140°

Stop This Senseless Video Game Console War

Kotaku: Hardcore. Casuals. Gamers.

Lend me your ear.

It's time to put a stop to console wars. It's time to listen to other's opinions on games. It's time to come together and accept each other for sharing a common interest.

In this day and age things are changing. Music is changing. Television is changing. and yes, even Games are changing.

Raendom5271d ago

Ironic coming from Kotaku.

thedudeftw5271d ago

Hmm magic 8 ball points to yes!

bakasora5271d ago

Its like asking the world to stop having wars.

hennessey865271d ago

i have both, are you telling me they are rivalls

PS3 Rules5271d ago

The war ended long time ago the xbots are defeated, they have the white flag now LOL

VINNIEPAZ5271d ago

This would be a dream come true if we could just all talk about gaming without the prejudice that is so thickly smeared all over this site. It gets in the way logical thinking.

IcarusOne5271d ago

I don't understand how anyone could disagree with you, Vinnie.

Aarix5271d ago

Yea but people are f*** ing assholes who Pisa other people off and that's how it starts.

finnhima5271d ago (Edited 5271d ago )

Ugh, I hate it how gaming websites want to claim neutrality and equalization amongst the gaming community, when they play a hand in the ignorance themselves all for the sake of sensationalism and page views. Make a un-necessary comparison, bash a company, downhype a popular game, Insert inflammatory title, and watch the flames. And it works EVERY time.

And its not just kotaku. You see tons of websites pandering to the ignorance by igniting flamewars to get attention. Destructoid, industrygamers, cvg, etc. Though there sentiment sounds logical and may be true, I find it HIGHLY contradictory and ignorant for them to make such an article when they've been swimming in it for the past few years now.

Hey Kotaku, you want to stop this senseless game console war? Start with yourselves!! Make a change at home before you start preaching to the masses. It'll save you from looking like hypocritical trash that you guys look like now.

IcarusOne5271d ago

I admit, I play the fanboy game as much as most. And it's probably time for me to grow up. So:

"I do hereby pledge to extend only courtesy and respect to my fellow gamers, whether through agreement or disagreement, cooperation or dissent, and do acknowledge that there are no absolutes when it comes to personal taste, and that in this world of opinions, all are equally valid and deserving of consideration.

First and foremost, we are gamers together, a community, and while every family may be dysfunctional, it is still our responsibility to defend, uplift, and preserve our uniqueness.

Cheers to all."

PS3 Rules5271d ago

PS3 gamers show no mercy to already defeated xbots

vishant1015271d ago

u r the type of person this article was intended for and how is a console defeated if it has a worldwide total sales figure higher then the PS3

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5271d ago
Anon19745271d ago (Edited 5271d ago )

I agree with the article's sentiment - but then I noticed this is coming from Kotaku. Kotaku is known for their negative stand regarding all things Sony since even before the whole Kotaku versus Home versus Sony debacle. I remember in the summer, Kotaku was falling all over themselves to downplay Gran Turismo 5, posting three negative articles in one week alone months prior to the game even being released, cumulating with an obviously faked video purporting to show extremely long load times.

It's hard to take the message "Can't we all just get along," seriously when it's coming from a site with the history Kotaku has.

deadreckoning6665271d ago (Edited 5271d ago )

Is it possible that Kotaku isn't the problem...but just that you(and others) get sensitive when someone says something negative about Sony? Maybe you should think about that.

According to N4G...IGN, Gamespot, Kotaku, Destructoid, NowGamer, and Giant Bomb are ALL against the PS3. Sounds kinda stupid don't ya think, especially since all these sites have given plenty of PS3 exclusives good reviews.

Btw, TONS of reviewers had negative things to say about GT5. For you to single out Kotaku only proves my point about your wacky conspiracy theories.

ApocalypseShadow5271d ago

it's not like YOU ever say anything positive about sony unless it is to gain a bubble.

but you ALWAYS have a NEGATIVE thing to say in EVERY sony article.

but claim you are neutral.

Parapraxis5271d ago

Is it possible that PS3 fans aren't the problem...but just that you(and others) get sensitive when someone says something positive about Sony? Maybe YOU should think about that.

finnhima5271d ago (Edited 5271d ago )

Oh please deadreckoning. DONT EVEN. Granted that every console is a rabid group of cheerleaders, but don't sit there and scrutinize others when YOU YOURSELF play a hand in the ignorance that pollutes this website. You're just as ignorant as the group you try to speak against. Any day of the week you'll be found in an article bashing either sony or its fanbase. Right here, even now you've gone off topic to try to turn this into a anti-ps3 thing which is something you do with almost EVERY comment you make.

Its THE MAIN reason you have only one bubble and even with that even that you still talk too damn much. If anything is worse than a console fanboy, is a fanboy who tries to perpetrate himself as a true gamer under a transparent veil of neutrality.

biggame9015271d ago

Of all people, dead, you shouldn't be talking. You' re the biggest fraud on this site. You claim neutrality, yet you're quick to say something negative about the PS3 and Sony.

You can claim l you like being neutral, but you're nothing but a fraud. You should look in the mirror before you say a word about anyone being a fanboy. Because you are among the worst of them all.

P_Bomb5271d ago (Edited 5271d ago )

@deadreckoning
You must not remember when Greg Miller at IGN said "The thing that a lot of people missed, however, is that Mass Effect 2 is indeed a better game than Uncharted 2, and I don't know how readers can be so blinded by their fanboyism to deny it. I need you to accept this."

In essence he said 'agree with me and accept what I say as gospel or you're a fanboy'. Thing is, I'm just not a big Star Wars/Star Trek,Battlestar Gallactica space cowboy kinda guy. For me, Uncharted was better. By Greg's law, that makes me a fanboy. That's idiot talk right there.

I think that's part of the point darkride66 and finnhima are making. Sometimes, the same sites that preach this videogame altruism with their left hand are stoking the fires with their right.

DERKADER5271d ago

The only place the Console War is fought is on dumb gaming sites. Gaming Companies fight the War, we as gamers get to bask in all the great games that come with manufactures having to compete with one another.

unknownhero11235271d ago

I believe it's not the site themselves but the person that is reviewing the game that's the problem. there are some people on the sites you mention that could be biased but not all of them are biased. so, in a way, both sides are right.

fatalred alarm5271d ago

When it comes to humans, everyone is going to try and justify their purshase of a particular console.

They feel the need to prove to themselves and other that THEY made the right choise. It's all human instinct/behaviour in my opinion.

IcarusOne5271d ago (Edited 5271d ago )

Just because someone is biased doesn't make them wrong by default.

Kotaku, IGN, Gamespot, Destructoid, etc. have all been labeled anti-Sony. Now either they've ALL been bought by Microsoft/inexplicably hate Sony for no reason, or those who support Sony are a touch overly sensitive. And I don't mean to single out the Sony camp. Xbox fans are just as radical.

But the truth, as always, is somewhere in the middle.

Let's all tone it down and just ignore those who can't.

Biggest5271d ago

You listed two reasons for bias. There are far more reasons. They don't have to be bought by anyone. How many people here support one consoles because "I just like it better" or "All my friends have it too" for example. The sites you listed have all used blatant bias to get more people interested in their website. It works until it backfires and they're left giving explainations and retracted articles.

There are no casualties in this so-called war. I don't see what the big deal is. People that have a general opinion about games or consoles aren't a problem. They can be funny, sad, crazy, stupid, and many other things. None of it is painful. The people that choose to call themselves gaming media are the only problem. It's the same in all forms of reported media. Television networks that align themselves with points of view away from the center fuel the same types of "wars" between viewers and listeners. The mob always follows the big voices. Enjoy the mob, or find something else to do with your time.

solidjun55268d ago

Yea, that's dead alright. He's one of the worst. A putrid fanboy under the veil of neutrality.

" tries to perpetrate himself as a true gamer under a transparent veil of neutrality. "

Comment of the year so far.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 5268d ago
Parapraxis5271d ago (Edited 5271d ago )

http://n4g.com/news/668334/...
^ An article based off a comment some random person on Kotaku posted, if that's not a desperate attempt to troll against Sony than what is?

Of course there are people out there that don't like certain games, but to make an entire article from one comment? I mean...really.

That's just one article that Kotaku posted, amid the sea of negative articles they produce each year.

Edited, As Kotaku are actually generally cynical and negative towards everything, it's not just Sony now, but for a time the negativity was heavily weighted against Sony.

I'll admit they have gotten better, but people who know their history understand why many PS3 fans find an article such as this one slightly hypocritical coming from Kotaku.

m23455271d ago

lol deadreckoning. i got disagrees for saying that microsoft hasn't announced any hardcore games for the longest time. i think you should look at who's actually sensitive to begin with.

Godmars2905271d ago

Little hard to do when:

1- You've got game journalist directly contributing to it where by "journalist" you're talking about anyone who can post a blog on a blog site. Make a game site.

2- Game companies themselves directly fueling it.

-Mezzo-5271d ago

Stop this Effing S@#t Already.

trounbyfire5271d ago (Edited 5271d ago )

ok no more console war when it is shameful to cheer your favorite sports team, favorite music artists, athlete, book, movie.

but alas that will never happen but why you ask yourself. The answer is simple there is no shame in cheering for your team or whatever outside of gameing that is. the media has repeatedly talked as if liking something more than something else is a crime. they from the start bashed fanboys yet ESPN would not demoralize it viewer.

The gaming media does try to demoralize it viewer and readers. slowly twisting their minds to conform to their false reality. now see the media creation the dual or multi console owner, the pc fanboy that has been neglected by the media, and most of all the sheep that follow there every world and use their names as if the know these people.

I say leave thses sites and come to N4g. the news is here and very thing else. after coming to this site you can see a fanboy from a troll yet the media cannot. we are not trolls but proud owners of machines

Bigpappy5271d ago

A agree pretty much agree with "trounbyfire". Humans are simply to complex to all conform to the wishes of the purest. If would be a lot more peaceful if everyone just talked about their favorite games and what they are looking forward to. But some people have very strong opinion and sense of loyalty, that they can help promoting or defending what they bought into.

What is offensive, is when people get into the insults and name calling because some one has a different perspective or taste than they do. I personally have people on this site that stalk me. They have nothing to add to the discussing except that they dislike "Bigpappy" for liking what he likes. I personally and not offended by this (I like the edgy conversation), I just don't want the kids a mound us to that these wars to seriously, to a point where some one is seriously hurt over a f'ing Video game Console. I would rather the whole thing just go away than for that to happen.

m23455271d ago

you're one to talk bigpappy.

Show all comments (53)
290°

The Real Enemy of Gaming Isn’t DEI. It’s the CEO

From Horse Armor to Mass Layoffs: The Price of Greed in Gaming. Inside the decades-long war on game workers and the players who defend them.

Read Full Story >>
rushdownradio.net
jambola20d ago

maybe a real enemy is people who use terms like "the real enemy"
there can be more than 1 bad thing, t's not like a kids show with 1 big bad

senorfartcushion19d ago

This is very much a “dummy who volunteers themselves to the middle” comment.

The real enemy is a common phrase, people use it all the time.

Calm down.

jambola18d ago

i'm very calm
you seem very upset however

Notellin18d ago

You don't seem calm at all. Don't take this so seriously, you seem desperate responding to others defending your opinion that lacks any value or critical thought.

jambola18d ago

stop projecting
i'm not desperately dong anything, i'm tapping at keys on my keyboard bud

PapaBop18d ago

It's not like kids show with one bad guy? I present to you.. Bobby Kotick

ABizzel118d ago (Edited 18d ago )

DEI was never the problem and it was an ignorant take to begin with.

DEI is why games like Kena Bridge of Spirits, South of Midnight, and Ghost of Tsushima exist.

DEI is why we have a huge resurgence in Japanese, Chineses, and Korean developers producing games like Stellar Blade, Black Myth, and why Nintendo & Sony exist.

DEI is why more and more games have HUGE accessibility options with both Sony and MS fully behind this.

DEI was never a bad thing, the entire purpose of DEI is representation of all people, genders, disabilities, etc…

The problem was people used DEI as a default derogatory term to describe what they believed was forced representation, which allowed colorist, racist, sexist, misogynist, homophobic, and xenophobic fools to run away with the negative DEI narrative.

jambola17d ago

you don't get to decide other people's motivations
sorry to break it to you

ABizzel117d ago (Edited 17d ago )

To each their own, however, nothing you said invalidates why some people take offense to DEI incorrectly.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 17d ago
Sciurus_vulgaris20d ago

Executives seem to often have an obsession with perpetual revenue growth. There is always a finite amount of consumers for a product regardless of growth. Additionally, over investment is another serious issue in gaming.

Killer2020UK19d ago

The fact that they also rarely have any real expertise in game development compounds things. They'll look at what's been successful elsewhere, lack the knowledge to properly understand why they have been successful and then force a team to 'reproduce' their badly interpreted idea of that success.

We see it so often with sequels to games that were successful too. The team are left well alone, they have a break through hit and all of sudden the money men descend on the IP and completely railroad the dev team's ideas. Usually winds up being 'make the same game but MORE'

LoveSpuds18d ago

This is true throughout all of the corporate and public sector organisations to be honest. CEO's generally move amongst the corporate world without any need to have experience of a particular industry, they simply need to rely on their senior leadership credentials. A CEO of a retail giant will just as easily transition to a CEO role in the energy sector for example.

Not defending CEOs here to be clear, I think it's a huge part of the reason the western world is so fucked up. CEOs don't need to care about the sector they work in, in fact it's better if they don't care if they want to screw everyone to make profits.

GhostScholar19d ago

Companies don’t hire executives to break even. If the goal is breaking even then why start the company in the first place.

Soy18d ago

That's understood; it's getting record profits and expecting to always beat those record profits, and seeing anything less as a total failure. Then they lay people off and raise prices to reach those record profit levels again, just to sate shareholders. It's setting expectations way too high just to spike share prices, then inevitably falling short. It's feeling entitled to being more successful than everyone else. It's the CEOs doing all this to boost their own bonuses.

ABizzel118d ago

Growth benefits the company’s profits and therefore the company’s stock if publicly traded, which pleases the shareholders making them more and more rich, which is why Growth is always at the forefront of the vast majority of any publicly traded company.

More growth = More Money and the people at the top want all the money they can get. I can’t really blame them anyone would love to see their profits go from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands, to multi-millions it’s almost like a gambling addiction.

But it also goes to show someone how morals can go out the window for a lot of these people, and how amazing some CEOs are when they catch this early and provide a balance solution that takes complete care of their employees across the board while keeping the business sustainable IE: Insomniac Games ALWAYS on the best places to work list. The rest of the industry could learn.

jambola20d ago

honestly, the "real" enemy of gaming, is ourselves
if nobody bought horse armor, shitty dlc would have died almost overnight
if we stood firm and nobody bought games from companies that were bad with layoffs, it would be solved
we're the idiots supporting awful business practices, we are the ones enouraging it

TiredGamer19d ago

I think the reality that we don't want to convince ourselves of is that without the rise of "horse armor" and DLC, game budgets would have essentially stagnated (smaller teams/smaller games), or game prices would have risen much more dramatically than they have. There was an incessant drive for bigger worlds, infinite detail, and hundreds of hours of "gameplay" over the last two decades, that while perhaps a natural evolution of things, needed a suitable funding stream to accomplish.

HyperMoused18d ago

What...CEOs make tens of millions and that doesnt include SLT etc etc...we now have multiple editions of games, in game currency, MT's, battle passes.....and what do we get..worse game than what was coming out 20 years ago....dont drink the cool aid, its this nickel and dime crap that is absolutely leading us to gaming destruction.

senorfartcushion19d ago

This is the worst possible answer to this conundrum. Blaming the masses is blaming the only people who are constantly “told” to buy.

Consumers are the only ones not to blame here. People make their own choices all the time. Disney movies are bombing and DEInis being blamed. Has that been enough to put Disney out of business? No and it never will.

Christopher19d ago

Disagree. Businesses are able to do what they do because people are bad consumers and don't think critically about purchases. Disney got away with doing shit stuff for years and it's just the last year where people got tired of it. It's not like it didn't work for 5 years or so for Disney to do the things they've done. They'll just move onto another way to get people to see movies and it will be just as bad but more profitable until people wake up and realize it.

TiredGamer19d ago

Consumerism drives business behavior. It's not so much "blaming" as it is observing behavior. The point I'm making is that the direction that games have gone are driven by the spending. Consumers are spending on DLC and they are driving the expectation of more glitz and padded out (lengthier) games. If they continue to pay, they will continue to drive that direction until a threshold is reached that forces a change in behavior.

senorfartcushion19d ago

Corporate advertising is the most powerful force on the planet.

This is N4G for god sake, every day there are arguments between people who are Team Xbox and Team PlayStation because they’ve been convinced that having an identity built on paying money to Sony and Microsoft matters more than having one as individual gamers who can play whatever they want.

And THEN we get to the corporate advertising part: to play whatever you want is to sink MORE into the advertising pits, making it so that you can more than one specific product.

jambola18d ago

ah you're right
they were told to buy it, it's clearly impossible to avoid that
if enough people stopped supporting, it would stop
disney not stopping would only be because enough people didn't stop

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 18d ago
victorMaje19d ago

Agreed. I’ve been saying for years, announce you won’t be buying the upcoming game because of the practices of the previous game, then you only have to stick to your guns once, see how quickly things change for the better.

We have to unite in what we shouldn’t purchase.

jambola18d ago

just imagine a world, fifa came out worse, nobody buys the next one until they see proof it's better and stick to it
or games being forced online for single player and nobody buys it
things would change so fast

HyperMoused18d ago

Just like scooby doo, you have shown us the real monsters are us

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 18d ago
Inverno19d ago

Greed and greedy people have and always will be the main issue for everything wrong in the world. Everything is a product to be exploited for monetary gain. Even when there are things that could help progress us along for the sake of making our lives easier that thing must be exploited for monetary gains. Anything that tells you otherwise is propaganda to make you complicit.

coolfool19d ago

I've never thought "DEI" (although the way most people use it doesn't match it's real definition) is the problem with games. Good games have continued to be good when they have a diverse cast, and likewise, bad games have continued to be bad. There isn't a credible example I've seen where a diverse cast has been the direct cause of a game being bad.

Show all comments (51)
70°

Why We Partnered With St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital

Matt Miller: "Every subscription to Game Informer now raises funds for St. Jude. We want you to know what that means."

Read Full Story >>
gameinformer.com
thorstein23d ago

I subscribed to this not knowing about how some of the proceeds go to St. Judes.

Really cool that some of the money goes there.

Even if people don't subscribe to the mag, it might bring people to the charity.

jznrpg22d ago

One of the main charities my wife and I donate to. They help a lot of children and being a parent of 5 children I can’t imagine what those parents go through. I’ll probably get a sub to GI because of St Jude and of course because I love video games.

80°

Dungeons and Dragons is About to Break a 6-Year Trend

Though Unearthed Arcana's content primarily consists of subclasses and spells, WOTC's latest UA drop is set to shake up Dungeons and Dragons' future.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com