620°

Sony saved GT 5 from the threat that Kinect's $500 mil marketing budget poised

Gamersmint : A Marketing Budget of half a billion, 7000 store midnight launches, numerous TV spots, an event at Times Square, a Youtube page among others forces us to think so.

Read Full Story >>
gamersmint.com
psb4931d ago

I think this guys makes sense

movements4931d ago

The title makes no sense:

"Sony saved GT 5 from the threat that Kinect’s 500 mil marketing budget poised"

I get what he's trying to say, but this makes no sense whatsoever.

Pennywise4931d ago

Movements you are right 100%. Poised makes no sense what so ever. Posed... I can see that. Not poised.

But judging by your disagrees people either understand stupid, or they are so eager to defend Kinect you must have been bashing it by saying the article title makes no sense.

Either way, who cares. Just give me Gt5 already.

Dee_914931d ago (Edited 4931d ago )

I doubt anybody whos getting GT5 plan on getting kinect
so what ever Kinect does it wil not effect anything GranTurismo related
they are for complete opposite fanbases

the author seems to think only 1 thing can sell at a time

@alpha hell I dont even think black ops could cause a delay because more than likely GT fans would pick up gt before they pick up black ops
gt5 would be taking away from black ops sells

Sheikh Yerbouti4931d ago

Kinect is not a threat to GT5. This would be a likely reason if the date for Move was changed because of Halo. But GT5 would have murdered Kinect in regions where it is popular.

Here in the States, I doubt it would matter. COD is another story.

stevenhiggster4931d ago

@Dmarc

You got that right, I wasn't planning to get Blops at all but now that GT5 is in limbo I'm gonna get it to fill the gap. So if anything Sony delaying GT5 has helped Blops, not the other way round.

HolyOrangeCows4931d ago (Edited 4931d ago )

Because all of those soccer moms and core gamer 360-diehards (The only people who might give a flying crap about Kinect - until the half a billion dollar brainwashing over a broken product, anyway) were really looking forward getting GT5.

/s

The Lazy One4931d ago

@"I doubt anybody whos getting GT5 plan on getting kinect"

Hardcore gamers make up like 10% of the market. The other 90% of casuals who are easily swayed by advertising would be seriously affected.

do people here really think they are the average game purchaser? The average game purchaser doesn't know a game's in development till commercials start coming on TV

DaTruth4931d ago (Edited 4931d ago )

The release of the new Lamborghini was also pushed back because Kinect buzz will hurt their sales!/s

tacosRcool4931d ago

People are gonna buy GT5 and not some lame Eyetoy knock off with Wii knockoff games. GT5 is a true gamers game despite the fact that there is no solid release date now :-(

Longrod_Von_Hugendon4931d ago (Edited 4931d ago )

"Sony seems to have got aware of the threat that Kinect poses for its holiday blockbuster, Gran Turismo 5 and realized that releasing it so close to the Microsoft’s motion-tech sensation might prove to be lethal to
the head-start that Sony expect GT 5 to make."

What!?

PSFan1004931d ago

@article author $500mill! Where are you getting this information from? That seems alot even for M$.

I'm really curious how Microsoft are actually going to advertise Kinect. I mean, are they actually going to show "gamers" playing the big red ball game? or show Cut-scenes of games that aren't finished yet and make out like it's ingame. peww pew

acedoh4931d ago

You have got to be kidding me. Even a company that is to advertise during the superbowl spends a few million. I can't imagine that much to marketing. I would like to see some proof behind that because I have yet to see a Kinect advertisement.

bananlol4930d ago

Do you people know why nintendom managed to sell over 100 million wiimotes and sonys eyetoy only sold a tenth of that? One worked, did it work well? no but it worked! and im not shure half a billion in marketing is enough to change that, seriously if they put that amount om money into r&d i might hav bought it!

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 4930d ago
Wildarmsjecht4931d ago

Sometimes, the simplest of sentences can be the funniest ones. That had me dying. Thank good sir. Bubs.

N4PS3G4931d ago

He's not high, your delusional If you think any game can compete with a marketing campaign of HALF A BILLION DOLLARS!

-Alpha4931d ago (Edited 4931d ago )

Maybe, but that marketing isn't geared/going to convince people who own a PS3 or people who want GT5. There is room for a half a billion marketing strategy and a long standing IP to attract their fair share of sales when you realize that they cast their reels into two different lakes.

Saying GT5 was delayed because of Black Ops makes more sense than saying GT5 was delayed because of Kinect. At least with Black Ops you can see some PS3 gamers are forced to pick between the two. Also, GT5 looks to have been delayed for technical reasons (or production complications). Maybe they inadvertently saved themselves from a couple of consumers who would have had to choose between Kinect and GT5 but I don't see that being a common dilemma this Christmas. The market is big for both of them. You could also say that Kinect was saved from GT5 because maybe some consumers would have chosen GT5 over Kinect. But again, this is not an issue that affects a significant amount of users.

The article is simple-minded jargon. He just connects two similar things (company marketing) and tries to build a correlation between them, despite the fact that it isn't evident that a connection exists. I really see this as another mindless pitting of two opposing products for the sake of console wars

Shadow Flare4931d ago (Edited 4931d ago )

Plus if GT5 were being pushed back because of kinect, then they'd push it back to 2011 and skip the massive kinect marketing over Xmas. But they're not. They're still releasing gt5 before Xmas. So gt5 "being delayed because of kinects marketing" makes no sense. What's more likely the truth is what polyphony themselves said, that they missed the production deadline by 3 days. Therefore the release date needs to be revised

And like alpha said, gran turismo has a huge fan base and loyal fanbase. Why is it loyal? Because every single gran turismo has sold 10 million minimum. I don't think Kinect, a product aimed at an entirely different audience is going to effect that much

Christopher4931d ago

Also, it's unlikely that this half a billion of advertising is going to be all at once. The next six months are going to be filled with Kinect ads and promos that will outshine everything else we've seen.

GT5 isn't being delayed for six months, only 3 weeks. It's still going to be caught up in the strongest part of Kinect's advertising.

blahblah4931d ago

campaign for tampons... i wouldn't care as i'm a guy.

same here for kinect, i don't even care if it gets released or not as i can't connect it to anything. the only way i'd bought kinect if someone would make linux drivers so i can connect it to PC (sorry, no windows at my home)

gt5? well, i got 3xps3 so i'm damn sure interested without one single commercial.

beside the point 0.5 billion $ campaign is a commercial flop by it self. even if they could achieve 0$ cost for kinect it would still mean they need to sell 3333333.33_ units just to break even. and whatever manufacturing cost is number goes higher with it.

Lightsaber4931d ago

When did MS ever say how much they were spending to hype kinect ? 500 million ? I seriuosly doubt it.

"Because every single gran turismo has sold 10 million minimum. "

Gran Turismo 2 9.3 millioon
Gran Turismo 5 Prologue 3.9 million
Gran Turismo (PSP) 1.4 million

Guess they are not as loyal as some say

Lightsaber4931d ago

I love pisses off fangirls with facts. all the can do is hit disagree and get all butthurt over it

Christopher4931d ago

***When did MS ever say how much they were spending to hype kinect ? 500 million ? I seriuosly doubt it. ***

http://www.1up.com/news/mic...

Shadow Flare4931d ago (Edited 4931d ago )

Maybe I should have been clearer and said that all the full fledged console gran turismos have basically sold 10 million or higher

* Gran Turismo – 10,850,000
* Gran Turismo 2 – 9,370,000
* Gran Turismo 3 A-spec – 14,890,000
* Gran Turismo 4 – 10,980,000

GT2 was 0.6million away from 10 million. Geez. Shoot me.

bananlol4930d ago (Edited 4930d ago )

Where i live a kinect will go for 220 dollars, while a new copy of gt5 will go for 80. We all know casuals like cheap stuff, so i cant imagine kinect outselling gt5. Besides its a small portion who own both consoles so i dont really get where this guy is comming from.

Btw, gt1 is the only ps1 disc i still own. Playing that upscaled on a hdtv looks hilarious:P Aneybody knows the resolution on that game because the pixels get gigantic:P

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4930d ago
Jamegohanssj54931d ago

ROFL at Pope's post. No oone is buying Kinect. MS just wasted a shit load of money.

TGSI

Simco8764931d ago

You have got to be kidding right?

Kinect will get sales, and most likely out sell the move. But are people going to enjoy it? That is the question.

People bought the Wii.... but now what does the Wii do? Give it a dust jacket please!

The Lazy One4931d ago

A lot of people in my extended family use their wii every day. Do they use it a lot every day? no. But they'll pop in a game or two when friends come over and a lot of people are using it for workouts now too.

PS360fanboy4931d ago

Lol, unfortunatly, you're very out of touch with the rality. Kinect is already sold out everywhere mate=/

kenkaniff4931d ago

How can it be sold it out everywhere if it hasn't released?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4931d ago
DaBadGuy4931d ago (Edited 4931d ago )

Relax, Popey, I think so. They're unrelated and if you only have a PS3, the choice is simple. If you only have a 360, the choice is simple. If you are thinking of adopting the other console, then great. If you own both, like me, then great. I don't think Kinect would have drawn much attention away from GT5, because again, they are unrelated. One is a peripheral, one is a game.

Now, if Forza 4 was being released along with Kinect, then you have cause for a connection, but even still, GT5 is a big effing deal.

number474931d ago (Edited 4931d ago )

Kinect is getting out of hand. I'd give props to MS for it, if it worked.

Someone remind me why Kinect(targeted to children)Is a threat to GT5(targeted to adults) Who the hell is deciding on GT5 or Kinect??????

Xbots are fucking going high off of this Kinect punch.

Dread4931d ago

all I c are sony fans here. I htink it is the sony fans who are going "high off" on the kenect hating.

Linzoid4931d ago

That is a lot of money to spend on advertising! If Microsoft are really spending this much on advertising they have got their priorities completely wrong in my opinion.

This money should have been spent on producing some exclusive games! Microsoft could have made 5 AAA exclusives for all that money.

What a disapointment, sort it out Microsoft, we want games not advertising!

KINGKON514931d ago (Edited 4931d ago )

I think you missed 3 more zero oh no you are right sorry

DaBadGuy4931d ago

This isn't The Dark Knight it's a damn peripheral, and I doubt Kinect is Dark Knight awesome or Dark Knight fun.

Unless Kinect comes with Aaron Eckhart I'm not interested.

rockleex4931d ago

Making Kinect actually work.

O_o

But what do you know, we only play sales and marketing.

We don't actually care about whether our products are good, or if they even work! We don't play games either.

OGharryjoysticks4930d ago

You can have all the money you want, but if you don't have the studios to make the games then how do they get made? All the studios MS has an association with are already working on whatever sequel they always work on, so unless you break the dev team up to get them working on multiple games Microsoft just has to buy timed DLC from 3rd parties and pass it off as having something unique. So maybe you should have said "This money should have been spent on producing some exclusive" DLC.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4930d ago
Enigma_20994931d ago

... you get an agree for that one.

morkendo234931d ago (Edited 4931d ago )

HAAAA PD laughing in their sleep (kinect threating us??) HAAAAAA
and we gamers is laughing too at the article
editor must been smoking some SERIOUS shit last night.

Silver3604931d ago

That Sony was changing the firmware code on GT5 because the code it was based on was hacked. They are apparently upgrading it so they won't have to deal with piracy.

DaTruth4931d ago

This is the best theory I've heard so far!

Bubbles!

gamingdroid4931d ago (Edited 4931d ago )

Other games have been late before. If I don't remember wrong, there were some late issues with LBP and they fixed that pretty quick.

It just makes sense not to go up against Kinect and especially CoD. Reality is that we don't even know if half a billion is the advertising budget for Kinect. MS said biggest launch, not biggest advertisement event!

phatak4931d ago

500 million could have bought microsoft 10 internal studios dammit

INehalemEXI4931d ago

Millions payed for GT5P ....a demo of GT5 , point is GT5 sells itself at this point no marketing required, so I don't think it was marketing related.

JokesOnYou4931d ago (Edited 4931d ago )

I've seen a few commercials, heard about some celebrity partnerships, plus they have a limited amount of demo booths setup around the country....but it still just doesn't ADD up(pun intended), so far I haven't seen this huge ad campaign, if they spent 500mil where's the kinect-coca-cola, huge billboards plastered all over the city, tons of "we believe kinect" ads, kinect parties in all the major cities, kinect sports during all the major sporting games, etc, etc, I just watched the baseball playoff game last night, not 1 kinect ad. I mean by this time before launch for Halo you couldn't turn on your tv or leave the house without seeing Halo...so since kinect is suppose to be by far the the biggest ad campaign ever then it seems like they are off to a slow start 'cause most of the hype I've seen is created mostly by regurgitated/speculating news on game sites.

JOY

AceofStaves4931d ago

I expect that we'll start to see the Kinect advertising push once November hits, particularly in the run-up to the Thanksgiving holiday in the U.S.

The most I've seen in the part of Canada I live in so far has been some ads for Kinect-enabled 360s.

1Victor4931d ago

its just me or this article reads like someone took the comments of some n4g deranged hardcore 360 fanboys like bungie and put them together in a rush

Zeevious4931d ago (Edited 4931d ago )

But what does that have to do with this article?

Oh, yeah, and Forgive me...I've sinned....actually right now in fact...
(do twins and a fake ID that says my name is Mr. Lawrence Laffer count?)
...so forgiveness is unto myself and stuff -- yadda..yadda...yadda...

Where the heck's GT5 again?

RumbleFish4931d ago

Anybody who buys this crap over GT 5 has my pity.

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 4930d ago
niceguywii604931d ago (Edited 4931d ago )

"marketing budget"

LOL Sony delayed GT5 before the supposed budget was announced/leaked.

Sony delayed it because the demand for Kinect would be too great to compete against so pushing GT5 back after the dust settles a little will allow more attention back on Gt5 using the game for a slight boost when Sony most needs it which is the late holiday season when product buzz dies down. The game isn't going to sell as well as people think. Low pre-orders for GT5 and without 100 million fanbase size. Obviously GT5 isn't done to begin with, with it's lackluster SIM claims(Bad physics etc.)

GT5 doesn't stand a chance against Kinect regardless of the ad budget so why delay it? Nothing stands a chance against Kinect so why try to strategically plan to avoid it or make the best of defeated effort? Why would a company be so paranoid? Did MSFT worry about Move hurting halo sales?

cyborg4931d ago

do you really think Sony wouldn't have been aware of that, also read the article, Black Ops seems to be another major reason.

This also enables Sony to dominate in December as both these biggies are releasing a week in-between each other. let them fight while GT 5 races ahead this Christmas.

Props to Sony

TheBand1t4931d ago

Replace the rambling about god with rambling about Kinect and this is probably what you'd look like IRL, brah.

AceofStaves4931d ago

It makes much more sense for Sony to position GT5 to not compete with Black Ops, than it does for its release to be determined by Kinect.

Why?

Fans of GT aren't going to put off purchasing the title because of the release of a peripheral device on another console. However, some of them *might* delay the purchase in favour of Black Ops. You don't want to have two major titles cannibalizing sales from each other.

To put it simply, no PS3-only owner is going to buy Kinect. They will only purchase PS3-related titles and peripherals.

Zir04931d ago

The only thing is that 500ml is for a whole year's worth of ads not just for the launch so it won't make a difference when GT5 releases.

rroded4931d ago (Edited 4931d ago )

The game was delayed because the devs wanted to polish it a bit more. Be patient it will be worth the wait. Unlike kinect its going to deliver. Remember you heard it here first the best racing simulator ever made will leave kinect in the dust. No matter how much $$$ ms throws away.

Nitrowolf24931d ago (Edited 4931d ago )

It may seem like a lot of money on marketing but they will make the money back in a week or 2

I mean if MS made at least $30 bucks on each Kinect sold they would only need to sell around 16,500 to make it back. This really shouldn't matter, but its that reason why i don't believe That Sony delayed it because of this when they themselves should be able to afford to spend that much on marketing and make it back with GT5 sales. And yeah it will make a big difference, the launch day and the days before it comes out will prob account for most of that money. Also if it was due to marketing wouldn't you think they would delay it to 2011, cause its for the whole year. You are prob right that it was just to polish the game, and i bet it was to stay away from releases of new COD and Kinect have an effect on it also.

KINGKON514931d ago

if Microsoft made 30 dollars for each kinect it will have to sell 16 million unit to make that 500 million dollar back, that wuould take more than a week.

Nitrowolf24931d ago

crap i used 500,000 instead of 500,000,000
that changes a lot

DaTruth4931d ago

I won't underestimate the stupidity of humanity to run out and buy some junk because it was flashed a lot in their face!

Even in a recession, people are just dumb sheep and will want to feel like that first guy with a Wii and hope Kinect will make them the new coolguy.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4931d ago
Ju4931d ago

MS or not. How do you make $500M back within a year with a peripheral?

INehalemEXI4931d ago (Edited 4931d ago )

I need to get into the Marketing bidness. MS could eliminate CA budget crisis alone.

Fishy Fingers4931d ago

Quite likely, because most of the PS3 gamers waiting on GT5 that I know are torn between the game and Kinect... :/

If anything it's the ideal time for Sony to release, try and use their major IP to keep "their" gamers busy and away from the Kinect/360 buzz.

But whatever, no one here knows the ins and outs, this is just speculation.

AssassinHD4931d ago (Edited 4931d ago )

Gran Turismo and Kinect represent two very different markets. I fail to see how either one would affect the other.

Edit: If you disagree then please give me a reason why. Gran Turismo 5 is an PS3 exclusive racing game (software), and Kinect is an Xbox 360 exclusive human interface device. Different consoles, different product types, one is a game you play, one is something you use to play games.

I can't imagine that many people, if anyone, would be on the fence about purchasing one or the other.

Show all comments (139)
90°

PlayStation 3: chasing the 1080p dream, part three - Gran Turismo 5 and the indie explosion

From Digital Foundry: "Welcome to the third part in the biggest DF Retro episode we've ever produced - a year-by-year look at how 1080p gaming fared on the PlayStation 3. Launched in 2007 touting its then-exclusive HDMI digital interface, Sony layered full HD gaming on top of its Cell processor and RSX 'Reality Synthesizer' as key selling points for its third generation console. Of course, we all know how that turned out - both Sony and Microsoft machines routinely ran the most advanced titles at sub-720p resolutions, often with questionable performance, so what happened to the 1080p dream?

In the first two parts of John Linneman's investigation, we've covered off the first four years of the Triple's lifecycle and moving into 2010, the overall fortunes of the PlayStation 3 continued to improve. The platform holder released - what was then - the most advanced motion controller in the console space, backed up by experiments with stereoscopic 3D, which turned out to be a short-lived but still formidable pairing. Combined with a strong E3 showing, PS3 was looking good.

However, it's fair to say that it was a fallow year for 1080p gaming on the system, with only Scott Pilgrim Saves The World's razor-sharp pixel art upscaling, Castle Crashers and Soldner X2's 3D/FMV stylings accommodating full HD output - alongside a wonderful Monkey Island remaster."

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
ApocalypseShadow633d ago (Edited 633d ago )

Just remember ladies and gentlemen, Sony never said all games would be 1080p. Only that the system would support games up to 1080p in a survey before the system was released.
https://spong.com/article/9...
And as we saw, some games did support it, some games tried their best to support it and some games didn't or never reached it.

Is a higher resolution great to have if you can do it? Sure. Is it necessary for a fun game? No

But what I find interesting is Eurogamer. Are they really talking about HD and PS3 in their article or are they really pushing their 4.50 Euros 4K video download subscription? Seems one is being used to sell the other. Just look at the bottom of the article.

Michiel1989633d ago

thats what every company tries to do, push for people to buy their products. Are you really gonna blame them for that?

ApocalypseShadow633d ago

Not all articles are about selling. They're about informing or entertaining.

Maybe I'm supposed to watch the video instead of reading. But I shouldn't have to click. But the article lazily tells us some games did hit 1080p and some didn't. I didn't learn anything new as I own the console. Then, they push a Patreon subscription.

Are you saying every opinion, preview, review and rant article requires a push to buy something now? Tell me which sites are prone to do so so that I can avoid them in the future.

Michiel1989633d ago

not everyone played during the ps3 era. I started during snes era but loved seeing articles/videos about how gaming evolved before that.

i dont think this article is trying to push you to get that patreon sub, it doesnt for me at least. I dont think theres anything wrong putting an ad at the bottom of the article. all the regular DF videos are free already.

SonyStyled633d ago

Wipeout HD on PS3, a remake of the PS1 game was 1080p 60fps. And that released in 2007-08

Christopher633d ago

This really feels like a filler article. I don't feel like I learned anything notable or substantial from this. I feel they could have reduced the unnecessary intro and over-explanation of things and put the whole series in one article for a more substantial and possibly informative piece rather than piece-mealing it out as they have.

dumahim633d ago

It's more about the video. DF Retro videos are for Patreon members first, and I think the whole thing was one big video. For the youtube channel, it gets chopped up and released weekly.

ApocalypseShadow633d ago

Chris is actually right on this one. Something known already was just kind of washed over in the article. Unless you're supposed to get more in the video. If more is in the video, then more could have been said in the article.

Only thing I learned new was that they are selling a subscription. My point though is that you gain more viewers by having better articles and content.

630d ago
20°

Joy Ride Turbo - The Beginning of the End for Xbox Kinect

Joy Ride Turbo launched 10 years ago today. The first title was Xbox Kinect exclusive, yet this sequel failed to support the device at all.

300°

10 of the Biggest Video Game Hardware Failures Ever

Cultured Vultures: "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal, and no matter how much developers might try, some gaming hardware just fails to hit the mark. We’ve compiled a list of 10 gaming hardware fails, and boy did some fail hard."

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Knightofelemia818d ago

I would label the Power Glove, Kinect, and that Tony Hawk skateboard more as hardware addons hardware failure would be like the Virtual Boy and one day Stadia.

Magog817d ago

Kinect was bundled with every Xbox One and inflated the price on an already underpowered and low RAM machine so for the One it wasn't an accessory as much as a white elephant.

CaptainHenry916817d ago (Edited 817d ago )

Definitely the RROD but that power glove had a lot of issues as well. The Kinect just didn't work

817d ago
CrimsonWing69817d ago

Hardware add-ons are more like RAM or a video card, basically components that enhance capabilities or performance of the computer.

If you really want to get technical the Kinect is more of a peripheral device, kind of like a keyboard or mouse to a computer.

ThatsGaming817d ago

The person in this article obviously is not up on their gaming history....

Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, Coleco Gemini, Commodore 128, Commodore Amiga, Atari 5200, Atari 7800 were all massive failures and in most cases cost their companies participating in future gaming generations.

Gamer79817d ago

Sega saturn (successful in Japan) and dreamcast were not failures.
Seems like you're not up on you're gaming history

septemberindecember817d ago

@Gamer79

How in the world are the Sega Saturn and Dreamcast not seen as failures? They both sold around 8M each, which is much lower than the ~30M that the Genesis had sold before it, and even the Master System before that. They were both the worst selling consoles in their respective generation (PS1, N64 outsold Saturn, PS2, GC, and Xbox outsold Dreamcast). Both of the consoles were incredibly short lived. The Saturn was discontinued in every territory but Japan after just three years. In Japan the console was discontinued after six years. Meanwhile the Dreamcast was discontinued worldwide in 2001 after launching in most territories in 1999 and in Japan in 1998. The failure of the Saturn and Dreamcast lead to Sega pulling out of the hardware market. Which, by the way, all of this occurred when Sega was massively dropping the price of their consoles quickly to compete. Sega was hemorrhaging money at this point.

None of this indicates a successful console. Saying the Saturn was a success because it did better in Japan is like saying the Vita is a success (they both sold around the same amount of units in Japan). Even the Wii U outsold these consoles worldwide.

Magog817d ago

The picture should be the 360 RROD. When I think of gaming hardware failures that's what springs to mind. Kinect and it's bundled price tag definitely hobbled the already underpowered Xbox One though for sure so I would give it a close second place.

porkChop817d ago (Edited 817d ago )

That's not what the author means by failures. It's about hardware that failed in terms of sales (Wii U) or just failed to deliver on its promise (Kinect).

Magog817d ago (Edited 817d ago )

Given that the 360 had a year head start, much easier hardware to develop for, was cheaper, and still ended up in third place I think it qualifies especially when you factor in the frustration and huge losses incurred by RROD.

porkChop817d ago

Selling over 80 million consoles isn't a sales flop. We get it, you don't like Xbox, but that doesn't mean the 360 is suddenly a failure.

Rhythmattic817d ago

Porky....
You know how many people I know bought a 2nd or third 360 due to RROD? Even when MS had to confront the issue with replacement systems, my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in, and waiting for a replacement.,,..,..
If that's how you consider it a win... OK.. but so is having 5 , of which 3 don't function.... Its a win win....mwhahahahaha

porkChop816d ago

"my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in"

You're acting like it would take months. When I sent my 360 in I got a new one literally 5 days later. As soon as MS had tracking confirmation that you sent yours, they'd send a new one to you the same day. No one is going to spend hundreds to buy a new console instead of waiting a week. I swear you guys pull some of the dumbest shit out of nowhere and think people will actually believe it.

Regardless, none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about.

Rhythmattic816d ago (Edited 816d ago )

Porky
"You're acting like it would take months"
Sometimes it could.. FFS.. 'Strya here...
Best turnaround I reckon was 2-3 weeks.....
Either way, My mates experiences still exist.. So Sorry, no point trying to earn Xbox Achievements when it doesn't feature in what was a situation you never dealt with,,,,
3 of my friends would disagree (overall, 10 extra Xboxes purchased)
Regardless.. MS sold a lot of 360's that was due to this reason.. That is sales. Fact

"none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about."
Headline says HELLO !
Oh and "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal," that's enough to pass this on without taking your article bias into consideration.....
As for the rest.... Ok.. But you've actually gone out of your way to give MS a Pass... Fap on.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 816d ago
Aloymetal817d ago (Edited 817d ago )

Yup, and because of that big fiasco MS had to fork out 1 billion but knowing them I think they're very proud of the 360, it's the only time a MS console reached 80mil+ sales, RROD played a big part of that and a record they will never break again.

Rhythmattic817d ago (Edited 817d ago )

So true.. Even when MS accepted they where caught out in the biggest lie of any generation, The wait for a replacement was outweighed by just buying another, and having one be returned as a backup, which, btw, generally failed on first swap.
I own honestly can't believe MS tards are just supporting , or arguing why and what MS did by just dismissing it....

lonewolf10817d ago

Lol I had the Atari Jaguar, surprised its "competition" the 3DO isn't on the list too, both as "popular" as each other.

SullysCigar817d ago

Lol same. Played the crap out of Aliens Vs Predator and Tempest 2000 .... aaand that's about it really!!

lonewolf10817d ago

Sad but true that was pretty much it.

Kurt Russell817d ago

Agreed, I never actually saw a 3DO make it to retailers in the UK. At least the Atari Jaguar was sold for around 6 months.

lonewolf10817d ago

It made it to some my brother got one, fared just as well as the Jaguar so most probably hard to find in general.

darthv72817d ago

3do had way better games. Jaguar not so much. Neo Geo sold less than both and yet isnt considered a failure. Go figure.

LWOGaming817d ago

Stadia is a weird one. It hasn’t sold at all well but in terms of how it works it’s still miles ahead of Xcloud in terms of stability and performance. Xcloud is still a way behind and that needs sorting but it will be in time. Stadia for me is one of those things that will go down as a what could have been moments. With better marketing it could have been a roaring success. I still play it and it remains the best place in my opinion to play CyberPunk 2077. Only platform I have played it on without having any issues at all. The tech is great. The concept is fine. Marketing terrible. Shame really.

Magog817d ago

The sales model was awful. They should have teamed with an existing player to allow for local and cloud access to games or a gaming subscription service.

LWOGaming817d ago

It was a strange mess from such a huge company, as I said, as a system it works really well but without gamers it’s nothing. Such a waste,

LWOGaming817d ago

The Xbox One was Microsoft’s Nintendo Wii U. Undercooked, undersold and just an unholy mess. The thing is with any of these failures is to learn from them and thankfully both Nintendo and Xbox did just that to the benefit of gamers everywhere.

Show all comments (39)