430°

Kinect "can't do a good lightsaber game" | Eurogamer

One of the chief architects of Sony's motion sensing platform PlayStation Move reckons the upcoming Star Wars game for rival motion sensing add-on Kinect won't be much cop.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Zir04895d ago

That sounds very unprofessional from Sony, in fact it almost sounds as if they are jealous Lucas Arts didn't want to make a Star Wars game for Move.

Cloudberry4895d ago

.
They could hint a future Lightsaber MOVE game like previous rumor awhile back...

Bereaver4895d ago (Edited 4895d ago )

That's exactly what I was thinking. There is a big possibility that they could be hinting at a future move game.

Masamori Sumimura4894d ago

To tell you the truth. Jealous or not he is right. We've all seen the Kinect Star Wars Trailer/footage (or however you want to call it) and it felt heavily scripted and Unatural.It would have been easier to make/play games for kinect if it had featured somekind of controller aswell. I do think it is possible to make a LightSaber game with Kinect but it will take some time to develop something that doesnt feel rushed or Unfinished like some of the earlier titles.

The 1'st wave of games are always the worse ones unless they are made by first partiesl I'm positive that the Capcom , Namco and Suda51 games will make good use out of kinect. Same goes for Playstation Move.

rroded4894d ago

yeh move pawns kinect in gameplay and graphics no doubt a move star wars game will own while a kinect one will b lame imo on the rail poor graphics no buttons laggy input no way can kinect do it justice.

Sharingan_no_Kakashi4894d ago

Wow, Harsh Anton

But true. I mean I've seen gameplay and it looks fluid but considering they didn't show the guy playing it....and it's MS.... it more than likely WAS scripted gameplay. I would like to see a less kiddy star wars game with move.

Lightsaber4894d ago

look whos saying it $ony you think they would seriously say anything good about the kinect

Weaksauce11384894d ago

Yet kinect will handle force power activation better

HolyOrangeCows4894d ago (Edited 4894d ago )

Oh plug it, Zir0. I know you and all of your troll friends are still high from GT5 "only" scoring an 87 (with less than 15 reviews so far), but you know that it is absolutely true; Kinect will never be able to have a decent lightsaber game because of its inaccuracy, and the Move is the absolutely PERFECT medium for a Star Wars game.

Biggest4894d ago

Masamori Sumimura said:
"We've all seen the Kinect Star Wars Trailer/footage (or however you want to call it) and it felt heavily scripted and Unatural."

It wasn't just a feeling, bro. It was both scripted and unnatural.

ravinash4894d ago

You know with the move for the lightsaber in one hand, there is no reason why they can't make the playstation eye capture the movements to do force moves.

Shang-Long4894d ago (Edited 4894d ago )

interesting

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 4894d ago
Kon_Artist 4895d ago

it would though. if you ever played sports champions.

i could so see myself using a light-saber or using the force.

one day.... one day...

JUDALATION4894d ago (Edited 4894d ago )

Well Bleach will be a ps3 exclusive next year as well as No More Heroes. The conduit and A new red steel also could be coming to the Ps3, and all these games have swords and show the potential of a star wars game... However Bleach amd No more heroes will easily be WAY better than any Lucis arts game could ever dream of being...

sinncross4894d ago

Sony had this on PS2:
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

and it was apparently quite accurate.

i'm pretty sure a Lightsaber game would rock on the Move.

KageMonkey4894d ago (Edited 4894d ago )

No. It was from a real engineer's perspective. Microsoft's technologies are usually smoke-and-mirrors, using marketing, instead of real innovation, to sell un-innovative products.

I have said this when Natal was first shown, and I will say it again: Kinect WILL NOT do what Microsoft has tried to market the device to be.

They tried to trick consumers into believing it is the next step in gaming with high precision and full of features. No. It's all marketing designed to trick uninformed consumers into thinking Kinect is the next innovation into gaming.

The fact is, software is NOT even at the point where it can 100% accurately do speech-to-text. There are many variations of voice, tone, and speech patterns where the software cannot catch all the cases.

Think for just one second. If speech-to-text is not even perfect, what makes you think that doing image-and-motion-processing will be even close to being accurate?

It can't. There are infinitely many variations in body types and movements. For example, the angle at which I reach for a weapon, such as a lightsaber, might be straight across at 0 degrees. Some people might exaggerate the movement, and reach for the weapon at 45 degrees.

The complexity of dealing with just that one movement alone is highly complex, and it will never catch all the cases and so it will never be 100% accurate.

Additionally, body types differ. Do you assume the middle of your arm as the skeleton for your avatar, or do you use the edges of your arm? That difference alone makes the Kinect highly inaccurate.

Sony's Move, however, is a home version of real motion-capture devices that motion-capture studios use. By tracking a lit-up marker, it is highly accurate. The Move does not run into the infinitely many variables that Kinect faces.

There is a reason why the recent home-brew Kinect lightsaber demo only showed the person picking up the lightsaber at a very slow speed: Kinect CANNOT detect rotation of your wrist. And the software challenges involved in making a usable solution is immense. Making a lightsaber game will require a ton of processing, and the result will be highly inaccurate due to excessive estimations and latency.

There is a reason why Nintendo and Sony dumped the Kinect technology. They listened to the real engineers that knows about the technical challenges involved. Microsoft, on the other hand, is known to use technology that is inferior and hopes to trick consumers into buying stuff that doesn't work with deceptive marketing.

Biggest4894d ago

"Sony's Move, however, is a home version of real motion-capture devices that motion-capture studios use."

I remember Microsoft saying that Project Natal was supposed to rival the motion capture tech of Hollywood. Obviously Kinect doesn't come close to that. Move is exactly that on a smaller scale. It's funny that we're still on this dead horse though. Kinect isn't what it was promised to be. It's a casual toy for casual gamers. If you want a "good game" with a light saber and Kinect, grab your personal light saber (you can make one at DisneyLand) and play Dance Central.

Jazz41084894d ago

I agree that a star wars gamme would play better on Move but why do I read in ever Kinect article how Sonys Doctor said it was no good and passed on it and now I should believe because he did not think it worked for the ps3 that its crap all together. In the right hands Kinect can be great and has many uses. We need quality Devs to make use of this and I believe hardcore games will come but they will use a controller in combination with kinect. That said I have a Kinect for my family an they enjoy it but I tried it and the room it requires to work well is unrealistic for most households. This product like all new ones will needd time and hopefully will be refined in the right devs hands.....time will tell. I also would like to know why the same people come in every ps3 article and ms article to troll about how much your product sucks and theres is better. whats the point of this? Please tell me as I thought we were all gamers and were one family. This hate on someone elses tastes is unacceptable and plain wrong. Btw Happy Turkey day to everyone!!!!! and happy gaming.

hellraiserpop4894d ago

Regardless of which will be more accurate, you can't make a good lightsaber game without any sort of feedback, so the point is moot. The best you can get even on the Move will be a No More Heroes clone.

Biggest4894d ago

Move has rumble. It'll give some sort of feedback.

hellraiserpop4894d ago

Unless Rumble can stop your slash mid-swing because a dark jedi parried you, it's still a moot point.

Lykon4894d ago

it's pretty obvious move will be more suitable for a game like this I haven't tried kinect yet though...must look up some you tube vids to see how users are enjoying it.

Shepherd 2144894d ago

Soooo when Microsoft makes a few jabs at their competition, they are childish and unprofessional, but when Sony does it, its alright and everyone here is an xbox fanboy?

Love. It.

Scotland-The-Brave4894d ago

The hell you on about? They are not bashing it, its obvious to everyone and their grandmother that kinect couldnt do anything great with a lightsaber game, Unless its on rails.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4894d ago
dale14894d ago

that scorery looks damn impressive ,star wars could be made really easy,that kinect on rail sh@ts a joke .killzone 3,socom,resi thats what i call motion

HOSe4894d ago

but... mgs rising is on both consoles?

(that is the only game im looking forward to with motion control)

buffig4894d ago

i didnt think motion controls had been confirmed.

krisq4894d ago (Edited 4894d ago )

But looking at the footage, it will be missed opportunity if they don't do it. I'm sure Sony already approached them.

sp1deynut4894d ago (Edited 4894d ago )

...Move can't do a good full-body sports game.

Surely Sony has something more important to worry about, than what the competition supposedly "can't do"...like fixing their inferior online community features, and firmware/game updates.

Apollyn4894d ago

Neither can kinect or Wii. What's ur point

NecrumSlavery4894d ago

you can flail around all you want......how are you going to move forward?

krisq4894d ago

Head first in to the TV set. lol

jwk944894d ago

Wouldn't you move forward with the nav controlller or something?

ActionBastard4894d ago

Kung Fu live. And you don't need a $150 web cam.

Scotland-The-Brave4894d ago

@spideynut
You are angry because kinect cant do anything decent apart from dance games so you revert to insulting the competition, how original.

Jazz41084894d ago

It looks like Sonys the one throwing jabs or just maybe its another site looking for hits and took what they said out of context. #2 gets my vote.

edhe4894d ago

Company official proclaims own product better than other company's SHOCKER.

Show all comments (90)
20°

Joy Ride Turbo - The Beginning of the End for Xbox Kinect

Joy Ride Turbo launched 10 years ago today. The first title was Xbox Kinect exclusive, yet this sequel failed to support the device at all.

300°

10 of the Biggest Video Game Hardware Failures Ever

Cultured Vultures: "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal, and no matter how much developers might try, some gaming hardware just fails to hit the mark. We’ve compiled a list of 10 gaming hardware fails, and boy did some fail hard."

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Knightofelemia819d ago

I would label the Power Glove, Kinect, and that Tony Hawk skateboard more as hardware addons hardware failure would be like the Virtual Boy and one day Stadia.

Magog818d ago

Kinect was bundled with every Xbox One and inflated the price on an already underpowered and low RAM machine so for the One it wasn't an accessory as much as a white elephant.

CaptainHenry916818d ago (Edited 818d ago )

Definitely the RROD but that power glove had a lot of issues as well. The Kinect just didn't work

818d ago
CrimsonWing69818d ago

Hardware add-ons are more like RAM or a video card, basically components that enhance capabilities or performance of the computer.

If you really want to get technical the Kinect is more of a peripheral device, kind of like a keyboard or mouse to a computer.

ThatsGaming818d ago

The person in this article obviously is not up on their gaming history....

Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, Coleco Gemini, Commodore 128, Commodore Amiga, Atari 5200, Atari 7800 were all massive failures and in most cases cost their companies participating in future gaming generations.

Gamer79818d ago

Sega saturn (successful in Japan) and dreamcast were not failures.
Seems like you're not up on you're gaming history

septemberindecember818d ago

@Gamer79

How in the world are the Sega Saturn and Dreamcast not seen as failures? They both sold around 8M each, which is much lower than the ~30M that the Genesis had sold before it, and even the Master System before that. They were both the worst selling consoles in their respective generation (PS1, N64 outsold Saturn, PS2, GC, and Xbox outsold Dreamcast). Both of the consoles were incredibly short lived. The Saturn was discontinued in every territory but Japan after just three years. In Japan the console was discontinued after six years. Meanwhile the Dreamcast was discontinued worldwide in 2001 after launching in most territories in 1999 and in Japan in 1998. The failure of the Saturn and Dreamcast lead to Sega pulling out of the hardware market. Which, by the way, all of this occurred when Sega was massively dropping the price of their consoles quickly to compete. Sega was hemorrhaging money at this point.

None of this indicates a successful console. Saying the Saturn was a success because it did better in Japan is like saying the Vita is a success (they both sold around the same amount of units in Japan). Even the Wii U outsold these consoles worldwide.

Magog818d ago

The picture should be the 360 RROD. When I think of gaming hardware failures that's what springs to mind. Kinect and it's bundled price tag definitely hobbled the already underpowered Xbox One though for sure so I would give it a close second place.

porkChop818d ago (Edited 818d ago )

That's not what the author means by failures. It's about hardware that failed in terms of sales (Wii U) or just failed to deliver on its promise (Kinect).

Magog818d ago (Edited 818d ago )

Given that the 360 had a year head start, much easier hardware to develop for, was cheaper, and still ended up in third place I think it qualifies especially when you factor in the frustration and huge losses incurred by RROD.

porkChop818d ago

Selling over 80 million consoles isn't a sales flop. We get it, you don't like Xbox, but that doesn't mean the 360 is suddenly a failure.

Rhythmattic817d ago

Porky....
You know how many people I know bought a 2nd or third 360 due to RROD? Even when MS had to confront the issue with replacement systems, my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in, and waiting for a replacement.,,..,..
If that's how you consider it a win... OK.. but so is having 5 , of which 3 don't function.... Its a win win....mwhahahahaha

porkChop817d ago

"my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in"

You're acting like it would take months. When I sent my 360 in I got a new one literally 5 days later. As soon as MS had tracking confirmation that you sent yours, they'd send a new one to you the same day. No one is going to spend hundreds to buy a new console instead of waiting a week. I swear you guys pull some of the dumbest shit out of nowhere and think people will actually believe it.

Regardless, none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about.

Rhythmattic817d ago (Edited 817d ago )

Porky
"You're acting like it would take months"
Sometimes it could.. FFS.. 'Strya here...
Best turnaround I reckon was 2-3 weeks.....
Either way, My mates experiences still exist.. So Sorry, no point trying to earn Xbox Achievements when it doesn't feature in what was a situation you never dealt with,,,,
3 of my friends would disagree (overall, 10 extra Xboxes purchased)
Regardless.. MS sold a lot of 360's that was due to this reason.. That is sales. Fact

"none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about."
Headline says HELLO !
Oh and "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal," that's enough to pass this on without taking your article bias into consideration.....
As for the rest.... Ok.. But you've actually gone out of your way to give MS a Pass... Fap on.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 817d ago
Aloymetal818d ago (Edited 818d ago )

Yup, and because of that big fiasco MS had to fork out 1 billion but knowing them I think they're very proud of the 360, it's the only time a MS console reached 80mil+ sales, RROD played a big part of that and a record they will never break again.

Rhythmattic817d ago (Edited 817d ago )

So true.. Even when MS accepted they where caught out in the biggest lie of any generation, The wait for a replacement was outweighed by just buying another, and having one be returned as a backup, which, btw, generally failed on first swap.
I own honestly can't believe MS tards are just supporting , or arguing why and what MS did by just dismissing it....

lonewolf10818d ago

Lol I had the Atari Jaguar, surprised its "competition" the 3DO isn't on the list too, both as "popular" as each other.

SullysCigar818d ago

Lol same. Played the crap out of Aliens Vs Predator and Tempest 2000 .... aaand that's about it really!!

lonewolf10818d ago

Sad but true that was pretty much it.

Kurt Russell818d ago

Agreed, I never actually saw a 3DO make it to retailers in the UK. At least the Atari Jaguar was sold for around 6 months.

lonewolf10818d ago

It made it to some my brother got one, fared just as well as the Jaguar so most probably hard to find in general.

darthv72818d ago

3do had way better games. Jaguar not so much. Neo Geo sold less than both and yet isnt considered a failure. Go figure.

LWOGaming818d ago

Stadia is a weird one. It hasn’t sold at all well but in terms of how it works it’s still miles ahead of Xcloud in terms of stability and performance. Xcloud is still a way behind and that needs sorting but it will be in time. Stadia for me is one of those things that will go down as a what could have been moments. With better marketing it could have been a roaring success. I still play it and it remains the best place in my opinion to play CyberPunk 2077. Only platform I have played it on without having any issues at all. The tech is great. The concept is fine. Marketing terrible. Shame really.

Magog818d ago

The sales model was awful. They should have teamed with an existing player to allow for local and cloud access to games or a gaming subscription service.

LWOGaming818d ago

It was a strange mess from such a huge company, as I said, as a system it works really well but without gamers it’s nothing. Such a waste,

LWOGaming818d ago

The Xbox One was Microsoft’s Nintendo Wii U. Undercooked, undersold and just an unholy mess. The thing is with any of these failures is to learn from them and thankfully both Nintendo and Xbox did just that to the benefit of gamers everywhere.

Show all comments (39)
120°

Pivotal Decisions in Gaming History - Xbox Goes All-In on Kinect

Xbox 360's Kinect had flopped yet Microsoft insisted on mandatory Kinect for Xbox One, driving the price up and alienating their potential customers.

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
darthv72995d ago

the tech was pretty damn good but their focus on making it the centerpiece was not. Had they opted to keep it as a secondary or even tertiary device, it may have found new use for AR/VR.

PrimeVinister995d ago

Maybe. But they were two early for VR and too late for motion control

995d ago Replies(2)
Godmars290995d ago

Their focus was marketing metrics. Information gathering for targeted advertising. Also "event curating" or head counting for special TV events. If MS had had their way with always online and mandatory Kinect pre COVID, as and during it they'd likely be turning into dominant presence in many Western homes. Be getting subsidized by Disney and other streamers as well as the NFL.

Thing was, Kinect as an actual game system, its games, just weren't ready. MS moved on it too soon. Thankfully.

Atticus_finch995d ago

Sorry but it was incredibly bad for gaming. The thing barely worked as intended and the games were broken shovelware. And let's not forget all the lies from Xbox to try and sell it. What happened to Milo?
It's like Xbox it's a perpetual lying machine.

PrimeVinister995d ago

I had almost forgotten about Milo. It looks so unbelievable in retrospect. How did anyone believe it?!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 995d ago
TheEnigma313995d ago

Kinect requirement, TV focused, DRM, and $100 buried Xbone before it even stared.

PrimeVinister995d ago (Edited 995d ago )

I think Kinect was the worst of the bunch. They reversed DRM overnight and try to play down the TV stuff when they realised it made them look disinterested in gaming.

Kinect stuck around for six months, preventing sales and making more and more people upset when they dropped the Kinect and the price.

Atticus_finch995d ago

Don't forget the inferior hardware which affects their game development to this day.
And the constant boasting and lying that hasn't change very much to this day.

kayoss995d ago

I was kind of excited for the kinect. It had potential. That was until i tried it at one of their Microsoft store. The thing was so laggy and worker who was there, had no clue what he was doing. It kind of made rethink about buying an Xbox One with Kinect.

PrimeVinister995d ago

I had already been turned off of the idea by Kinect for 360. Even when it worked, the games were bad and showed no potential.

Wii made you understand what they were going to do with it within about 10 seconds of Wii Sports. It went on to become a bit of a joke but at least it worked and had a purpose.

Thundercat77995d ago

The damage to the Xbox brand was so hard that til this day they are just the last place brand in the market.

PrimeVinister995d ago

Totally. They haven't been really all that relevant since.

Godmars290995d ago

That has to do with repeatedly failing, having to reaffirm only to again fail at creating a competent flow of decent games.

@PrimeVinister:
Until Game Pass and BC are mentioned. Only for the point to be missed.

kayoss995d ago

thats because they dont know what they want to be. A gaming console, Television, or a gaming service?

Godmars290994d ago

@kayoss:
They wanted, expected, to be Steam. To have everyone coming to them and paying for the privilege. That's the exact mentality on display when they tried to push always online.

brewin994d ago

Its sad because the Xbox one version of Kinect was actually pretty solid. Not for motion games, I couldnt care less about those, but for the other features that are now commonplace in the gaming ecosystem. Things like voice control and optional motion features in games. Stuff that Sony did with the PS camera was pretty sweet and they could have done some of that stuff with Kinect.

The tech was pretty sweet when implemented right though. Who remembers the implementation in Dead Rising 3?! You could lure zombies away by saying stuff into the kinect, it was a bit hokey at first, but it actually enhanced the game significantly once you learned all the different voice commands. There was and still is nothing else like that!

The focus on TV seemed to be an issue for people, but the TV pass through had some real potential. They could have had cable companies giving the XBone out instead of cable boxes! I understood what they were trying to do, but they needed to show the games too, and thats where they lost the core gamers. Being able to jump right to a sports event or TV show with out leaving the console was actually a pretty cool thing. I spent many nights switching between NHL games or TV shows and jumping right back into my games seamlessly, just by telling Kinect to do so. It was better than people care to admit, but I loved it!

People say XBone had no games, but on launch I got Dead Rising 3, AC Black Flag, Watch Dogs, Killer Instinct, Battlefield 4, Forza 5, and Ryse. That was actually a pretty solid lineup in hindsight! Then later on it got gems like Quantum Break, Dead Rising 4, Sunset Overdrive, Gears 4 and 5, the Ori games, Rare Replay, Forza Horizon 3/4, State of Decay 2, ReCore (SUPER UNDERRATED GEM), Halo 5, Halo Wars 2, and all the great 3rd party stuff as well! I dare anyone who sat on the Xbox One to go back and give it a shot now.

It was actually a pretty great console all things considered. Yes the PS4 had better 1st party stuff, stuff that MS just couldnt top or even compete with, but there are some really great games that a lot of people missed out on that they would probably really enjoy if they actually played them. Thats why I recommend a Series S and Gamepass to a lot of people, as its a great way to get an awesome lineup pf games for super cheap!

Show all comments (22)