In this screenshot check they compared the PS3 to the Xbox 360 version of Fallout: New Vega.s Hint: Click on "Full-size image" to view the images in original size.
ps3 looks a hair sharper but i want to know about performance.
This isn't the sort of game that anybody's going to buy for the graphics, so I'm not sure what the point of this article is supposed to be.
Duplicates and flamebait. That's all these google translate sites post on N4G.
Look at the aliasing in the PS3 pics. Yikes.
It'll be the same as Fallout 3. PS3 has AA and performance problems (watched 2 gameplay videos on YouTube and both of them had FPS problems but nothing major) while having a better texture quality and 360 will have the upper hand with AA and performance. It'll just come down to the players decision at the end. Nice comparison pictures except one or two. I'm going with the PS3 version first and when the DLC comes and if it's something worth buying, I'll get the PC version later. Edit: @big_silky Check one of the YouTube gameplay videos I've watched (the other one was GameBlurb's First Ten video and it's been removed). And then check the screens. Texture quality differences aren't noticable too much (when I first watched this video I thought rifle's textures were looking worse on PS3 but thanks to the comparison pictures above, I now know that it looks identical on both systems). http://www.youtube.com/watc...
look at the texture(or lack of) in the Xbox pics. yikes more here is better comparison with better tools even though i think the it is not calibrated correctly for PS3(brightness is wayyy too high) but just look at texture difference.
yeah I would just buy it for the gameplay and story(maybe?). But I would love to play this on PC though.
i cant wait for this
is pretty obvious that the 360 version looks better, AA and textures
http://www.gameblurb.net/mo... AA yes. xbox looks pretty good. textures??? now i know u r a fanboy. and look at how many agrees u got. and they say this site is full of ps3 fanboys.lol i think its other way around. either way, check out the link texture looks so crappy on xbox.
the difference in texture is so noticeable... it should not even be debated.... i will take the disagree as "i am a fanboy and i am mad cause Xbox texture sucks"
It's because you're grasping at straws, like any good Ps3 owner does when the 360 version looks better. It boils down to this; the Ps3 version doesn't look as good.
Who the f- cares! Fun game, end of story
those jaggies on the ps3 look just horrid those slightly better textures dont make up for.
My God, what a hideous game. Whoever wins, we lose.
that was a troll or not, that was pretty damn funny. Your avatar only makes the comment even more priceless... edit: towards N4PS3G
we lose how?
Because graphics are synonymous with quality... didn't you know that? Atleast they are on N4G.
And you are calling yourself a gamer?
do you troll other websites too, spreading your shitiness as you go?
The PC version maxed out on 1920x1080 actually looks pretty sweet.
I second that. Run duplicate on a 40"+ inch LCD HDTV, have you tried it? I've got an Xbox360 Controller for PC, I sometimes play Fallout 3 with that because I don't a have a small table to put in front of the TV for the mouse and keyboard.
It's sad that you have to do that just to make the game look good -_-
What, set the games graphics to what was always intended? Uhh yeah, "Sad".
Well, you called it! We lose! Go home everybody, nothing to see here! Let's try again NEXT generation! We had a good run, guys, but if N4PS3G says it, it must be true... sorry it had to end like this. /s
On the upside its one of the better games ever released soooooo graphics don't really matter too much when theres 100 hours to run free.
Fallout 3's dull grey palate suited Betsheda's game engine. New Vegas just seems to be smeared in diarrhea browns & scoury yellows.
I cant believe the game looks worse than Fallout 3 on pc... But it looks better than the PS3 version of FO3 at least XD
As much as I love 'FO3' - time has not been kind to it's graphics engine. Maybe, we'll get a new one for 'Fallout 4'..
That will probably use Rage engine.
Next RPG (Rumoured to be the Elder Scrolls MMO) using iD Tech 5, it would be an obvious choice for Fallout 4, and a tremendous choice at that...
That should be a winner.
-_- seriously why do people give a sh*t, they both look exactly the same, if you can really tell a difference then u clearly have no life
Because fanboys have nothing better to do - as none of them have ever physically played a video game since buying their console. They just go on about how great their version is - if you want to see what FO:NV looks like look at a PC Screen Shot, other than that they really are the same.
Actually I'm a PS3 fan and I can clearly see how much better the 360 pics are. PS3 version is riddled with jaggies, it's disgusting. It looks like a ps2 game. I HATE jaggies so much! HATE THEM!! Well done bethesda.
my money is on 360, It something like 500-7 XBOX
Looks the same, but more jaggies on ps3. What we really need is a performance comparison.
Less grass on 360 version!!!! Mafia 2 all over again! LOL
PS3 version has no AA just like Fallout 3, jaggies are present in the PS3 version. While AA is turned on in the 360 version, things like telegraph poles look a lot smoother. Don't bite my head off, just saying.
why is so hard to play some kind of efective AA on PS3... :( like the one usen on God of Wars
From my limited knowledge, the 360 has dedicated hardware for AA. So the developers just enable it, and voila! Everything has some lovely AA, practically free of charge. Any AA on the PS3 is either done through the RSX (which costs performance), or off-loaded onto one of the PPUs during the stage any post processing is done. The problem is that the PS3's power lies in these PPUs, which requires specific coding. Obsidian are obviously relying on Gamebryo's multi-platform capability to deliver a consistent experience. And it's already leagues ahead Fallout 3 on those terms.
Forget AA Textures are more important and PS3 blows 360 away it's clear to see in this first pic http://www.gameblurb.net/mo... But either way I have never anything like this in a game so differnt like this where one has a higher res and one has extra features.
If there was a difference, I'd say the 360 has better AA going (especially in the distance), but the the PS3 has slightly higher texture resolution on certain things (note the gun and hands in iron-sights mode). Though both of these things can change with other effects like HDRL, motion blur. Well done to Obsidian!
not the telegraph poles again damnit!!. They ruined the last Fallout with inferior,jagged poles and it would seem that this is again the case. *admires the smoothness of nearby telegraph poles*
Didn't anyone else notice that the window is covered in the xbox360 versio,n while PS3 and PC has some nice light effects going on there?
The 360 version is more crisp overall. The PS3 version is quite jaggy and has a much blurrier draw distance as well. Looks to be about the same differences as there were with Fallout 3. Glad I picked the 360 version up this time.
Nice AA at PS3 version, lol! Anyways the PS3 has UC2, KZ3, GOW3 and GT5.. 4 games out of 900 available which prove the Power of the PS3! The Other 896 games?? Dont care that they look better on the xbox360, they are all multiplatt and nobody is buying that games! /s
awesome keep playing ur 8 exclusives till ps4
Keep playing your 2 exclusives until x720 to play 3 exclsuives until x whatever.
hahaha I love how you 360 trolls keep bringing up the AA and yet the textures are god damn terrible on 360 version and none of you pick that up. Typical fanboyism to ignore the plainly obvious. But whatever helps you sleep at night. You only bought a 360 over PS3 because your too cheap to buy a PS3 and everybody knows it and now your trying to justify the fact your cheap. The worst thing is you don't even realise over 5 years PS3 is actually cheaper so your dumb aswell! LOL!!
I also notice the removal of the emotion-engine chip, 2 usb ports, and Other OS feature. Don't know if my logic can compete your superior logic but I'd say that could be a contributing factor to lowering of cost. You also mention about some people are cheap so you might as well just get the PC version to get BOTH the AA and high res textures. And don't give me that "It takes 3k to run games" BS because it doesn't take much run New Vegas maxed. An HD5770 with a dual core CPU will decimate any console. INB4 Fanboy announces PS3 exclusive.
Really? Maybe it's just me but the ps3 version looks more detailed and sharper, third screenshot in of the gas station the xbox version seems blurry compared to the ps3 version.
Lol, why always the screenshots? I would like to see 3 seperate video's in full HD quality to compare... I doubt you'll see a difference between PlayStation 3 and XBox 360 then... Screw screenshots, gamers never see games standing still... So what's the point showing screenshots?
ok I'm not an expert at spotting differences, but in those pics, if they are to be believed IMO the ps3 version looks better...more contrast and better lighting oh ok i found the enlarge button...yeah ok the ps3 has more jaggies but hey i'll be getting the ps3 version anyway being a one console sort of person. more interested to see if the game is stable tbh
Lmao why is it that when screen comparisons that come from this translated website the 360 is almost sure to lose? Do you guys not see the pattern? If I go anywhere else they look identical. Right when I seen the name pop up on my browser I instantly say well Im wasting my time but lets take a look at what doctoring they did this time. This one suprisingly isn't that off.
ps3 looks sharper 360 looks to have aa
I see no difference. I also see no point in comparing a multi-plat that isn't even big in the graphical department. If we absolutely must compare games, shouldn't we compare games that are known for their great visuals and powerful engines?
None of that tiny Pic BS http://www.lensoftruth.com/...
lol, you do realise that there is a link on the bottom right of the window that says "full-size image"? you click on it and you get the full 720p pixel for pixel image. people have lost the ability to read... :(
The graphics kind of look like a step back from Oblivion.
bah! its a wash! the 360 has anti-aliasing, but the ps3 is a tad sharper with some textures being slightly higher res. it really doesnt matter, unless one has significantly better fps. but bethesda used the same insanely outdated engine as oblivion and f3, and is almost assuredly going to have lots and lots of technical issues on all platforms... shame. BETHESDA USE ANOTHER FUCKING ENGINE!!! ill get it regardless(prob for ps3.)but damn is it dissapointing graphically.
I got the PS3 version and the game seems pretty sharp but it occasionally stutters which is a real turn off but...id rather sit in a comfortable chair and a huge TV with a ps3 controller...than in front of my PC in a non so comfortable chair and have to use the keyboard and mouse. --Especially for this game that is going to eat up plenty of time.
Ps3 version has much worse jaggies but the cost for 360 is a soft,fuzzy look and that makes textures look less detailed.Look at the jaggie riddled garage on PS3 and on same pic the 360 hand/rifle look so blurry and the back drops are foggy.
eww some of those x360 shots was super blurred in the background
the 360 shots are much worse especially in the distance, the ps3 version is definitely more clear,and instead of just disagreeing go look for yourself.... For example on picture 6 you can see the rusty shack on the edge of the building, where as on the 360 version, not only can you not see the colour of it, you can hardly see the structure the whole little town is shown in much less detail, screen 7 ps3 has way better lighting, and even has an extra window, with rays of light shining through, 360 version window, boarded up.... it really is clear to see which version is better if you stop being a fanboy for one second
Holy antialiasing Batman!