounds crazy. I don't remember any of that. Played it on ps3 and I remember thinking that why was this game so bashed compared to second one. I liked it.

Chocoburger902d ago (Edited 902d ago )

Another thing that annoyed me about UC3 events was the agent Talbot teleporting around Turkey. It just felt off to me, and made no sense.

Also, for about one third of the game, you go on a wild goose chase to rescue Sully, who wasn't even there to be rescued, and you end up back where you started again. There was simply no pay off for all the events you go through, so it fell flat in that regard as if they couldn't figure out how to make the game longer, so they decided to side-track you to do something with no pay off, hoping you wouldn't notice due to all the incredible action set pieces they made.

Overall though, even with its flaws, I still enjoy the game.

TheEnigma313902d ago

This was actually my least favorite in the series. Didn't have that same impact that part 2 set.

Flewid638902d ago

Uncharted 2 is the pinnacle of the series (to me).

Granted, 4 had the best story in my opinion, but 2 was the overall best game.

Show all comments (12)
210°

Uncharted 3 Anniversary Retrospective: Shackled By Its Precursor's Legacy

A decade after its release, how does Uncharted 3 fare today? Does its story still work? Was its precursor’s legacy a bedrock or quicksand for its own aspirations?

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community903d ago
904d ago Replies(2)
SullysCigar904d ago

When arguably the weakest game in the series is still awesome and more fun than most games today, you know you're onto a winner!

coolbeans904d ago

I'd extend "arguably" before awesome too. Many technically demanding scenes were jaw-dropping for the time, but it's tough to ignore the sub-par context propelling the action forward.

SullysCigar904d ago

Tough for you, perhaps, and that's fine. I enjoyed it very much. Perhaps a little less than the others in the series, but then the bar is extremely high.

I remember being blown away by the water and sand tech in U3 for the time too. It certainly was a visual treat!

LucasRuinedChildhood903d ago (Edited 903d ago )

It is very good, but when I originally played Uncharted 3 it was the most disappointed I'd ever been in a video-game because Uncharted 2 was just that good. I enjoyed 3 much more when I replayed it in the Nathan Drake Collection though. I could just enjoy it for what it is and accept that it's not Uncharted 2 - it's not a roller coaster, and it doesn't balance and rotate between action, puzzles, platforming and set-pieces in the same way.

Uncharted 3's gameplay is a bit more compartmentalized and focused on one thing at a time. I'm not surprised the scrapped version of Uncharted 4 was going to have no gunplay for the first half. It's also paced much differently - it takes a long time to get to the notable set-pieces. Uncharted 2 is insane from Nepal onwards which is about an hour into the game. haha.

I did like the introduction of chase sequences, and I love first hour (bar fight, young Drake) and from the airplane sequence onwards but I just think the rest of it just sort of meanders along without as much purpose as 2.

When it comes to the script, you can feel the absence of Neil Druckmann and Josh Scherr (writer on every other console Uncharted game). Drake gets hit in the face, and the game goes on a random side plot for an hour to give you some boat set-pieces. He then washes up on a beach close to where Elena is staying to get you back to the real plot. Drake just says "How convenient" to try make you laugh off how sloppy the plot got.

In retrospect, I'm not sure if Naughty Dog were ready to work on 2 different games at once. 3 clearly had production issues that 1 and 2 didn't have, and Hennig's version of 4 didn't work out. They had to crunch so hard to get the rebooted version done on time that Bruce Straley gave up making video-games.

coolbeans903d ago

I'll give you some props for the extra analysis. I remember Druckmann climbing his way to a writer spot in UC2, but wasn't aware of Josh Scherr. I didn't know that was the reason for Straley's departure either. That's pretty damn rough.

GhostofHorizon903d ago

They had to make some weird choices as far as story went because the actor for Cutter had to bail which left a few holes in the story.

Uncharted is one of my favourite series and while the leap from 2 to 3 was not nearly as big as the leap from 1 to 2, I think it was an amazing experience none the less.

coolbeans903d ago

Graham McTavish's departure wasn't easy, but I don't think that would fix many holes tbh. Because the main issue to consider is the precarious mindset Naughty Dog was operating on: an increased emphasis in set pieces that HAD to go in and worrying about the context later.

Petebloodyonion903d ago

I really liked part 3 ( Among Thieves is still the best in my opinion) My only complaint was the interactions with the villains and how they were a missed opportunity, Linda MacMahon (Marlowe) was an interesting antagonist due to the history with Sully and Nate but it fails basically flat especially with her ending. And I couldn't care about Navaro 2.0.

What I did love and made me care was Cutter, in the short time he was in the game you could feel that the guy was a good treasure hunter for example when he pulled his own notebook with the clues he founds so the team can escape a room.
It was a small touch that add a lot to the character.

Good-Smurf903d ago

Marlowe was played by Rosalind Ayres.

MadLad903d ago (Edited 903d ago )

I have mixed feelings on the series. I still own all of them on the PS3, and the collection for PS4, but I didn't truly "love" any of the games until 4.

They're good games, but they always stumble on some element.
The first is good, but the climbing mechanics weren't exactly fine tuned with the first showing. Not to mention the spongey enemies if you played on anything past normal; but you're then faced with a fairly unchallenging game experience.
The second mostly fixed the climbing, but added in a pretty clumsy stealth mechanic.
Three was just two with a new story.

Four got it right though.
I don't remember once getting annoyed by any mechanic had in the game.

I know that everyone has a soft spot for 2, and 3 is sort of the black sheep of the series; but they did, overall, get progressively better. Which doesn't always happen.

Show all comments (28)
190°

Ranking the Uncharted Games From Worst to Best

KeenGamer: "Which Uncharted game is the best? Uncharted is widely recognized as one of the most groundbreaking and consistently great franchises in gaming. For both long-time fans and newcomers to this action-adventure classic, here’s a ranking of the franchise’s four main games."

Read Full Story >>
keengamer.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1002d ago
Kyizen1002d ago

UC 2, 4, 3 and 1. Great read and article

ABizzel11001d ago

No Golden Abyss -_-, otherwise I agree with the order.

UC2: Best overall
UC4: Best graphics, best gameplay, best locations, best environements
UC3: Best set pieces IMO (the boat and desert fights will always be amazing)
UC1: A rough Draft of what was to come
UCGA: Basically UC1 on Vita

Levii_921002d ago (Edited 1002d ago )

Great list and great article nicely writen and explained. Although for me personaly i would put Drakes Fortune above Drake’s Deception and Uncharted 4 is absolutely my favourite of the franchise and number 1 for me.

Inverno1002d ago

U2 is the only game playable on crushing without causing a great amount of frustration. Not to mention just how much influence it had that they redid some of U2s set pieces like the caravan twice, and armored truck chase in U4.

DFresh1002d ago (Edited 1002d ago )

I'd rate it as the following.

1.) Uncharted 2
(Close to perfection of any game I've played in years. Single Player/Multiplayer/Co Op all amazing.)

2.) Uncharted 3
(On par with UC2 multiplayer/co op wise minus the kickbacks [aka killstreaks]. I really liked the Lawrence of Arabia story.)

3.) Uncharted 4
(Single player is amazing. Multiplayer was meh. Co Op had potential. Absolutely hated the health revive system it slowed down the game way too much. Always preferred the fast pace action of UC2/UC3. Made it way more fun that way. Recoil was too ridiculous that most people in lobbies would only do hip firing, using power weapons and using that OP grappling hook to melee people after dropping them. Nobody wanted to revive anyone.)

4.) Uncharted
(It's the first in the series so it's hard to judge. Though I loved the story.)

NecrumOddBoy1002d ago

I agree here but it’s also a series you can play from front to back and truly enjoy. Story-wise, they are all great and flow so well. I wish they threw both Golden Abyss and Lost Legacy on this list. Lost Legacy is the best mechanically in my opinion. You can see it’s stepping stone framework for TLOUS2.

Michiel19891002d ago

uncharted 2 is one of the few games that actually surpassed its pre-release hype.

medman1001d ago (Edited 1001d ago )

I am a single player gamer...I barely ever touch a multiplayer component. The only exceptions over the years have been the Mass Effect 3 multiplayer, TLOU factions, and the Uncharted 2 multiplayer. The Uncharted 2 multiplayer saw me spend more time playing it than all my other multiplayer experiences over the years combined. That game really was a masterpiece all around.

brando0081001d ago

I agree completely, those are all stellar MP experiences, coming from another SP gamer who only occasionally gives MP some time.

Gardenia1002d ago

Come to think of it, the step between Uncharted 1 and Uncharted 2 is huge. It goes from the weakest in the series to one of the best games ever made.
I think I'm going to play all of them again soon.

Ninver1002d ago

Yeah all of a sudden I've got that Uncharted itch.

Michiel19891001d ago

is multiplayer still up for the remastered trilogy? or did it never have UC2 mp?

Ninver1001d ago

@michiel1989

Not sure

Show all comments (26)