New gameplay footage emerged: Video shows Crysis 2 in Stereo 3D on Samsung UN55C8000 (55 inch 3D LED TV).
Oh my...thats on 360? 0_0'
Enjoy! >> http://www.youtube.com/watc... <<
Thank you.....Gladly adds a bubble
Graphically I think it looks good, but it's hard to tell thanks to 3D image. I don't get what all the hate is for. Get whatever version of the game suits you. If you're a PC gamer get it on PC, if you're a 360 gamer get in on 360, if your a PS3 gamer you can skip over it for Killzone 3 and Resistance 3. No need to argue or bash Crysis graphics. Now as far as the gameplay goes again I'm not impressed. They need to put action heavy scenes out for showings and trailers, because these scenes don't get me hype for the game. From everything I've seen of Crysis 2 makes it look like an 8 - 8.9/ 10 game, which is great but it'll only be because of it's graphics. Everything about this game screams slightly above average with very good graphics.
What's shown is definitely 360 video, because you can tell by the right/left offset that it's not "true" 3D, but some sort of substitute that Crytek has come up with. In fact, I'm pretty sure that I remember them mentioning a way that they do 3D without rendering two separate views. I hope that the PC version allows for true 3D, though.
I disagreed, simply because I'm fully aware you are a PC supporter. Surely, you cannot be impressed with this mediocrity especially once the benchmark is released for the PC making this look like the PSP port. -End of Line
They show a 360 on the floor, but they also show a PC right beside it and the 360 doesn't even appear to be turned on. Developers seem to love to pass off their PC versions as their console versions, leading to disappointment in the product and 360 owners staying away from forums where they proclaimed the game would destroy PS3 exclusives graphically! Edit: Well, here comes another 4 day ban for stopping short of worshiping 360 owners for their incredible foresight in predicting the best console and the death of Sony in the gaming business!
They said the 360 was running it. Thats a dev kit. denial much? I'm not even sure why you even mentioned the PC whatever the game was doing one the PC it was not demoing the game being shown.
WoW...this game is looking better and better. It looks like EA and crytek have put some extra time in on the game as a result of the delay...a couple of things... It's running on 360 ( clearly seen on the video ) in 3d. Not sure what rez, but he claims 720p. That would be a neat trick seeing that the 360 doesn't have HDMI 1.3 or 4. Must be less than 720...maybe CoD 640 or SC C 540p...doesn't matter...still looked great. Why do they always show this game running on 360 and not PC or PS3??? Might have something to do with the exclusive 360 Kingdoms game or maybe it just looks better on 360??? Rage as well as alot of multi-plats are always shown on 360...Hmmmm.
360 is show most of the time because its 9/10 times lead platform with devs. Meaning most stable, polished and presentable version of the game.
If you think this is good check out PC.
Bu bu but 360 doesn't do 3D! :D
seriously unimpressed by crysis 2. this game is known for having amazing graphics so for it to look like this on home console systems is a let-down. should have stayed on pc exclusively imo
No, Crysis 1 was known for having amazing graphics...And that's pretty much ALL it was known for. Crysis 2 is known for being a consolized version of the series that pales in comparison to Killzone 2 & 3.
"And that's pretty much ALL it was known for" Clearly haven't played the game, just spouting the usual console gamer garbage that you all agree on.
Exactly, console 'fanboy' garbage! Not necessarily console gamers in general :) But seriously, if you play the game yourself you'll understand it's not just 'teh lookz'! I FIRST completed the game @ 800x600 resolution with med graphics (looked like sh*t) and enjoyed the hell out of it (had a 9500gt, very ooold graphics card).
@Deathstroke So arent Killzone 2 & 3 just known for amazing graphics? except they look last gen in comparison to a 3 year old game like Crysis. Clearly you have never played Crysis its a lot more then the standard console corridor shooter(which is the category KZ falls into as well).
@imvix LOL did you see the reload animation yeah KZ2 has better ones than this game aldo KZ in know for graphics, online, the different feel weight wise. and being in a war crysis 1 just graphics which have been surpassed but denial is ignorance. face it crysis 2 can't compete with KZ3 a console game and you hate it. KZ3 better graphics, animation, art style, online, do i have to go on disagrees i see PC fanboys must be up late check their fans to make sure their rig don't overheat LOL you guys are so much fun
@ trounbyfire I disagreed because your statements are moronic. Just reading it and seeing the two words "ignorance" and "denial" keeps bringing up the word "irony" to mind.
you lately has been living alternative worlds where kill zone 2 and 3 are good¿? crysis have more polys than k1,k2,k3 and they not use low res textures for hiding the mediocrity
Lol, Killzone 2 is basically a corridor shooter. In Crysis, you have HUGE, almost sanbox-like at times, levels, and there are hundreds of ways to approach any situation. There's so much freedom, and that's what makes the gameplay. "crysis was a mediocre games (talking about metacritics scores ?) and nobody was really enjoying the "great graphics" (not so) at the time the game was a new game (only pc of the future)." 91 is now considered mediocre? Really? And at that time, the graphics weren't really contributing to the score because most reviewers had rigs that barely ran at medium at the time.
I agree STONEY4, I found KZ2 incredibly boring, and the graphics were unimpressive, console gamers will lap up anything these days.
Anyone that thinks Crysis was just graphics never touched the game. I'd stay away from the game if I were you though, the gameplay is probably too much for you to handle.
the game was shown in 3D
The PC version is the only version that will look good. It should have stayed on PC, but Crysis isn't that good. Wait for Rage to come out, better game. Edit: Also, why the hell is it on an LED TV? LED's don't do good 3D compared to Plasmas.
You must be talking about the PS3 version. The game running on the 360 and PC is unmatched. The only game that will compete with this will be Rage and Brink. http://www.youtube.com/watc... You must be talking about those leaked PS3 screenshots. @Grenadan No he knows this video is 3D PS3 fans started saying the game looks meh after seeing these http://n4g.com/news/668053/... Plus they don't want to admit there will be three or four games that will look better than PS3 exclusives most are multi platform. Looking forward to see how Forza 4 and Kingdoms turn out.
Have they even shown a video of the PS3 version of Crysis 2 Yet? No? stfu.
@ Tinasumsum That Ps3 screenshot is a fake it is from a Crysis 1 mod. The nanosuit and vegetation detail is excactly the same as in the previous crysis. Try harder. Also those multi platforms you are talking about. Better than ps3 exclusives? Like anyone sane would believe that. Rage and Crysis will look great, but not like Killzone 3, Uncharted 3 and some 2010 exclusives, Not on consoles. Pc yes.
Dude everything in cryengine 3 is better then in 2. Shaders are better optimized and result are more precise. Heck you should compare this to perhaps borderlands a game with big levels and sectioned openworld. If you compare it to lets say a linear shooter your doing it wrong. But i will first wait for the game to be released before making claims so far the game sounds more like borderlands kind of level then lets say a killzone or a call of duty. But i could be wrong about it. Want to first play it before placing it inside a fps subgenre. Then i can compare it to the best of the subgenre.
Looks cool, nothing that would blow my mind. Still can't wait to play this game on my 3D TV.
you hear him talking about how gimped it is on 360 in the video. I hope I can crank this game way up on PC.
I dont knw why every one is hyped up by 3D gaming.Im sure it looks amazing but IMO its nothing that will freak me out. I played some 3D games and all i could say after playing for a while my eyes was hurting a little. To b honest im happy with regular HD gaming. Apart from that d video sucks...D camera was just moving around and he played most of it with out d glasses :/
Its like how console gamers got hyped about playing at HD in 2006. Late to the party, but think they were first to arrive
HD? that's completely different to 3D, you people who have no legitimate arguments need to STFU, TV's have been upping their resolutions since TV's began, we just happen to call the latest upgrades HD because that's what they are. The move to 3D was a quick one for all these company's to stay away from bankruptcy due to the recession. 3D messes your eyes up and a lot of people have turned away from it due to that reason.
Except they weren't the latest upgrades... HD LCDs have been around 2000 or so. HD-level resolutions have been possible on CRT monitors for ages (although I'd still take an LCD any day).
It looks like it runs at 20FPS-25FPS range considering its the console version and running 3D.
Lol console version without 3D is running in 720p at 25-30fps. With 3D it would probably be Sub hd with 20-25fps max.
right cause console can't do 1080p with 3d on....if only there wss a GT5 we could use to show PC fanboys they are wrong ......oh well lets ignore GT5 1080p with 3d like pc fanboys maybe santa will bring us a new graphics card you know that xgter450slrnxt graphics card I sound cool right >_> denial my friend its ok to admit you are wrong. Hey one more thing didn't GOW3 kratos have the best animation and model ever better than crysis but its ok denial you'll come around
You mean the game with static environments, and has jaggies showing in 80% of its cars lol. I saw GT5 the game looks last gen at best. Games like Grid, Dirt 2, hell even NFS shift look better.
A large part of Sony's exclusives are static on some level. PlayStation has always used hardware and software this way. Baked on graphics is easy, effective and fast.
@troubyfire Ever cared to see all the low res textures surrounding Kratos? Every game has its downfalls, While Kratos may have smooth animations the textures surrounding him look last gen.
trounbyfire, do your research. gt5 doesn't run in 1080p in 3D. Nor does it run in native 1080p in any condition.
@kaveti6616 http://www.eurogamer.net/ar... GT5 does do 1080p and it not with 3d so your right about that but it does do 1080p. its not native CRY ME A RIVER the only difference between 720 and 1080 is size they look the same to me. my SDTV in my room set to 9:16 looks just like my HDTV in the living room via HDMI on 720 and 1080 the only difference is its smaller other wise it looks HD. my sd tv has component cables which probably makes it a Hd tv with the max of 720p but i don't have ccomponent cables only HDMi. it looks the same on my SDtv as the HDTv
From your own link: "the resolution shifts to 1280x1080 with 2x quincunx (QAA) when the 1080p mode is engaged. So we're not seeing anything like native 1080p resolution here" But since your SDTV looks "just like" your HDTV as you say, it's probably pointless to reason with you.
Oh wow, you guys are idiots. GT5 is the best looking racing game on ANY platform and yet we have stupid comments like this from imvix "GT5 the game looks last gen at best. Games like Grid, Dirt 2, hell even NFS shift look better." GT5's car models have more than double the poly count of EVERY game you just listed when maxed. The attention to detail in GT5 is insane, graphically it is the best looking racing game. Don't take my opinion on it seriously? Heck, why not take a purely racing game only reviewer's opinion? They're very well known and are quoted in this video as saying "GT5 is the best looking racing game on any platform... yup even on the PC, guys" http://insidesimracing.tv/v... Be a fanboy all you want, but when insidesimracing say it and literally hundreds of reviewers say it, you need to put down the kool aid and stop kidding yourself/
@Jammydude GT5 seriously got alot more hype then it deserved, i was expecting the game to look outstanding, however after the final game materialized it looks very ordinary. Specially look at the textures on the sides of the road or the trees, any place Sony doenst want you looking looks bad.
Imvix please stop being delusional, you have guys at Eurogramer digital foundry, Inside sim racing, stating that GT5 is the best looking simulation game available today in the market. beating the likes of Rfactor and other big names simulation games. You saying Games like Grid, Dirt 2, Hell even NFS shift look better is just being a butthurt fanboy and a delusional guy. Why isit so hard for a fanboy like you to admit that it looks better than other simulation, to make it even worst your saying GT5 looks last gen at best, You got some serious issues mate. Fanboys love to denied the fact that PS3 has the best games with the best graphics on consoles. God of war 3 did so many things that other games don't even do, it did so many things at once. Substance101 - Your just saying the same thing as what Imvrix is saying, Yes it did received a lot of hype but saying it looks very ordinary is an understatement, How can you be saying that if it is the best looking simulation game available? most advanced simuation with highly accurate and advanced physics, doing 60FPS, 1080P, Photorealistic graphics, Amazing weather system, all those at once, you rarely have any games on console doing what GT5 is doing. Like you said it received a lot of hype but whether it lived up to your standard is up to you, and am easily going to assume that you do not play simulation games at all so why comment?
Better than that red and blue crap I had to use for Arkum Asylum
Looks really good,amazing lighting,runs great in 3D. This and Rage are my most anticipated console games because they are new IPs(console in Crysis 2 case). Almost everything else suffers from sequelitis(2,3,3,3,3,3...meh).
This one will be for my pc for sure. I got my samsung 3d led and I just have to get rid of both my 4870's in favor of a 3d compatible graphics card. I just don't know who's making the better ones. Nividia?? ATi?? Time for some research.
a simple answer ATI
Crysis 2 will be part of Nvidia's The Way It's Meant To Be Played. So Nvidia is a safe bet. It also gives you Physx on some titles (most notably Arkham Asylum) and well supported stereoscopic 3-D drivers.
. http://www.youtube.com/watc... I doubt crytek will let crysis 2 look bad on any different solution!!
I use to think ATi, but I seriously don't recommend the 6xxx series as they have been getting ALOT of problems in different games due to their drivers. Heck, the drivers they released after the 6xxx series were released didn't even support 6xxx cards :/ I own a 6850 right now, and I've gotten quite a few deal-breaking problems so far
Same here. A got a couple of 4870's in xfire. I'ts been nothing but problems from the start. Purchased it just for crysis but had over heating problems and power supply problems according to the red lights that come one when it crashed. Just a couple of nights ago i was playing ME2 when it happened again. An Nvidia graphics card will probably be my next purchase.
guys be realistic, crysis 2 on pc will blow us all away while on consoles it will barely be able to compete against killzone 2, killzone 3 is miles better than crysis on consoles ( note this is console im talking about). consoles: Killzone 3>>>>>>>& gt;>>crysis 2 PC: Crysis 2>>>> Killzone 3 overall on consoles will be like this i guess: Uncharted 3>>>> Killzone 3>>>>>> Infamous 2socom 4 ( this game looks amazing!)>>>>> Gears 3>>>>> crysis 2.
Socom? Seriously, that game don't look that good at all
Neither Socom nor Infamous have amazing graphics.
Killzone 2 was more of a muddy mess, dont see how people rate it as one of the best looking games.
Maybe because you never played it? at the time when it came out, it was the best looking game on the market, TBH i couldn't believed that people were being delusional and stated that Gears of war 2 still looked better, KZ2 had the best lightning system back then and still probably does.
Should not have mentioned Socom. I have a PC rig, I use for gaming with a 0.5M graphics card. I just lmao at the continue compares of PC games to consoles games. PC gamers..Show me a rig I can buy for 300 bucks complete, off the shelf from the store that can compare to consoles.. until than... just use some sort of intelligence and stop comparing a VW to a Ferrari.. If the $$ I pay for a PC cant whip up on a console..thats an ePic fail
Getting the hardware isnt all what it takes to game. You need to buy the software too. PC games cost alot cheaper. Gaming on console in the long run is expensive period. You can get a PC for 500usd that will wipe the floor with any console. However no ones stopping you from spending more and getting something light years better, with PC you just have options, with console you dont.
I think it will beat killzone (same crap as kz2) 3!! seeing how killzone's only innovation seems to be move support,jet packs (like halo)& mechs (like a lot of games have done)& call of duty run & gun.. plus crysis will be played by more people(on 3 platforms).. I pretty sure there are no other nano suit, ny games!! plus even the multiplayer maps look more fun!!! http://www.youtube.com/watc...
yeah so your one of those who loves innovation right? the why don't i see anything new in crysis 2? same crap right? dude killzone has better melee system than crysis 1+2, better feel to the wepons, great graphics,better animation than crysis and better online play than crysis. only thing crysis do great is graphics, but sorry the graphics dosen't = great game. and if you want innovation, go play LBP,MOVE,KINECT AND STUFF LIKE THAT, and leave the hardcore games to us real gamers who like it old school. IF YOU look at uncharted, what is so "new" in that game? ohh thats right, nothing. but the game is still one of the best games this gen.
The 360 and PC zealots are out in force today! Don't want to write a novel so I'll touch on a few points. 1. Crysis for PC is a mediocre shooter. Point blank. Only exciting part was the encounter with the aliens. I liked that part. 2.Crysis 2 will look good on console but don't expect it to take home any awards. 3.To 360 fanboys, Killzone 2 is the benchmark for FPS on console right now. End of story. Until the release of Rage, Crysis 2, etc. it will remain so. Thank you.
There are videos for Crysis 2 PC already on the net in fact N4G had a link up a while ago and Crysis 2 PC looks awesome. Crysis 2 console will look good as well but I'll take KZ3 over it but that's just my choice. Now most Pc gamers are not really excited about Crysis 2 because it's basically a console title now meaning it has simple console type game play versus the tactics of Crysis 1 PC but just wait until Battlefield 3 hits. No DX9 in BF3 which means FULL DX 10.1 and DX11 for PC gamers.
Sorry hammer dude, but dirt 2 on ultra settings with dx11 smokes gt5.....smokes it. Don't get me wrong I understand, I waited a long time for Alan wake and was disappointed even denied it was average....but come on.....gt5 was a disappointment to me, except the actual driving, graphically its all over the place
Just the TV model I was getting, too. Can't wait to play Crysis 2 and Uncharted 3 on 55 inches, in 3D.
video not clear enough to say wow. dont get your hopes up.
I bet the main reason crytek have made crysis 2 on consoles is due to the huge amount of tight ass PC gamers downloading pirated copy's of crysis.