60°
8.0

Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood Review - Gadget Review

A game’s weaknesses are rarely also strengths, but perhaps we’ve all been gauging something wrong with Assassin’s Creed. The series has thus far been based on dumb AI and seemingly basic gameplay problems…and yet we keep playing and we keep enjoying. Ubisoft has certainly stumbled onto something great, especially if they contend with Call of Duty and still make exceptional sales.

Their latest, Brotherhood...click to continue reading.

Read Full Story >>
gadgetreview.com
Dsnyder5000d ago (Edited 5000d ago )

This game should have been an expansion. It was just assassins creed 2 in Rome with noob recruits to auto kill everyone with; The controls for climbing were GOW1 unresponsive so I ended up aiming for a ledge but jumping to my death; Not to mention SURPRISE another cliffhanger ending with no questions answered. Im glad I rented this game or else I would have felt even more screwed than I already was.

Muitnorts5000d ago

I personally thought Brotherhood was far and away the best Assassin's Creed game. It tightened and improved every aspect of the game. Not to mention the online was actually good against all odds.
It's certainly one of my favourite games this year, and that's from someone who didn't love the first two particularly.

Dsnyder5000d ago (Edited 5000d ago )

Dont get me wrong, the gameplay is great (regardless of the bad climbing controls). That is why I keep coming back to Assassins Creed. Hooping around rooftops and exploring has a pretty serene feel to it. It really sucks me in. But the biggest problem is with the story. Its been 2 and a half games and what do we know? Nothing. What are the templars planning? What the hell are those pseudo god things? What are they planning? What happened to altiar? Why are there only 3 assasins left in present time to help Desmond? We are just being pulled along like puppets on a string with these questions right in front of our face only to have it yanked away with a "cliffhanger lol" ending. Its a very cheap way to tell a stary and and even more ceap way to hype up the next sequel and ensure that they make money off of it. Well I dont like being treated like a talking wallet. I want to play a game because I like it not because the ending is actually in the next damn game.

Also I didnt play the mutiplayed becasue this is the type of series that isnt suited for it. I also didnt want to go through that Bioshock 2 tacked on feeling that happened to me before. That game taught me that even the greatest single player games cant create good multiplayer versions of that game.

Seijoru5000d ago

I still feel like the game is much too easy. It holds your hand completely and you can just spam the attack button. They also added that killstreak move that makes the game even more easier. The only thing I enjoy about the game is the architecture and the gadgets really.

QuodEratDemonstrandm5000d ago

Let me see if I can answer your questions. Just bear in mind that some of it might be speculation.
The Templars are planning on installing one of the "Apples" in a Satellite. They can then use it to control.... everyone.
The Pseudo god things are referred to as "Those Who Came Before." So far we've met Minerva and Juno... now go Google them. If I understand it right they creaded the Pieces of Eden that all the fuss is about. It would appear that they also created us normal people; as for what they're planning... they're trying to save us from some impending catastrophe, I don't know what exactly, but it looks like the Sun is involved. And they said in AC2 that it happened once before.... which is why TWCB are extinct now.
Altair hooked up with the Templar woman sent in as a decoy in the 1st AC. That's the last we saw of him. My guess is he raised his child to be an Assassin, and at some point the lineage moved to Italy.
Lucy, Rebecca, Shaun, and Desmond aren't the only Assassins left, but the Brotherhood is in pretty dire straits. Three is either all that's necessary or all the Brotherhood can spare... maybe both.
My guess is AC3 will be the last one. As with movies, game franchises tend to go downhill after 3. That's not ALWAYS true, but odds favor it.
If it is the last one, then all this discussion about setting is irrelevant, It'll most likely be set in the present, with Desmond as the Assassin. I'm guessing he'll have three objectives.
1. Find the Temples Minerva mentioned in AC2.
2. Track down and round up as many PsOE as he can.
3. Kill Warren Vidic. During the completion of this objective he could very well bring down the whole Templar order.
Cliffhangers aren't really meant to keep stringing you along. Sooner or later, one of the installments in the franchise ties it all together. As examples.... Revenge of the Clones, Season 6 of Lost, Metal Gear Solid 4, Heroes got cut short so I can't say for certain. Say what you want about Matrix Revolutions, at least it had a proper ending. Same with LOTR.
A cliffhanger ending means one of two things: what you just experienced (Movie, Game, TV episode) is part of a larger story that WILL have a proper ending, just not yet (Matrix, Star Wars, Lost)... OR.... The creators are going to try and drag it on forever (Friday the 13th, any soap opera). With the 72 day time frame established in AC: Brotherhood, as well as all the questions raised so far.... this feels like the former. Keep playing, and your questions will be definitively answered. That's not a promise..... it's a cliche.

NewZealander5000d ago

im loving it, by far the best AC game, out of all games this gen the assassins creed franchise is hands down my favorite

jarrod19815000d ago

i agree these games are absolutely amazing. i loved the first one and the second one was so much better even. some of the most amazing environments ive seen just started bh tonight and i already know it will be great

NewZealander5000d ago

im about 35% through and yeah its fantastic, so many cool elements to the story, its like they tweaked everything, ezio is pretty badass now.

170°

Hedge fund calls for further layoffs at Ubisoft after shares slump

A minority investor in Ubisoft has called on the company to go private amid a shares slump following the release of Star Wars Outlaws.

TheNamelessOne12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

Wait. So you're telling me spending years and years mainly producing high budget, mid games hasn't been working out for them?

staticall11d ago

And the weird thing is, this do-same-thing-over-and-over-an d-expect-different mentality is coming from the company, that was partially responsible for Vaas and his famous quote: «Did I ever tell you what the definition of insanity is? Insanity is doing the exact same fucking thing over and over again, expecting shit to change. That is crazy.»

Was it foreshadowing?

Flewid63811d ago

This started when AC games ditched stealth for RPG. You can see the downgrade in the visuals when compared, but all 3 sold well so I think they kept saying "fck it, people will praise mid games".

Once it started creeping into their other franchises, it all went downhill. I have Ubisoft + so its interesting going thru their whole library of greats just to see when the decline starts.

TheNamelessOne11d ago

The last 3 games I bought of theirs were AC Syndicate, Division 2 and Immortals Fenyx Rising. They CAN make goods games, but they're coming less and less frequently.

kennyg12311d ago

Why are you still giving them your money??

ElaBosak10d ago

Your argument here does not make any sense considering the RPG AC games are some of the most successful games in the industry.

Michiel198910d ago (Edited 10d ago )

@ElaBosak, genshin impact is one of the most succesfull games in the industry ever, does that now mean gaas/gacha is the best gamedesign?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 10d ago
RiseNShine11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

I don't understand, I thought buggy woke AAAA games were the future, and yet the share is sinking almost 40% in complete free fall since the release of SW Outlaws ($3.76 on 30 Aug, - $2.55 today), it's brutal.

neutralgamer199211d ago

Ubisoft has really gone downhill because of the Guillemot family’s bad decisions. They’ve completely lost touch with what gamers actually want, focusing way too much on microtransactions, buggy releases, and XP boosters. It’s like they think these quick cash grabs are the future of gaming, and they don’t care that most of us aren’t comfortable with the idea of not owning our games anymore. The stupid comments they’ve made, along with the idiotic choices, have led to a massive drop in their stock—over 40% since *Star Wars Outlaws* launched. Honestly, I think the only way Ubisoft can improve is if the Guillemots sell the company. They’re holding it back.

Jingsing11d ago

Yeah, They have gone into that downward spiral of bad products and trying to chase every penny to make up for it while being anti consumer in the process.

neutralgamer199211d ago

All these companies want to squeeze very penny out of their customers instead of over delivering like a lot of them used to do

Goozex11d ago

Go woke you go broke! The gamers have spoken

IAMRealHooman11d ago

or its a buggy bland game, with horrible AI, bare bones mechanics, awful animations, and a predictable boring story

northpaws11d ago

Woke is not the main problem... Ubi games are just so boring now...

Walalon11d ago

Yeah... Woke it's just one of the list why Bugisoft it's struggling so much.

Charlieboy33311d ago

Woke IS a big reason because people are being hired based on their skin colour, gender, what they like to screw and how much they like to play pretend in their heads......instead of their actual skill. Which is why you get a boring, buggy, technically all round crap product like this and all the other steaming piles like it.

Mr_cheese11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

When creativity is replaced by a formula, sooner or later people tend to clock on, especially if the end result is continued mediocrity.

The IPs that ubisoft own have and had so much potential to be more than what we got, it's crazy. Watchdogs is a great example. How refreshingly different that looked when the original was announced and what did they do? Chased away all originality and replaced it with what ever insert people choose to call it.

Make less games if you're making too many but really put the time and focus into making each release standout in its own way instead of being generic reskinned worlds.

Show all comments (30)
140°

Ubisoft Faces Pressure to Go Private as Share Prices Plummet

Ubisoft's significant shareholder, AJ Investments, is pressuring it to go private. The shareholder suggests a cost-cutting plan and advises replacing the company's CEO, Yves Guillemot.

Read Full Story >>
tech4gamers.com
XiNatsuDragnel14d ago

Ubisoft needs to be an indie studio or just become like cd project.

isarai14d ago

Going private might honestly be the best

neutralgamer199214d ago

To go private they would need a lot of money so a better option is get acquired by someone and get rid of the current family who controls the company. Nepotism in that company up and down the leadership ladder

CrimsonWing6914d ago

Hey Ubisoft, have you maybe thought to start listening to consumers now?

Demetrius14d ago

Doubt that'll ever happen lmfao

Show all comments (13)
400°

Ubisoft share price falls to 10-year low after Star Wars Outlaws launch

Ubisoft's stocks have taken a hit following the release of Star Wars Outlaws, having fallen by more than 10% in two day…

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
isarai15d ago

Cool! At this point i just want all these trash "AAA" publishers to die. They've more than earned it with all the lies and consciously instilling what is essentially gambling addictions into customers including children. Let'em burn, we'll be better off for it.

LordoftheCritics15d ago

I mean they made it happen for themselves.

Well done I guess??

isarai15d ago

I don't get the sudden surge of Ubisoft Defense on here lately, i swear there's bots out here defending them or something 😅

VenomUK14d ago

If Ubisoft includes more diverse characters so gamers can see themselves on screen, then it will appeal to more people.

Obscure_Observer would like the option to have blue-hair options for their characters.

MajorLazer14d ago

I wouldn't want them to die, because that's 20,000 people out of a job but I would hope they see it as a massive wakeup call.

Crows9014d ago

20,000 prospects for new indie studios or support for other good established devs. Could be a huge win for the industry in the long run.

Losing a job isn't fun but it happens. Adults deal with it.

seanpitt2314d ago

Most of there games is all quantity over quality.. it puts people off star wars for eg looks good had some great ideas but the main execution was done so poorly and the combat needs to be better! The same team that did the division games which had great combat and gameplay!

Skull and bones wow that should have been cancelled, AC Valhalla was a disaster in terms of the grind and how it felt so boring after 10 hours! Watchdogs was very poor

Let's just hope shadows is there Saviour odessy was a good game overall not much AC in it though!

This has all been brought on themselves bad management and direction with mediocre games

Michiel198914d ago

I think they got a sum of money from a country to help with development for Skull and Bones, they had to pay them back if they were going to cancel it. I imagine that's the only reason they kept going with development

AshleeEmerson12d ago

I agree with this, (I know they make plenty of good games) the only game I can give high praise to is Avatar Pandora; this game nailed it for me. One of the best to come out of this generation.

neutralgamer199214d ago

They introduced XP boosters because they were making their games more grinding on purpose. The artificial enemy leveling system made sure no matter what you ere always a level or 2 below the enemies. 3 day early releases, 5-10 different editions of each game for release

UBI and WB games needs to be bought out by someone. Both are full of greed

BISHOP-BRASIL14d ago

You think a company looking at acquisitions of this caliber somehow would come with a less greed management? LOL

EazyC14d ago

The best thing that could happen to videogames is a big fat crash

jznrpg14d ago

Instead of them dying off it would be better for them to change their practices and give gamers what they want

neutralgamer199214d ago

A crash would bring on real changes but a crash would never happen because of how big this industry has become. End of the day way too many investors get into buying stocks only for money. They could careless about quality of games all they want to see is a spreadsheet full of profits

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 12d ago
darthv7215d ago

Just about time for MS to step in and consolidate the industry even further..... /s

just_looken15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

ten-cent/ owns 49% so they would take the rest
https://www.globenewswire.c...

Jingsing14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

That would essentially be like one arm of the US government owning Ubisoft and the other half being the Chinese government. Wouldn't happen unless the US force Tencent to sell their half. Which these days doesn't seem unommon. This why it is hard to see the difference between companies like Microsoft and Tencent and partly why they are not popular.

TheNamelessOne15d ago

And yet they make absolutely no changes to how they do things. Not going to feel bad for them. Would rather see their IP in fresh hands anyway.

DarXyde14d ago

I think that comes from the top down. It's a shame the talent would suffer.

CantThinkOfAUsername14d ago

Can you name a publisher that has money and talent to pump into these dormant IPs with uncertain outcome?

Are you happy with how TimeSplitters and Deus Ex ended up in 'fresh hands'?

TheNamelessOne14d ago

Embracer was a failed experiment that destroyed themselves spending money they didn't have.

Chocoburger15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

Good, burn yourselves up.
Ubisoft, a long time ago you were a great publisher, but over the past decade you've gone out of your way to create these protracted, filler experiences, and pack them with micro-trash-actions.

You intentionally create a problem with grindy slog fake 'RPG' games, and then you sell the solution for $10 in order to accrue EXP at what should have been the normal rate. Another $10 to accrue resources at a normal rate as well.

Create a problem, and charge extra for the solution. Nope, you don't get my money anymore. And the people who defend your shitty games don't realize that they're screwing themselves over, wasting their lives on low-end junk-tier games.

porkChop15d ago

Honestly, good. Ubisoft has continued to ignore its customers and has repeatedly doubled down on the kinds of things gamers don't want. They've had every opportunity to turn things around and refused. The devs themselves are super talented, but the management and the Guillemot family both need to go. Just last year Yves told all the devs that 2023 was a crucial year and that the ball was in their court to deliver on their games. Yves, you've been holding the ball the entire time.

jaymacx14d ago

I agree with you mostly, I do see that some people must have been buying the micro transactions at some point for them to keep doing it. I would put Take Two in the same category. Only difference is 2k games sell very well. Ubisoft however gets the most attention for complaints because the quality of their games has dropped and are in desperate need of redirection.

Show all comments (70)