Eurogamer: "Crytek UK, the developer that rose from the ashes of the collapsed Free Radical Design, hopes that when gamers look back on PlayStation 3 exclusive Haze they'll remember it more fondly than they did at launch.
The ill-fated Haze was met with a 4/10 review score from Eurogamer upon its 2008 release.
It was the TimeSplitters creator's last game."
Alex S. from Link-Cable writes: "When shopping for new video games you can often trust the name publisher or developer on the box to be an indication of the quality of the game. Names like Nintendo, Square Enix, Sony Interactive Entertainment, Capcom, Xbox Game Studios and Sega are world famous because they helped shape the industry by releasing some of the most defining video games of all time. Though sometimes even these great gaming houses stumble and put out a stinker."
Splatterhouse remake . Loved the og’s at the arcade growing up . Hell the best thing about the remake was the og,s were included . And left alive by Square . That game had so much potential , but the gameplay was worse horrendous .
once Great studios getting destroyed is actually common. happened with ND and Last of Us2, Bioware and Mass Effect Andromeda/Anthem, Bungle and Destiny .
I'm pretty much certain that any Sonic game that comes out will be terrible, I've not enjoyed one since the original side-scrolling days of the MegaDrive.
For this Topic it says Good Studios that make bad games. Sonic Team hasn't been good in years.
Guns, drugs, and unnecessary war. Fun for the whole family.
I personally thought it was a very good game and never understood why it was hated on like it was. The graphics weren't very good. OK. Granted. But the multiplayer had a ton of unique ideas, the way it incorporated events from the main story into the settings for multiplayer matches was very cool. The story itself was pretty interesting. The abilities you had were cool. Full campaign co-op for 4 players was of course an excellent inclusion, something very few games ever incorporate, and it did it well. There was a lot to like about the game in my opinion. I think if it had come out with no hype at all, but exactly the same product, it would have scored pretty well, somewhere in the high 70's and low 80's average on Meta. I think the hype disillusioned people, they felt it didn't live up to the hype so that clouded their ability to see that yes the game isn't particularly worthy of Halo levels of hype, it's still a fun, good game, and instead they just said no, it's not worthy of the hype, 4 out of 10, off you go.
I certainly don't, it was a nice idea that was poorly executed, plus it was a victim of it's own hype.
It wasn't the best shooter out at the time.
That said the controls and movement and shooting were all incredibly fun.
lol
i liked haze, it was a mediocre game but i liked it. haze downfall was because it didnt have amazing graphics.