I swear F1 doesn't look even half as good GRID sometimes. Hopefully Codemasters develops GRID2 from the ground up using DX11 and make full use of tessellation.
@sunnygrg: Actually it's sub85 who failed. The original video is about comparing the track implementation not visuals. sub85 "made it" graphical comparison in his quite effective but lame attempt to generate heat.
is a great game in its own right and comparing them is unfair. to me they are totally different games but i will say f1s backgrounds are better but gt5 is better everywhere else.
Not really. GT5 doesnt have no where near the complexity of F1 2010 when it comes to F1 racing. F1 2010 has: All teams in F1 All drivers in F1 All tracks in F1 with dynamic weather on each The ability to total your car 3 practice sessions 3 qualifying sessions The ability to change your wing angle and engine mapping. The ability to damage your wing The ability to puncture your tyres Press confrences and Interviews The ability to be a number 1 driver or number 2 Research and Development throughout the season. F1 2010 is a much better game when it comes down to F1, ForzaGT.
F1 2010 - like name say is a F1 game meaning all the resource were used to make it a complete F1 experience
whereas as GT5 on the other hand concentrates on the Racing simulator as a whole(karts, nascars, WRC and many more), totally irrevelent to what F1 2010 looks to achieve
as a game they are both good but visually GT5 is better than F1 2010- the point of this article
My hero Senna won five F1 victories in a row on this track from 89 to 93. He won at Monaco 6 times in total. Graham Hill 5 times during the sixties. Senna's other win was 87.
even though the quality is a complete SH*t Storm . its pretty obvious that GT5 is better! i mean just look at how the city looks while the car is moving . plus the the reflections on the car are mind staggering !
would like to see another comparison with actually good quality !! just to be fair
I don't know why but GT5 has made me want to buy more racing games, maybe just because I'm really enjoying racing right now... so F1 is my next buy..
Just found it on Amazon for $39.95 sweet deal, so I'm just going to get that now since you just confirmed for me that it's good so far.. -so I think I'll like it...
I was worried because I'm coming from GT5 so didn't want to get it and then feel like it's a let down after playing GT5, but since you have GT5 and like it, that's all I needed to know to make my purchase.. -so I'm excited now, can't wait to check it out.
I'm still mixed on gt graphics some cars and tracks look amazing and other don't. F1 2010 looks amazing on all the tracks plus I think the rain and water on tracks look better than what I have played so far on gt5. Before any one starts I'm not saying gt is a bad game but its by far the best looking game at times.
Please read the comments at the beginning as well as the end. Itll save you a lot of pointless comparison and fanboy talk.
Posted by hay 4 hrs ago @sunnygrg: Actually it's sub85 who failed. The original video is about comparing the track implementation not visuals. sub85 "made it" graphical comparison in his quite effective but lame attempt to generate heat.
Holy crap! I watched the video once, and though wow, the F1 game looks horrible compared to GT5, and it seems to also be taped with a webcam or something. Then I realized that GT5 is on the right...
Both.
to be fair the F1 2010 footage looks more like direct feed than the GT5
GT5 will rip apart F1 at 1080p on a PS3
Is this even fair comparison if it using Cam?
Using youtube 360p to make graphics comparison...
My hero Senna won five F1 victories in a row on this track from 89 to 93. He won at Monaco 6 times in total. Graham Hill 5 times during the sixties. Senna's other win was 87.