Conflicting Gamers: Halo: Reach – One Month Later

Conflicting Gamers, "With most die-hard Halo fans having had the opportunity to enjoy Bungie’s swan song for the better part of a month now, we thought it would be interesting to examine the biggest release of 2010 thus far from a more “experienced” perspective. We’ve seen all the launch reviews, heard all the regurgitated specs. But now that we (and most fans) have fully gotten to explore all that Reach has to offer, we wanted to cover the points all the other reviews may not have touched on."

[fromasterjay]

GOOD READ!!!

[Sneak-Out]

nice

[HellsJanitor]

This article shows Reach's biggest problem, the story was great for Halo fans especially those that read the books and not newcommers. I personally like it better that way but obviously it has some people scratching their heads.

[cgmike]

The books do indeed have a rich backstory that fleshes out the Reach saga in more detail, it just would have been nice to see it come to life on screen with a little more depth than the short Reach campaign offered.

[midgard229]

reaches campaign is aweful, especially the voice acting, dear goodness its bad. and it feels so....un epic? unpolished? i dunno what it is but halo 3 did a better job. tho i still wasnt a fan. i only play halo for the multiplayer and even that isnt so good in reach due to bad match making, and lack of lvls.

where the F are all the vehicles in reach??? and seriously every lvl uses that forge base lvl (the green with water and waterfalls set) bungie was so lazy to make real levels they used their own lvl editing level to make 5 of the games lvls.....pretty bad.

w/e halo is dead, love the new abilities, just needs to be fused with halo 2 and it would be awesome