180°
9.0

PCN Review: Castlevania: Lords of Shadow

Vampires, Lycans, and a guy with a Combat Cross, who is going to win? PS3Center.net reviews Castlevania: Lords of Shadow

Read Full Story >>
ps3center.net
IronFist4951d ago

It's great that the PS3 version is on one disc, game is soooo addictive. Still, if you only have a 360, definitely give the game a go, it's really good.

Soldierone4951d ago

360 version has to use multiple discs? That really sucks, they should go Blu ray so that doesn't happen. Oh....wait.....

Im only joking guys! lol, but its also a test. All the people that disagreed obviously don't read entire comments. :D

gaffyh4951d ago

Well the game looks identical on both (pretty much), so it doesn't matter that much. I actually forgot that the 360 version was on 2 discs, probably cos I always intended on getting the PS3 game.

Redrum0594951d ago

i hate that i have the game but cant play it due to not being at home :(

dude_meister4951d ago

Nice review, I agree with the fact that it definitely has elements from certain games in it. GOW, SOTC, and DMC, it's still quite a cool game though. Dunno if it deserves 9 though, i would have given it slightly less.

lalalala4951d ago

Still not out here yet, until tomorrow anyway, sounds gud so i will hav to try it out.

gamerdude1324951d ago

Sheesh, 360 owners, just install the first disc after completing that half of the game and you'll never need disc 1 again. You guys act as if it is such a great deal.

Solidus187-SCMilk4951d ago (Edited 4951d ago )

I have both a 360 and ps3 and got the 360 version. I like the 360 controller better and I installed the entire game. The loads only take a few seconds and if you die it reloads in about 1 second.

BrianG4951d ago

Its easy to say that, but honestly some gamers don't want to get up to change discs, so its unfair to just say that Xbox players don't care about switching discs.

Now if you can install it onto your hard drive, which remember not all Xbox owners can cause they all don't have hard drives, then I don't see a problem at all.

Just sayin

The Wood4951d ago (Edited 4951d ago )

in fact you will have to go back if you're the trophy whoring type as some abilities are needed to get items on earlier levels. No biggie really though

only ps3 fanboys care

yeah dude...of course*rolls eyes*

60°
100°

Looking Back to 2010 and the Gothic Castlevania: Lords of Shadow

Edgar writes: "To celebrate the game's 10th anniversary, let's take a look at the gothic world of Castlevania: Lords of Shadow."

Read Full Story >>
thexboxhub.com
NecrumOddBoy1300d ago

Although being linear, which I wish it wasn't, the first game was absolutely incredible. A mix of old school God of War meets Date's Inferno; I was highly impressed by this title. I heard the sequel was trash so I ever played it but I think LoS was a good example of how a 3D CV game could be.

rgraf771300d ago (Edited 1300d ago )

I was very happy the game was Linear as I hate exploring. The first game was one of my all time favorites and the 2nd game was a total letdown with the lame hub system and stealth sections. Playing in current times sucked too. I wish they would make a remaster of part 1.

magdiellima1300d ago

Good as a game but terrible as a Castlevania. The sequence was even worse.

Terry_B1300d ago

It is a great game, but just like DMC is not a Devil May Cry..this one was not a Castlevania :-)

FreeckyCake1299d ago

Give Castlevania to Igarashi team, and they will nail it as they did with Lament of Innocence and Curse of Darkness.

230°

Terrifyingly Bad: A Look Back At the 3D Castlevania Games

If you decide to play a Castlevania game, make sure it's in 2D. Unfortunately, the series has never been able to make the jump from 2D to 3D successfully. Publisher Konami has tried. Six times in fact, but whether trying to build it in-house or with a third party developer, they never captured the essence of the series or make a good game for that matter. So just to be sure you know what to look out for, here are the six 3D Castlevania games that have been made.

isarai1656d ago

I loved the hell out of lords of shadow, lords if shadow 2 had its moments but just didnt leave as much of an impact on me as the first did, still loved it though. They are both great games IMO, maybe not the best "Castlevania" games but great games in their own right.

RememberThe3571656d ago

Yeah that first game was legit good. Really wish they hadn't taken a step back for the second, this series really looked great in 3D.

AK911655d ago (Edited 1655d ago )

According to one of the former devs of Mercury Steam the higher ups kept interfering with the sequel to the point where the game was nothing like what the dev team had envisioned for the sequel so we got the mess that was Lords of Shadows 2.

PhoenixUp1656d ago

I enjoyed Lament of Innocence and Lords of Shadow. They were entertaining titles and I wouldn’t mind trying Lords of Shadow 2 on PS Now.

Just because a game isn’t GOTY worthy does not mean it’s not worth playing. You could do a lot worse than those exceptional titles.

Abcdefeg1656d ago

Curse of darkness was ahead of its time

Hedstrom1656d ago

I really liked lament of innocence and Lords of shadow! Havent tried the other 3d games. But ive played most of the 2d games!

gangsta_red1656d ago (Edited 1656d ago )

I don't know why Castlevania: Lament of Innocence gets a bad rap. It was one of the best in the series at that time and really was a compliment to the Devil May Cry 3rd person style of action that was getting popular at that time.

I rented it on a fluke and was seriously surprised on how good it was. So much so I went out and bought a used copy of Curse of Darkness and instantly returned that trash.

The problem with Nintendo 64 games is they all tried to mimic the Mario/Zelda 64 style of gameplay and how could they not with that whacky ass N64 controller. Almost every game outside of Nintendo's own felt horrible and incomplete.

Show all comments (26)