110°
8.0

Gran Turismo 5 review | Electricpig

The suffocating burden of expectation will ensure that racing fans will be especially critical of Gran Turismo 5’s minor failings. The inconsistency of the graphics engine is rather galling, and the neanderthal opposition AI hasn’t evolved since the first game was released.

Despite these irksome problems, even the most hardened critic must admit that Gran Turismo 5 is a truly extraordinary racer.

It’s as close to driving a high-performance sports car as many of us are ever likely to get, and the feature-packed career mode and garage of over 1,000 vehicles is certain to keep petrol-heads entertained for months to come.

It may not represent the quantum leap we’ve been led to expect – and it’s certainly not for everyone – but Gran Turismo 5 is nonetheless one of the best driving games available on the PlayStation 3.

Read Full Story >>
electricpig.co.uk
Game-ur5292d ago

There are hardcore games and casual games, and there are the very rare and hard to make simulator games, GT is non apologetic simulator racer, and the time it goes "arcade fun" is the time it dies.

NewsForMe5291d ago

Sorry, GT5 cannot be considered a non apologetic simulator racer. A simulator would immediately throw you into a realistic and difficult racing experience. GT5 requires you to level up to unlock the more realistic and difficult options. GT5 is first and foremost a game, a great and varied racing game at that. PC has and always will do real simulation. If you're looking for pure simulation go there. If you're looking for a fun game continue what you're doing.

Braxens5291d ago

How about just normal fun then?
This whole hardcore simulator excuse is getting pretty thin. Reviews keep saying the inconsistent graphics, the dumb AI, the barebones multiplayer and the weak damage are negatives but every ps3 fan runs to the arcade, casual, noob excuse like all those flaws don't matter.

PirateThom5291d ago (Edited 5291d ago )

People that have actually played the game for any length of time mention the leveling system for AI and damage, which means, obviously, reviewers aren't playing the game for any length of time. They may not be casual, but they're definitely not playing the game for more than a few hours.

mike90775291d ago

I know if the damage becomes better as you level up many review sites are gonna look pretty foolish. GT5 is a huge game and theres no way you can even finish this game within 2 weeks it would take you months just to finish a spec mode and thats only if your good at the game.

Game-ur5291d ago

@Braxens
Fans who are actually playing don’t find any of these "problems", its called nitpicking and making things up.

And if you don’t find simulators fun then the game is simply not for you. I Don't like platformers but I don’t say Super Mario Galaxy 2 is bad.

Braxens5291d ago (Edited 5291d ago )

This is a SIMULATOR, not an RPG! In what real world does damage increase as you drive?? AI remains on rails though so don't even try that.
@game-ur. Making things up? All of them just decided to talk about the dumb on-rails AI? They won't even let you take close up pics of standard cars, why do you think that is so? And the damage, come on, leveling up damage is realistic now? Enough excuses guys, you sound paranoid
Even people here that have played it have said they hope they fix the bare multiplayer

T9X695291d ago (Edited 5291d ago )

@Game-ur - Well of course, their huge fans of the game, they don't want to see those problems and when they come up, they call it nitpicking and that goes for any game period.

It's not like the sites chooses a reviewer that hates a specific genre and tells them to review it, which is why sites have more than one reviewer. It wouldn't make much sense to have someone review a simulator if they hate simulators. It would be like me reviewing a hack and slash game, I hate hack and slash games it wouldn't make much sense for me to review God of War 3 and say it's not that great of a game because I hate the genre.

ryuzu5291d ago (Edited 5291d ago )

^^ Look, if you simply bought and played GT5 like everyone else in the world, you'd be having a lot more fun now than trolling GT5 threads.

Damage is levelled for a simple GAMEPLAY reason - you start with limited cash, paying for repairs to your first few cars will put you in the poor house. If you want to play with damage just go online.

The AI is actually good this time round and certainly superior to for example F1 2010 which often praised.

Online works well and with an update due for the weekend I think this side of things will improve still more.

Reality is I've played about 25 hours of GT5 in 3 days. So far I've still barely scratched the surface of the game and only played online for about 3 of those hours.

It is GOTY - sadly, the reviewers posting this stuff have managed to play the game for about half of what I have and no surprise they've seen about 10% of what is in GT5.

If you're mildly interested in cars and driving, then this is an automatic purchase together with PS3 - if you're not, then why are you reading GT5 articles?

r.

thief5291d ago

"In what real world does damage increase as you drive?"
refer to ryuzu's comment. Its not "increased", its switched on in stages after you reach a certain level.

T9X695291d ago (Edited 5291d ago )

Not sure if you're talking to me or someone else, but I wanted to comment on one thing you posted.

"Damage is levelled for a simple GAMEPLAY reason - you start with limited cash, paying for repairs to your first few cars will put you in the poor house. If you want to play with damage just go online."

Why not just have the option to have damage on or off, or cosmetic only, similar to how Forza handles damage? What if someone wants more of a challenge instead of the game holding your hand until you reach a certain level. If a gamer wants a challenge, what's the point in making the game start on easy mode (if that is what you wish to call it) then turning into hard mode after a certain level, instead of having the option to start the game out in the most difficult way?

I'm not sure how many of you actually played Forza, but when I play, I turn off all the stupid assist, and make damage on full. Sure if I screw up I lose a portion of my payout to fix my car, but it also teaches me to be more careful and pay attention to what I'm doing, rather than playing bumper cars to hit 1st place.

EDIT: Wait....you just the game would basically be a challenge because it would put you in the poor house.....now it's just a challenge on it's own? I'm not stupid I can read lol. I don't have to own GT5 to read people comments on here that actually have the game. I've read from many people on this very site the game is really easy at the start, which is why I said, why not give the option to turn on things such as damage to add a challenge for people who want it?

ryuzu5291d ago (Edited 5291d ago )

^^ If you had played GT5 you would know 2 things

1) It's challenge is legendary even without damage and
2) GT series has always followed this structure.

It's like Princess Peach getting kidnapped in Mario, GT has this structure so that only the dedicated see the game through to completion.

It's what makes GT so great. Still wasting time on here isn't getting the 'ring challenges done! So you guys stay here and troll while bored - I'm off for some more wheel time :)

r.

PS : Wheels on 360 suck - no wheel = no play.

hay5291d ago

@PirateThom: Exactly. It's amusing to see reviewers bashing the game they played for like 2, 3 hours, mentioning "issues" that are gone if you spend some quality time with it.
It isn't the first time, isn't last time, but it's obvious that reviews are written in really unprofessional manner.

GT5 is one of the very few games which are fresh during first hour or during 50th thanks to leveling system, improving damage, AI etc. But most reviewers can't get past that. They don't review this game for what it is and instead are just spewing BS(excluding reviewers who are gamers, 'cause everyone who stated such idiotic drawbacks can't be called a gamer).

@Game-ur: And exactly again. GT5 was made for racing sim fans mainly. It's incredibly accessible for beginners, learning curve is fantastic for people new to the genre, there's lots of things to do, and career is always fresh thanks to often switching cars, adjusting driving strategies etc.
It's incredibly well thought game with few questionable design choices and some flaws. But it's closest to perfection of all console sims.
But it's better to be ridiculous noob and brag. /s

And yeah, it's absurd that reviewers are calling games bad just because they don't like the platform, franchise or genre. It's so immature and narrow minded...

infamousinfolite5291d ago

@T9X69

Think of it like this there are newcomers who are playing this game as now as we speak sure the idea of turning on damage is coool and all but most people would prob keep it off so the way it is set in GT5 is that these new comers get a feel for this game learning on how the game works as far as turning making the right moves to get to first place and some levels later the real action starts and the damage comes on as standard and wll probably not have the option of turning it off.

NBT915291d ago

It doesn't seem to be that way, I was just driving a Ferrari 512 and that damage was easily much more visible than any other premium car I have yet driven. Even then, it was sometimes getting small dents from huge smashes but just for clipping the AI was demolishing the front end completely >.> the damage needs work pure and simple.

SeanRL5291d ago

Ok, guys here's what's happening. The trolls are saying the game sucks and it's a flop. The fanboys are bitter and are overlooking every bad part of the game in an attempt to save their precious game from even being questioned. You need to realize that this game does have it's flaws, and while some of them may not be enough to bring the game down to an 8/10, some are. Disagree, bubble me down but it won't matter, because I can enjoy GT5 for what it is; a fun racing game that has it's flaws and not the second coming of racing sim jesus.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 5291d ago
Kon_Artist 5291d ago

i got in 12 hours in already :)

finally about to order a DFGT
people need to play this game for a long time to really understand it. its an amzing game

snp5291d ago

And that's the 8th new account (ie. less than 2 days old) i've spotted created purely for trolling GT5 threads.

This is getting old.

Kurt Russell5291d ago

Ignore them then? It's just text on a page, they're hardly writing on your eyelids are they?

snp5291d ago (Edited 5291d ago )

Thanks champ for the superior sage advice, but i'll speak when i want eh?

And if that's to point out extreme dills and how tiresome they are becoming monopolising GT5 threads - then that's what it is. You'll find we all see things differently (it's the way the world works, you see).

But if you've got a problem - take your own advice (after all, i'm hardly writing on 'your' eyelids am i?). Indeed, if you can't do that, then maybe you shouldn't be the one dishing out such advice. Here's your chance.

Sorry for mirroring the tone, but i really can't stand 'snarky/snearing'. Whether you're like that naturally and we simply clash, or if your just cultivating it for this forum as some sort of distinguishing 'hip shtick' (or whatever...) - it's immensely offputting.

callahan095291d ago

The whole idea is that in the lower levels, the game treats you like you're a beginner. As you do well, you level up, the game treats you differently. In this game, when you damage your vehicle, it stays damaged until you get it repaired. It has drastic effects. You're not supposed to be damaging your car, and damaging it has consequences. Which is why they don't introduce damage in the beginner series or amateur series. The opposition AI also gets more intelligent and aggressive and skilled as you level up and join in on the higher-ranked series'.

MonkeyBoy925291d ago

I agree I think the levelling system makes sense, considering that there are a lot of newbies to this series. It would be foolish for PD to make it insanely hard from the off go, it would put people of and be extremely overwhelming. I don't see why people are complaining, if your a long term fan your going to love it and play it so much that you would be competing with the higher levelled difficultly within a few days, whereas new players get a nice learning curve into a fabulous game series. They have to allow for a different generation of gamers after all

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5291d ago
5291d ago Replies(2)
buffig5291d ago

I aknowledge many of the criticisms levelled at GT5 and I'm not going to try and defend the quality of standard cars or the ropey shadows or even the sub standard damage. What I will say is that where it matters, where it truly counts, GT5 is the most impressive driving game I've ever played. I don't mean the best arcade racer or crash simulator or best motion blur generator. When it comes down to the sheer pleasure of driving and maintaining these vehicles there is absoltely nothing that comes close. It could have ratings of 70% across the board and it would make no difference to how I personally feel about it.

Show all comments (41)
90°

PlayStation 3: chasing the 1080p dream, part three - Gran Turismo 5 and the indie explosion

From Digital Foundry: "Welcome to the third part in the biggest DF Retro episode we've ever produced - a year-by-year look at how 1080p gaming fared on the PlayStation 3. Launched in 2007 touting its then-exclusive HDMI digital interface, Sony layered full HD gaming on top of its Cell processor and RSX 'Reality Synthesizer' as key selling points for its third generation console. Of course, we all know how that turned out - both Sony and Microsoft machines routinely ran the most advanced titles at sub-720p resolutions, often with questionable performance, so what happened to the 1080p dream?

In the first two parts of John Linneman's investigation, we've covered off the first four years of the Triple's lifecycle and moving into 2010, the overall fortunes of the PlayStation 3 continued to improve. The platform holder released - what was then - the most advanced motion controller in the console space, backed up by experiments with stereoscopic 3D, which turned out to be a short-lived but still formidable pairing. Combined with a strong E3 showing, PS3 was looking good.

However, it's fair to say that it was a fallow year for 1080p gaming on the system, with only Scott Pilgrim Saves The World's razor-sharp pixel art upscaling, Castle Crashers and Soldner X2's 3D/FMV stylings accommodating full HD output - alongside a wonderful Monkey Island remaster."

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
ApocalypseShadow1032d ago (Edited 1032d ago )

Just remember ladies and gentlemen, Sony never said all games would be 1080p. Only that the system would support games up to 1080p in a survey before the system was released.
https://spong.com/article/9...
And as we saw, some games did support it, some games tried their best to support it and some games didn't or never reached it.

Is a higher resolution great to have if you can do it? Sure. Is it necessary for a fun game? No

But what I find interesting is Eurogamer. Are they really talking about HD and PS3 in their article or are they really pushing their 4.50 Euros 4K video download subscription? Seems one is being used to sell the other. Just look at the bottom of the article.

Michiel19891032d ago

thats what every company tries to do, push for people to buy their products. Are you really gonna blame them for that?

ApocalypseShadow1032d ago

Not all articles are about selling. They're about informing or entertaining.

Maybe I'm supposed to watch the video instead of reading. But I shouldn't have to click. But the article lazily tells us some games did hit 1080p and some didn't. I didn't learn anything new as I own the console. Then, they push a Patreon subscription.

Are you saying every opinion, preview, review and rant article requires a push to buy something now? Tell me which sites are prone to do so so that I can avoid them in the future.

Michiel19891032d ago

not everyone played during the ps3 era. I started during snes era but loved seeing articles/videos about how gaming evolved before that.

i dont think this article is trying to push you to get that patreon sub, it doesnt for me at least. I dont think theres anything wrong putting an ad at the bottom of the article. all the regular DF videos are free already.

SonyStyled1032d ago

Wipeout HD on PS3, a remake of the PS1 game was 1080p 60fps. And that released in 2007-08

Christopher1032d ago

This really feels like a filler article. I don't feel like I learned anything notable or substantial from this. I feel they could have reduced the unnecessary intro and over-explanation of things and put the whole series in one article for a more substantial and possibly informative piece rather than piece-mealing it out as they have.

dumahim1032d ago

It's more about the video. DF Retro videos are for Patreon members first, and I think the whole thing was one big video. For the youtube channel, it gets chopped up and released weekly.

ApocalypseShadow1032d ago

Chris is actually right on this one. Something known already was just kind of washed over in the article. Unless you're supposed to get more in the video. If more is in the video, then more could have been said in the article.

Only thing I learned new was that they are selling a subscription. My point though is that you gain more viewers by having better articles and content.

1029d ago
280°

What Happened To Gran Turismo?

When thinking about simulation racing games in this console generation, it’s not unreasonable for your first thought to be “Forza”. Microsoft’s first-party sim-racer series has been wildly successful, and for many of us, it’s been the go-to franchise for quite some time. But simulation racing games weren’t always synonymous with Forza; there was a time when Polyphony Digital’s hardcore series, Gran Turismo, reigned supreme. While the long-time franchise continues to sell exceptionally well, there’s no doubt that it isn’t the young, spry series it used to be.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
darthv722099d ago

It doesnt suck but I would love to see a return to form with GT7. Sport is such a departure that it can turn some people off. It has gotten better over time but it's still no match for a proper GT7.

Rude-ro2099d ago

Sport is awesome for what it is...
However, polygon built a whole new engine and the tech is still being worked on...
I understand it is easy to praise a cookie cutter because it release the same game over and over with rotations of maps and cars...
But this engine polygon has designed does more for things other than gaming.

Repetitive old engines with new makeup does not make anyone king.

Gt7 will be most likely in two years with 120fps and ray tracing because their new engines are ready now.

LordStig2099d ago

It decided to focus on racing rather than cars and in the gaming world, racing = gameplay.

Imalwaysright2099d ago

What complete and utter BS. GT has always focused on racing and gameplay.

2099d ago
neutralgamer19922099d ago

Good I guess selling millions of copies and have OFFICIAL FIA license races and Esports means it sucks

We just don't get it every year which is why ms also delayed next forza. You can't keep making yearly sequels. Quality and innovation takes time

GT sports at launch to now it's a different game and support has been free

Imalwaysright2099d ago

GT games have always sold millions of copies and what's so innovative about GT sport? It's a racing game FFS.

IRetrouk2098d ago

The online championships and tournaments alone offer more innovation than any racer this gen🤷‍♂️ then you also get the live ones in New York etc with proper race like commentary, something else no other sim has done before. It sells millions because it's the best, simple really.

Imalwaysright2098d ago (Edited 2098d ago )

IRetrouk

I'm not even sure why think that having proper like race commentary or championships and tournements is innovative but I'll play along... GT Sport was released in 2017 so how do explain that this video https://www.youtube.com/wat... from 2016 exists?

Dark_Knightmare22098d ago

Spoken like someone who hasn’t played sport

Imortus_san2097d ago

And those Paid demos, that fans try to hide and not talk about it.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2097d ago
SCW19822099d ago

It became the best online racing community for console players and its an amazing achievment.

Keltech2099d ago

"Forza?" HaHaHaHaHaHaHa!! good joke!

kayoss2099d ago

Too early for an Aprils fool joke.

2099d ago
ElementX2099d ago

@solidgamerX That's really not very impressive. Somebody with an interest in cars plays racing games and becomes a race car driver. That's like saying "look at this guy, he played COD and now he's in the military"

Imalwaysright2099d ago

SolidGamerX

You must think that we're all stupid enough to believe that a game will turn anyone into a professional racing driver.

Prince-Ali2099d ago

FORZA!!! AAHAHHAHA !! Haven't i schooled you on this already before! You're still spewing nonsense on this threaddd looool

mcstorm2099d ago

Forza has always been better online than. GT and still is. Great to see PD try something different with GTS but let's face it this gen sonys racing games have been poor this then compaired to what Microsoft has had to offer. Forza 7 is one of the best racing games on xbox and pc but for me Horizon 3 and 4 have set the bar this gen. Of all the things microsoft got wrong this gen 2 of its racing games got a lot right and others are now playing catchup.

DarXyde2099d ago

It's debatable which is the better game. To me, Forza has the upper hand.

But in terms of online community and events? Ha. Don't lie to yourself just because you don't like Playstation.

2098d ago
2098d ago
Dark_Knightmare22098d ago

Lol not even close have you even played gt sport online?

Imalwaysright2098d ago (Edited 2098d ago )

SolidGamerX

You didn't need to confirm what I already knew: if you didn't think that we're all stupid you wouldn't make such stupid comments that only those that are dead from the neck up will agree with.

IRetrouk2098d ago (Edited 2098d ago )

Did he say gt could turn anyone into a racer? No he didnt, he asked what game has done it like gt has, which is true, gt academy done it throughout gt5 for a start. You need to do some research fella, cause your wrong.. again.

And lmao at element and the downplay, not even similar you crazy man, not even similar🤣 you realise gt has turned gamers into drivers from gt5? Go look at gt academy and tell me how that would be anything like someone playing cod and then joining the army, the downplay in gt articles is funny.

ElementX2098d ago

So you think he learned the required skills playing video games? I remember when people claimed children were learning how to operate guns because of video games, do you think that's also true?

IRetrouk2098d ago (Edited 2098d ago )

Two completely different things and you know it, it is a fact that gt has helped real gamers become real race drivers, the proof is easily available online and I'm not going round searching for links that has been posted many, many times before on this subject, Go and look at gt academy like I mentioned and you can see for yourself, they start out on gt and go from there, so yes the game gran turismo teaches you some driving techniques, now if you can find me a link where someone has been playing cod and went on to become a war hero, please let me know because I couldnt find anything, also do you have a link to where cod has a program to train soldiers? Like cod academy or something?, I couldnt find one of those either, maybe when you do then your comparison will actually make sense.

Imalwaysright2098d ago

IRetrouk

You mean the GT academy that provides training and licenses for a person to become a professional racing driver? The GT academy is how you go from being an average driving joe to become a professional racing driver not GT the game.

2098d ago
+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 2098d ago
2098d ago
xRacer74x2099d ago

Forza owns the racing game scene in my area as far as video games go.

dekke2099d ago

Forza = Arcade
GT= Sim

why u ppl keep comparing those 2 games every time..

Keltech2099d ago (Edited 2099d ago )

GT owns the console sim racing scene in my area and around the world. Just ask a real race car drivers

https://youtu.be/2pC3-eCAdv...

LordStig2099d ago

Forza isn't a racing game. It's a car game.

2099d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2099d ago
Hungryalpaca2099d ago

I’ll stick to sims. You keep playing with your hot wheels.

King_Noctis2099d ago

You forget that there are two Forzas, Forza Motorsport and Forza Horizon, which aims at different audiences.

King Nezz2099d ago

The usual response from someone insecure that feels their favorite racing game is nowhere near as good as it once was. I really liked Gran and played them all. Loved the Vector from part 2. But the franchise is not the same.

Gaming4Life19812099d ago

Yea Forza took over and is now the best sim racer with motorsport and the best arcade racer with horizon. GT was the best but it has been falling short for a long time and I'm not saying gt games are bad but no where near king like it used to be. I'd say forza motorsport 3 was the forza that really upped the franchise and forza 4 was when forza became #1.

I remember the glory days of gt but those days are long gone but it's still a good game just not the best. Of course ps fans will never admit it because they will die before giving MS credit.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2099d ago
Nacho_Z2099d ago

I do think they need some new creative heads in to give them some new perspectives, they seem stuck in a rut. It's a very high quality rut but they're still stuck in it.

LordStig2099d ago

The USA leg of the Gran Turismo World Tour is going on in New York right now. Go watch it guys, there's some damn good racing and crazy updates to come.

Nacho_Z2099d ago

I've seen some of it before and to be fair it's not much different to watching real motorsport so credit to them for that.

Heavenly King2099d ago

the MACH 5 :) GO SPEED rACEr!!

Show all comments (108)
320°

Gran Turismo 5, Gran Turismo 6, Wipeout HD, God of War 3 and more running on PC via the latest RPCS3

DSOGaming writes: "It appears that the best Playstation 3 emulator that is currently under development, RPCS3, received a new update recently. kd-11 has implemented new Surface Cache fixes to RPCS3 that reportedly improve the appearance of car reflections in Gran Turismo 6, and fix various graphics glitches in other games."

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
2136d ago Replies(6)
gangsta_red2136d ago

If someone out there in internet land could make a decent PS3 emulator imagine what Sony could actually do if they put the time and effort in to make this happen for their next console?

It's definitely not impossible as we can see here. It should definitely be done since BC seems to be very important to Sony this next gen. Imagine PS+ free game offerings from Sony that could include the whole catalog from the PS console family..fantastic.

Silly gameAr2136d ago

Why waste time and money on it? Some people want to move forward, not go back.

Eonjay2136d ago

It's not a deal breaker but having the feature would be amazing. I would rather have it than not have it.

gangsta_red2136d ago

Not everyone feels that way and if Sony is making an issue of supporting PS4 games for PS5 why not support their other past games for people who still have them or a means to buy them and play them.

KwietStorm_BLM2136d ago

You literally just said some people. So I'd imagine you can comprehend that there's a larger subset of people not in that same "some" group. PlayStation used to be known for backward compatibility. Xbox made a big deal about support for their entire catalog. What's the issue with PlayStation, who has an even more substantial history in gaming, tapping into that market? We don't have this problem on PC. It's only a good thing for consumers to be able to bring their games with them through generations on console.

Silly gameAr2136d ago (Edited 2136d ago )

@kwietstorm

Yes, I said some people. What I said was MY opinion. I'm one of those people that couldn't care less about bc, but im not saying ALL people don't care about it. I think they should spend that time and energy for future features and games, but like I said, that's only my opinion.

Imortus_san2135d ago (Edited 2135d ago )

Not every body trows their games way every time the new gen cames along, and everybody that likes games like to be able to play their favorite games in the best possible way.

PS: Retrocompatability is the most requested feature in Sony Foruns, even Sony said so.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2135d ago
frostypants2136d ago (Edited 2136d ago )

The question is would the return on investment be worthwhile? Are the number of additional consoles PS3 BC would push be enough to justify the cost of developing the emulation (and it would have to be bullet proof)? I like the idea of having it, but for my part not having it won't effect my purchase decision.

2136d ago
Eonjay2136d ago

You are asking the right question but the wrong way. For me, the addition of PS3 BC would add value as a customer and make it even more likely for me to buy a PS5. If it is valuable to the customer it is valuable to them.

Also, the way they are doing it would be way cheaper than a program like Microsoft had. The are emulating the hardware. Not the software.

gangsta_red2136d ago

"The question is would the return on investment be worthwhile?"

Sony could definitely make some extra profit selling PS3 games through their marketplace (the same way they have their other classics available). It's not about whether or not it will effect anyone's purchase decision, it definitely didn't do so for the PS4. But as others have expressed, it would be a nice addition to have for PS5 if Sony could open up their whole library digitally and physically to users.

ShadowWolf7122136d ago

Racing games should be some of the easiest to emulate and they're still not hitting 60fps with it, to say nothing of image flickering and occasional sound issues.

Still gonna be a bit yet before they have it fully up and running, it seems, and even then it may only work for part of the library. :/

2136d ago Replies(2)
Gwiz2136d ago

Is it possible to have PS3 emulation on PS5?yes depending on what kind of power it really has.
An i7 9700k is no slouch and the PS4 already has a God of War 3 running much better with less
power required because they converted CBE to X86 which is not something you want to be doing in the long run.

What power would be required to play these games emulated at said PS4 version?.
It's not an easy situation Sony themselves created and ultimately I believe they are happy this way because they
want you to use PSNow,that service is why you will not even get it. (let's not forget that it was a huge investment)

2136d ago Replies(1)
Show all comments (45)