Fallout 3 is a great game but there are a few things Bethesda should fix in their upcoming sequel Fallout: New Vegas
Obsidian Entertainment developed Fallout: New Vegas, Bethesda is Only the publisher
None of this stuff really bothered me about Fallout 3. Yeah, more enemies and weapons would be nice, but there were plenty in F3 to keep it entertaining. The thing I really want to see fixed is for the save files to not get so big and unstable. I've never seen a game freeze up as often as F3 did after I had been playing my character for a while.
yeah, my level 28 char was so unplayable after i bought all the DLC. My save file was over 12MB big.
Fallout New Vegas is out in 5 days
The title is rather misleading. The list is aimed at what should be changed from Fallout 3 into New Vegas.
I hate the animation of characters, they seem like card board cut outs. Bethesda needs to upgrade their character animation engine, it's been terrible since Morrowind.
Its never bothered me all that much, mainly due to the fact that almost every game made by them is great.
I totally agree, I've loved every Bethesda game I've played. Their animation engine is just so ridiculously dated, characters still act like they did in Morrowind: Elder Scrolls three and that game is how old? I just think it's time for some sort of an update. I might have seen something in an interview stating that they we're updating the character and NPC animation but I'm not sure.
Of crossfire and SLI!!! becuz when i buy this game, im going to mod the crap out of it! I will need more gpu POWER!!!
Buy the Pc version then. Its improved over Fallout 3, at least on PC
They always do
hey article writer: a) Obsidian made the game, not Bethesda (Bethesda made the engine). b) It's not a sequel
The article never states that Bethesda is making New Vegas or that it is a sequel. I didn't upload this onto N4G.
sorry. fixed below. hey article description: a) Obsidian made the game, not Bethesda (Bethesda made the engine). b) It's not a sequel
Most media outlets are referring to it as the sequel to Fallout 3, my mistake on the Bethesda thing, I didn't realize they outsourced the development of this game. I've added an update to the description.
Most media outlets in this case are wrong. It's not a sequel as stated by Peter Hines a long time ago at the unveiling. And the reason is because they allegedly don't want it to conflict with what their internal team is doing with the IP. http://www.shacknews.com/on... Just saying.
Main thing I would like to see is a bit more of a gripping storyline, I was enjoying it but the ending was a little bit underwhelming to me, The overall game was brilliant aside the countless glitches. But I remember staring across the ravaged wasteland and thinking, this is going to be something special, It was but I hope this game gives more reward for exploring, It all seemed like I was doing it all for nothing on 3, Oblivion certainly pulled me in more, and had a much more diverse set of rewards, By the fallout Universe pulls me in more in temrs of character and story, its only the world I find less immersive in that sense. I guess I want the best of both lol but thats asking a lot
Just like Halo: Reach isn't Halo 4? Either way people will still perceive it as a sequel.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.