The designers had a good handle on what they wanted and they've created a game with a ton of depth. Unfortunately, the execution is flawed. On both Xbox 360 and PC this game is buggy and unpolished, and these quirks will prevent it from duplicating the real key to Oblivion's success: mainstream appeal. The game has some very real issues that should not be overlooked.
Ethan Butterfield from GameGrin wrote "Has there ever been a point when you’ve looked through your gaming library and wondered, “Huh, whatever happened to this title?"
Replies(1)
First one was garbage. The second was a janky cheese-fest. And then their follow-up release, Raven's Cry, wasn't even complete at launch; doing so badly they re-released it under a new title more than a year later ... still not complete.
I'm probably in the minority but I loved the second one! I acknowledge that it wasn't a great game but I enjoyed it thoroughly and even platinumed it >_<
The first one was pretty bad, but I enjoyed the second despite its flaws. A bit rough around the edges, but it was a pretty decent RPG.
The first one just had too many big glitches. The second was much smoother and had more polish
"Two Worlds is a weird game. But that’s fine, because that’s why it’s worth talking about.
"It didn’t sit with critics all too well on its release back in 2007, but take a quick look at its GoG page and you’ll find glowing review after glowing review.
"Along with many people, I also like it – even though it's absolutely terrible."
Yea, two worlds 2 was great. Lots of great mod tools too which were super fun. Nothing about the game was done well, but something about playing it with a few friends was just a fun time. Thought I was the only one.
I really enjoyed both entries. I wish they would attempt another and keep the unprofessional voice actors, but improve the AI so they react to you stealing their stuff and such. The bad English gave the game a unique personality and added a lair of humor not found in other RPG's.
There's something genuinely great about a game that's so bad it's good - probably because it's a rarer thing to find in gaming than, say, movies.
Back in the day I got obsessed with a really weird FPS called PO'ed. It was rubbish in so many ways, but it had more personality and character than pretty much any other shooter I've ever played.
Ignoring the cheesy dialog, the PC version of the first Two Worlds was actually a good game. The 360 version was a complete mess though.
We all like to play video games with our friends. However, there are many games that will strain a relationship as players struggle to work together. This list commemorates the most frustrating games to play with a friend, or anyone for that matter.
Did IGN give the low profile xbox360/pc exclusive far better rating than
(THE AMAZING,GOD MADE,THE 360 KILLER , THE PS3 POWER) LAIR
----------------------------- ------------------------------- -----
Now watch PS3 fangirls reporting this story as Bad editing ect ect..(EDIT:they did)
Ign says its Passable. And I understand and respect their reasons. Its clearly better than Lair which I also own. But, the framerate does hold it back from being in the 8's and 9's and understandably. But the game is so fun and deep that if you look past the frame rate, which is really easy to do, the game is Great. Its a cross of diablo and oblivion....They just should have spent more time on perfecting the framerate....Hopefully they will have a patch coming or somthing....
By over two points? I smell a rat.
Well, it's better than GameSpy's 1.5/5 but certainly lower than GameSpots 7/10.
All reviews have one thing in common, the RPG mechanism and class system which IGN calls true RPG. That alone is tempting me to get this game...
even a garbage 360 game beats out Sony "triple A"