With three Blockbuster franchises released within two months of each other, one must wonder which is better and why. Using several mediums of judgment, this article attempts to determine what is the best shooter of the end of 2010 and why.
Black Ops, Halo Reach these two games are best for your coins :)
Let's see....Call of Duty, Call of Halo, and Call of Goldeneye. Hmmm....that's a tough one. Screw all of them, just get COD4 or Halo 3.
I had 10 friends that played this title when it came out and now I got one... and that one would agree to the following. OMG this game is horrible! This and Gears are the only two games were you can shoot someone in the back and they can turn around and kill you first. This title is broken... having a jump on someone means nothing!
Goldneye 007, unless you're big on Halo or COD. Halo Reach and BO are both too much of the same IMO.
I don't think any of these were the best shooter of 2010, but out of the three, my vote definitely goes to GoldenEye.
Halo reach is the best one then its probably 007.
Anything but black ops. ANYTHING!
I'm with you on Black Ops. The variations are sweet, and it does get intense; but the offensive playercards are lame. Some of the creative ones are sweet, I've seen a few dragon balls, and Japanese anime. -Here's mine -
Seems to me that the author was comaparing GE:wii to GE:n64 a little too much. I found the game to be best of the three.
They shouldn't matter KZ3 is getting released soon they'll be distant memories
all those games suck in my opinion
reach. Blops its a broken insult to 2/3's of HDgamings community Goldeneye007 apparently did great but, reach still looks more fun imho =) Add BF:BC2 to that GDAMNIT!?!?!=")#)$(T$&quo t;?EGRU
Out of those three it would be Halo Reach. Black Ops is just shit...
Reach easily. None of those other games will be supported as well as a Bungie game is. Besides it has way more content and longevity than the others.
Exactly, Reach already has a bazillion fan-created maps and game types, plus awesome co-op. It's definitely the most bang for your buck.
I hate Halo, but quality wise I think that's the best of the 3.
Reach no question. Better graphics than Black Ops. Better gameplay than Black Ops. Better campaign than Black Ops. Better mulitplayer than Black Ops. These two games aren't even on the same level. Goldeneye remake? Never played it...
Killzone 3, end of story.
"this article attempts to determine what is the best shooter of the end of 2010 and why." Should've gone to specsavers.
In that case Battlefield Bad Company 2.
I have to go with Reach. It just doesn't get old.
Battlefield bad company 2 was released in march, I examined, dissected, and based my opinions upon the three powerhouse franchises that released games at the end of 2010.
I bought them all because I love games :) Halo Reach on 360, Black Ops on PS3 and GoldenEye on Wii!
Sorry I Finished All 3, I liked black ops more than halo. But golden eye was still better than reach.
Reach, but thats just because Black Ops was a waste of time. Not even as fun as world at war's zombie mode
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.