250°

Valve Wanted PS3 Return 'The Right Way'

Valve's Chet Faliszek has confirmed to NowGamer that the developer's return to the PlayStation 3 had to be done 'the right way' following the console's port of the Orange Box...

Read Full Story >>
nowgamer.com
DA_SHREDDER5262d ago (Edited 5262d ago )

The fact Valve added more people to their team just to implement things such as cross platform play, user generated content, ect... makes me wanna buy the game day 1 even though I've never really got into the series before cause of the superior complex they had. It seems they got on the right track, and will end up pushing the envelope on what can be done on consoles. Its amazing and I see this gen being relevant for many more years to come.

I will admit though. I would love to see what the ps3 and pc would collaborate if the ps3 had more RAM.

Soldierone5262d ago

It is a cool idea that people have wanted. However it is the first step with a game that probably wont utilize it too much. With games like COD etc...it could be interesting. Unreal Tournement 3 already broke the boundry, we are just patiently waiting for it to explode.

As for me i wont pick it up for this reason unless its used. Its Valve, ill wait till other developers take stabs and see where it goes.

MintBerryCrunch5262d ago

you have something against Valve?

kinda giggled when you brought up CoD...when the devs dont even want to update an ancient game engine, what makes you think that they will spend more time and resources on cross platform play?

Soldierone5262d ago

Simple fact that Activision needs to make COD seem cool and its popular. If it slips at all, or they need that small little feature to liven things up, cross platform features are what will happen. It wont be anything like cross platform gaming, but it will be something.

I expect EA or even SOE to be there first. That or Microsoft will push for it since they are so closely tied to PC games and can offer exclusives.

MintBerryCrunch5262d ago

i think that MW3 will be a make or break situation for Activision...if they drop the ball with the "true" CoD sequel as most like to say, then it will either force Activisions hand to do something, or they will tout that sales are still great and gamers dont have a problem with what direction CoD has been going in

jimmins5262d ago

What were the main probs with the ps3 port of the orange box again?

jashwin5262d ago

Valve didn't port the PS3 Orange Box. Infact, I think EA(?) was responsible for it. The game had many graphical glitches and bad textures, which rendered the game almost unplayable.

I still think that Valve is one of the only "honest" developers left. As a PC gamer, I LOVE their steam platform.

Soldierone5262d ago

It had many technical issues and was ported by EA, not Valve. However Valve offered no help and no support at all, so EA was left being the bad guy.

There were several reports where EA stated they would gladly work on a patch port, but Valve said no. Thus the game never got fixed.

@above the only "unplayable" game in the box set was team fortress as the servers were absolutely terrible.

AntoineDcoolette5262d ago

How were the servers terrible? I played TF2 on PS3 constantly lag free. Once in a while the they would be unavailable for a little bit but they worked fine when available. Despite the fact it doesn't have the thousand of players the PC version does there's always enough people to get several games going at a time.

Soldierone5262d ago

To be honest id respect them and possibly buy Portal if they outright state they were stupid and wrong. They were the ones, and only ones, that bashed the PS3 and called it so many abusive things. Calling the fans dumb and so on. Come out and say those comments were said and were wrong and that your biting your own arse then we talk.

All this "oh we have excuse after excuse" bs is just making me hate them more. I never liked Valve, their comments cemented me not buying their games, and the only way to fix that is to live up to yourself and make good games. Thank god my Orange Box purchase went to EA and not them.

plb5262d ago (Edited 5262d ago )

Hasn't Gabe already done that? Maybe I'm wrong but thought I heard that a while ago anyway. Anyway, actions speak louder than words and I think Valve are doing great things for PS3 now not just saying they will unlike Activision who promise this and that and don't deliver.

distorted_reality5262d ago

You'd rather give money to EA than Valve?

Dude, that's just wrong.

RedBullGT5262d ago

I remember reading an article after they announced this at E3 with Gabe, where he said that he has been treating the ps3 and its fans like crap, and how he should not have done that, and now they need to come to the ps3 with a bang. I will try to find the article, but it was a long time ago.

StoneyYoshi5262d ago

Gabe Newell had already ate his words at E3 last year. He apologized on stage at the sony press conference about all he had said about the PS3. That's where he stated that the PS3 version will be the best version on any console.

skyward5262d ago

Who cares if they make good games? Don't cut off your nose to spite your face!

Godmars2905262d ago

At this point Valve just needs to show that they can support the PS3. Something that only becomes an issue when you look at their overall history and realize that they've *NEVER* put something out without issues. Out of all devs, they're the most guilty of putting out day-one patches to fix game breaking glitches. That's why they started Steam in the first place so that they could keep up with their own screw ups.

They need to show that they can support the PS3, but they've never properly supported anything they've done. For the first few weeks if not months. So the question becomes how quickly they can get up to a decent level of competence on PSN and weather or not gamers and the especially media will give them a chance.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5262d ago
tehpees35262d ago

They pulled excuse after excuse in getting away from PS3. the funny thing is they bashed PSN and look what they now favour because Sony let them use Steam. How the tables turned.

Gabe was hoping the PS3 would fail the whole time but greatly underestimated the playstation brand. Now Valve eat their humble pie and get their games on cause they know there is profit there as well lol.

If only Ninja theory would shut their faces about it as well.

Show all comments (30)
80°

Valve Makes Up for Steam Deck Repair Delay by Gifting Free Game

Valve gave a user Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 for free as compensation for the long wait during their Steam Deck repair.

UltimateOwnage35d ago

I had a similar experience when I initially pre-ordered my Deck. There was an issue during shipping and they offered me a customer service perk for the hassle and let me pick any game on Steam. It was super nice of them. I got a copy of Rime.

16d ago
130°

10 Legendary Games That Still Absolutely Crush It in 2025

Discover 10 timeless video games from the past that remain absolutely playable today. From Chrono Trigger to DOOM, these classics have aged like fine wine!

Read Full Story >>
gamegeeked.com
anast42d ago

Simon's Quest is better than Symphony.

djl348541d ago

If you're gonna troll, at least make a legitimate attempt.

Levii_9242d ago

Hot damn that's a good list. The only one i never played is AOE2 and i never finshed Chrono Trigger but it was damn good.

Speaking of what's old but holds up amazingly well and plays like a dream.. i played Symphony of the Night for the first time in 2019.. yep that's right. It became one of my favourite games of all time that i replay almost every year. I couldn't believe how good it was. That is almost impossible for me with newer games let alone older ones. Truly a special gem.

LG_Fox_Brazil42d ago

That's a pretty fucking great list

__y2jb42d ago (Edited 42d ago )

The only one I’d disagree with is doom. It shows its age badly I think. After 5 minutes of play these days you put it down.

Show all comments (8)
100°

Valve doesn't need to compete with Nintendo Switch 2 right now, suggests poll

There have been plenty of comparisons online between the Steam Deck and Nintendo Switch 2, but does Valve really need to compete?

gold_drake66d ago

i love how people think this would be a fair "fight"

SegaSaturn66965d ago

Steamdeck plays Switch games better than the switch hardware.

I see no reason why this won't continue with the successors. Switch will sell more, sure. But those who game on PC always come out ahead both in enjoyment and value for their money.

Neonridr65d ago

you think a Steam Deck is going to emulate a Steam 2 when it's arguably more powerful than it?

Interesting..

Vits65d ago

We're going to have to wait and see. Currently, there's no technology that would allow a Steam Deck 2 to achieve a performance leap over the Steam Deck 1 similar to what the Switch 2 offers over the Switch 1, without sacrificing the device's portability.

We'll either need AMD to seriously improve the efficiency of their cores, so we can get something with the rasterization power of a Radeon 8060S but without the power consumption of an Xbox Series S, or Valve would have to invest heavily in a translation layer for ARM. Neither of these paths is easy to achieve, so we probably shouldn't expect a Steam Deck 2 for at least a 3 or 4 more years.

Inverno65d ago

Considering that other companies have shat out multiple PC handhelds already while Valve hasn't even mentioned a successor tells me they aren't looking to compete with anyone. They went for a console experience and that includes holding off on new hardware til there's a generational leap.

--Onilink--65d ago

None of those other companies can realistically compete with Valve either. Valve can sell the hardware for a minimal gain and still know they are for the most part, just having every user still use Steam.

Every other handheld has to make its profit entirely on the hardware, which is why most of them went for an even more PC enthusiast market/price point

That is the one point where Nintendo does compete with Valve, or Sony with their rumored handheld or even more so MS, if they release a first party handheld (with a decent version of handheld windows)

65d ago
Amenalien65d ago

What many people don't get is that most of Steam Deck users have a high-end or at least a good enough PC alongside the Steam Deck. Yes, we like better graphics and higher refresh rates and we get them in our PC, we are not relying on the Steam Deck for them. We use the Deck for other reasons and in other eventualities, where we are willing to compromise on all these things, because we still get to enjoy them when we can/feel like it in the PC. Thus, a direct comparison with a sole device like the Switch is misplaced. Of course you need the Switch 2 to be strong if there is no stronger alternative to play your games in. By the way I got a Switch on day 1 and I loved it, it's just that I'm not really playing it anymore.

Show all comments (12)