240°

Sony: Core gamers will prefer to use Move over normal controls

So far, Playstation Move and related devices have been associated with a new type of demographic, one that is 'non core'. Although Sony have different believes. Speaking recently, they believe that 'core gamers' will make Move their control scheme of choice, replacing traditional controls.

Read Full Story >>
maxconsole.net
Dramscus5266d ago

I got a move for my core gaming needs. It's wicked fun to play shooters with. I'm very stoked about a bunch of games coming for it which are obvious so I won't mention them. Problem is some devs use it improperly.
Eg. One fps I play with it they implemented aiming with it like it's a tps game. Your characters arms and gun move around the screen ala third person which impedes the shooting I would be doing. Just at the wrong time usually the cursor gets to the edge that makes me turn. Ultra lame.

Pixel_Enemy5266d ago (Edited 5266d ago )

I will be using my Move for core games like Killzone 3, LBP2, inFamous, Socom 4 and so on. No doubt about it.

The video review for Killzone3 with Move by iWaggle3D was enough to get my hyped!

At least Sony recognizes the core audience with their motion peripheral ;)

karl5266d ago

as long as everyone has the choice i dont see a problem with it...

i will be using move for killzone 3 .. thats for sure

its a lot more comfortable than the dualshock..

but i get it if most people arent convinced yet and feel this just as another threat from the motion gaming that seems to be swallowing everything we love...

i would just recommend everyone to give it a try.. works really well

AAACE55266d ago

Yeah right... I'll stick with the dual shock 3!

nycredude5266d ago

I'm buying the Sharpshooter to go with move, navigator, 3d tv and Killzone 3! If it's great it will be my goto setup for all shooters.

Redempteur5266d ago

i dunno about infamous 2 but i'll be using move with KZ3 that's for sure ...

BISHOP-BRASIL5265d ago

Definitely going to use Move for SOCOM4 and KZ3 single player and coop, while I may give it a rest on competitive online. I'm willing to try it for InFAMOUS 2, but I can't think of a way to motion control being good in this kind of fast paced action/platformer, anyway good to have the option.

LBP2 however I though it wouldn't support Move, just Sackboy Prehistoric Moves (or whatever it's called)... I couldn't make Move work with the demo, that's for sure, but is the final version supposed to have Move support? If yes that's great news, probably great to go along creation tools!

captain-obvious5265d ago

not me
not interested in motion crap

Ju5265d ago

I don't know. Doesn't work for me in online mode; that is with the game I've tried. Those are MAG and Modern Combat. MAG is a bit better because it plays a bit slower, and the implementation is much better (better customization). But in Modern Combat before I can even think how the controls work, I am already dead. Those games should at least have an option to say "DS3 | Move | Both" so you can chose what kind of game you want to play. Move vs. Move would at least level the playfield until everybody know how to use the controls - otherwise you can even learn how to use them.

nveenio5265d ago

Well, I know I'm buying a sub-controller in time for KZ3 because I'll want it for Sorcery and such, too. I'm not big on holding the Move controller and playing games...I need to get used to it. I think I try to move it too much, it starts to bother my wrist after an hour or so.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5265d ago
BLACKBOIJONES5266d ago

U r right.Same here, i tried the move and i did not like it. Im ok with my normal ps3 pad. Try using move on a FPS online and u will get owned worst than hackers own people in cod.

nycredude5266d ago

I don't think so blackboijones. I am sure GG has done extensive testing of MOVE vs DS3 and they have decided not to segregate the two during online battles. I am pretty sure their results showed there weren't enough of an advantage either way. If you suck you just suck and if you are good then you are just good, no matter what the controls system is. I know people suck ass on fps period, with m&k and DS3.

BeastModeYMOB5266d ago

U sir must suck ass with the move then. Because I've been raping ppl on MAG with it & that game patched in move support. KZ3 was built from the ground up with move in mind. Most ppl don't take enough time to get used to it. Take your time and customize everything to ur liking and i'm sure you will rape with it. Trust me i've did clan matches with move vs ds3 and my move team RAPES! I don't even like using the ds3 for shooters anymore.

Trizard5265d ago

I will 25-0 anyone 1v1 against anyone who uses the move in Killzone 3 (when it comes out) for sure while me using my DS3.

RememberThe3575266d ago

Not me either. But that doesn't mean that wont change in time. People can be so afraid of change that they hate any thought of the future. I haven't even used Move yet but I'm not going to rule out that in the future Move might be a better option than a regular controller. People seem to love Move for shooter and they obviously like it for a reason.

DlocDaBudSmoka5266d ago

you should try modern combat domination. it has move support and its only $8 or $6 for ps+ members.

visualb5266d ago

no we won't sony...no we wont

Ares84PS35266d ago

No, I don't prefer move. It's a nice addition that I put aside after 4 days of playing. But that's it, an extra. No more no less.

Traditional controller for me.

ikkeweer5266d ago

I will use it, but not mainly. It's fun and very usefull to use it for two hours a day maximum. After that my aiming really starts to drop because my arms get tired. MAG is what I used it on, but I don't expect KZ3 to be much different in usage.

Masamori Sumimura5266d ago

Anything to sell a product. We all know core gamers dont give a flying F about motion controls.

HornyHaggis5265d ago

Laughing at disagrees in this thread from angry Move consumers trying to justify their purchase.

KiLLUMiNATi_895266d ago

My Opinion is no wayyyyyyyy for me, even tho move is a pretty good device.

Tachyon_Nova5265d ago

Yeah my experience with MAG tells me that's downright bs

BattleAxe5265d ago

Looks fun, but if I want to pwn noobs, I wont be using MOVE.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5265d ago
Bigpappy5266d ago

Sony seems to think it is easier to sell Move to current PS3 owners than the casual crowd. If they can sell to you guys and get the numbers up, developers are more likely to port some of the wii stuff over and current first party would continue to support it when developing future IP's.

I believe Sony is dead wrong about its core base. People aren't going to all of a sudden stop using a controller for core games, because Sony made the Move. Controller games will be here for a long time to come. I think there is room for both. Some core gamers would love the opertunity to try some motion controll in their fav games, just for a change up. But very few will chose it over the controller they are so familiar with.

Sony needs to make more games that were made specifically for Move. Something where the controller is not the better option.

The-Tentacle5266d ago (Edited 5266d ago )

You don't even own a Playstation let alone Move.

Killzone 3 is about as 'Core Gamer' as it gets and it has full Move support and possibly will be BETTER than a controller. Come back and give your misguided opinion when you have actually tried out a variety of genres using Move to properly determine it's worth.

It's always better to have an option rather than forcing your peripherals onto people. Some will never let go of their controllers just from the genuine fear of change and others will try but maybe not like it and return to the controller. However some will adapt and open up new ways to play that the less open minded would miss out on.

I like options, I like to be in control of what and HOW I play, Move and Playstation 3 offers this to me.

Bigpappy5266d ago (Edited 5266d ago )

I have use the Move on more than one occasion. Thanks for asking.

As to your rant: Where did I say anything about KZ3 not being core? You think I am knocking the Move for saying that people who play core games are not going to give up the controller for a motion wand? Okay, we shall see after KZ3 has been release how many PS3 gamers give up their controllers for "motion controll kill Zone".

I am in no way trying to put a value on the Move, I am purely speaking from a common sense perspective. Having Move implimented in as many games as posible is a good thing. Thinking it will replace the DS3 is a bit presumptuous, if you ask me. It is also PR hype.

I am not trying to take away your Move son. I believe you like it and you should keep it and enjoy it. Stop being so darn defensive when no one is even attacking. Calm down, seriously!

TronEOL5266d ago

No one is complaining about options. I'm all open to options too. But I just don't want this "Move is better" thing to get to Sony's head. We don't need a PSWii.

RememberThe3575266d ago (Edited 5266d ago )

How are you getting disagrees? Are there really that many people who don't like having options?

@Bigpappy: It sounds like you thinking very shortsided. No one is saying that adoption will happen immediately. But if Sony proves to the consumer that Move is a better device for their favorite games then why is it not feasible that people will use it? It's not going to be about one game, it's going to be about a collection of games and how they feel with move. So even if it isn't a huge success with Killzone 3 it could still be a huge success in the future.

Sony always goes to the hardcore first and from there tries to court the casuals. It's been the way they've done it from the start.

EDIT: Tron: Who are you to say "we"? It sounds like a ton of people love Move. So it's basically Sony saying "people really like this" and you say "well I don't." Sony is not Nintendo they do things very different. Don't expect the Move to be like the Wii.

deadreckoning6665266d ago (Edited 5266d ago )

@RememberThe357- He's getting disagrees because his first statement proves his ignorance. How do you u determine what consoles someone owns based off several lines of text posted on the Internet? Please I'd love to know

nycredude5266d ago (Edited 5266d ago )

what are you move haters on about? Who is forcing you to use it? Who is forcing you to even buy it? Are you not getting enough exclusive games this year? Stop stressing it just "move" on. Why are you in here anyway if you do not care about it?

Have the Ps3 gone the Kinect route? Am I missing something here? Give it time with the backing of Snny 1st parties and hopefully continued success of teh Move we will get great games with it in the future. But if all every did was bash on it all the time then it will fail and we won't get those games.

So if you don't like it fine but please don't try to ruin it for others who like it.

I thnk all you haters needs to go watch the killzone 3 move demo (27 minutes) on iwaggle3d.com and see what a good implementatin of the MOVE system can do for fps before you bash it.

shinrock5266d ago

pokemon is a core game too.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5266d ago
gamingdroid5266d ago (Edited 5266d ago )

I never heard anyone ever say, geeh this controller scheme on the CoD for Wii is soo fantastic, I wish we had one for the Xbox 360/PS3 just more accurate!

Point being, I tried it and it is fun for what it is, but it doesn't replace the controller. I have never heard or spoken to anyone ever say that PS Move is a better choice for hardcore games ever!

For some things, yes... as a replacement, NO!

at least not as it is implemented in other FPS'es.

Redempteur5266d ago (Edited 5266d ago )

i'm a pc FPS gamer i grew up playing Quake2/3 , halflife CS 1.0 to CS source and day of defeat , unreal tournament 1 ect ect .

Anyway .. i dislike playing fps games with the dualshock ..it just so hard to get into when you've used the speed of moving your hand with a mouse .

When i played metroid prime : corruption everything was intuitive and precise .. and guess what : playing with a "MOVE set" is precisly what i wanted all these years struggling with the dualshock.
Something that can translate accurately the moves my hand is making on consoles ..

I know i'm not alone on this case , numerous people trying MAG with move , agree with me , it just is accurate and easy to get into ... NO MATTER WHAT HATERS says ..

Not Everything on wii using the wiimote isn't a gimmick ..there some serious GOOD , accurate game that can only be improved by a better system ..

That being said .. they aren't even forcing you guys to use it ....they give you a damn choice ..why the complains ??

gamingdroid5266d ago

Well you are one of the few I know that would prefer a PS Move controller over a Dualshock, but I doubt there aren't too many of you.

"That being said .. they aren't even forcing you guys to use it ....they give you a damn choice ..why the complains ?? "

It's not a complaint, more like a reaction to a bold statement... and I certainly hope it is a choice and not something that turns into no choice.

_DragonSlayer_5266d ago

@Bigpappy, They do have Sorcery that looks very promising but we will have to wait and see. I have tried KZ3 with the move, and the sharpshooter and its incredible. I know I'll be using the move instead of the dualshock but to each his own. Whether Sony is right or wrong, I give them kudos for letting me decide what to use. As far as Move or Kinect for that matter replacing standard controllers, you're probably right, it will be a long time before either one of them become the norm.

DlocDaBudSmoka5266d ago

i plan to use my MOVE for when i want to have fun and not worry about a k/d ratio. when i worry about k/d that when i use the ds3.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5266d ago
AutoCad5266d ago

lol wer do they get this stuff from..?
Move will never take over core gamers.

SnukaTheMan5266d ago (Edited 5266d ago )

shooting ...ducking....sounds fishy. I think all these people saying they will use it are full of crap....hell I have a kinect and have not touched it in months.....

Stealth20k5266d ago ShowReplies(2)
Show all comments (90)
170°

Sony Aims To Sell 15 Million PS5 Units This Year, but Is Shifting Focus to Monthly Active Users

Sony CEO Hiroki Totoki and CFO Lin Tao talked about the state of the PlayStation business and the strategy and targets going forward, including how they're responding to the tariffs.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
1Victor39d ago

I wonder how the USA tariffs war will affect that projection. 🤔

S2Killinit39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

I think they take that into consideration when they announce their projections. Currently, after the xbox price increase, the PRO is cheaper than the series x! That is ridiculous, and it can’t last.

darthv7239d ago

you keep saying that but the price of a PS5 Pro is S699.99 (US) and the price of a Series X is $599.99 (US)

S2Killinit39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

The series x with 2 TB storage space is more expensive than PS5 PRO which also has 2 TB storage space.

darthv7239d ago (Edited 39d ago )

Oh so you are pitting a regular Pro with a special edition X... got it. If you are going so far as trying to compare apples to apples... please add in the optical drive and stand to the Pro. Seeing as the X has both of those by default.

I will help you if you are unable to do so.
PS5 Pro 2tb: $699.99, Optical Drive: $79.99, Stand: $29.99 = $809.97
Xbox Series X Galaxy Black Special Edition 2TB: $729.99

39d ago
S2Killinit38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. The series X with 2TB storage and much weaker, is… more expensive! So yeah, Im pointing out that fact.

Also, the PRO does not require a stand.

Ps: regular series 2TB is $749 (where did u get 729?)

darthv7238d ago

Its right here on the official XB site: https://www.xbox.com/en-US/...

Okay, so no stand for the Pro, but you might still want the optical drive. So $779.98 vs $729.99. A properly outfitted Pro is still more $$ than a 2tb X.

S2Killinit37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Do I need to mention that the series x is not nearly as powerful as the PS5 PRO?

And no, the PS5 PRO runs just fine without a drive, and people don’t have to buy the drive right away, assuming they want it.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 37d ago
drivxr39d ago

I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU.

RaiderNation39d ago

Because that's where the real money is made, in microtransactions.

Profchaos39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

People are spending less time playing is a typical trigger for this.

The less time spent playing the less likely you are to spend more money on games and services including subs or even the next console.

Increased engagement equals more money.

39d ago
DarXyde38d ago

Same reason Microsoft does it: it looks better to investors and it's a solution when unit sales slow down.

Personally, I'm not a fan of this metric; and by using it, you're kind of signaling that you're moving into the "This is a PlayStation" era.

Z50138d ago

Because the PS4 also has users and not necessarily sales

Obscure_Observer36d ago

"I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU."

Because they´d finally realized that MS wasn´t wrong after all.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 36d ago
39d ago
39d ago
310°

Sony Announces Large Profits Growth for PlayStation; Expects Further Wins in Current Fiscal Year

Sony announced its financial results for the fiscal year 2024, and things are certainly looking up, despite a decline in PS5 sales.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
CrimsonWing6939d ago

Expect sh*t to slow down if prices aren’t kept in check.

Redgrave39d ago

Who downvotes the truth?

Even PSN itself is too damn high.jpg

S2Killinit39d ago

Gamepass is already at 20$ per month if im not mistaken.

toxic-inferno39d ago

@neutralgamer1992

Not all of us. I'm a big PlayStation fan, and have been since the PSOne. But I can't begin to defend what's happening currently.

At least Nintendo release a large number of games from their major franchises. Sony is just not banking on their established franchises, and yet are raising prices. Not great.

S2Killinit39d ago

Im pretty sure we are going to see a price increase for PRO. I mean think about it, its currently cheaper than xbox series x! That cannot last.

Eonjay39d ago

I'm absolutely sure we will not see a price increase. I don't think we should 'expect' to see price increase because it just adds validity to what Nintendo and Microsoft have done.

darthv7238d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Sorry to pop that bubble but the Pro is not cheaper than a series x... generally speaking (like you are). It is cheaper than one specific version, and doing so by not including the optical drive and stand like the X has by default.

So keep on trying to convince people you are right when everyone knows it's quite the opposite. A stock Pro is $699.99 and a stock X is $599.99. A special edition galactic black 2tb X is $729.99. And if you really want to compare apples to apples... adding the aforementioned optical drive and stand brings that Pro to $809.97 and then they would be on equal footing.

Twisting truths to fit a narrative... I expect better from you S2.

S2Killinit38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. And the series X with 2TB is more expensive. Which in my opinion is insane conseidering how much more powerful the PRO is. The PS5PRO does not need a stand, it can be used without a stand.

TheKingKratos39d ago

So the Pro is not offering any push in sales at all ?

CrashMania39d ago

It's still an expensive, niche product ultimately. And they exceeded their sales projections for units sold by half a million.

lawox39d ago

"18.5 million units have been shipped during the full fiscal year. This is actually ahead of the 18 million units target set by the company."

They beat their yearly estimate. It's not broken down by device, but it's clearly performing well enough. Since it's been released it's consistently been the second best selling SKU on Amazon only after the the Slim with disc.

39d ago
Bathyj39d ago

18 million a year is in the toilet?
I remember when 10 was considered good
Hell Microsoft would take that right now.
Probably pay $100b for it.

39d ago
BeHunted39d ago

If their profits fall next quarter, we'll probably see more price hikes. I can't imagine having to pay £20 a month for PlayStation Plus.

S2Killinit39d ago

I think gamepass is already paying that much.

39d ago
drivxr39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

Decline in hardware sales.
Behind on lifetime sales and decline in first party sales.
Third party content and PSN came through to save the day.
Things will improve starting with the next Ghost game.

Hopefully a steady flow of first party content by end of '25

rlow139d ago (Edited 39d ago )

I guess you get downvoted for stating facts from Sony’s own lips. What I’m curious about is what their top games of the year were and how much Xbox games contributed to the increase?

CrashMania39d ago

Well, generally 3rd party publisher games contribute the most anyway, so no different to capcom, EA and so on contributing to this figure.

lawox39d ago

That's because the report is actually really good.

They beat the console sales estimate that they set last year March, they have increased users both due to the record numbers of PS4 users and strong PS5 sales which is leading to great profits in sales and user spend.

This report is about the financial health of the PlayStation brand and as a platform PlayStation is stronger than ever. Heck they even have Microsoft putting their biggest franchises on the platform.

39d ago
S2Killinit38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Well, the facts in the article are positive. Nothing wrong with his comment, but in my opinion it doesn't correctly indicate all the facts and nuances that give context to the reality of things. I downvoted for that only.

Make sense?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 38d ago
Lightning7739d ago

This is exactly what happened to Xbox year's ago. They had no first party and started seeing decline in 1st party sales, which effected their third party games which eventually effected their console sales. A slow decline across the board.

Calm down PS fans I'm not saying PS is becoming like old Xbox. I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. Look how Xbox finally has compelling first party and things are on a up swing(despite years going on a downswing). I know thanks to PS releases which helps a ton, (which is why Xbox hardware only dropped 6% instead of 30+% like it usually does) The point still stands despite what Genz Trends may go, first party and compelling games sell hardware and software still. Sony's financial quarter is an example of this, of what lower First party output looks like.

No matter they'll be right back on track in due time any time especially with DS2 (not my type of game but I know many like it) and Yotei. They're not Xbox and let things get bad for so many years on end.

crazyCoconuts39d ago

"I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. "
First party is mostly relevant for the sole purpose of creating EXCLUSIVES that are needed to stay competitive. With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important. PlayStation as a platform now has free reign to profit without the high expense of needing exclusive first party titles.

red2tango39d ago

Sony has been very lazy with 1st party games compared to the PS4 era. And even the PS4 era was nothing compared to the PS3 era in terms of games.

S2Killinit38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

We have Ghost and Intergalactic coming. And then Marathon which is not exclusive to PlayStation. I think Covid and that chip shortage put a speedbump in game development because game manufacturers dont want even more risk that their game will arrive to too little hardware, but the games are starting to show up.

Lightning7739d ago

"With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important."

Absolutely not. If that was the case then Nintendo would put Mario on Sega Genesis and Sonic on Super Nintendo. I know things are way different 30+ years later but not much has really changed in terms of exclusives and their impact on hardware. Especially early in the console life cycle.

Sony made all the money this quarter handover fist. Profits isn't a issue for them right now. I was just saying lower hardware sales and lower first party sales will hurt them or any console manufacturer of they don't have the compelling games in the long run. Just like it hurt Xbox. IF Sony keeps up not having lower first part output. Which we know they're not.

crazyCoconuts39d ago

Well no big exclusives in the last two years yet PS is doing great. What are people gonna do? Buy an Xbox?

S2Killinit38d ago

I agree with you. But they have had plenty of exclusives so far. Has it been ideal? Nope. I have a feeling we are seeing a resurgence with the effects of covid and that chip shortage now behind us.

Lightning7739d ago

No it's just like 360 where they had no games yet ppl still bought it because they sold ppl on the games early on that gen the fans were locked in and invested. They were riding the good will and was dubbed the shooter, racer box. The games dried up and they never recovered from it which hurt them in the long run. Same here with PS they still make the big bucks because they had games early on and the fans locked in and will continue to lock in for a little while longer despite lacking in first party.

S2Killinit38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

I agree. But the problem with xbox was that for some crazy reason MS thought game development wasnt all that important to a platform holder. They literally did not fund games with their own studios. When they lost marketshare they couldnt justify paying for exclusives with large install bases making it too expensive. That is not the scenario with PlayStation.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 38d ago
Show all comments (46)
150°

PS5 shipments top 77.8 million

PlayStation 5 has shipped 77.8 million units worldwide, Sony announced in its financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

italiangamer39d ago

Perfectly in line to reach 100 million by March 2026.

Profchaos39d ago

Theys have to clear 22.2 million to do this.
When you average out the current number over 5 years it's unlikely.

If the console was going down in price it would be possible but they have not been able to reduce the cost in fact it's gone up so this is working against them.

gta Vi has also been pushed out of the financial year and there's likely millions of GTA v players still on ps5 that have not made the jump those players would for GTA vi

The overall poor market conditions and uncertainty doesn't fill me with confidence trade war, weak yen and the ongoing cost of living crisis. We're not talking core gamers picking up a new system were talking gamers who wait for the back 9 to enter a new generation.

I think 2027 they will but 100 not this year.

italiangamer39d ago

They will reach 100 million during 2026.

S2Killinit39d ago

It might actually get a boost considering that even the PS5 PRO is currently cheaper than the series x. This will of course be over soon as Im expecting a price hike for the PRO.

Travesty39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

I know Sony said they are considering raising prices.. Well as of yesterday China and the US lifted their tariffs standoff. At least for 90 days until they can agree on a trade deal that would benefit both parties. So with manufacturing in China and shipping them to the US I’m hoping it will not affect the prices.

Although I kind of doubt Sony will top 100 million since GTA 6 will be releasing next year by March. Could be wrong and I’ll be glad to be.

Xbox shooting itself in the foot or more like nailing their own coffin with rising prices. Hopefully Sony will stay put.. Ghost of Yotei is releasing for $70 still so that’s a god sign hopefully.

senorfartcushion39d ago

Is this a good thing for someone with no shares in Sony stock?

italiangamer39d ago

More PS5 on the market = higher chance of getting even more games.
It's not rocket science.

gold_drake39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

very nice.
in almost 5 years too.
some big hitters are yet to come

badz14939d ago (Edited 39d ago )

come on...don't say that! that slogan "Greatness Awaits" is haunting me everytime someone says this and yeah...1st party output has not been a highlight this gen which is a huge bummer! personally, I would rate their 1st party output this gen 4/10!

gold_drake38d ago

to be honest, when i typed it out, it did sound like a slogan for that ha